Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- You have accessRestricted accessCULPRIT-SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock)Implications on Guideline RecommendationsHolger Thiele and Steffen DeschCirculation. 2018;137:1314-1316, originally published March 26, 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032907
- You have accessRestricted accessLetter by Khan and Boyle Regarding Article, “Early Use of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) With Nitrate Therapy in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Reduces Myocardial Infarct Size (The NACIAM Trial [N-Acetylcysteine in Acute Myocardial Infarction])”Arshad A. Khan and Andrew J. BoyleCirculation. 2018;137:1418-1419, originally published March 26, 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032281
- You have accessRestricted accessLetter by Mansour et al Regarding Article, “Early Use of N-Acetylcysteine With Nitrate Therapy in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Reduces Myocardial Infarct Size (the NACIAM Trial [N-Acetylcysteine in Acute Myocardial Infarction])”Alexandre Mansour, Hervé Le Breton and Vincent AuffretCirculation. 2018;137:1420-1421, originally published March 26, 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030180
- You have accessRestricted accessResponse by Pasupathy et al to Letters Regarding Article, “Early Use of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) With Nitrate Therapy in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Reduces Myocardial Infarct Size (The NACIAM Trial [N-Acetylcysteine in Acute Myocardial Infarction])”Sivabaskari Pasupathy, Rosanna Tavella and John F. BeltrameCirculation. 2018;137:1424-1425, originally published March 26, 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032512
- You have accessRestricted accessLetter by Ye et al Regarding Article, “Early Use of N-Acetylcysteine With Nitrate Therapy in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Reduces Myocardial Infarct Size (the NACIAM Trial [N-Acetylcysteine in Acute Myocardial Infarction])”Ziliang Ye, Qiang Su and Lang LiCirculation. 2018;137:1422-1423, originally published March 26, 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030312
- You have accessRestricted accessResponse by Rahman and Perera to Letter Regarding Article, “A Lead to the Culprit”Haseeb Rahman and Divaka PereraCirculation. 2018;137:1307-1308, originally published March 19, 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032342
- You have accessRestricted accessValidation of DAPT Score (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) in East Asian PatientsHiroto Yabushita and Shinya GotoCirculation. 2018;137:563-566, originally published February 5, 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031785
- You have accessRestricted accessRandomized Comparisons of Double-Dose Clopidogrel or Adjunctive Cilostazol versus Standard Dual Anti-platelet in Patients with High Post-Treatment Platelet Reactivity: Results of the CREATIVE Trial (Clopidogrel Response Evaluation and AnTi-platelet InterVEntion in High Thrombotic Risk PCI Patients)Yi-Da Tang, Wenyao Wang, Min Yang, Kuo Zhang, Jing Chen, Shubin Qiao, Hongbing Yan, Yongjian Wu, Xiaohong Huang, Bo Xu, Runlin Gao and Yuejin Yang on behalf of the CREATIVE investigatorsCirculation. 2018;CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030190, originally published February 2, 2018https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030190
- You have accessRestricted accessClinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery DiseaseThree-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)William F. Fearon, Takeshi Nishi, Bernard De Bruyne, Derek B. Boothroyd, Emanuele Barbato, Pim Tonino, Peter Jüni, Nico H.J. Pijls and Mark A. Hlatky for the FAME 2 Trial InvestigatorsCirculation. 2018;137:480-487, originally published November 2, 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031907
- You have accessRestricted accessThree-Year Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable ScaffoldIndividual-Patient-Data Meta-Analysis From the ABSORB Randomized TrialsZiad A. Ali, Runlin Gao, Takeshi Kimura, Yoshinobu Onuma, Dean J. Kereiakes, Stephen G. Ellis, Bernard Chevalier, Minh-thien Vu, Zhen Zhang, Charles A. Simonton, Patrick W. Serruys and Gregg W. StoneCirculation. 2018;137:464-479, originally published October 31, 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031843
Pages
Current Issue
Circulation
April 17, 2018, Volume 137, Issue 16
Search This Journal
Related Collections
- Anticoagulants (583)
- Cardiovascular Surgery (3875)
- Compliance/Adherence (128)
- Nursing (16)
- Pacemaker (394)
- Pharmacology (1607)
- Rehabilitation (11)
- Revascularization (48)
- Stent (47)
- Transplantation (147)
- Treatment (1354)