Diagnosis and Treatment of Fetal Cardiac Disease
A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
- Indications for Referral for Fetal Cardiac Evaluation
- Fetal Echocardiography
- Advanced Techniques in the Evaluation of the Fetal Heart
- Extracardiac Assessment of the Fetus With CHD
- Prenatal Counseling and Parental Stress
- Fetal Therapy for Cardiovascular Conditions Before Birth
- Perinatal Management and Outcome of Fetuses With CHD
- Figures & Tables
- Info & Metrics
Background—The goal of this statement is to review available literature and to put forth a scientific statement on the current practice of fetal cardiac medicine, including the diagnosis and management of fetal cardiovascular disease.
Methods and Results—A writing group appointed by the American Heart Association reviewed the available literature pertaining to topics relevant to fetal cardiac medicine, including the diagnosis of congenital heart disease and arrhythmias, assessment of cardiac function and the cardiovascular system, and available treatment options. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association classification of recommendations and level of evidence for practice guidelines were applied to the current practice of fetal cardiac medicine. Recommendations relating to the specifics of fetal diagnosis, including the timing of referral for study, indications for referral, and experience suggested for performance and interpretation of studies, are presented. The components of a fetal echocardiogram are described in detail, including descriptions of the assessment of cardiac anatomy, cardiac function, and rhythm. Complementary modalities for fetal cardiac assessment are reviewed, including the use of advanced ultrasound techniques, fetal magnetic resonance imaging, and fetal magnetocardiography and electrocardiography for rhythm assessment. Models for parental counseling and a discussion of parental stress and depression assessments are reviewed. Available fetal therapies, including medical management for arrhythmias or heart failure and closed or open intervention for diseases affecting the cardiovascular system such as twin–twin transfusion syndrome, lung masses, and vascular tumors, are highlighted. Catheter-based intervention strategies to prevent the progression of disease in utero are also discussed. Recommendations for delivery planning strategies for fetuses with congenital heart disease including models based on classification of disease severity and delivery room treatment will be highlighted. Outcome assessment is reviewed to show the benefit of prenatal diagnosis and management as they affect outcome for babies with congenital heart disease.
Conclusions—Fetal cardiac medicine has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades, predominantly in response to advances in imaging technology and innovations in therapies. The diagnosis of cardiac disease in the fetus is mostly made with ultrasound; however, new technologies, including 3- and 4-dimensional echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and fetal electrocardiography and magnetocardiography, are available. Medical and interventional treatments for select diseases and strategies for delivery room care enable stabilization of high-risk fetuses and contribute to improved outcomes. This statement highlights what is currently known and recommended on the basis of evidence and experience in the rapidly advancing and highly specialized field of fetal cardiac care.
Examination of the fetal heart and cardiovascular system has evolved considerably over the past 2 decades, mostly as a result of advances in imaging technology. In the past, the role of the pediatric cardiologist as it pertained to the fetus was to provide a basic, often limited, anatomic cardiac diagnosis with the primary goal of counseling families on what to expect after delivery if the fetus survived to be evaluated postnatally. Counseling was based on the premise that nothing could be done in utero and that what we understand to be true of postnatal disease applied to the fetus as well. Treatment of the fetus was the responsibility of the high-risk obstetrician; resuscitation of the newborn in the delivery room was the responsibility of the neonatologist; and the care of the baby became the responsibility of the pediatric cardiologist only once the baby arrived in the nursery or the neonatal intensive care unit. With technological advances and increasing experience and interest in fetal medicine, the multidisciplinary specialty of fetal cardiology has emerged. In the modern era, it is now expected that ultrasound will be able to diagnose structural heart disease with precise detail, and now the goal has become to understand the fetus as a patient, knowing that the fetal circulation is different from the postnatal circulation, that structural disease may progress in utero, and that cardiac function and stability of the cardiovascular system play an important role in fetal wellness. Given the expanded roles of the pediatric cardiologist specializing in fetal medicine and the maternal fetal specialist as collaborative caregivers for fetuses with structural heart disease, arrhythmias, or cardiovascular dysfunction, a new standard of care for the practice of the multidisciplinary, rapidly advancing, and highly specialized field of fetal cardiac medicine is needed.
This article covers important topics relevant to fetal cardiac medicine, including the diagnosis of heart disease, assessment of cardiac function and the cardiovascular system, and treatment options that are available. Recommendations relating to the specifics of fetal diagnosis, including the timing of referral for study, indications for referral, and experience suggested for performance and interpretation of studies, are presented. The components of a fetal echocardiogram are described in detail, including descriptions of the assessment of cardiac anatomy, cardiac function, and rhythm. Complementary modalities for fetal cardiac assessment are reviewed, including the use of advanced ultrasound techniques, fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fetal electrocardiography, and fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG) for rhythm assessment. Models for parental counseling and a discussion of parental stress and depression assessments are reviewed. Available fetal therapies, including medical management for arrhythmias or heart failure and closed or open intervention for diseases affecting the cardiovascular system such as twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), lung masses, and vascular tumors, are highlighted. Experimental catheter-based intervention strategies to prevent the progression of disease in utero also are discussed. Recommendations for delivery planning strategies for fetuses with congenital heart disease (CHD) including models based on classification of disease severity and delivery room treatment are highlighted. Outcome assessment is reviewed to show the benefit of prenatal diagnosis as it affect outcome for babies with CHD.
A writing group appointed by the American Heart Association (AHA) reviewed the available literature pertaining to important topics relevant to fetal cardiac medicine, including references on the diagnosis of CHD, assessment of cardiac function and cardiovascular system, and treatment options that are available. The American College of Cardiology/AHA classification of recommendations (COR) and level of evidence (LOE) were assigned to each recommendation according to the 2009 methodology manual for American College of Cardiology/AHA Guidelines Writing Committee (Table 1, updated July 3, 2012). LOE classification combines an objective description of the existence and type of studies that support the recommendations and expert consensus according to the following categories: Level of Evidence A, recommendation is based on evidenced from multiple randomized trials or meta-analysis; Level of Evidence B, recommendation is based on evidence from a single randomized trial or nonrandomized studies; and Level of Evidence C, recommendation is based on expert opinion, case studies, or standards of care.
Indications for Referral for Fetal Cardiac Evaluation
The incidence of CHD has been estimated at 6 to 12 per 1000 live births1–4; however, reasonable estimates in fetuses are less abundant. A study from Belgium5 reported an incidence of 8.3% in live and stillborn infants of ≥26 weeks of gestation without chromosome abnormalities. There is likely an even higher incidence in early gestation given spontaneous and elective pregnancy termination.
A multitude of factors are associated with an increased risk of identifying CHD in the fetus that are related to familial, maternal, or fetal conditions. The leading reason for referral for fetal cardiac evaluation is the suspicion of a structural heart abnormality on obstetric ultrasound, which results in a diagnosis of CHD in 40% to 50% of fetuses referred. Other factors such as maternal metabolic disease or family history of CHD are also reason for referral; however, many of these indications have been estimated to carry a <5% to 10% risk. Whether any increase over the baseline risk of 0.3% to 1.2% necessitates additional expenditure of resources and at what level (screening ultrasound or fetal echocardiogram) are topics of debate. The answers vary, depending on the healthcare system environment, skill of screening operators, and available resources. Thus, recommendations for indications for referral for fetal echocardiogram must take into account risk for CHD in individual populations. In general, risk levels of ≥2% to 3% as defined by prenatal screening tests (such as maternal serum screening) result in a recommendation for consideration for additional testing; therefore, it is reasonable to perform fetal echocardiography at this risk level, whereas if risk exceeds 3%, fetal echocardiography should be performed. Fetal echocardiography may be considered when risk is estimated at 1% to 2%, although the relative benefit of this additional testing in this population is less clear. When risk approaches that of the general population (≤1%), fetal echocardiography is not indicated. It should be noted, however, that all fetuses with an abnormal screening ultrasound of the heart should have a detailed fetal echocardiogram by a trained examiner. Table 2 summarizes the current risk factors or conditions that may trigger referral for fetal echocardiogram with supporting COR and LOE. Table 3 summarizes the most common indications for referral for fetal echocardiogram.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common maternal conditions complicating pregnancies, affecting ≈3% to 10%. Of these, 20% (or ≈1% of all pregnant women) have DM before conception and are considered to have pregestational DM.87 Overall, there is nearly a 5-fold (3%–5%) increase in CHD compared with the general population in women with pregestational DM,6 with a higher relative risk noted for specific cardiac defects, including 6.22 for heterotaxy, 4.72 for truncus arteriosus, 2.85 for transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA), and 18.24 for single-ventricle defects.7 Several studies indicate that lack of preconceptional glycemic control, as evidenced by elevation in serum hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels >8.5% in the first trimester, is associated with an increase in all congenital malformations,8 whereas strict glycemic control before conception and during pregnancy reduces risk to a level comparable to that in the nondiabetic population.88 Additional studies, however, have suggested that there is no threshold HbA1c value that increases risk for fetal CHD.7,89 In a study of 3 different diabetic populations, HbA1c values slightly above the normal range (mean, 6.4%) were associated with a significantly increased risk of cardiac malformation of 2.5% to 6.1% in offsprings.7 Therefore, it appears that although the risk may be highest in those with HbA1c levels >8.5%, all pregnancies of pregestational diabetic women are at some increased risk. Given this information, a fetal echocardiogram should be performed in all women with pregestational DM. Insulin resistance acquired in the third trimester, or gestational DM, does not appear to confer an increased risk of CHD in the fetus.90 For this reason, a fetal echocardiogram is not indicated for these pregnancies. Fetuses may develop ventricular hypertrophy late in gestation in the presence of poorly controlled maternal gestational or pregestational DM, and the degree of hypertrophy has been shown to be related to glycemic control. In women with HbA1c levels <6% in the second half of pregnancy, the effects are mild, so fetal echocardiogram is not recommended.91 If HbA1c levels are >6%, fetal echocardiogram in the third trimester to assess for ventricular hypertrophy may be considered, but its usefulness has not been determined.
Maternal phenylketonuria, when untreated, results in adverse pregnancy outcomes, including mental retardation, microcephaly, growth restriction, and CHD in offspring.10,92 Elevated maternal serum levels of phenylalanine (>15 mg/dL) are associated with a 10- to 15-fold increased risk of CHD.10,11 The risk for CHD in fetuses has been reported to be 12% if control is not achieved by 10 weeks of gestation12; therefore, a fetal echocardiogram is indicated for these pregnancies. With good periconceptional dietary control, risk can be greatly reduced. A large, prospective, international collaborative study of 576 completed pregnancies in women with phenylketonuria and 101 control subjects revealed no cases of CHD if maternal phenylalanine levels were <6 mg/dL before conception and during early organogenesis.11 This study suggests that a fetal echocardiogram is not indicated for women with well-controlled phenylketonuria if preconception and first trimester phenylalanine levels are <10 mg/dL. If levels are >10 mg/dL, fetal echocardiogram should be performed.
Autoimmune Disease and Autoantibody Positivity
The association of maternal lupus and other connective tissue diseases with congenital complete heart block (CHB) is well known.93 Fetuses can be affected in the presence of maternal serologic evidence of disease and no overt clinical symptoms. The exact prevalence of symptomatic or asymptomatic maternal autoantibody (anti-Ro/SSA or anti-La/SSB) positivity in the general population is unknown. In prospectively examined pregnancies of mothers with known antibodies and no prior affected child, the reported incidence of fetal CHB was between 1% and 5%. The number of affected pregnancies increases to 11% to 19% for those with a previously affected child with CHB.13–17 In addition, women with both autoantibodies and hypothyroidism are at a 9-fold increased risk of having an affected fetus or neonate compared with those with SSA or SSB alone.18
In addition to abnormalities in the conduction system, up to 10% to 15% of SSA-exposed fetuses with conduction system disease may also develop myocardial inflammation, endocardial fibroelastosis, or atrioventricular (AV) valve apparatus dysfunction.94 Because of the perception that the inflammatory effects resulting from antibody exposure may be preventable if detected and treated at an early stage, it has been recommended that SSA/SSB-positive women be referred for fetal echocardiography surveillance beginning in the early second trimester (16–18 weeks).14,16,95 The mechanical PR interval has been measured in fetuses at risk with the use of a variety of M-mode and pulsed Doppler techniques and compared with gestational age–adjusted normal values.96 Although the value of serial assessment for the detection of the progression of myocardial inflammation or conduction system disease from first-degree block (PR prolongation) to CHB has not been proved, serial assessment at 1- to 2-week intervals starting at 16 weeks and continuing through 28 weeks of gestation is reasonable to perform because the potential benefits outweigh the risks. For women who have had a previously affected child, more frequent serial assessment, at least weekly, is recommended.
Most of the current literature implicating maternal medications in congenital abnormalities comes from retrospective patient interviews and voluntary registries and therefore may be subject to bias. Nevertheless, a number of human teratogens are used clinically in women of childbearing age, and exposure to these medications in the period of cardiogenesis increases the risk of CHD. Among the most studied include anticonvulsants, lithium, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, retinoic acid, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs).
Anticonvulsants used in pregnancy include carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, and valproate. In a meta-analysis including a group of untreated epileptic women as control subjects, 1.8% of 1208 carbamazepine-exposed fetuses exhibited cardiac malformations.21 This proportion was similar whether the mothers were taking carbamazepine alone or in combination with other antiepileptic drugs. The incidence of malformations in the unmedicated epileptic control subjects was similar to that for the normal population. Fetal echocardiogram may be considered, although its usefulness has not been established if exposure occurs.
Lithium has been reported to be associated with cardiac malformations in up to 8% of offspring in a registry study.25 However, more recent prospective case-control studies22 and literature analyses97 have suggested that the risk is not as high as initially thought, with a risk ratio for cardiac anomalies of 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1–16.6).22 Fetal echocardiogram may be considered, although its usefulness has not been established if exposure occurs.
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor exposure in the first trimester is associated with increased risk for CHD, with 2.9% of exposed infants affected and a risk ratio of 3.72 (95% CI, 1.89–7.30) compared with 0.78% of unexposed infants in a large control population.23 Of note, most of the reported defects were atrial septal defects or patency of the ductus arteriosus, which would not have been detectable prenatally. Fetal echocardiogram is reasonable if exposure occurs.
Retinoic acid, a vitamin A analog, is teratogenic in laboratory animals and contraindicated in pregnancy; however, inadvertent use occurs. Cardiac malformations (conotruncal defects and aortic arch anomalies predominating) were reported in 8% of exposed fetuses in a small retrospective series, although this number rose to 20% (12 of 54) if the 95 with first-trimester pregnancy terminations were included.24 Fetal echocardiogram is recommended if exposure occurs.
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
The use of SSRIs in pregnancy has been investigated.26,28–30 Results indicate that there is no increased risk of CHD associated with the use of most SSRIs, although paroxetine may be an exception. In a meta-analysis,26 first-trimester paroxetine exposure was associated with increased risk of CHD with an odds ratio of 1.72 (95%, CI, 1.22–2.42), although the authors also reported a very high rate of ultrasound use in exposed pregnancies that may have introduced an ascertainment bias. In a study of nearly 10 000 infants with birth defects, SSRI use was not associated with an increase in risk of CHD (3724 subjects, 100 exposed; odds ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9–1.6),29 but additional analysis in a small number of patients showed a possible increase in paroxetine exposure among infants with right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3–8.8). Fetal echocardiogram may be considered if exposure to paroxetine occurs.
Vitamin K Antagonists
Warfarin and other Coumadin derivatives when used in the first trimester of pregnancy have been reported to be teratogenic. In a recent multicenter, prospective study of >600 exposed pregnancies and 1000 controls, equal numbers of cardiac malformations were seen in the exposed and control groups (3 in each), suggesting that there was no increased risk of CHD despite a clear increased risk of other birth defects.31 Fetal echocardiogram is not indicated if exposure occurs; however, a detailed anatomy scan should be performed.
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents
NSAIDs are sometimes used for tocolysis. Doppler evidence of ductal constriction is evident in 25% to 50% of indomethacin-exposed late second– and third-trimester fetuses, although it is usually mild and resolves with drug discontinuation.33,98 Ductal constriction may also occur with the use of other NSAIDs.34 Fetal echocardiogram is recommended with NSAID use in the late second or third trimester. The use of NSAIDs in early gestation has been associated with a small increased risk for CHD with an odds ratio of 1.86 (95% CI, 1.32–2.62).32 For this reason, fetal echocardiogram may be considered, although its usefulness is not established if early exposure occurs.
The effect of nonspecific maternal infection (other than with specific viruses such as rubella) is difficult to separate definitively from the effects of medications used to treat the illness and the systemic maternal effects that result from the infection such as fever. In 1 population-based study, febrile illness was positively associated with the occurrence of CHD in offspring with an odds ratio of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.4–2.4).35 Because of the risk for structural disease, a fetal echocardiogram should be performed with first-trimester maternal infection with rubella. Exposure to or seroconversion associated with other viral agents in pregnancy is not likely to be associated with positive cardiac findings in the absence of other ultrasound findings (ie, effusions, hydrops); therefore, seroconversion alone is not an indication for fetal echocardiogram, although it should be performed if fetal pericarditis or myocarditis is suspected.
Assisted Reproduction Technology
The use of assisted reproductive technologies has increased over the past 2 decades. In 2005, an estimated 1% of all live births in the United States were conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection.99 There are conflicting reports on the direct association of the use of this technology and CHD malformations in offspring, with the more recent reports suggesting that the increased incidence of CHD in these pregnancies may be attributable to the increased risk specifically for multiple gestations and that singletons conceived with in vitro fertilization are not at increased risk.37 In addition, because of the influence of advanced maternal age on CHD risk,100 the known increased risk associated with monozygous twinning (increased with in vitro fertilization), and the unknown effect of the underlying reason for subfertility in couples using in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, the direct causation from the technology remains unknown.38–40 Nevertheless, the overall risk of CHD in infants conceived through in vitro fertilization seems to be slightly higher than that for reference populations with a risk of 1.1% to 3.3% (95% CI, 0.3–1.8).37,38,41,42,44 The majority of defects identified are atrial and ventricular septal defects,42,101 which may be difficult to detect in fetal life and are of minor clinical significance in many cases. Fetal echocardiogram is reasonable to perform in pregnancies of assisted reproductive technologies.
Maternal Cardiac Disease
The risk of recurrence of nonsyndromic, nonchromosomal CHD is >2 times as high if the mother is affected versus the father or a sibling.45,46 Risk varies greatly with the specific maternal diagnosis and is reported to be highest with heterotaxy and AV septal defects (AVSD) at ≈10% to 14%45–48 or aortic stenosis (AS) at 13% to 18%.48,49,102 For the majority of maternal cardiac diagnoses, the risk of recurrence is in the range of 3% to 7%. The recurrence risk for isolated tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) or d-TGA has been reported to be ≤3%.45,48 Fetal echocardiogram is indicated if there is maternal CHD.
Paternal Cardiac Disease
Although reported risk varies somewhat with lesion type, most studies cite a 2% to 3% risk of cardiac malformation if the father is affected with nonsyndromic CHD.45,48–50 Recurrence risk for AS may be higher,49 although in some populations, bicuspid aortic valve has been shown to be more highly heritable than other defects,103 which may account for this difference. Fetal echocardiogram is indicated if there is paternal CHD.
The risk of recurrence of cardiac malformations in siblings is lower than the risk in the offspring of affected parents; however, studies suggest that recurrence risk if a sibling is affected with unaffected parents is 2% to 6%.2,45,49,52 Risk for recurrence increases if >1 sibling is affected.51,104 Fetal echocardiogram is indicated, especially if >1 sibling has been affected.
Second- and Third-Degree Relatives
Recurrence risk in second- and third-degree relatives with CHD is not well studied. In 1 report,45 a <0.3% prevalence of CHD was reported in second- and third-degree relatives of patients with TOF, with no cases of recurrence of AVSD or d-TGA. Although the risk of familial recurrence may cluster for specific lesions,53 overall risk of CHD in second- and third-degree relatives of a proband is low with an odds ratio of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.25–1.54) in second-degree relatives and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.05–1.32) in third-degree relatives in 1 large study.46 Fetal echocardiogram may therefore be considered if there is a family history of isolated, nonsyndromic CHD in second-degree relatives, but it is not indicated in isolated third-degree relatives.
Diseases, Disorders, or Syndromes With Mendelian Inheritance
In pregnancies in which a prior child is affected by an recessively inherited disease, in pregnancies in which a parent is affected by an autosomal-dominant genetic disorder with increased risk for cardiac malformation, or in pregnancies with a deletion syndrome known to be associated with a significant incidence of cardiac phenotype (eg, 22q11 deletion, Alagille syndrome, or Williams syndrome), the recurrence risk in the fetus is high. In these situations, a fetal echocardiogram is recommended, given the limitations inherent in detecting disease with variable penetrance or expressivity.55 For a more extensive review of the available literature on the genetic basis of CHD, please see the Genetic Abnormalities section.
Suspected Cardiac Abnormality on Obstetric Ultrasound
Numerous studies have documented that the diagnostic yield for fetal echocardiography detection of CHD when the referral indication is an abnormal 4-chamber screening view on obstetric ultrasound is >40%.57–59 Suspicion of an abnormality of the outflows or great vessels on a screening ultrasound is less well studied. In 1 report, 52% of fetal echocardiograms were abnormal when referred for an indication of abnormality on a screening examination incorporating both 4-chamber and outflows tract views.58 Studies incorporating the view of 3 vessels with trachea into screening obstetric examinations have also increased the detection of CHD.105,106 Fetal echocardiogram should be performed in all fetuses with a suspected cardiac abnormality noted on obstetric ultrasound.
Suspected Abnormality of Heart Rate or Rhythm
Fetal tachycardia rarely may be associated with CHD. In contrast, fetal bradycardia resulting from abnormal AV conduction (CHB) has been reported to be associated with CHD in ≈50% to 55% of cases.65 Fetal bradycardia resulting from long-QT syndrome (LQTS) may present as isolated mild sinus bradycardia or 2:1 AV block.107–109 A fetal echocardiogram should be performed in all fetuses with suspected or confirmed tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias to assess cardiac structure and function, to ascertain the mechanism of the tachycardia or bradycardia (discussed in the Bradycardia and Tachycardias sections), and to guide therapy.
An irregular fetal rhythm such as that caused by atrial extrasystoles has a low diagnostic yield for CHD (0.3%; 95% CI, 0–0.7 in 1 series) but may be the harbinger of more malignant arrhythmias if it is persistent.66 Because premature atrial contractions may be difficult to distinguish from premature ventricular contractions and other types of more significant arrhythmias, fetuses with frequent ectopic beats (bigeminy, trigeminy, or more than every 3–5 beats on average) should have a baseline fetal echocardiogram to assess cardiac structure and function and to determine the mechanism of the arrhythmia (discussed in the Irregular Rhythm section). In fetuses with less frequent extrasystoles, if there is any question about the mechanism, if the ectopic beats persist beyond 1 to 2 weeks, or if the practitioner lacks sufficient training or experience to differentiate a benign irregular rhythm from a pathological one, a fetal echocardiogram is reasonable to perform.
CHD may be present in fetuses with extracardiac malformations even in the presence of normal karyotype.67 The incidence of CHD in the presence of ≥1 extracardiac malformations is estimated to be 20% to 45%, depending on the population studied, the type of malformation, and the gestational age at which ultrasound screening was performed.67–74 Cardiac malformations have been observed in 30% of omphaloceles, in 20% of duodenal atresia, in 30% of congenital diaphragmatic hernias, in 5% to 15% of central nervous system malformations, and in up to 71% of genitourinary abnormalities. (Table 4). Realizing that within these general categories, risk of CHD associated with specific anomalies (ie, unilateral cleft lip, isolated mild ventriculomegaly) may be low, a fetal echocardiogram should be performed in all fetuses with identified extracardiac abnormalities unless the specific anomaly is known to confer low risk and has been well demonstrated by other testing (including obstetric scan that includes normal 4-chamber and outflow tract views) to be isolated.
Known or Suspected Chromosomal Abnormality
If fetal chromosome testing reveals a genetic mutation, deletion, rearrangement, or aneuploidy, the risk of congenital anomalies is high, and fetal echocardiogram should be performed. The interested reader is referred to the AHA scientific statement for a more comprehensive discussion of the genetic basis for CHD.55
Increased Nuchal Translucency on First-Trimester Screening
A transient subcutaneous collection of fluid seen posteriorly in the neck in human fetuses at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation as determined by crown-rump length is called the nuchal translucency (NT). When increased, the NT has been shown to correlate with an increased risk of aneuploidy and other malformations.114–116 The cause of an increased NT is speculative, and studies of cardiac function at this gestational age do not support a causal relation between decreased heart function and increased nuchal fluid.117,118 Normal values have been established and vary with crown-rump length. In addition, percentiles in the large population studies can be roughly correlated with absolute measurements for use in clinical practice. Generally speaking, the 95th percentile cutoff is at 3.0 mm and the 99th percentile cutoff 3.5 mm.115
The association of an increased NT with CHD in chromosomally normal fetuses, first recognized in 1996,75 has been the subject of a number of studies. In an early report, the NT had a sensitivity of 56% for detecting CHD using the 95th percentile and 40% using the 99th percentile cutoff.119 Subsequent studies have demonstrated a much lower sensitivity: 31% (range, 25%–55%) in a meta-analysis using the 99th percentile77 and only 10% to 15% in several studies of low-risk populations using the 99th percentile threshold.78,120,121 The likelihood of a fetus with normal karyotype having CHD once an increased NT is detected increases from 1% to ≈3% for NT above the 95th percentile and to ≈6% for NT at or above the 99th percentile.78,79,122–124 The risk for CHD rises exponentially with increasing NT measurement,79,122–125 with a risk estimated at 24% if NT is ≥6 mm80 and >60% with a NT ≥8.5 mm.79 Some centers advocate use of the 95th percentile cutoff for a specific crown-rump length to determine the NT value above which a fetal echocardiogram should be offered.119 With this methodology, smaller NT cutoffs at earlier crown-rump length measurements would qualify for fetal echocardiography. Others have recommended relying on the multiple of the median method with a cutoff of 2.5 for specific crown-rump length, which corresponds to the 99th percentile.78 Given the difficulty of applying these methodologies in clinical practice, a simple cutoff of NT ≥3.5 mm or an NT ≥3.0 mm is suggested.
Absence or reversal of flow with atrial contraction in the ductus venosus Doppler in the first trimester has been associated with an increased risk of CHD, aneuploidy, and poor outcome.126 In a meta-analysis, euploid fetuses with NT at or above the 95th percentile and abnormal ductus venosus flow had a 15% incidence of major heart malformations.76 When NT was at or above the ≥99th percentile, the incidence increased to ≈20%.127 This indicates that the addition of ductus venosus Doppler analysis is useful for identifying those at greatest risk among the high-risk screening population.
Given the available data, a fetal echocardiogram should be performed if there is an NT ≥3.5 mm and is reasonable to perform with an NT ≥3.0 mm but <3.5mm. A fetal echocardiogram is not indicated in fetuses with an isolated NT <3.0 mm. In fetuses with reversed flow in the ductus venous, especially in association with an enlarged NT, a fetal echocardiogram is recommended.
Abnormalities of the Umbilical Cord and Venous System
The presence of a single umbilical artery has been associated with an increased incidence of CHD in the fetus, as high as 3.9% in 1 study.81 In another study, more than twice as many infants with a single umbilical artery had CHD compared with infants with a normal cord.73 Anomalies of the human fetal venous system occur sporadically and have been associated with cardiac malformations, in particular, agenesis of the ductus venosus.128 Occasionally, the absence of the ductus venosus results in unimpeded placental return because the umbilical vein drains through alternate low-resistance fetal venous pathways, which can lead to significant volume overload and heart failure.129 The true incidence of fetal venous malformations is undefined, but because of the frequently reported occurrence of cardiac abnormalities,82 fetal echocardiogram has previously been recommended. Given the existing data, fetal echocardiography may be reasonable to consider in the presence of an umbilical cord or venous abnormality; however, because considerable ascertainment bias may have been introduced in the available studies, usefulness is not well established, especially if obstetric ultrasound is otherwise normal.
Spontaneous twinning in humans occurs in 1% of pregnancies, although the incidence is higher with the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Monozygous twinning, in which division of the early embryonic cell mass results in 2 fetuses with identical genomes, occurs in ≈3 to 4 per 1000 live births; two thirds are monochorionic.130 Twin pregnancies have higher rates of congenital malformations than singleton gestations, and monochorionic twins are at increased risk130,131 over dichorionic twins. Overall, in monochorionic twins, the risk for CHD has been estimated at 2% to 9%.83,130,132 TTTS has been reported to occur in 10% of monochorionic twin pregnancies. TTTS has been associated with polyhydramnios and myocardial changes, including acquired right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, which occurs in ≈10% of recipient twin fetuses.84 Atrial septal defects have also been reported postnatally in either twin.84,133 The incidence of pulmonary stenosis may be lower if the pregnancy is successfully treated with invasive laser photocoagulation of the intertwin anastomosis.84,133,134 Fetal echocardiogram is recommended in all monochorionic twin gestations.
Nonimmune Hydrops Fetalis and Effusions
Fetal hydrops refers to the pathological accumulation of fluid in ≥2 fetal compartments, including the pleural or pericardial spaces, abdominal cavity, integument, or placenta. The mechanism of the development of hydrops in the fetus is thought to be a combination of increased hydrostatic pressure, decreased oncotic pressure, and in some, lymphatic obstruction. Approximately 15% to 25% of fetuses with nonimmune hydrops have cardiac abnormalities or arrhythmias. Abnormalities that result in increased venous pressure from volume overload caused by valve regurgitation, pressure overload from biventricular outflow obstruction, or decreased diastolic filling time during tachycardia are among the causes that have been reported.85,86 An additional 10% of fetuses with hydrops have a high cardiac output state caused by fetal anemia, acardiac twinning, sacrococcygeal teratomas, or fetal or placental vascular malformations. Fetal echocardiogram is recommended in fetuses with nonimmune hydrops or effusions.
Fetal echocardiography has been shown to have a much higher sensitivity for the detection of CHD than routine obstetric scanning, which initially included only a 4-chamber view of the heart; however, more recently, has expanded to include assessment of outflow tracts. In fact, fetal echocardiography in experienced hands has been reported to detect up to 90% of serious CHD in low-risk populations.135,136 Because of the very low yield (10%–26% detection of CHD) of obstetric screening,137–139 some have advocated for routine fetal echocardiogram in pregnancy. The feasibility of this approach is a matter of question,140 and obstetric ultrasound screening protocols incorporating multiple views of the heart have become the mainstay of screening for fetal cardiac malformations in the United States. The 4-chamber view can be reliably obtained in 95% to 98% of pregnancies58,141 and theoretically detects >50% of serious cardiac malformations when performed in midgestation. Addition of the outflow tracts and 3 vessel with trachea view increases sensitivity to as high as 90%.142–144
Because only 10% of fetuses with CHD present for imaging with an identifiable “risk factor,”135 it is suggested that all fetuses, regardless of maternal, familial, or fetal factors, be approached as if they have the potential to have a cardiac malformation. Recent studies in the United States have indicated that up to 99% of women giving birth to babies with serious CHD had obstetric ultrasound examinations in the second or third trimester; however, only ≈30% of the fetuses were identified prenatally to have CHD.145,146 The detection rates for CHD have been shown to vary by type of ultrasound practice and level or type of training of the examiner.145,147 In low- and high-risk populations evaluated in university settings in the recent era, anatomic survey that included the 4-chamber view and outflow tracts minimized the need for detailed fetal echocardiogram.148 It stands to reason that with uniform standards for training and performance, detection rates may improve,144 with fetal echocardiography being reserved for those expectant women in whom obstetric scanning suggests the possibility of an abnormality.
The fetal echocardiogram represents the primary tool for the detailed diagnosis and evaluation of fetal cardiovascular pathology from the late first trimester to term. Despite the central importance of the technique to the field of fetal cardiology, the definition and scope of fetal echocardiography remain controversial. The expansion of obstetric screening of the fetal heart to include outflow tracts and, in some settings, color flow imaging has diminished the distinction between obstetric cardiac screening and fetal echocardiography. At the same time, advances in computer processing and transducer technology have expanded the capacity of the fetal echocardiogram to include a wide variety of new modalities and sophisticated measures of structure and function.
In an attempt to clarify the fundamental role of fetal echocardiography and the specific components that constitute a fetal cardiac examination, several subspecialty organizations have published formal practice guidelines.149–152 These guidelines vary, with no consensus on which modalities and measurements should be required as a minimum standard.153 Recently, a task force with representation from multiple societies developed revised guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiogram.154 This effort represents an initial step toward consensus among specialties. Table 5 highlights the required and optional elements each published guideline recommends. Discrepancies may be partially attributed to professional/training biases among subspecialty groups and, perhaps more importantly, to a deficiency in relevant supportive literature and evidence. Moreover, some guidelines describe exhaustive, comprehensive approaches to fetal cardiovascular system evaluation, whereas others describe a more basic approach to anatomic imaging.
Recommendations for the specific components that constitute a fetal echocardiogram should reflect a consensus of expert opinion from multiple disciplines and incorporate evidence-based recommendations to the extent that such evidence can be identified from the literature. Because fetal cardiac imaging may include an expansive number of both standard and more advanced measurements and modalities, the fetal echocardiogram can be described by first including the essential elements and then detailing what is available as part of a more expanded examination. Table 6 lists all the potential elements of a fetal echocardiogram; some are recommended as mandatory components for all studies, and others are suggested as useful. It should be noted, however, that some elements that are not considered mandatory for all studies will be indicated in specific clinical situations. Many factors contribute to the decision of whether to perform the standard examination or to add various additional elements that can be included as part of a more extended cardiac examination.
Timing of Fetal Echocardiogram
Initial Fetal Echocardiogram
The timing in gestation in which a fetal echocardiogram should be performed is determined by multiple factors, including the reason for referral and the gestational age at which cardiac or extracardiac pathology is detected by obstetric ultrasound. Fetal echocardiography for screening of pregnancies at risk for CHD (discussed in Indications for Referral for Fetal Cardiac Evaluation) generally should be performed at 18 to 22 weeks of gestation, the time at which most routine midtrimester obstetric ultrasound assessments are performed to screen for other fetal abnormalities. It must be recognized that this strategy for screening may not identify diseases that progress in utero from subtle pathology in midgestation to more obvious disease closer to term.136,155 In addition, fetal arrhythmias may evolve late in the second or third trimester. This is particularly true for premature beats and tachycardias, which often do not manifest before 25 to 26 weeks of gestation and, in some cases, only in the third trimester.156,157
Abnormal findings on routine obstetric ultrasound should prompt performance of a fetal echocardiogram if there is a suspected cardiac diagnosis as soon as is feasible. Lesions at risk for fetal cardiovascular compromise, in particular, should be referred urgently (the same day or next day if feasible). Fetal echocardiographic assessment of an affected pregnancy should be performed sufficiently early to provide time for additional testing, including amniocentesis for fetal karyotype or other appropriate testing to facilitate counseling, to provide the pregnant patient with as many options as possible for the pregnancy and for delivery planning.
Follow-Up Fetal Echocardiogram
When fetal CHD is identified or suspected, given the risk of progression for some fetal CHD,136,155 serial fetal echocardiography is recommended. The necessity, timing, and frequency of serial assessment should be guided by the nature and severity of the lesion, coexisting signs of heart failure, the anticipated timing and mechanism of progression, and the options that are available for prenatal and perinatal management. Table 7 lists the potential mechanisms through which cardiac defects diagnosed before birth may evolve. This information should be incorporated into the counseling and planning of ongoing surveillance. Of note, for pregnancies at risk, if imaging of the fetal heart is inadequate on the initial scan, then a follow-up scan should be performed.
Early Fetal Echocardiogram
A fetal echocardiogram may be performed at earlier gestational ages, including the late first and early second trimesters (<18 weeks of gestation). This has been prompted by advances in image resolution with the development of higher-frequency transducers, including those specialized for transvaginal imaging, and increasing detection of extracardiac pathology182,183 at earlier gestational ages. Indications for earlier fetal echocardiogram are similar to those for midtrimester assessment; however, the earlier examinations are usually reserved for pregnancies at highest risk for CHD or for those families with a significant history of a previous child with serious CHD. The indication that has yielded the greatest number of pregnancies with a fetal cardiac diagnosis in a series of late first– and early second–trimester diagnoses is the finding of an increased NT noted on first-trimester screening ultrasound.184,185 In the absence of aneuploidy, a variety of fetal heart defects have been identified in pregnancies referred for an increased NT, including atrial septal defects, ventricular septal defects, TGA, TOF, and AVSDs.78,79,122,125,184 Transabdominal imaging to visualize the structures of the fetal heart is feasible in most pregnancies at 13 to 14 weeks, allowing detection of pathology184; before that time, however, transvaginal imaging may be necessary because of both the distance of the fetus from the maternal abdominal wall and the small size of the heart structures.186 As a consequence of the small size of cardiac structures, image resolution at 11 to 14 weeks is typically less than that observed at later gestational ages; however, detailed segmental evaluations are still possible in the majority of fetuses, particularly at 12 to 16 weeks of gestation, with the aid of color Doppler.187 Furthermore, at these earlier gestational ages, growth of the fetal heart and great arteries is more accelerated than at later gestational ages; thus, the potential for evaluating anatomic details improves significantly every week. Given the limitations in image resolution with potential to miss more subtle cardiac lesions and the potential for the progression of lesions undetectable at earlier gestation, repeat midtrimester assessment of all pregnancies evaluated before 15 to 16 weeks should be performed.
Small cardiac structures, rapid fetal heart rate, substantial depth of imaging through the pregnant abdomen, and suboptimal imaging conditions, including limited acoustic windows, maternal obesity, and fetal lie in the prone position, all contribute to the challenges of imaging the fetal heart. The ultrasound systems to be used in the performance of fetal echocardiogram should have 2-dimensional (2D) or gray scale, M-mode, color, and pulsed-wave Doppler capabilities. The use of high-frequency transducers optimizes imaging of the diminutive heart structures; therefore, the highest frequency that provides sufficient penetration for a given patient should be chosen. In the midtrimester, high-frequency transducers are sufficient for most pregnancies in women with normal body habitus and, most importantly, provide better image resolution for the smaller fetal heart structures. Later in pregnancy, lower-frequency transducers may improve penetration and permit better imaging of the fetal cardiac structures. In the late first and early second trimesters, the highest-frequency transducers should be used for both transabdominal and transvaginal imaging.187
The rapid fetal heart rate necessitates optimization of individual systems to provide the highest frame rate possible (preferably >50 Hz). Narrowing the imaging depth and sector width and using dynamic zoom capabilities will increase frame rates and thus image resolution. Use of settings including little to no persistence assists in the evaluation of the rapidly beating fetal heart. A compression setting allowing a narrow dynamic range (gray scale) has better sensitivity and defines the blood-tissue interfaces. Limited use of harmonic imaging provides better penetration and endocardial definition, particularly in later gestations.
Concerns have been raised about the use of repeated ultrasound examination and the potential risk for fetal injury, in particular, modalities that have higher outputs such as Doppler and harmonic imaging.188,189 Although no documented case of fetal injury related to diagnostic imaging has ever been reported, the US Food and Drug Administration has published guidelines on the intensity of ultrasound used during fetal scanning (Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, part 884, subpart C, section 884.2660), which includes maintaining low mechanical and thermal indexes.190,191 The standard approach to fetal echocardiography should take into consideration the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle, limiting examinations to those that are medically necessary and the length of the assessments to what is necessary, particularly the application of higher-output modalities. This becomes especially important at earlier gestational ages when fetal tissues may be more susceptible to injury.192
Given the spectrum and complexity of cardiac pathology encountered in fetal life, fetal echocardiography should be performed and interpreted by personnel who have had formal training or experience in fetal echocardiography and exhibit continuing education in and experience with the diagnosis of CHD. Fetal echocardiography demands detailed evaluation of cardiac anatomy and cardiac function with 2D imaging, M-mode imaging (for rhythm assessment), and Doppler interrogation that goes beyond the basic screening examination typically used in obstetric ultrasound. Guidelines for training for physicians who evaluate and interpret these specialized examinations exist; a detailed discussion is outside the scope of this document and may vary regionally. It is recommended that only well-trained or experienced pediatric cardiologists, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, obstetricians, or radiologists who have acquired the appropriate knowledge base and skills should supervise and perform fetal echocardiograms. Once a diagnosis is made, consultation or referral to a provider experienced in fetal cardiology should be made before detailed counseling on diagnosis, management and outcome. Complex cases, including those with severe CHD, significant arrhythmias, or heart failure, should be referred to centers with extensive experience in fetal/pediatric cardiovascular care and the management of congenital cardiovascular disorders.
Fetal Heart Examination
Elements of the Fetal Echocardiographic Examination
All fetal echocardiograms should include acquisition of essential elements (Class I) that are necessary for exclusion of structural, functional, and rhythm-related cardiac disease (Table 6). Inclusion of additional elements (Class IIa) can be useful in the basic examination; however, they should be performed in the setting of CHD, in the presence of certain extracardiac anomalies, or if there is risk or concern for abnormal heart function or abnormal cardiac rhythm.
The fetal echocardiogram should include detailed 2D/gray-scale imaging of all cardiovascular structures; color Doppler interrogation of all the valves, veins, arteries, and atrial and ventricular septae; pulsed Doppler of the valves and ductus venosus; and assessment of cardiac rhythm and function. Additional measurements (cardiac biometry, including chamber length and valve measurements, additional pulsed Doppler measures, and quantitative evaluation of cardiac function) can be useful and are reasonable to perform (Table 6). The inclusion of such elements, beyond those considered to be required elements of the examination, provides the fetal specialist with additional information, facilitating the recognition and quantification of subtle pathology that may not be otherwise suspected.
For every examination, the initial assessment must include determination of fetal position for accurate assessment of visceral and atrial situs. Although standard planes of imaging used in postnatal cardiac imaging are not always possible because of variable and often suboptimal fetal position, cross-sectional and sagittal sweeps through the fetal torso and long- and short-axis sweeps of the fetal heart should be attempted. In addition, the 4-chamber view with sweeps through the outflow tracts and the 3-vessel view with sweeps through the mediastinum should be obtained.151 Figures 1 through 3 show representative views and sweeps of the fetal heart.149
As is true after birth, a segmental approach to defining cardiac anatomy and pathology is an important component of fetal cardiac assessment. The examination should start with a gross assessment of the cardiac position and axis, which may be altered in the presence of cardiac or extracardiac intrathoracic pathology.193 A segmental approach should include definition of systemic and pulmonary venous connections, atrial and ventricular connections and morphology (including relative chamber size, wall thickness, and anatomy of the atrial/ventricular septum), AV and semilunar valve morphology and size, ventricular arterial connections, great artery size and position relationships, and an assessment of aortic and ductal arches, including their position relative to the trachea and their size relationship with each other. Heart disease in the fetus may involve any or all aspects of the cardiac anatomy. Given that subtle lesions such as semilunar valve obstruction and coarctation of the aorta may progress136,155 and may be clues to more important underlying extracardiac diagnoses,194 when an abnormality is identified, a detailed assessment reduces the likelihood of missing aspects of the cardiac anatomy that may contribute critically to the surgical risks and prognosis of the lesion. All major structural CHD and many less severe forms of heart disease have been documented by fetal echocardiogram, and the accuracy of fetal echocardiography in defining specific anatomical details beyond the basic diagnosis has been demonstrated.195–198
Imaging of the fetal heart is unique relative to that of other aspects of the fetal anatomy in that the heart is a dynamic, constantly moving structure that rhythmically beats usually more than twice per second. Static 2D images do not demonstrate abnormalities of fetal heart structure, function, and rhythm; thus, they negate the basic purpose of fetal echocardiography. The dynamic assessment of cardiac structures has been recommended in previous guidelines for a detailed fetal echocardiogram.150–152 Therefore, during the performance of a fetal echocardiogram, digital cine clips of the beating heart should be acquired, stored, and retained for subsequent review.
In addition to the assessment of fetal heart structures, basic fetal biometric measurements, including head circumference, biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, and femur length, are reasonable to obtain if not readily available from the obstetric examination. An evaluation for the presence of pleural and pericardial effusions, ascites, and integumentary edema should be made. Two or more of these features establish a diagnosis of fetal hydrops. Nonimmune hydrops accounts for 76% to 87% of all cases of hydrops, and of those, primary cardiovascular disorders account for 15% to 25%,85 whereas many noncardiac causes of nonimmune hydrops alter cardiac loading and heart function and result in the evolution of fetal heart failure, also manifested as hydrops.85,86
Color Doppler adds utility to fetal cardiovascular assessment by providing confirmatory information on valve function and vessel patency. Pulsed Doppler interrogation of the valves may provide additional information to color Doppler and thus should be included in the performance of the fetal echocardiographic examination. Since the late 1980s, all published investigations describing the application of fetal echocardiography in the detection and evaluation of fetal heart disease have included the use of Doppler modalities, lending further support for their importance.
Most of the evidence for the routine application of Doppler in the evaluation of the fetal heart has focused on the use of color Doppler. Color Doppler has been shown to confirm the patency of ventricular inflows, outflows, anatomy, and flow through the arches; competency of AV and semilunar valves; appropriate connection of systemic and pulmonary veins; and documentation or exclusion of septal defects.199–201 In the normal fetus, it reduces scanning times, permitting rapid assessment of the relationship and patency of cardiac structures.199 It facilitates recognition of normal and abnormal anatomy when 2D image resolution is suboptimal199 and may be especially helpful at earlier gestational ages.187,202 In 1 study, color-flow mapping was documented to be essential for accurate anatomic diagnosis in 29% and useful in making a complete diagnosis in an additional 47% of pregnancies.200 In another large study, color-flow mapping was shown to be additive, particularly with the detection of AV valve insufficiency, demonstration of turbulent high-velocity jets of semilunar valve stenosis, altered ductal and distal arch flow, and septal defect shunting.201 More subtle outflow tract obstruction has been identified through the detection of flow acceleration across the pulmonary or aortic valves that may otherwise have been missed in routine 2D imaging.203 In the presence of more severe fetal CHD, abnormal flow patterns through the ductal or aortic arch, particularly flow reversal as identified by color and pulsed Doppler, have been shown to herald the presence of critical pulmonary or aortic outflow tract obstruction.204,205 Color Doppler has also been shown to facilitate identification of the source of pulmonary blood flow in more complex disease.206 Color Doppler interrogation of all valves and cardiac vessels, including veins and arteries, the septae, and ductus venosus, should be included in all fetal echocardiographic examinations (Table 6).
Less evidence exists to support the additive value of pulsed Doppler in the routine assessment of the fetal heart. Nevertheless, pulsed Doppler has been shown to contribute importantly to the understanding of fetal heart function and fetal circulation in both normal fetuses and those with disease. Normative data are available that define blood flow patterns and peak velocities through the mitral and tricuspid valves,207 aortic and pulmonary valves,208,209 branch pulmonary arteries,210 aortic isthmus,211 ductus arteriosus,209 and pulmonary212 and systemic veins.213 Pulsed Doppler interrogation of the ventricular inflows, systemic and pulmonary veins, ductus venosus, and umbilical vein provides clues to the diastolic properties and filling of the ventricles not obtainable with color Doppler.167 Pulsed Doppler assessment of ventricular outflows can be used to calculate ventricular stroke volumes and outputs214 and may be helpful in pregnancies at risk for high fetal cardiac output, including but not limited to anemias, arteriovenous malformations, acardiac twin gestations, and agenesis of the ductus venosus.129,179,180 Reversal of flow in diastole in the aortic isthmus may identify the fetus with significant vasodilation of brain vessels or “brain sparing.”211 Pulsed Doppler interrogation of pulmonary venous flow may be used not only to confirm normal and abnormal pulmonary venous connections215 but also to provide evidence of the severity of left atrial hypertension in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and a restrictive or intact atrial septum.175–177 Although the additional information contained in the pulsed-wave Doppler signal over the information present in an apparently normal color Doppler signal in an otherwise normal fetal heart has not been directly studied except in specific diseases such as TTTS and maternal DM, the subtle functional and structural abnormalities that produce an abnormal pulsed Doppler signal may provide additional important information for the fetal heart assessment. It is therefore recommended that pulsed Doppler of the AV inflows and ventricular outflows, in addition to interrogation of the ductus venosus, be included in the fetal echocardiographic examination (Table 6). Additional measures and pulsed Doppler interrogation of other structures and vessels is reasonable, particularly on a disease-specific basis in fetuses with suspected cardiovascular or extracardiac pathology.
Continuous-wave Doppler may be useful as an adjunct to pulsed Doppler in the performance of a fetal echocardiogram, although this technology may not be available on curvilinear probes and cardiac specific probes may be needed. Continuous-wave Doppler can be used to assess ventricular systolic pressures through interrogation of AV valve insufficiency jets161,216 or gradients through ventricular outflow tracts161 and arches.173,174 This information may provide additional insight into the pathophysiology and severity of a given lesion, although it must be interpreted in the context of gestational age, ventricular function, and the specifics of the fetal circulation. Of note, the fetal circulation provides challenges to defining lesion severity in the presence of the unique fetal shunts that permit redistribution of ventricular preload and output to the contralateral ventricle or great artery. Significant postnatal Doppler gradients may not be present prenatally; therefore, Doppler data must be interpreted with an understanding of fetal cardiac physiology.
The presence of ventricular or great artery size discrepancy may provide important clues to the basic diagnosis and the spectrum of severity. A smaller pulmonary valve or main pulmonary artery compared with the aortic valve or ascending aorta suggests the presence of pulmonary outflow tract obstruction.163,217 Conversely, a significantly smaller aorta relative to the main pulmonary artery and aortic relative to the ductal arch may suggest the presence of important left heart obstruction such as coarctation of the aorta.164,218 Chamber size discrepancy with a smaller left relative to right side of the heart could be secondary to altered pulmonary venous return219 or a restrictive foramen ovale.178 It may also occur as a consequence of right heart pathology that leads to an increased volume load to the right heart, including tricuspid158,159 or pulmonary insufficiency,160 severe pulmonary outflow obstruction,220 or ductus arteriosus constriction.173 Right heart dilation may also be observed in the presence of arteriovenous malformations such as vein of Galen aneurysm221 or in agenesis of the ductus venosus where umbilical venous return results in preferential streaming to the right heart.129
Valve and chamber size can be assessed qualitatively or quantitatively. Quantitative assessment includes 2D measurement of valve diameter and chamber length, with comparison of the right side with the left side of the heart. For both qualitative and quantitative assessment, the valves on the right side of the heart should be slightly larger than those on the left, and the right ventricular length should be equal to the left ventricular length in the 4-chamber view. Measurements and z scores that adjust the measures for gestational age are available for determining whether a measurement falls outside the normal range for gestational age and may facilitate the detection of subtle abnormalities or disease progression during serial assessment.222–225 Qualitative assessment of chamber and valve size should be included in the performance of a fetal echocardiogram with comparison of right- and left-sided structures. Additional quantitative measurement of valve diameters and right and left ventricular length is reasonable and particularly beneficial if qualitative assessment suggests an abnormality. Measurement of structures using z scores is useful when serial examinations are being done to determine disease progression.
Cardiac Function Assessment
Intrinsic abnormalities of the fetal myocardium, structural heart defects, persistent tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias, and altered loading conditions may contribute to reduced fetal myocardial function. Increased ventricular and atrial filling pressures associated with more severe myocardial dysfunction or cardiac/systemic venous compression lead to increased central venous pressures, which ultimately culminate in the evolution of fetal heart failure manifested as hydrops.85 Myocardial dysfunction may also jeopardize the well-being of the fetus through the development of fetal hypoxia and acidosis secondary to altered umbilical venous return, reduced placental function, and altered cardiac output, which may result in sudden fetal demise presumably in the face of limited reserve and hypoxia. Finally, fetal hypoxia secondary to more severe placental insufficiency may also contribute to myocardial dysfunction.226,227 Although the assessment of fetal heart function is one of the main functions of the fetal echocardiogram, consensus does not exist as to the extent to which such an evaluation, whether qualitative or quantitative, should be done, particularly as part of the basic fetal echocardiogram. A qualitative assessment of heart function is recommended as part of a fetal echocardiogram; however, a wide variety of approaches for the evaluation of fetal cardiac function are available and may be useful, particularly in certain disease processes as outlined below and elsewhere in this document (Table 6).
Cardiomegaly is an important sign of altered fetal heart function.168,228,229 The cardiac size relative to the thorax may be evaluated from cross-sectional images through the fetal chest with measurements of cardiothoracic diameter, cardiothoracic area, and cardiothoracic circumference ratios.228,229 From a cross-sectional view of the thorax, the heart area is usually about one third the size of the thorax. Although quantitative assessment is not necessary if qualitatively there is a normal cardiothoracic ratio, measurement may be useful in the assessment of fetuses with structural or functional CHD or in those at risk for myocardial dysfunction or high cardiac output states.
Systolic function of the fetal heart should include qualitative assessment of both the right and left ventricles with evaluation of contraction using real-time or video cine clip images. Both ventricles should be equally dynamic. In the expanded examination, quantitative measurement of ventricular internal dimensions during systole and diastole from 2D223 or M-mode230,231 images permitting calculation of shortening fraction (shortening fraction=[end-diastolic−end-systolic ventricular diameter]/end-diastolic dimension) should be considered. The calculation of shortening fraction is more appropriately applied to the left ventricle given that the right ventricle tends to contract by shortening along its long axis as a consequence of differences in fiber orientation. Left ventricular shortening fraction does not change from the mid to the third trimester.230 Measures of shortening fraction may be useful in assessing and following up the fetus at risk for myocardial dysfunction; however, errors may be made if the planes through the fetal heart do not remain constant as the ventricles contract and if the fetal position does not permit measurements axial to the plane of imaging. Estimation of ejection fraction with a modified Simpson technique has also been reported in the fetus with validation in animal models.231 The diminutive nature of the fetal heart, with potential to amplify calculation errors and assumptions of the ventricular geometry that may not be true of the fetal heart, contribute to the inaccuracy of this measure of systolic function in utero and therefore is not recommended.
Several parameters using pulsed Doppler are available to assist in the evaluation of systolic and diastolic function in the fetus.232–234 Diastolic function may be assessed by ventricular inflow Doppler patterns, including duration and the relationship of filling during early and late diastole, and assessment of systemic venous Doppler waveforms. Diastolic dysfunction may be less well tolerated by the fetal circulation than systolic dysfunction, as suggested in a retrospective study of fetal cardiomyopathies in which diastolic dysfunction was associated with an 8-fold increased risk of fetal mortality relative to other parameters of fetal heart function in a multiple logistic regression analysis.168 Short-duration, monophasic ventricular inflow Doppler flow patterns have been observed in fetal cardiomyopathies, the recipient in TTTS, ductus arteriosus constriction, and severe semilunar valve stenosis,161,168,173,174,235–237 and have been shown to be predictive of progressive ventricular hypoplasia in the presence of severe semilunar valve obstruction.235,236 Doppler interrogation of blood flow in the inferior vena cava or hepatic veins, ductus venosus, and umbilical vein can also be used in the assessment of functional pathology of the fetal heart. Increased “a” wave reversal in the inferior vena cava, the presence of any “a” wave reversal in the ductus venosus, and umbilical venous pulsations are abnormal and often are seen in the presence of increased central venous pressures. Other measures of ventricular function may be assessed in the fetus at risk for or with myocardial dysfunction. From simultaneous left ventricular inflow and outflow samplings, the isovolumic relaxation time of the left ventricle, a measure of diastolic function, can be assessed238,239 and may be prolonged in the presence of certain fetal cardiomyopathies, CHD associated with ventricular dysfunction, or growth restriction.168,216,239,240 Global left or right ventricular function can be estimated from calculations of the myocardial performance index (MPI) in which the sum of the isovolumic relaxation and contraction times (or the ejection time subtracted by the time interval between 2 consecutive inflows) are divided by the ejection time.241,242 An abnormal MPI has been demonstrated in many fetal cardiac abnormalities associated with altered function, including myocardial pathology in TTTS recipient twin, ductus arteriosus constriction, and Ebstein anomaly.168,242,243 Ventricular function assessment with pulsed Doppler can be useful as part of the expanded fetal cardiac examination for fetuses at risk for or with myocardial dysfunction.
The prognosis of some forms of fetal heart failure can be assessed with the cardiovascular profile (CVP) score244 (Table 8). Scoring of the 5 categories (2 points for each), including hydrops, venous Doppler, heart size, heart function, and arterial Doppler, has been studied as it relates to prognosis in fetuses with hydrops, CHD, and growth restriction.226,245,246 The CVP score may be useful in the baseline and serial evaluations for fetuses at risk for or with myocardial dysfunction. Finally, abnormalities of myocardial structure and function may affect the fetal circulation, including placental blood flow and fetal growth,247 and conversely, placental pathology may contribute to fetal hemodynamic compromise through fetal hypoxia.226,227 The assessment of umbilical artery pulsatility may be useful in these conditions. Recent experience has also suggested that fetal cardiac pathology can influence cerebral blood flow.248,249 Thus, assessment of middle cerebral Doppler flow might be useful; however, the definitive link between cerebral Doppler changes, neurological insult, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes is still to be elucidated.
Fetal Rhythm Assessment
A fetal echocardiogram should always include assessment of the fetal heart rate and rhythm. Several techniques are available for these assessments, including 2D, M-mode, and pulsed Doppler imaging.250 M-mode imaging was the first modality used to define arrhythmia mechanism. With the sample cursor placed through the more trabeculated right atrium and either ventricle, the relationship between atrial and ventricular contractions can be demonstrated, and heart rate can be measured.60,61 Pulsed Doppler recordings of simultaneous left ventricular inflow and outflow,251 superior vena cava and ascending aortic flow,62 or pulmonary artery and pulmonary venous flow permit documentation of the relationship between mechanical atrial and ventricular systole.63 In the presence of a fetal arrhythmia, including isolated ectopy, bradycardia, or tachycardia, documentation of the relationship between atrial and ventricular contractions is important. Differentiating between types of arrhythmia mechanisms is helpful in establishing a differential diagnosis and may be useful in determining the most optimal therapy and the likelihood of success of arrhythmia treatment (discussed in the Fetal Therapy section).62,63 Any of the techniques mentioned may be used to evaluate arrhythmia mechanism and should be included as part of the expanded fetal echocardiogram to assess the fetus with a suspected or documented arrhythmia.
Limitations of Fetal Echocardiography
Certain fetal heart abnormalities will not be consistently identified, particularly when image resolution or fetal lie is suboptimal. Fortunately, most of these lesions represent pathologies that do not affect fetal health or the well-being of the infant at birth. Small or moderately sized ventricular or atrial septal defects, minor valve lesions, single/partial anomalous pulmonary venous connections, and coronary artery anomalies are among the lesions that may be undetectable before birth.197 Certain postnatally acquired forms of CHD such as supravalvar mitral ring and fibromuscular subaortic stenosis are typically not diagnosed before birth. Cardiac lesions that progress later in gestation, including obstructive lesions, rhabdomyomas, and certain cardiomyopathies, may not be evident in earlier gestation and warrant repeated assessment for pregnancies at risk.136,155,167,169,171,172,252
Advanced Techniques in the Evaluation of the Fetal Heart
The evaluation of the fetal heart relies principally on 2D echocardiography and color-flow and pulsed Doppler techniques. Advanced modalities provide complementary perspectives, offering additional insights into fetal cardiac structure, function, and rhythm. The evaluation of fetal cardiac structure/function has been expanded with the development and application of 3-dimensional (3D) and 4-dimensional (4D) fetal cardiac imaging, cardiovascular MRI, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), and strain/strain rate imaging of the fetal heart. At the same time, the evaluation of fetal cardiac rhythm has been enhanced with the development and application of fetal electrocardiography and fMCG. Table 9 summarizes current COR and LOE about the usefulness of these tools in clinical practice. These new technologies are still under investigation; however, in specific instances, some are reasonable to consider in clinical practice.
Three-Dimensional and 4D Ultrasound
Three-dimensional and 4D ultrasound has been applied to fetal cardiac screening, the evaluation of CHD, and the quantitative, volumetric assessment of cardiac chamber size and function. The acquisition, display, and manipulation of 3D and 4D cardiac volumes require specialized transducers, sophisticated algorithms, and technical expertise. These considerations, along with resolution concerns and a substantial learning curve, have slowed the widespread clinical application of 3D/4D technology to fetal cardiac imaging. Nevertheless, various applications of this technology have enhanced the quantitative measurement of fetal cardiac chamber volumes and ejection fractions.253 Clinically, the technique has the potential to improve screening of low-risk pregnancies for CHD, particularly when combined with telemedicine and algorithms to automate extraction of various planes from the 3D/4D data set.254
Acquisition of 3D/4D volumes of the fetal heart currently may be performed with 3 different approaches: nongated reconstructive 3D, gated reconstructive 3D/4D, or real-time, volumetric 3D/4D.
The most basic approach to 3D volume acquisition uses an automated, nongated sweep of a 2D image plane across the fetal heart. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial coordinates enables the reconstruction of a single-volume data set. The reconstructed volume contains a large number of still, tomographic ultrasound images, with no regard to temporal or spatial motion. Advantages of the static 3D acquisition of the fetal heart include its rapid speed of acquisition (0.5–2 seconds) and the ease of volume manipulation. Major disadvantages of static 3D acquisition include its limited resolution and inability to assess events related to the cardiac cycle, valve motion, and myocardial contractility. Moreover, nongated reconstructive acquisitions fail to provide important clues to cardiac anatomy offered with gated acquisitions.255
The technique of gated reconstructive 3D/4D sweeps the ultrasound plane across the fetal heart while obtaining spatial coordinates for each pixel within each plane; however, in addition, this technique uses a sophisticated algorithm to evaluate temporal information on the cardiac cycle, thus enabling the reconstruction of multiple volumes, each representing a discrete point in the cardiac cycle. First described in 1996,256,257 the technique was adapted to clinical ultrasound as spatiotemporal image correlation.258–260 Spatiotemporal image correlation acquisitions may be combined with other imaging modalities such as color, power, or high-definition-flow Doppler.261,262 Four-dimensional ultrasound with spatiotemporal image correlation for the measurement of fetal cardiac ventricular volume, stroke volume, and ejection fraction has been validated in small balloon and animal models263,264 and can be used in mid and late gestation in human fetuses.253,264–266 Disadvantages of reconstructed, gated acquisitions include prolonged acquisition times, which introduce artifact related to fetal movements or maternal breathing during the acquisition.
Real-time 3D/4D volume acquisitions of the fetal heart have been performed since 1999.267 The major advantages of real-time 3D/4D acquisitions are that gating of the heart rate is not required and that volumes of the beating heart are displayed instantaneously. Current technology allows either biplane imaging (the display of 2 simultaneous planes without the need for moving the transducer)268 or a rendered real-time display of any portion(s) of the pyramidal volume data set.269,270 Several small postnatal studies have shown the superiority of real-time 3D/4D imaging compared with conventional 2D ultrasound in the evaluation of CHD,272,272 but there have been no such comparison studies in fetuses with CHD. Currently available systems are limited by the size of the acquired volume, often too small for a complete evaluation of the fetal heart and great vessels. Over time, sweep volume273 and full-volume (multiple volumes acquired in succession) techniques may mitigate this limitation of current real-time 3D/4D technology.
Options for display of data from fetal cardiac volumes include selected, orthogonal 2D images from within the volumes (multiplanar displays) or internal/external spatial views of the heart (volume-rendered/surface-rendered displays). Guidelines for standardization of display of postnatal 3D/4D cardiac views have been published.274
The multiplanar display conventionally includes 3 orthogonal 2D planes and has been used for nongated and gated reconstructive and for real-time 3D/4D fetal echocardiography. Advantages of the multiplanar display include its use of familiar 2D planes and nonconventional planes and the ability to view cardiac abnormalities from 3 orthogonal views simultaneously. The addition of color Doppler to multiplanar displays has been shown to be feasible for the evaluation of normal and abnormal hearts.275 Tomographic ultrasound imaging represents a variation on the multiplanar display that provides a sequential anatomic view of a region within the acquired volume.276,277 This method resembles the display of images from computed tomography and MRI.
Algorithms for the automatic extraction and display of diagnostic cardiac planes278–280 or cavities281 from 3D/4D volumes have been described. Automated sonography has the potential to standardize and simplify the ultrasound examination of the fetal heart by eliminating the need to acquire multiple views in real time. Tomographic ultrasound imaging may facilitate the clinical application of automated sonography, controlling for inherent variability in fetal cardiac anatomy (cardiac axis, cardiac position in chest, size of chest) by providing multiple parallel planes for review. This approach has been applied to evaluation of the outflow tracts in fetuses with d-TGA.282 Rendered displays mimic actual visualization of external features (surface renderings) or internal features (surgeon’s eye views), combining data from multiple planes into a single display. These modes have enabled 4D visualization of normal and abnormal fetal cardiac anatomy and may be useful in evaluating the anatomy and morphology of the AV valves, the ventricular septum, and the arrangements of the great arteries.283,284
The current resolution of 3D/4D cardiac imaging data sets has limited the clinical utility of the technique. However, in some settings, the use of 3D/4D fetal cardiac imaging may complement or enhance the ability of conventional 2D imaging to provide important structural and functional information. The ability to store entire volume data sets enables virtual examinations of the fetal heart after data acquisition, either on site or remotely via electronic transmission. Nevertheless, image resolution remains relatively low, and significant potential remains for missed or false diagnoses. In a recent study, remote analysis of volume data sets by experts in fetal cardiac diagnosis yielded mostly correct diagnoses, but the details of anatomy were not thought to be accurate enough for exclusive use in clinical decision making.285
In summary, 3D/4D fetal cardiac imaging is currently a research tool and is not adequate for use as an alternative to conventional fetal cardiac imaging. However, this technology may be useful to facilitate screening for CHD or for complementary imaging in fetuses identified as having CHD.
Although advances in magnetic resonance technology have expanded the clinical role of MRI for pediatric patients with CHD, the application of MRI to the fetal heart has been limited because of the small size of fetal cardiac structures, random fetal motion, and the challenge of gating the rapidly beating fetal heart in the absence of a fetal electrocardiogram. Furthermore, in contrast to conventional ultrasound technology, MRI requires expensive, large, less portable equipment, as well as specialized expertise to perform and interpret. Nevertheless, MRI offers several advantages over obstetric ultrasound. Fetal position, rib calcification, maternal obesity, and oligohydramnios, particularly during the third trimester, interfere more with ultrasound imaging than with MRI. If the challenges relating to motion and cardiac gating can be overcome, MRI has the potential to provide high-resolution imaging of the fetal heart in multiple planes and to generate volume data sets with greater resolution than those obtained with ultrasound, offering the potential to provide robust quantitative evaluation of cardiac function and chamber volumes and to provide unique perspectives on venous and arterial anatomy, visceroatrial situs, and thoracic extracardiac malformations affecting fetal cardiovascular structure/function.
Early feasibility studies in fetuses have used half-acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo sequences with variable success.286,287 Some investigators, by combining these sequences and balanced steady-state free-precession sequences, have achieved better images.288,289 The development of these more sophisticated sequences, with improved temporal resolution, has enhanced the ability of MRI to evaluate fetal cardiac structure despite fetal motion and rapid fetal heart rates.290,292 However, although these advanced sequences can generate highly useful information without true gating, this single-shot imaging approach has limited spatial resolution.287 High-resolution, gated fetal cardiac MRI has been performed in chronically instrumented sheep with the use of cine steady-state sequences.292 The ongoing development of additional algorithms, including metric-optimized gating,293 may help to establish a clinical role for gated fetal cardiac MRI, but at present, its use mostly lies in the research arena.
In summary, with increasingly sophisticated MRI technology, faster imaging sequences, improvements in resolution, and innovative gating algorithms, fetal cardiac MRI has the potential to complement ultrasound imaging in the evaluation of fetal visceroatrial situs,288,290,294 cardiac structure,286,288–292 and cardiac function.287,292 Although the clinical utility of the technology has not been well established and although it currently is used mostly as a research tool, fetal cardiac MRI is reasonable to perform in the evaluation of certain forms of fetal cardiovascular disease, including heterotaxy and systemic venous anomalies, and in the assessment of associated extracardiac malformations.
Tissue Doppler and Strain and Strain Rate Imaging
Tissue Doppler, 2D speckle, and tissue and feature tracking are among the newer ultrasound-based techniques that have been demonstrated postnatally to provide enhanced, quantitative, noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion and mechanics, including analysis of wall motion and calculation of myocardial strain and strain rate. These techniques have been applied to the fetus in a variety of settings.
Tissue Doppler Imaging
TDI represents a quantitative and temporally precise analysis of segmental wall motion and myocardial velocity. TDI has been shown to be useful in the evaluation of impaired systolic and diastolic cardiac function in children and adults and can be of clinical value in the early identification of cardiac dysfunction.297 In the fetus, TDI has been applied to the evaluation of myocardial motion- and time-related event analysis.96,298,299 Reference ranges for TDI time intervals, including mechanical PR intervals, have been established96 and may be useful in the assessment of fetuses at risk for AV block. Myocardial TDI velocity indexes obtained with color TDI have been reported, including normal data of fetal myocardial velocities and MPI in the left and right annulus and the interventricular septum.96,300 In a prospective study in 25 growth restricted fetuses, TDI demonstrated both systolic and diastolic tissue velocity abnormalities compared with normal fetuses, whereas pulsed Doppler detected only an increase in left ventricular MPI with all other indexes, including E/A ratios, outflow tract velocities, and right ventricular MPI, being similar to those in controls.301 TDI has also been applied to the assessment of diastolic dysfunction in fetuses of diabetic mothers and other complicated pregnancies302,303 and in the presence of TTTS,304 CHD,305 heart failure,306 and arrhythmias.307
In summary, TDI evaluation of fetal cardiac function may be considered in clinical practice, although its usefulness has not been established and the technique currently remains a research tool. However, TDI evaluation is reasonable to use in the assessment of fetal cardiac rhythm.
Strain and Strain Rate Imaging
The deformation of tissue, normalized to its initial size or shape and expressed as a percentage, is referred to as strain. Strain rate is the rate at which this tissue deformation occurs. The initial application of strain imaging used Doppler technology. Another method, known as 2D speckle tracking, relies on identifying patterns of gray scale within small regions and allows direct calculation of strain from changes in distance between tracked features rather than calculating on the basis of velocity measurements.
There have been several small studies of strain and strain rate in fetuses using color Doppler TDI or 2D speckle tracking at various gestations in normal fetuses.233,308–319 Several of these studies have applied 2D speckle tracking echocardiography to the normal midgestation to late-gestation fetus for the assessment of longitudinal mechanics, although only 1 study to date has also addressed circumferential strain.318 In general, feasibility is reasonable, although some studies have reported up to 20% to 30% interobserver variability. Absolute measures of strain and strain rate differ between color Doppler TDI and 2D speckle tracking, and the techniques have been shown not to be interchangeable within the same fetus,319 although changing trends during gestation should be similar. There are conflicting data using strain and strain rate analysis in normal fetuses. Peak longitudinal strain for the right ventricle is higher than for the left ventricle in most studies, but there is disagreement about gestational age–related change. Technique variation and variation in reporting (global versus regional values) may also be factors contributing to discrepant results across studies.310,311,313,317
The clinical relevance of the information obtained with strain techniques with respect to fetal myocardial function remains to be proven. Concerns exist about vendor-specific image acquisition, storage, and processing, resulting in limited cross-vendor applicability.145,320–324 Standardization in measurement and reporting has still not been achieved. Frame rate limitations, which may result in a loss of temporal detail and dramatically increase the variability of measurement even within the same fetus,316 are problematic. Thus, at present, the role of strain and strain rate imaging in the assessment of fetal cardiac function is yet to be determined, and its usefulness has not been established in clinical practice.
Advanced Evaluation of Fetal Cardiac Rhythm
The evaluation of fetal rhythm ideally should extend beyond diseases associated with bradycardia or tachycardia to include conditions in which conduction disturbances are possible, including maternal medication exposure, hydrops, myocardial dysfunction, intrauterine growth restriction, and TTTS, among others. Although a fetal echocardiogram alone can diagnose many fetal arrhythmias (discussed in the Fetal Echocardiography section), the technique relies on assembly of the sequence of atrial and ventricular events that represent mechanical activation rather than electric activation of the heart, and it is fundamentally limited in its potential to identify fetal conduction disease. fMCG and fetal electrocardiography are able to more precisely diagnose fetal arrhythmias and conduction disorders and can define the finer nuances of arrhythmia diagnosis, uncover unsuspected arrhythmias, accurately assess the effects and toxicity of antiarrhythmic therapy, and provide insight into developmental fetal electrophysiology.325–331
Although fetal electrocardiography has been available for decades, its clinical application has been slowed for several reasons. First, the technique (which involves the use of up to 12 maternal abdominal leads, a single ground lead across the maternal body, and a mildly abrasive cream) requires time and skill to ensure good-quality signals. Second, throughout gestation and despite sophisticated and sensitive equipment, the fetal electrocardiogram has relatively low signal-to-noise ratios. Moreover, between 24 and 35 weeks of gestation, the vernix caseosa has electric insulating properties that can further attenuate or even eliminate the fetal electrocardiography signal. Normal values for fetal electrocardiography have been reported.96,332 Compared with mechanical PR intervals derived from fetal pulsed Doppler, fetal electrocardiogram PR intervals were shorter than those obtained by pulsed Doppler.96,333 The utility of fetal electrocardiography in assessing first-degree AV block associated with maternal collagen vascular disease has been demonstrated.332 Fetal electrocardiography during labor (using a scalp lead) for the detection of fetal compromise has been studied extensively. The ST-segment analysis algorithm measures the ratio of QRS to T amplitude, ST-segment depression, and T-wave changes to predict abnormal fetal cord blood metabolic state.334 With this technique, T-wave amplitude was noted to be increased during states of asphyxia; these changes were believed to be attributable to myocardial potassium liberation during glycolysis.335 Results of several randomized, clinical trials using fetal electrocardiography involving >15 000 patients after 36 weeks’ gestation336–338 have shown variable results in the outcome measures of reduction in metabolic acidosis, decrease in moderate/severe neonatal encephalopathy, and operative delivery rate. Although the use of fetal electrocardiography may be reasonable to consider in the assessment of cardiac conduction and rhythm in fetuses with known or suspected diseases of the conduction system, its utility has not been established. Monitoring of fetal heart rate with fetal electrocardiography during labor after the rupture of membranes can be useful and is reasonable to perform.
fMCG is a noninvasive means of assessing electromagnetic characteristics of fetal cardiac conduction. Magnetometers used to perform fMCG use superconductor physics principles to measure magnetic fields. The studies must be performed within a magnetically shielded room that excludes magnetic interference from environmental sources. Unlike MRI, fMCG devices represent passive receivers that do not produce energy or alter magnetic energy states. Because of the requirement for specialized equipment and expertise, fMCG is currently performed in only a small (albeit increasing) number of centers worldwide.
fMCG provides heart rate trend analysis, raw rhythm recordings at gestations >17 to 24 weeks, and signal-averaged recordings.339 The fMCG captures the P wave, PR interval, QRS interval, ST-T waves, QT interval, and RR interval in most fetuses of >24 weeks’ gestation and QRS and RR intervals in fetuses of >17 weeks’ gestation.340–343 With the use of fMCG, normative data for cardiac intervals, including gender-based intervals and those in multiple pregnancies, have been established.340,341,344,345 Compared with mechanical PR intervals derived from fetal pulsed Doppler, fMCG PR intervals were shorter than those obtained by pulsed Doppler.346 Similar to Holter monitoring, the fMCG can display uninterrupted segments of recorded time during normal rhythm or during arrhythmias.343,347 fMCG may therefore be especially useful for analyzing complex rhythm and rate patterns such as irregular, multiple, or transient arrhythmias and for providing a more accurate differential diagnosis of tachycardias and bradycardias. No other current method can detect repolarization abnormalities such as T-wave alternans.331 Over the past decade, fMCG has been reported in case series and has increased the understanding of the pathophysiology of life-threatening arrhythmias such as LQTS,348 CHB,330,349,350 and various tachyarrhythmias with or without Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.351,352 fMCG has led to modifications in medical therapy of arrhythmias in some cases.329–331,353
Unlike fetal electrocardiography, fMCG allows raw signal analysis even in the presence of an irregular rhythm. fMCG holds an inherent advantage over fetal electrocardiography in signal-to-noise ratios because the conductance properties of magnetic signals are not affected by poor conductivity of fetal and maternal tissues. Only a limited number of studies have compared contemporaneous fetal electrocardiography and fMCG recordings.354,355 Case studies and small case series documenting postnatal follow-up present compelling evidence that fMCG provides prenatal information concordant with postnatal findings during persistent fetal arrhythmias.329 Although fMCG currently has limited availability, use of this technique is reasonable in the assessment of cardiac conduction and rhythm in fetuses with known or suspected disease of the conduction system.
Extracardiac Assessment of the Fetus With CHD
The wide range of associations between CHD and other anomalies have been known for decades, and it is considered axiomatic in prenatal diagnosis that any fetus with 1 anomaly may also have others.68 Some of these anomalies lend themselves to prenatal diagnosis through imaging, whereas others may manifest only after birth. In addition, our knowledge about genetic conditions in general is rapidly expanding, with diagnostic modalities such as array comparative genomic hybridization testing now revealing new insights into genetic origins for an expanding number of conditions in which CHD is present in isolation or in combination with other anomalies. Some fetuses will come to cardiac evaluation after being first diagnosed with other extracardiac anomalies or genetic abnormalities (discussed in the Indications for Referral for Fetal Cardiac Evaluation section), whereas for other fetuses, the CHD prompts investigation for extracardiac abnormality or genetic syndrome. In all, surveillance during the remainder of gestation may be recommended because of the increased risk for fetal compromise resulting from the cardiac or extracardiac anomalies. Because of implications for pregnancy management and outcomes, all fetuses with recognized CHD should undergo assessment for extracardiac abnormalities.
Genetic Abnormalities and CHD
Approximately 15% of infants with CHD have recognizable chromosomal abnormalities.356 Most of these are aneuploidies, with trisomies 21, 13, and 18 and monosomy X making up the majority. Fetuses with CHD, however, exhibit a much higher incidence of karyotype abnormalities, on the order of 30% to 40% in most series194,357–362 and up to 56% in selected high-risk populations.202,363 Cardiac defects in the fetus have been associated with autosomal trisomies, many of which are not seen clinically in postnatal life, including trisomy 9, 16, and 8 and partial monosomy for chromosomes 4p, 5p, 8p, 10p, 11q, and 20, among others.55 The disparity between fetal and postnatal incidence and spectrum of disease is likely attributable to a higher in utero mortality in many of these patients. Additionally, gestational age at assessment of the population will affect the incidence because some abnormalities are compatible with longer duration of intrauterine survival than others.364,365
Available Genetic Testing
Many types of genetic testing are currently clinically available, with other testing still in the research phase.55 Conventional metaphase chromosome banding for karyotyping of fetal cells obtained via amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling has been the mainstay of prenatal genetic testing for decades. High-resolution banding permits analysis of smaller regions of the chromosome than standard karyotyping but is used less often. More recently, fluorescent in situ hybridization for the detection of abnormal complement of chromosomes 13, 18, or 21 or sex chromosomes in interphase (nondividing) cells has become available with the advantage that the test provides results much more rapidly than karyotyping, which requires cells to be actively dividing and may require 7 to 10 days for results to be available. Fluorescent in situ hybridization techniques can also be used to assess metaphase chromosome preparations for microdeletions not detectable by visual banding techniques through the use of region-specific labeled probes to detect copy-number variation in the region of interest. This is widely used in clinical practice for the detection of deletions of chromosome 22q11.
Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy has been made available recently using massively parallel sequencing of cell free DNA in the maternal circulation.366 A detection rate of trisomy 21 of 99.5% with a screen positive rate of 0.2% has been reported.366 Although noninvasive prenatal testing is not currently commercially available for subchromosomal analysis, research studies have already been published on the ability of this technology to detect fetal 22 q11 deletion and other deletions and duplications.367,368
Abnormalities of chromosome complement do not account for all cases of fetal heart malformation. It has been estimated that 70% to 85% of fetuses with isolated cardiac malformation and 25% to 65% of those with additional extracardiac abnormalities will have normal karyotype and fluorescent in situ hybridization.194,357,369,370 These patients may benefit from microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization testing, which has been shown to detect abnormalities in an additional 5.2% (95% CI, 1.9–13.9) of fetuses with ultrasound-detected anomalies and normal karyotype.371 Many submicroscopic chromosomal rearrangements that lead to copy-number gains or losses have been identified in fetuses with CHD through the use of comparative genetic hybridization testing. The question of whether this test should be used as a replacement for routine testing with traditional cytogenetics (karyotyping and fluorescent in situ hybridization) has been a topic of recent debate.372,373 Microarray analysis is not useful when there is no net gain or loss of chromosomal material. Balanced rearrangements such as reciprocal and robertsonian translocations, inversions, and balanced insertions are not detectable by comparative genetic hybridization testing. This has led most clinicians to adopt a sequential approach to testing whereby advanced testing is performed only after a normal karyotype result has been obtained.374 Because microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization testing may also uncover copy-number variants, microdeletions, and chromosomal derangements of unknown significance, there is a risk of introducing uncertainty in prognosticating that should be disclosed thoroughly to the patient before testing in the context of relative risk versus benefit of this type of testing.
Other tests that can be performed prenatally are DNA mutation analysis and direct sequence analysis. Commercially available DNA mutation analysis is available for several disorders involving cardiac structural, functional, and electrophysiological conditions. If the index of suspicion is high such as in a fetus with a family history or suspicion of LQTS, commercial testing of amniotic fluid may be considered. The diagnosis of Noonan syndrome can also be made with this analysis in fetuses with normal karyotype and findings including pulmonary stenosis, polyhydramnios, and pleural effusions.375 Other single-gene disorders with familial inheritance may also lend themselves to prenatal genetic testing, although this should be reserved in most cases for instances in which a family member has been previously confirmed to be affected.
Although invasive sampling of the pregnancy has been necessary until recently, the refining of techniques for recovery of fetal DNA from maternal serum is showing promise for the development of noninvasive assessment for fetal aneuploidies.376–379 This will likely change the way genetic testing of the fetus found to have sonographic evidence of disease is managed in the future. As a means of keeping abreast of the latest genes and availability of testing, the reader is referred to online resources such as Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim) and GeneTests (http://www.genetests.org/), which are updated regularly. In addition, a more detailed analysis and review of the current status of knowledge about the genetic basis for CHD were the subject of a recent AHA scientific statement.55 The interested reader is referred to this publication for a more in-depth discussion.
Genetic Abnormalities Associated With CHD
Certain cardiac lesions are recognizable as being associated with a higher prevalence of abnormal chromosome complement, microdeletions, or individual gene variations. Ventricular septal defects and AVSDs are the lesions most often found to be associated with karyotype abnormality357; however, several other cardiac defects also carry a higher-than-expected incidence of chromosomal aberrations (Table 10). In 1 series, aneuploidy rates were highest for AVSD (80%), coarctation (49%), TOF, and ventricular septal defects (45%),361 but in other series, the detection rates of aneuploidy in AVSD and TOF have been reported to be closer to 55% and 20% to 25%365 respectively.381,382
On the order of 50% to 70% of fetuses with AVSDs and normal situs have been found to have trisomy 21.360,381,383 Conotruncal lesions and right aortic arch have been found to be associated with 22q11 deletion. In 1 fetal series, 15% to 50% of fetuses diagnosed with TOF had a 22q11 deletion.384 Similar findings are true of truncus arteriosus,385 TOF with absent pulmonary valve,386 and TOF with pulmonary atresia387 at 32%, 26%, and 25%, respectively. An isolated right aortic arch was found in 10% of fetuses with 22q11 deletion. If there were additional cardiac findings, the incidence of 22q11 deletion rose to 21%388 (Table 11). A diagnosis of cardiac tumor (single or multiple) in the midgestation or late-gestation fetus should also prompt genetic testing and evaluation because >60% of fetuses will have tuberous sclerosis.171,172
Conversely, certain cardiac defects are rarely associated with aneuploidy; these include heterotaxy syndrome,194 d-TGA,381,389 congenitally corrected TGA,382,390 and pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA/IVS).381,389 Parents of fetuses with these diagnoses should still be offered genetic testing in association with genetic counseling but with the expectation that for most the testing will provide negative results that will reassure but may not necessarily contribute to prognosis for the current pregnancy. As greater experience develops with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization testing, many of these lesions will have genetic markers identified.391
Genetic Testing of Fetuses With CHD
Given that fetuses with “isolated” CHD diagnosed by ultrasound carry at least a 15% to 30% risk of chromosomal abnormality,357 genetic testing and counseling should be recommended for all fetuses with a diagnosis of cardiac malformation regardless of whether other anomalies are present. Detection of a chromosomal or genetic abnormality in a fetus with CHD serves several purposes. Identification of an abnormality may prompt further investigation for additional anomalies. Knowledge of a genetic cause for the cardiac defect will allow more specific and appropriate assessment of recurrence risk for the parents of the fetus and for the child as he or she reaches reproductive age. In some cases, genetic testing of the parents may be indicated either as a surrogate for testing the fetus (in single-gene, autosomal-dominant syndromes such as DiGeorge, Holt-Oram, Williams, and Alagille) or as adjunctive testing in assessment of recurrence risk (in cases of suspected balanced translocation in 1 parent) or clinical significance of copy-number variants detected on microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization testing. Finally, decisions on terminating the pregnancy or carrying to term but not pursing aggressive postnatal management may be greatly influenced by knowledge of the genetic basis of disease, specifically in cases of aneuploidy or microdeletions associated with poor functional or neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Infants with CHD may have additional extracardiac anomalies in up to 20% of cases.1 In fetuses, this percentage is higher, with as high as 50% to 70% reported.139,194,357,361 Ventricular septal defects and tricuspid atresia are often associated with other anomalies, whereas other CHD lesions such as d-TGA and PA/IVS are more often isolated. All organ systems can be affected. The frequent association of fetal cardiac anomalies with other extracardiac anomalies drives the need for any fetus identified as having CHD to have a thorough detailed ultrasound examination of all other fetal anatomy.68,95,194 Other imaging modalities, including MRI, have also been used in this population. Even with vigilance and high index of suspicion, a significant number of extracardiac anomalies may go undetected or may be undetectable until later in gestation (as may be the case with some gastrointestinal anomalies); therefore, a low threshold for repeat anatomic assessment later in gestation after an initially normal extracardiac evaluation may be appropriate in some instances.194
The evaluation for extracardiac anomalies in fetuses with CHD may help guide pregnancy and postnatal management decisions. Whether the result of a specific association or coincidence, the presence of an extracardiac anomaly in a fetus with CHD may have a profound impact on neonatal care. Major abnormalities associated with CHD, including but not limited to congenital diaphragmatic hernia, renal anomalies, omphalocele, intestinal atresia, transesophageal fistula, or central nervous system abnormalities, may affect parental decisions to proceed with the pregnancy or affect the plan for postnatal care. A thorough evaluation of the remainder of fetal anatomy is thus crucial to the prenatal evaluation of any fetus with a heart anomaly.
The components of a detailed fetal anatomy survey may vary with the clinical situation392 and go beyond those of standard obstetric scanning. The Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine has issued recommendations on the detailed fetal survey,393 which, according to the statement, should be performed and interpreted by an operator with expertise, and it is expected that performance of these scans will be rare outside referral practices with special expertise in the identification of and counseling for fetal abnormalities. A detailed fetal anatomy survey is recommended in all fetuses diagnosed with CHD.
Developmental structural brain abnormalities can be diagnosed in the fetus with MRI394; however the role of MRI in anomaly screening of the fetus with identified CHD in the presence of a normal ultrasound examination has not been established. If an abnormality is suspected on ultrasound, the yield for fetal brain MRI is high,394 and it should be considered, although expertise is limited to tertiary centers at present, and the incremental benefit has not been studied. The use of MRI to assess fetal brain maturation and acquired abnormalities in the presence of CHD has also been studied,395 but at present, it is considered a research tool. MRI determination of fetal lung volumes has been shown to correlate with prenatal and postnatal lung volume396 and outcome in patients with lung hypoplasia in the setting of congenital diaphragmatic hernia,397 and it has been used to assess fetal lung volumes in patients with CHD who are at risk for pulmonary hypoplasia.398 If lung hypoplasia is suspected, MRI may be considered, although experience concerning its usefulness outside the setting of congenital diaphragmatic hernia is very limited.
Fetal Wellness Assessment
The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology has issued a practice bulletin on fetal surveillance that suggests that certain antepartum testing may be appropriate in high-risk pregnancies in which there is an increased risk of fetal demise.399 Antenatal testing may identify fetal compromise and thus afford the opportunity to intervene. Some cardiac structural anomalies, functional disorders, or arrhythmias have the potential to compromise fetal cardiac output and tissue oxygen delivery. Antepartum testing may be considered in these selected cases to minimize the risk of stillbirth and related morbidities. It is important to recognize that none of these recommendations have been tested specifically in the fetus with isolated CHD, that benefits remain theoretical, and that the nature of testing and inherent false-positive results may expose the fetus and mother to unnecessary risks, including cesarean section and iatrogenic preterm delivery.
Fetal Movement Assessment by Mother (“Kick Counts”)
Although methods may vary somewhat, the general premise of maternal fetal movement assessments relies on daily counting of perceived fetal movement events over a prespecified time period. Theoretically, decreased fetal movement will correlate with deteriorating fetal condition. Although widely practiced, there has only been 1 randomized, controlled trial of fetal movement assessment in a large population-based group of >68 000 pregnant women. This study showed no benefit, with an antepartum fetal death rate of 2.9 in 1000 in the intervention group versus 2.7 in 1000 in the control group.400,401 Unfortunately, there are no such trials in high-risk pregnancies with fetal anomalies such as CHD or cardiac conditions that might put the fetus at risk as a result of hemodynamically unfavorable circumstances such as severe AV or semilunar valve regurgitation or arrhythmias. In populations with structural, functional, or rhythm-related CHD that put the fetus at risk for developing acidosis, it may be reasonable to encourage daily maternal movement assessments beginning at 26 to 28 weeks of gestation when movement can be reliably felt; however, the usefulness is not well established.
Cardiotocography and Nonstress Testing
Cardiotocography is a widely used method of assessing fetal well-being in high-risk pregnancies. The technique uses an ultrasound transducer on the maternal abdomen for continuous recording of fetal heart rate and a second transducer on the uterine fundus for monitoring of uterine activity. Components of the fetal heart rate that are assessed include baseline rate, variability, accelerations, and decelerations. In this way, fetal heart rate variability and reaction to uterine contractions can be monitored noninvasively. Nonstress testing monitors at baseline, whereas contraction stress testing is performed while uterine contractions are being stimulated (usually with oxytocin or nipple stimulation). Normal fetal heart rate tracings have a high predictive value for fetal wellness, with a false-negative rate of <1%402; however, the positive predictive value for an abnormal test is fairly low.401,402 Cardiotocography and nonstress testing are unlikely to be useful in fetuses with arrhythmias, particularly bradycardia and CHB, but may be considered as an adjunct to other monitoring in high-risk pregnancies with at-risk structural, functional, or rhythm-related fetal heart disease beginning in the third trimester and continuing periodically until delivery, although their usefulness has not been established.
Ultrasound-determined biophysical profile (BPP) includes visualization of gross fetal movements, fetal tone, and fetal breathing and ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid volume. Assessment of the fetal heart rate by cardiotocography also may be incorporated in BPP. The BPP is performed in an effort to identify fetuses who may be at risk of poor pregnancy outcome. A score is generated with a maximum (best) score of 8 or 10 (depending on whether fetal heart rate is included in the score), with 2 points for each variable noted within a 30-minute time period. When abnormal (≤6 of 10), the fetal BPP score is a measure of the probability of tissue hypoxia and the likely degree of central acidemia, and it has been correlated with fetal venous blood pH.403 A Cochrane review of randomized studies comparing BPP with conventional monitoring in high-risk pregnancies404 found no evidence of survival benefit or improvement in Apgar scores in the BPP group (n=2974). There are no randomized trials of BPP use in fetuses with CHD. In those fetuses with CHD at risk for hypoxemia and acidosis, it may be reasonable to institute BPP testing in the third trimester in combination with nonstress testing in fetuses for whom delivery might afford the opportunity to alter hemodynamics and to improve cardiac output and tissue oxygen delivery. This theoretical framework may apply to those with severe right-sided valve regurgitation (where reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance postnatally could be beneficial) or tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias refractory to transplacental therapy. Widespread recommendation for testing in these populations should be withheld until the efficacy in improving outcomes has been tested because it is likely to result in early delivery of these infants, which may introduce additional comorbidities.
Prenatal Counseling and Parental Stress
Once an accurate diagnosis of prenatal CHD is made, the condition and its implications must be conveyed to the family405 with prenatal counseling. The aims of prenatal counseling are 4-fold: providing an accurate diagnosis of the malformation, providing a clear and truthful picture of the prognosis, outlining management and treatment options that are available, and helping parents reach decisions concerning the form of management that is best for them.405
Once the findings and the ramifications of fetal CHD are conveyed, the care team, which may include social workers, genetic counselors, and nurse practitioners, should be available to provide support. This relates to the acknowledgment of and emotional support for parents who may wish to discontinue the pregnancy or to the sustained education and guidance of families during the time period between initial prenatal diagnosis and the point in which treatment takes place after birth.
Little research has been undertaken in determining the most effective techniques for performing prenatal counseling for CHD or the most effective strategies for providing family support. Nevertheless, a sensible, rational approach to prenatal counseling and support is possible and should be undertaken after a diagnosis of fetal CHD.405
Prenatal counseling is an integral part of the diagnostic encounter and has an impact on overall outcome.406 Counseling should be offered in temporal sequence shortly after the fetal echocardiogram, ideally on the same day. It should offer information on the nature of the specific diagnosis, with the practitioner providing an honest and truthful account of the findings. Limitations of the findings should also be discussed, including that maternal body habitus, fetal position, or early gestational age may limit the extent and accuracy of the diagnosis. Counseling should offer information on the natural history in utero, the potential for a change in or progression of disease, and prognosis for the remainder of the pregnancy. Parents should be made aware of the possible associations of CHD with specific genetic, chromosomal, or syndromic anomalies and their possible implications for management and outcome. Counseling should help alleviate parental guilt that is commonly associated with the prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformations.
Expectant parents should be informed about the possible range of treatment and management strategies in utero and after birth. Families are hoping for a normal lifespan for their child. It is important that they understand the limitations of our knowledge in this respect and the challenge in fully predicting lifelong morbidity and impact on life span for many forms of CHD.407 Counseling should include information on the long-term postnatal prognosis and should be based on the most accurate and contemporary data. Such data are continually evolving as the number of survivors of CHD into adulthood increases. The counselor should be familiar with the latest outcomes data for the prenatal cardiovascular condition or should be able to refer the parents to other specialists or resources where such data are available. Known specific challenges that survivors face or unknowns for the future should be discussed, albeit with the caveat that new solutions for current challenges may yet be discovered as the field moves forward.
The most effective techniques and styles of counseling for prenatal CHD vary, depending on the clinical condition or family situation and dynamics. Specific counseling techniques for situations when prenatal CHD is detected have not been scientifically studied. Investigational efforts in defining proper end points for good-quality counseling and in understanding the variables that influence effective counseling would be helpful in identifying the best techniques.
Despite the absence of rigorous investigational work, there are a number of basic principles of prenatal counseling for CHD.408–410 Counselors must have good communicative skills and human empathy. Skills in the assessment of body language and emotional perception are important. The level of parental understanding must be judged on a continuous basis during the counseling session and adjusted accordingly. The shock and immediate grief of receiving news of the diagnosis may limit the ability of the parents to absorb all of the information being conveyed at the initial visit. Counselors should continuously judge the progress of the counseling session and try to avoid information overload. Multiple sessions may be necessary to complete adequate counseling, particularly if the mother is present alone at the initial encounter. Serial, sustained counseling should be available to parents for the duration of the pregnancy and should be offered during follow-up fetal echocardiograms or at separate encounters.
The initial counseling encounter includes an explanation of complex medical information under conditions of parental duress. As an aid for the counselor, a preset algorithm of what to say and the order in which information is given can be helpful. Such an algorithm will allow certainty in making sure all topics for discussion are covered. Printed diagrams, hand drawings, models, videos, and other media materials may be helpful in effectively conveying the diagnosis to parents. Counselors should advise about the utility of the Internet and online Web sites for information but should warn families about misleading data. One should be prepared to answer questions about conflicting information that may be found in various sources to dispel parental confusion. As innovative and experimental diagnostic or therapeutic techniques evolve, counseling may include information on new techniques and treatment options for fetal cardiovascular care that are available only at specific centers such as regional specialized centers of fetal care.
During the counseling session, the option of termination of pregnancy should be discussed. Information on the time constraints for termination based on individual state or regional legal limits should be conveyed. Timely identification of genetic/chromosomal abnormalities may strongly influence decisions concerning termination of pregnancy.411 Amniocentesis and additional imaging (eg, high-level obstetric ultrasound, fetal MRI) can contribute to a more complete characterization of the fetus and may be offered to the family. Such testing may aid in making decisions about the continuation of the pregnancy or in planning for specific needs at birth for care beyond the heart.412,413
Decision making about pregnancy termination or about nonintervention and palliative care at birth for severe anomalies is a complex and personal process.414 Parents come to their decisions with various degrees of ease or deliberation, which influences what they seek from the healthcare professional in terms of information, opinions, and support.415 In a large meta-analysis of studies looking at parental decision making for child health care, influential factors included information, others with whom to talk including concerns about pressure from others, and a feeling of a sense of control over the process.416 Regardless of a choice made, counselors and care providers should provide support for the decision parents make. Counselors should refrain from imposing personal bias into the discussion and should strive for the goal of providing families with all of the tools and support necessary to come to a decision that is best suited for them.417
Maternal and Paternal Effects
The experience of prenatal testing for possible congenital anomalies is extremely stressful. Referral for fetal echocardiogram is associated with increased maternal anxiety.418 Detection of CHD further increases maternal anxiety and creates unhappiness during pregnancy.419 Difficulty in coping, psychological dysfunction, and distress are increased in parents given a prenatal diagnosis of CHD compared with a postnatal diagnosis, and such differences may persist even months after birth.420–422 Identification of potential modifiable variables of maternal stress during pregnancy in which there is prenatal diagnosis of CHD may alter the burden of stress and is worthy of investigation. In a study of mothers given a prenatal diagnosis of CHD, psychometric testing was performed at an average of 27 weeks’ gestation; depression was seen in 22%, state anxiety in 31%, and traumatic stress in 39%. Partner/marital satisfaction was associated with less maternal stress, and use of the coping mechanism of denial was associated with more maternal stress, anxiety, and depression.423
Elevated maternal psychological stress during pregnancy can negatively affect fetal and child outcomes. Alterations in somatic growth, neurocognitive development, and cardiovascular health have been reported to be associated with maternal stress during pregnancy.424–427 Offspring outcomes may be influenced by elevations in maternal cortisol caused by stress during pregnancy.428,429 Potential physiological influences on the developing fetus such as alterations in maternal uterine artery flow and fetal hemodynamics may be the cause430–432 and is worthy of exploration.
Fetal Therapy for Cardiovascular Conditions Before Birth
Fetal therapy, the process of offering treatment to the human fetus before birth, is now possible and practical in a number of conditions. In addition to improved accuracy in diagnostic capacities, managing and treating the fetus as a patient are now possible. Current fetal therapeutic strategies range from maternal administration of medication with transplacental transfer to the fetus to ultrasound or minimally invasive fetoscopic-guided techniques to invasive open uterine fetal surgery. Despite dramatic innovations, the field of fetal therapy is still young. Few randomized, controlled studies have been performed, none of which pertain to fetal cardiac therapy. Much of the hesitation with regard to fetal therapy is because of the risk to the mother and the substantial resources and interdisciplinary personnel necessary to safely and effectively perform such care. Deciding on fetal therapy for otherwise modifiable or lethal disorders must always be weighed against the risks to the mother and against the potential for successful treatment of the condition after birth.
Fetal Arrhythmia Management
The cause and mechanism of fetal bradycardia determine treatment strategy in utero. Table 12 provides a summary of bradycardias, including COR and LOE for treatment. The treatment of fetal bradycardia involves close observation for signs of fetal compromise or distress. Decisions on early delivery and the complications of prematurity must be weighed against therapies available, their effectiveness, and the risk to both mother and fetus. If bradycardia persists postnally, it should be evaluated.
Sinus or Low Atrial Bradycardia
Basic mechanisms include congenital displacement of atrial activation, acquired damage to the sinoatrial node, ion channel dysfunction, and secondary suppression of sinus node rate. Both left and right atrial isomerism can result in bradycardia as a result of low atrial rhythm or dual sinoatrial nodes. In these conditions, fetal heart rates range between 90 and 130 bpm. In patients with Sjögren’s syndrome antibodies (SSA or SSA/SSB) or viral myocarditis, inflammation and fibrosis of the sinus node have been observed. Maternal treatment with β-blockers, sedatives, or other medications has been noted to suppress the sinus node rate. No fetal treatment is recommended for sinus or low atrial bradycardia.
LQTS and Other Ion Channelopathies
Asymptomatic, persistent fetal bradycardia (heart rate below the third percentile)433 is one of the most consistent presentations of congenital LQTS.434,435 For assessment, it is critical to link fetal heart rate to gestational age–based normative values to adequately recognize these life-threatening conditions during the fetal period.435 Management of the fetus with suspected LQTS includes close observation, postnatal evaluation, and measurement of the QTc by fMCG or fetal electrocardiography if available.436 Fetal treatment is not recommended for bradycardia; however, torsades de pointes and ventricular tachycardia (VT) require treatment if they occur (Tables 13 and14).435 Maternal electrolyte abnormalities, especially hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia, should be avoided, as well as drugs and anesthetic agents that lengthen the QT interval. A frequently updated list of these drugs can be found on several Web sites, most notably www.torsades.org.
Atrial Bigeminy With Block
Blocked atrial bigeminy produces fetal heart rates between 75 and 90 bpm when conduction is in a 2:1 AV pattern.437 This condition can be mistaken for second-degree AV block. The management of atrial bigeminy is the same as for isolated premature atrial contractions. No treatment is required, although the occurrence of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) has been documented in ≈10%. A baseline fetal echocardiogram to assess cardiac structure and weekly fetal heart rate auscultation by the obstetrician or maternal fetal specialist until resolution of the arrhythmia occurs is recommended.
Three types of fetal CHB have been described. A congenitally malformed conduction system associated with complex structural cardiac defects is seen in ≈50% to 55% of fetuses presenting with CHB. Isoimmune CHB associated with maternal Sjögren antibodies (SSA/SSB) represents ≈40%. A third group has an undetermined origin. Treatment of CHB depends on the origin, the ventricular rate, and the presence and degree of heart failure. Regardless of the origin (immune mediated or structural CHB), the use of β-sympathomimetics (terbutaline, salbutamol, isoprenaline) to augment fetal ventricular rates when <55 bpm has been reported.353 β-Sympathomimetics are reasonable to use in fetuses with heart rates <55 bpm or in fetuses with higher heart rates if there is underlying severe CHD or symptoms of fetal heart failure or hydrops. Terbutaline appears to be well tolerated, although maternal resting heart rates of 100 to 120 bpm and benign ectopy are commonly encountered.353 Unfortunately, although terbutaline may increase fetal rates and prolong pregnancy, no studies have shown survival benefit. Although there is merit to the notion, because of significant technical limitations, fetal pacing has not been shown to be successful in improving survival or prolonging gestation436 and therefore at present is experimental and not recommended as part of usual care.
Unlike CHB resulting from congenital malformation of the conduction system, immune-mediated block may benefit from in utero treatment with fluorinated steroids, intravenous infusion of γ-globulin (IVIG), or both.438–441 Reported benefits of dexamethasone (4–8 mg/d) include reduction of inflammation,438 reversal or stabilization of incomplete block, and improvement or resolution of hydrops or endocardial fibroelastosis.438–443 Important complications of dexamethasone that have been reported include growth restriction, oligohydramios, ductal constriction (conveyed also by the collagen vascular disease itself), maternal DM, and central nervous system side effect.441,444,445 Despite these potential complications, a trial of dexamethasone for second-degree AV block or first-degree AV block if there are additional cardiac findings of inflammation (echogenicity, valve regurgitation, cardiac dysfunction, effusion, etc) may be considered to prevent progression to CHB, although its usefulness is not well established. Dexamethasone treatment of fetuses with established CHB and no heart failure may also be considered with the goal of improving survival or reducing the incidence of dilated cardiomyopathy, although its usefulness has not been established given that studies to date have been retrospective and nonrandomized and have had incomplete follow-up.444,446 Given the significant risks and limited data on benefit, extensive maternal counseling should be undertaken before the initiation of dexamethasone, and the drug should be discontinued if significant maternal or fetal side effects develop. Prospective, randomized trials or a registry is necessary to establish definitive treatment recommendations for the fetus with CHB. IVIG, usually administered with dexamethasone, may be considered given that it improved survival when endocardial fibroelastosis or systolic dysfunction was present in 1 retrospective multicenter study.439 The most optimal timing of administration and intervals of repeat dosing remain unknown. IVIG prophylaxis in early pregnancy is not recommended.443 Risks of IVIG treatment are mainly exposure to blood products and allergic reactions.
Other Conditions Associated With CHB
Idiopathic CHB has a better prognosis than other forms of CHB and can be managed without fetal treatment. Channelopathies such as NKX2.5, Herg (LQT2), SCN5A mutations (LQT3, Brugada syndrome), and LQT8 can manifest as AV block. Diagnosis of these syndromes can be confirmed by genetic testing after birth.
Fetal tachycardia constitutes a rare but important cause of intrauterine fetal nonimmune hydrops, premature delivery, and perinatal morbidity and mortality. In utero therapy for treatment of fetal tachycardia depends on its cause. In general, the goal of treatment is not conversion to 100% sinus rhythm but rather establishment of sufficient sinus rhythm to allow resolution of hydrops or ventricular dysfunction. The management of fetal tachycardia depends on gestational age at presentation, the presence and degree of fetal compromise, hydrops or other risk factors, maternal condition, and potential maternal risk from both fetal therapy and early delivery. In these instances, decisions about early delivery and the complications from prematurity must be weighed against the therapies available, their effectiveness, and the risks to both mother and fetus. For sustained tachycardias, noted for the majority of the time of evaluation (more than ≈50%), decisions about treatment depend on fetal and maternal risk analysis with little data to support the specific treatment protocol that is likely to be most effective and to carry the lowest risk. In contrast, the treatment of intermittent tachycardia (noted less than ≈50% of the time) is likely to include close observation if the risk of treatment outweighs the benefit. Pharmacological treatment is recommended for all but the near-term fetus with sustained tachycardia with or without hydrops or for intermittent tachycardia in the presence of cardiac dysfunction or hydrops. In general, for fetuses near term, delivery is recommended. Table 13 provides a summary of tachycardias, including the COR and LOE for treatment. Medications used in transplacental (given orally or intravenously to the mother) and direct fetal treatment of tachycardias, including suggested dosing, are listed in Table 14.
The majority of intermittent tachycardias remain intermittent during fetal life with no signs of cardiac compromise. These fetuses do not need treatment447; however, close follow-up is necessary in the rare event that tachycardia becomes sustained. The exception is VT with rates >200 bpm, for which treatment is reasonable because of the risk of rapid progression to hydrops. After birth, intermittent tachycardia may require treatment; thus, empiric observation for 48 to 72 hours is recommended.
Sustained SVT, which usually occurs at rates ≥220 bpm, includes reentrant SVT, atrial flutter, and rare tachyarrhythmias. Fetal treatment is recommended if delivery does not offer lower risk; however, the choice of first- and second-line antiarrhythmic therapy and criteria for decisions about management after initial treatment failure are controversial. The use of combination therapies presents greater risk of maternal/fetal complications than monotherapy. For reentrant SVT, in many centers, digoxin, administered maternally either orally or intravenously, is used as first-line therapy because of its relatively safe profile, its long history of use during pregnancy, and the familiarity with its use. In some centers, flecainide or sotalol is used as primary therapy.448–450 These agents are all reasonable as first-line agents, although there is no study to support which is the best initial therapy. Digoxin, flecainide,449,451,452 sotalol,449 and amiodarone453 have been used as second-line therapy. Amiodarone has a more significant toxicity profile for the expectant mother and fetus454 than other drugs and should be reserved as third-line treatment of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias. The duration of therapy with amiodarone should be minimized with discontinuation after hydrops resolves. Verapamil and procainamide are no longer used to treat fetal tachyarrhythmias.
Because transplacental transfer of drugs is significantly reduced with hydrops, direct fetal treatment concomitantly with transplacental therapy has been used to restore sinus rhythm more rapidly.447,455 This approach may be reasonable to consider in the severely hydropic fetus, especially if the modified BPP is abnormal. Direct treatment can be intramuscular to the fetal buttock or thigh, or intracordal. Intramuscular digoxin has restored sinus rhythm successfully and safely in the hydropic fetus. Intracordal antiarrhythmic therapy has been successful in converting tachyarrhythmias; however, caution should be exercised given that there are reports of fetal deaths with the use of this strategy.456 Intracordal treatment with adenosine has not been effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in fetal SVT and therefore is not recommended. After delivery, medical treatment must be reassessed relative to the antiarrhythmic drug used in utero, the length of time since the last recurrence, and the mechanism of clinical tachycardia. As many as 50% of reentrant SVT cases have no postnatal tachycardia recurrence.457
Atrial flutter accounts for ≈30% of fetal tachyarrhythmias329 and can be seen with myocarditis, CHD, and SSA/SSB isoimmunization. Accessory AV pathways and reentrant SVT are a common association.457 Sotalol is recommended given that it has been effective in converting 50% to 80% of fetuses with atrial flutter without mortality.450 Digoxin is also recommended, and amiodarone may be considered.453 Procainamide is contraindicated. After delivery, transesophageal pacing or synchronized cardioversion is recommended to restore sinus rhythm. It is important to be prepared with backup external pacing after conversion because sinus node suppression may occur, although rarely, from in utero drug therapy. After delivery, medical treatment must be reassessed given that the arrhythmia may not recur.
Chaotic or multifocal atrial tachycardia is rare and usually is seen during the last few weeks of pregnancy. It can be associated with Costello syndrome.458 Atrial ectopic tachycardia causes persistent variable atrial rates of 180 to 220 bpm with 1:1 conduction pattern, similar to persistent junctional reciprocating tachycardia, which also varies in rate. These tachycardias are difficult to treat and most often occur in the late second or third trimester. If the average heart rate is >200 bpm (or >160–200 bpm with associated cardiac dysfunction), treatment is recommended. Junctional ectopic tachycardia is commonly associated with SSA isoimmunization in the fetus and has been noted in both the presence and absence of AV block.330,459 Rare familial pedigrees with this life-threatening arrhythmia have been observed.460 Digoxin is suggested as first-line solo therapy for multifocal atrial tachycardia and atrial ectopic tachycardia without hydrops or ventricular dysfunction, although sotalol or flecainide may be considered. Flecainide or sotalol is recommended as the initial treatment for persistent junctional reciprocating tachycardia or rapid atrial ectopic tachycardia. Treatment for junctional ectopic tachycardia is similar, although amiodarone has been used. Dexamethasone may be considered in the treatment of junctional ectopic tachycardia if it occurs with maternal SSA/SSB antibodies. After delivery, medical treatment is usually continued.
Tachycardia caused by positive anti-thyroid antibodies can be mistaken for atrial ectopic tachycardia or persistent junctional reciprocating tachycardia; however, ventricular dysfunction is uncommon.329 Sinus tachycardia at rates of 180 to 190 bpm can be associated with infection, anemia, drug/medication use, trauma, or hyperthyroidism in the mother. Treatment of the underlying cause is recommended.
VT has been observed in association with AV block, cardiac tumors, acute myocarditis, and hereditary ion channelopathies. When tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias coexist, LQTS is likely.348 Rapid torsades de pointes and monomorphic VT with significant ventricular dysfunction, AV valve regurgitation, and hydrops have been reported in LQTS.329 A prolonged QTc interval by fMCG can confirm the diagnosis and affect antiarrhythmic selection in this setting. If the tachycardia is related to isoimmunization or to myocarditis, dexamethasone and IVIG have been used.325,330 Maternal intravenous magnesium is recommended as first-line treatment for fetal VT at rates >200 bpm, but its use should be limited to <48 hours duration.348,434,461 Redosing may be considered in cases of recurrent VT as long as maternal magnesium levels are <6 mEq/L462 and there are no signs of maternal toxicity. In addition to short-duration magnesium, treatment for VT includes intravenous lidocaine, particularly with associated hydrops, or oral propranolol or mexiletine. If LQTS can be excluded, sotalol, amiodarone, and flecainide have been given, resulting in successful termination of VT.348,434 Given that there are no data to support which agent is most effective, all can be considered. Of note, however, is that in the presence of suspected or confirmed LQTS or torsades de pointes, drugs with QT-prolonging potential such as flecainide, sotalol, and amiodarone are contraindicated. After delivery, medical treatment of VT should be continued.
Accelerated ventricular rhythms are slightly faster than the sinus rate, and are a more benign form of VT. They are usually seen late in gestation and generally do not require treatment prenatally or postnatally.
Fetal ectopy occurs in 1% to 3% of all pregnancies and in general is a relatively benign condition. Because premature atrial contractions may be difficult to distinguish from premature ventricular contractions and other types of more significant arrhythmias (LQTS, second degree AV block), fetuses who present with frequent ectopic beats (bigeminy, trigeminy, or more than every 3–5 beats on average) should have a baseline fetal echocardiogram to assess cardiac structure and to determine the mechanism of the arrhythmia. In fetuses with less frequent extrasystoles, if there is any question as to the mechanism or if the ectopic beats persist beyond 1 to 2 weeks, a fetal echocardiogram is probably indicated and reasonable to perform. Atrial ectopy is 10-fold more common than ventricular ectopy. Risk of fetal tachycardia is about 0.5% to 1%, although couplets and blocked atrial bigeminy may increase this risk. Medical treatment is not recommended for either premature atrial contractions or blocked atrial bigeminy; however, interval auscultation of the fetal heart rate by the obstetrician weekly is recommended for premature ventricular contractions or frequent premature atrial contractions until resolution of the arrhythmia is documented. Table 15 provides a summary, including COR and LOE for treatment.
With most antiarrhythmic drugs, relatively high doses must be used during the second and third trimesters because both maternal circulating blood volume and renal clearance are increased. Maternal transplacental treatment initiated in the hospital is the mainstay of therapy, and in most cases, oral administration of antiarrhythmic agents is recommended. Exceptions include intravenous digoxin loading (in which conversion using the oral route is often delayed), short-term intravenous magnesium, and lidocaine. Direct treatment of the fetus by intracordal or intramuscular injections may have a role in more rapidly restoring sinus rhythm in the hydropic fetus, but experience with these routes is limited, and mortality for the intracordal route has been higher than with other routes. In most cases, therapy is continued until delivery. Limited information exists on the maternal-fetal transfer of antiarrhythmic agents in humans. Most drugs, with the exception of sotalol and flecainide, have diminished transplacental transfer with fetal hydrops.464 These 2 drugs concentrate in the amniotic fluid in greater concentrations than in the fetus.464 Neonatal conduction abnormalities have been reported with flecainide.
Serious maternal adverse effects are rare in most reported series and have in general resolved with discontinuation of therapy.250 Close assessment of calcium, magnesium, electrolytes, and vitamin D for the duration of treatment is recommended to reduce the possibility of proarrhythmia in the mother and the fetus. A history of LQTS or drug-induced torsades de pointes in the patient or close family member should be elicited before treatment with QT-prolonging drugs, and close monitoring for maternal QTc lengthening >500 milliseconds is important. Frequent monitoring of drug levels and maternal electrocardiogram is recommended to assess drug effect and toxicity, especially with dose escalation. There are no randomized, multicenter, clinical trials for the use of antiarrhythmic agents in fetal tachyarrhythmias; therefore, treatment protocols remain center specific.
Medical Therapy for Fetal Congestive Heart Failure
The treatment of fetal heart failure with transplacental digoxin may be considered, although its usefulness is not well established. In a study of fetuses with heart failure, heart function improved as measured by the CVP score in a small group of fetuses treated with digoxin.465,466 A dose of 0.25 mg orally twice a day was used with no maternal complications.
Fetal Cardiac Catheter Intervention
Cardiac lesions that are amenable to fetal intervention are distinctive in that they can progress rapidly from mild to severe during gestation such that there is significant irreversible myocardial damage and chamber, valve, or vessel hypoplasia at the time of birth. In this unique group of defects, there is commonly a time-limited window of opportunity to intervene when deleterious effects on cardiac growth and function are deemed to be potentially reversible. The objective of fetal cardiac intervention is to alter the natural history of an anomaly so that it either is lifesaving to the fetus or results in an improved state at birth that leads to reduction in short- or long-term morbidity or mortality (Table 16).
In the development of fetal cardiac intervention, a number of principles have been recognized. Procedural technical success does not always translate into clinical success after birth. Understanding the natural history of the malformation and the continual ability to refine patient selection are critical. When faced with novel, potentially risky prenatal therapies, it is important to note that most forms of CHD are not lethal and that standard postnatal palliative therapy is still an option in most situations. However, for some anomalies in which an alteration in prenatal natural history for the better is possible and for those with extremely poor outcome, fetal cardiac intervention may be the best course of action and is a reasonable therapeutic option.
Cardiac Lesions Amenable to Fetal Intervention
AS With Evolving HLHS
HLHS is a form of CHD in which the left heart structures are unable, by virtue of inadequate size, function, or a combination of both, to support the systemic circulation after birth. Several developmental pathways can result in HLHS, most of which are not amenable to fetal cardiac intervention. The lesion that has been the main focus of fetal cardiac intervention over the past 2 decades is severe AS in early gestation and midgestation, which has been shown to evolve into HLHS at birth.165,236,467–474 AS in the fetus is rarely isolated. The papillary muscles, mitral valve, and endomyocardium are affected to various degrees, raising the question of whether this is a more diffuse developmental defect or secondary as a result of the valvar abnormality. Unlike many other forms of univentricular CHD, which are embryological malformations from the earliest point in development, it is hypothesized that AS with evolving HLHS starts out with the cardiac chambers normally formed and most often with normal function in the first and even second trimesters.475,476 As the stenosis becomes more severe, progressive LV dysfunction develops, and flow reversal at the foramen ovale and aortic arch eventually occurs such that blood is diverted away from the left heart. This, along with myocardial and valvar damage and hypoplasia, results in HLHS at birth. The goals of fetal intervention with in utero balloon dilation of the aortic valve are to improve left ventricular function, to improve flow through the left heart, to reverse the ongoing damage to the left heart structures, and consequently to promote left heart growth and the prevention of progression to HLHS.
Timely fetal intervention preventing the evolution of AS to HLHS in utero has been reported.236 Of 70 fetuses who had in utero aortic balloon valvuloplasty, the procedure was technically successful in 52 (74%). More than 30% of those delivered who underwent a technically successful fetal cardiac intervention had a biventricular circulation from birth, and another 8% were converted to a biventricular circulation after initial univentricular palliation.
Because fetal AS with evolving HLHS is relatively uncommon and probably more often than not goes undetected prenatally, clinical experience with fetal intervention for this lesion is limited. Despite the relatively small numbers, insight into the natural and unnatural histories of this lesion has been gained that has enabled more accurate selection of patients who might attain benefit from this intervention. Selection guidelines have been described and are reasonable to use for assistance in determining which fetuses are likely to benefit. First, the anatomy must be favorable in that there is AS and not atresia with evidence for antegrade flow across the aortic valve on Doppler assessment of the valve. In addition, there should be no or minimal subvalvar left ventricular outflow obstruction. Second, there should be strong evidence for the process of evolving HLHS based on the presence of depressed left ventricular function and flow abnormalities determined by fetal echocardiogram. Flow abnormalities include either retrograde or bidirectional flow in the transverse aortic arch or at least 2 of the following: monophasic inflow across the mitral valve, left-to-right flow across the atrial septum, or bidirectional flow across the pulmonary veins. Factors predicting a favorable outcome for 2-ventricle repair include a left ventricular long-axis z score >−2, the left ventricle being able to generate a pressure of at least 10 mm Hg across the aortic valve or a 15-mm Hg mitral regurgitant jet, and a mitral valve diameter z score of >−3. In essence, the larger the left ventricle and mitral valve are and the greater the ability is for the left ventricle to generate reasonable pressure, the greater the likelihood is of a successful ultimate biventricular circulation.236 Given the morbidity and mortality associated with palliative surgery for HLHS, aortic valve dilation may be considered in fetuses with AS in whom the selection criteria are met. Before the procedure, extensive family counseling should detail the risks of the procedure to mother and fetus and lay out the expected clinical course for those who undergo intervention to those who choose more standard management.
Essential in the treatment of evolving HLHS is postnatal management of the infant. The neonatal and ongoing management of these patients requires insight and experience with the natural and unnatural histories of the borderline left heart. A key element of achieving a biventricular circulation in these patients is the postnatal decision making, including the use of specialized interventional catheterization procedures and surgery. Fetal intervention alone is unlikely to be adequate therapy to achieve a biventricular circulation in all candidates; therefore, delivery and management at a specialized congenital heart center are recommended.
