Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Hypertension: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention (SPRINT) Trial

Abstract
Background—It is currently unknown whether intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering beyond that recommended would lead to more lowering of the risk of Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with hypertension, and whether reducing the risk of LVH explains the reported cardiovascular disease (CVD) benefits of intensive BP lowering in this population.
Methods—This analysis included 8,164 participants (mean age 67.9 years, 35.3% women, 31.2% blacks) with hypertension but no diabetes from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention (SPRINT) Trial; 4,086 randomly assigned to intensive BP lowering (target systolic BP<120mmHg) and 4,078 assigned to standard BP lowering (target systolic BP <140mmHg). Progression and regression of LVH as defined by Cornell voltage criteria derived from standard 12-lead electrocardiograms recorded at baseline and biannually were compared between treatment arms during a median follow-up of 3.81 years. The effect of intensive (vs. standard) BP lowering on the SPRINT primary CVD outcome (a composite of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, and CVD death) was compared before and after adjusting for LVH as a time-varying covariate.
Results—Among SPRINT participants without baseline LVH (n=7,559), intensive (vs. standard) BP lowering was associated with a 46% lower risk of developing LVH (HR=0.54, 95%CI: 0.43 to 0.68). Similarly, among SPRINT participants with baseline LVH (n=605, 7.4%), those assigned to the intensive (vs. standard) BP lowering were 66% more likely to regress/ improve their LVH (HR=1.66, 95%CI: 1.31 to 2.11). Adjustment for LVH as a time-varying covariate did not substantially attenuate the effect of intensive BP therapy on CVD events (HR (95%CI) of intensive vs. standard BP lowering on CVD: 0.76(0.64,0.90) and 0.77(0.65,0.91) before and after adjusting for LVH as a time-varying covariate, respectively).
Conclusions—Among patients with hypertension but no diabetes, intensive BP lowering (target systolic BP<120 mmHg), compared with standard BP lowering (target systolic BP<140 mmHg), resulted in lower rates of developing new LVH in those without LVH, and higher rates of regression of LVH in those with existing LVH. This favorable effect on LVH did not explain most of the reduction in CVD events associated with intensive BP lowering in the SPRINT trial.
Clinical Trial Registration—URL: ClinicalTrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT01206062
- Received March 17, 2017.
- Revision received May 9, 2017.
- Accepted May 10, 2017.
American Heart Association Professional?
Log in using your username and password
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$35.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.
Current Issue
Article Tools
- Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Hypertension: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention (SPRINT) TrialElsayed Z. Soliman, Walter T. Ambrosius, William C. Cushman, Zhu-Ming Zhang, Jeffrey T. Bates, Javier A. Neyra, Thaddeus Y. Carson, Leonardo Tamariz, Lama Ghazi, Monique E. Cho, Brian P. Shapiro, Jiang He, Lawrence J. Fine and Cora E. Lewis for the SPRINT Research Study GroupCirculation. 2017;CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028441, originally published May 16, 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028441
Citation Manager Formats
Share this Article
- Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Hypertension: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention (SPRINT) TrialElsayed Z. Soliman, Walter T. Ambrosius, William C. Cushman, Zhu-Ming Zhang, Jeffrey T. Bates, Javier A. Neyra, Thaddeus Y. Carson, Leonardo Tamariz, Lama Ghazi, Monique E. Cho, Brian P. Shapiro, Jiang He, Lawrence J. Fine and Cora E. Lewis for the SPRINT Research Study GroupCirculation. 2017;CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028441, originally published May 16, 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028441Permalink:







