Is Cardioprotection Dead?
Jump to

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
For >4 decades, the holy grail in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction has been the mitigation of lethal injury. Despite promising initial results and decades of investigation by the cardiology research community, the only treatment with proven efficacy is early reperfusion of the occluded coronary artery. The remarkable record of failure has led us and others to wonder if cardioprotection is dead. The path to translation, like the ascent to Everest, is certainly littered with corpses. We do, however, highlight a therapeutic principle that provides a glimmer of hope: cellular postconditioning. Administration of cardiosphere-derived cells after reperfusion limits infarct size measured acutely, while providing long-term structural and functional benefits. The recognition that cell therapy may be cardioprotective, and not just regenerative, merits further exploration before we abandon the pursuit entirely.
- cardiosphere derived cells
- cell- and tissue-based therapy
- heart failure
- myocardial Infarction
- ventricular function, left
- © 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.
American Heart Association Professional?
Log in using your username and password
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$35.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.
This Issue
Jump to
Article Tools
- Is Cardioprotection Dead?David J. Lefer and Eduardo MarbánCirculation. 2017;136:98-109, originally published July 3, 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.027039
Citation Manager Formats







