Search for author "Ron Simon"
20 Results
- You have accessRestricted accessIschemic PreconditioningIntroductionAntoine Hakim and Roger SimonStroke. 2004;35:2675, originally published October 28, 2004https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143238.24952.88
- You have accessRestricted accessGenomics of PreconditioningMary P. Stenzel-Poore, Susan L. Stevens and Roger P. SimonStroke. 2004;35:2683-2686, originally published October 28, 2004https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143735.89281.bb
- You have accessGenomics of PreconditioningMary P. Stenzel-Poore, Susan L. Stevens, Roger P. SimonStroke November 2004, 35 (11 suppl 1) 2683-2686; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143735.89281.bbFigure 1. Ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct after injurious ischemia. Sixty minutes of MCAO alone (left) or 60 minutes of MCAO 72 hours after 1...Show MoreFigure 1. Ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct after injurious ischemia. Sixty minutes of MCAO alone (left) or 60 minutes of MCAO 72 hours after 15 minutes of preconditioning (right) were performed. Infarcts visualized with 2′3′5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, and percent infarct measured using National Institutes of Health image. Values are mean percent infarcts±SEM, n=8 mice per group. *P<0.05, Student t test.Show Less
- You have accessGenomics of PreconditioningMary P. Stenzel-Poore, Susan L. Stevens, Roger P. SimonStroke November 2004, 35 (11 suppl 1) 2683-2686; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143735.89281.bbFigure 2. Preconditioning and stroke alter gene expression. A, Cortices were harvested at the indicated times (small arrows). B and C, Venn diagrams i...Show MoreFigure 2. Preconditioning and stroke alter gene expression. A, Cortices were harvested at the indicated times (small arrows). B and C, Venn diagrams illustrate the number of regulated genes in each condition 3 hours (B) or 24 hours (C) after ischemia.Show Less
- You have accessGenomics of PreconditioningMary P. Stenzel-Poore, Susan L. Stevens, Roger P. SimonStroke November 2004, 35 (11 suppl 1) 2683-2686; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143735.89281.bbFigure 3. Preconditioning alters the genomic response to stroke. Number of genes in various functional categories that are increased or decreased in i...Show MoreFigure 3. Preconditioning alters the genomic response to stroke. Number of genes in various functional categories that are increased or decreased in ischemic versus nonischemic hemispheres. Data do not include genes of unknown function.Show Less
- You have accessGenomics of PreconditioningMary P. Stenzel-Poore, Susan L. Stevens, Roger P. SimonStroke November 2004, 35 (11 suppl 1) 2683-2686; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143735.89281.bbFigure 4. Preconditioning or preconditioning followed by damaging OGD decreases outward potassium currents and whole-cell conductance in an in vitro m...Show MoreFigure 4. Preconditioning or preconditioning followed by damaging OGD decreases outward potassium currents and whole-cell conductance in an in vitro model of tolerance. Rat cortical neuronal cells were exposed to OGD for 30 minutes. (preconditioning), or 30 minutes, followed 24 hours later by 120 minutes (preconditioning + damaging). A, Patch clamp (voltage-gated potassium currents) current density plot. Density of outward current in control neurons (white circles, n=21), neurons that received preconditioning OGD (white squares, n=19), and neurons that received preconditioning plus damaging OGD (black squares, n=9). *P<0.05. Student t test (unpaired) was used to compare points on different curves but activated by stepping to the same potential. B, Representative plots of whole-cell conductance (current–voltage relationship) measurements in control (white circles) and preconditioned (black circles) neurons by linear regression of the current–voltage relationship between −30 and 80 mV.Show Less
- You have accessGenomics of PreconditioningMary P. Stenzel-Poore, Susan L. Stevens, Roger P. SimonStroke November 2004, 35 (11 suppl 1) 2683-2686; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143735.89281.bb
- You have accessRestricted accessIschemic PreconditioningIntroductionAntoine Hakim and Roger SimonStroke. 2004;35:2675, originally published October 28, 2004https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143238.24952.88
- You have accessRestricted accessGenomics of PreconditioningMary P. Stenzel-Poore, Susan L. Stevens and Roger P. SimonStroke. 2004;35:2683-2686, originally published October 28, 2004https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143735.89281.bb
- You have accessGenomics of PreconditioningMary P. Stenzel-Poore, Susan L. Stevens, Roger P. SimonStroke November 2004, 35 (11 suppl 1) 2683-2686; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143735.89281.bbFigure 1. Ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct after injurious ischemia. Sixty minutes of MCAO alone (left) or 60 minutes of MCAO 72 hours after 1...Show MoreFigure 1. Ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct after injurious ischemia. Sixty minutes of MCAO alone (left) or 60 minutes of MCAO 72 hours after 15 minutes of preconditioning (right) were performed. Infarcts visualized with 2′3′5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, and percent infarct measured using National Institutes of Health image. Values are mean percent infarcts±SEM, n=8 mice per group. *P<0.05, Student t test.Show Less
Pages
Journal
Source
- Circulation 6
- Stroke 14
Article Type
Article Type
Content Type
Resource Type
- Articles 5
- Tables & Figures 11
- HWTABLE 4