Although it is important to appreciate the potential benefits and promise of fetal cardiac catheter intervention for critical AS evolving into HLHS by possibly creating a postnatal 2-ventricle system, the long-term benefits and outcomes of this procedure are unknown. Although outcomes for HLHS after the Fontan operation and the limitations of this strategy are relatively clear, the fetus undergoing a cardiac catheter intervention for AS may be at future risk for multiple operations, valve replacements, ventricular dysfunction, and possibly pulmonary hypertension within the context of a borderline-size small left ventricle. Families should be counseled about these concerns and about the lack of data on long-term outcomes. Comparative analysis of these alternative strategies through careful investigational efforts is warranted.
HLHS With Restrictive or Intact Atrial Septum
HLHS with highly restrictive or intact atrial septum is among the most challenging CHDs with the constellation of defects having an extremely high mortality and substantial morbidity even after neonatal survival.477 The fetus with this condition is stable in utero, although there is likely continuing damage to the pulmonary vasculature and lung parenchyma as a result of obstructed left atrial egress and impediment to pulmonary venous drainage.477,478 Typically, the newborn becomes critically ill immediately after birth when blood is unable to exit the left atrium and succumbs to a combination of hypoxia, acidosis, and pulmonary edema. If such a patient goes undiagnosed prenatally and is born outside a cardiac center, survival is unlikely. If diagnosed prenatally, a well-planned delivery with urgent transfer to the catheterization laboratory can be arranged for decompression of the left atrium by balloon dilation or stent dilation of the atrial septum; however, outcomes remain poor.479,480 Theoretically, some of the devastating effects on the lungs and vasculature may be reversible if an intervention can be performed at a critical point in gestation.
Because some level of restriction at the atrial septum is typical in HLHS, identifying those in whom a critical degree of atrial obstruction is present is essential in identifying candidates who will benefit from fetal intervention. Fetal Doppler assessment of pulmonary venous flow patterns can aid in gauging the degree of impediment to left atrial egress, with greater prominence of flow reversal during atrial contraction reflecting greater restriction.176,177,481 Assessment of pulmonary arterial impedance through Doppler imaging during maternal hyperoxygenation can test for pulmonary vasoreactivity in the fetus with HLHS. A diminished vasoreactive response to maternal hyperoxygenation suggests an abnormal pulmonary vasculature and indicates clinically important restriction at the foramen ovale.482 Either or both of these assessments are reasonable to obtain for determination if fetal intervention may be beneficial.
Several techniques used to open the atrial septum have been reported. The techniques that usually involve puncture and tearing with a balloon are complicated by the fact that the atrial septum is typically thick and not amenable to tearing. Questions concerning the most effective technique for opening the atrial septum in utero, including balloon atrial septoplasty versus stent placement, in addition to the optimal timing to perform the procedure to mitigate against the development of pulmonary vasculopathy, remain unanswered.483–486 However, given the significant mortality and morbidity of HLHS with a restrictive or intact atrial septum, fetal intervention may be reasonable to perform in this disease, not only to stabilize the patient in the immediate postnatal period but also to potentially prevent or reverse the damage to the lungs and vasculature.
Mitral Valve Dysplasia Syndrome With Mitral Regurgitation and AS
A unique form of left-sided heart disease has been described in which there is severe AS or atresia with a dilated left ventricle and severe mitral regurgitation.487,488 Incompetence of the mitral valve is typically attributable to a mitral valve arcade with combined stenosis and insufficiency. Severe mitral regurgitation leads to left atrial dilatation with a restrictive or intact atrial septum. Unlike the condition of AS with evolving HLHS in which the hypothesized primary anomaly is obstruction at the aortic valve, mitral incompetence with severe regurgitation is believed to be the primary hemodynamic abnormality in this condition. Mitral regurgitation results in a dilated left ventricle, a dilated left atrium, and secondary closure of the foramen ovale. Severe dilatation of left-sided structures may compress the right side, leading to hydrops, which, if present, is most often lethal. Fetal cardiac intervention may be considered to open the aortic valve and to promote forward flow487; however, aortic regurgitation after the procedure may complicate the physiology. Opening of the atrial septum with the goal of decompressing the left atrium and improving filling of the right side has also been proposed488 and may be considered. Left ventricular dysfunction and mitral valve disease may still prevent the use of the left ventricle for a biventricular repair, and a single-ventricle strategy may still be necessary after birth.
Pulmonary Atresia With Intact Ventricular Septum
Only a small subset of fetuses with PA/IVS should be considered candidates for fetal cardiac intervention. The goal is to prevent the need for single-ventricle palliation after birth. Intervention in this lesion is controversial because there are limited studies describing the natural history and fetal predictors of postnatal outcome.235,489,490 The threshold for right ventricular inadequacy and nonviability as a pulmonary ventricle is much higher than is the threshold for inadequacy of the left ventricle as a systemic ventricle. Even in very small right ventricles, as long as the tricuspid valve is of an appropriate size, continued rehabilitation of the right ventricle can take place through staged surgical palliation after birth, which can result in successful achievement of a biventricular repair. In addition to promoting right ventricle growth and avoiding a single-ventricle palliation, another possible indication for intervention in right-sided disease is in the group with PA/IVS, severe tricuspid regurgitation, and hydrops in whom impending fetal demise is anticipated.491 In such circumstances, prenatal intervention may be lifesaving to the fetus.
The technique for intervention in PA/IVS is more difficult than it is for the aortic valve given that the right ventricular cavity is commonly small, hypertrophied, and located behind the sternum.166 Defining the optimal candidates for prenatal opening of the pulmonary valve and developing effective techniques that are unique to the right side of the heart are continuing challenges. Fetal intervention may be considered in select cases; however, benefit is uncertain.
Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome
TTTS is a serious complication occurring in ≈10% to 20% of monochorionic twin gestations. Fetal mortality approaches 90% to 100% if left untreated. The presence of placental vascular anastomoses is a requisite for the development of TTTS. These placental vascular anastomoses may allow intertwin transfer of vasoactive mediators, with resultant polyhydramnios, hypervolemia, and hypertension in the “recipient” twin and oligohydramnios and hypovolemia in the “donor” twin.492–495 Multiple studies have documented elevated activity of renin,493,496,497 angiotensin,496 and endothelin-1498 in the recipient twin, which could offer a pathophysiological explanation for the observed findings in this syndrome.
In TTTS, cardiac changes in the recipient twin are well described.499–503 Ventricular systolic dysfunction, cardiac chamber enlargement, ventricular hypertrophy, and AV valve regurgitation are often seen in the recipient twin of affected pregnancies. Right ventricular outflow tract abnormalities such as pulmonary stenosis, pulmonary atresia, and pulmonary insufficiency have also been reported.162,503–505 Despite successful fetoscopic laser therapy, a significant proportion of right ventricular outflow tract abnormalities documented in utero persist after birth.84
Changes in venous Doppler flow patterns in the hepatic veins, ductus venosus, and umbilical vein consistent with elevated fetal central venous pressure can manifest, particularly in the recipient twin of TTTS. Quantitative methods to assess cardiac function have been used to characterize changes in TTTS, including Doppler MPI,239,499,501 an index of global systolic and diastolic function.506 Diastolic dysfunction in particular appears early in the disease process. The diastolic filling time may be an early cardiac finding of TTTS, distinguishing TTTS from other causes of fetal growth or amniotic fluid discordance.237,304,499 These imaging techniques may provide clinicians with advanced tools to differentiate TTTS from other disease processes and may be reasonable to perform as part of the assessment of monochorionic twin gestations.
Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Assessment
In clinical practice, the severity of TTTS is most often characterized by a staging system proposed by Quintero et al.507 Although preliminary studies have suggested that cardiac changes may present even in early Quintero stages,239,499,501 cardiac findings are not incorporated into the Quintero assessment of TTTS severity. This has led to the development of cardiovascular scoring systems to characterize the severity of cardiac involvement in TTTS.508,509 The Cincinnati staging system uses fetal echocardiography to detect recipient-twin cardiomyopathy and modifies staging on the basis of the severity of recipient-twin echocardiographic abnormalities. The severity of recipient-twin cardiomyopathy is scored as an aggregate impression of the severity of AV valve regurgitation, ventricular wall hypertrophy, and ventricular function as assessed by the MPI508 (Table 17). The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia scoring system uses an inventory of 5 domains of cardiovascular status, 4 within the recipient and 1 within the donor. Abnormalities in each finding within the domains are given a higher score for worsening abnormality509 (Table 18). Despite widespread appreciation for the cardiovascular pathology observed in TTTS, the role of fetal echocardiography in clinical decision making remains controversial. There are very limited data to suggest that specific cardiovascular findings are predictive of outcome.510,511 Some centers integrate fetal echocardiogram findings into pretherapy evaluation of TTTS and incorporate fetal cardiac findings into the clinical decision-making process.512,513 Other studies such as the Eurofetus trial514 have suggested that laser therapy is the optimal therapy regardless of fetal status or TTTS stage and recommend laser therapy in all cases of TTTS regardless of severity of cardiac findings. This approach is perhaps supported in turn by data suggesting that cardiovascular findings are not predictive of outcome after fetoscopic laser therapy for TTTS, although this has not been systematically studied and reports are conflicting.510,515 Given the body of evidence of cardiovascular manifestations in affected twin pairs, fetal echocardiography should be performed in the diagnostic assessment and initial management of TTTS.
Fetal echocardiography has been performed as part of postprocedural evaluation to assess cardiovascular response to laser therapy in TTTS. It has been shown that although the majority of cardiovascular perturbations will improve within days to weeks of therapy and ultimately resolve,516 some will not and the hemodynamic condition of either fetus may suddenly worsen.517,518 Therefore, although experience is thus far limited, fetal echocardiography for surviving twins should be considered at 24 to 48 hours after the procedure with additional follow-up dictated by clinical findings thereafter.
Right ventricular outflow tract abnormalities and valvar regurgitation may persist in postnatal life and not infrequently require cardiac management. In addition, after delivery, diastolic function abnormalities have been reported in surviving recipient twins,519 and abnormalities in vascular function have been reported in surviving donor twins.520 Given these data documenting postnatal persistence of cardiac abnormality in TTTS, postnatal echocardiogram may be considered in cases of TTTS.
Invasive fetal intervention is indicated if it can save the life of the fetus or alter the natural history of a condition and thus improve postnatal outcome.521 Invasive fetal interventions currently exist for the treatment and management of primary extracardiac anomalies. Fetal surgery can be performed with hysterotomy and exposure of the fetus or through laparoscopic techniques with a closed uterus, depending on the anomaly present. Fetal surgery may be reasonable to consider in select congenital anomalies, including large congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations with signs of hydrops, giant sacrococcygeal teratomas, severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and meningomyeloceles. The assessment of the cardiac function and fetal circulation with fetal echocardiography may be useful before, during, and after surgical intervention.
Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation
Open fetal surgery with resection of large intrathoracic masses can be performed for anomalies such as congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. Large congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation with early signs of hydrops is a fatal condition, and fetuses with this condition are potential candidates for fetal surgical intervention as a lifesaving intervention. Large congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation disturbs the fetal cardiovascular system through alterations in loading conditions by causing cardiac compression and creation of tamponade-like physiology.522 Serial fetal echocardiography with Doppler interrogation can identify progressive changes reflecting alterations in ventricular filling and compliance.523
Giant sacrococcygeal teratoma is a highly vascularized tumor that functions as an arteriovenous malformation leading to massive cardiac volume overload, ventricular dilation, AV valve regurgitation, and heart failure.181 Assessment of the cardiovascular impact of sacrococcygeal teratomas and determination of prognosis can be performed with serial evaluation of heart size and cardiac output measures via Doppler interrogation of left and right outflow tracts.524,525 Doppler interrogation of umbilical arterial flow with the finding of diminished or reversed diastolic flow reflecting competitive “steal” from the placenta to the sacrococcygeal teratoma is a marker for poor outcome.526 Surgical resection and debulking of giant sacrococcygeal teratomas through open fetal surgery or embolization of feeder vasculature through laparoscopic techniques can improve survival.
Laparoscopic techniques have been developed for percutaneous endoscopic tracheal occlusion in the prenatal management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia.527 Deployment of an occlusive balloon within the fetal trachea may promote lung growth and improve neonatal outcomes.528 Left ventricular hypoplasia may be associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernias resulting from ventricular compression or diminished filling secondary to pulmonary hypoplasia and decreased pulmonary venous return.529 Fetal tracheal occlusion does not negatively affect left ventricular function in these patients; however, the potential of this intervention to improve left ventricular filling and mechanics is unclear.530
Open Fetal Surgery
Surgical repair of CHD before birth may theoretically offer benefits over postnatal repair in select conditions; however, the optimal techniques have not yet been developed, and the proper candidates have not yet been identified. In animal models, it has been noted that cardiac bypass in the fetus results in significant placental dysfunction, in part related to fetal stress and placental vasoconstriction.531,532 Open fetal surgery for extracardiac conditions affecting the heart such as resection of pericardial teratoma is possible.533,534 Innovative open fetal surgical procedures that may be lifesaving to the fetus or may improve postnatal outcomes may be pursued on an investigational basis, but only once the benefits are carefully weighed against the risks to both fetus and mother.
Cardiovascular Changes During Fetal Surgery
In a randomized, clinical trial, open fetal surgery for meningomyelocele repair before 26 weeks of gestation was demonstrated to reduce the need for ventricular shunting procedures and to improve motor outcome at 30 months of age compared with conventional postnatal repair.535 This multicenter, randomized trial functions as a model for answering important questions concerning the benefits and risks of prenatal intervention for a congenital anomaly. Although the anomaly of meningomyelocele has no physiological impact on the fetal cardiovascular system, serial fetal echocardiographic observation of heart function during open fetal surgery for repair provided insight into the response of the fetal heart to prenatal invasive intervention.536 Intraoperative changes with a decrease in cardiac output, decrease in ventricular function, and development of AV valve regurgitation were common.537 Maternal anesthesia, the interplay between maternal-placental-fetal hemodynamics, and the stressors of open fetal surgery all likely played a role but are still not completely understood.538 These observations provide caution and highlight the importance of careful fetal echocardiographic surveillance during and after any invasive fetal procedure.
Cardiovascular Impact After Fetal Surgical Intervention
Invasive fetal intervention for extracardiac anomalies may have negative consequences on the cardiovascular system with an impact that is lesion specific.537 In congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations, surgical mass resection and acute relief of cardiac tamponade may result in acute mismatch in volume with filling impairment and ventricular dysfunction. In sacrococcygeal teratomas, removal of the tumor leads to an acute reduction in preload and sudden imposition of increased afterload after the elimination of the low-vascular-resistance circuit provided by the mass. The sudden imposition of decreased preload and increased afterload on an already stressed heart may lead to ventricular mass-to-volume mismatch, ventricular dysfunction, and death.537
Perinatal Management and Outcome of Fetuses With CHD
The prenatal diagnosis and management of fetal CHD have several potential important benefits. In addition to providing time for extensive prenatal counseling and family support, advancements in fetal imaging technology with analysis of interval fetal studies have enabled better prediction of the clinical course in utero and during the circulatory transition that occurs with delivery. This allows specialized planning of deliveries in select cases with the goal of improved fetal and postnatal outcomes. Fetal medicine specialists are now being asked to consider the fetus as a patient and the transition to postnatal life an important part of individualized care.
Benefits of Prenatal Diagnosis and Perinatal Management
Impact on Morbidity
The prenatal diagnosis of critical neonatal CHD has been shown to affect neonatal morbidity and, to a lesser extent, mortality associated with these defects. Infants diagnosed prenatally with CHD who depend on patency of the ductus arteriosus for systemic or pulmonary blood flow have been shown to be less compromised preoperatively than infants in whom the diagnosis is made after birth, with improved arterial pH, improved oxygenation, less myocardial dysfunction, and less end-organ disease such as necrotizing enterocolitis and renal injury.176,539–544 In infants diagnosed prenatally with HLHS, timely stabilization and initiation of a prostaglandin infusion have been shown to result in fewer neurological sequelae compared with those infants diagnosed postnatally in whom hemodynamic compromise may have occurred before the diagnosis was made.545 Therefore, it has been proposed that prenatal diagnosis may contribute to improved long-term neurocognitive function and outcome.544,545 Prenatal diagnosis may also predict the need for emergent postnatal intervention such as balloon atrial septostomy for d-TGA,546,547 atrial septoplasty for HLHS,176,548,549 or pacing in CHB,550 thus improving outcome by allowing more rapid stabilization of the postnatal circulation. Finally, although hospital length of stay has been unaffected by prenatal diagnosis in some settings,544,551 others report earlier time to surgical intervention and reduced length of hospital stay in neonates diagnosed in utero with critical heart disease who undergo biventricular repair.545
Impact on Survival
Despite studies suggesting a reduction in morbidity associated with prenatal diagnosis, studies documenting improved survival in fetuses with CHD are sparse. Improved preoperative survival among prenatally diagnosed infants with d-TGA has been documented,546 and improved survival has also been shown in a series of infants with a spectrum of lesions associated with a biventricular circulation.545 An important limitation of such an assessment is that most published investigations have reported the experience of tertiary centers176,539–545; thus, the cohorts studied typically represent only neonates who survived to transport. In addition, most studies do not account for deaths that occur before diagnosis. In studies that include necropsy data, prenatal diagnosis has been shown to improve survival in newborns with coarctation of the aorta542 or d-TGA,546,552 and a population cohort of all CHD diagnoses excluding ventricular septal defects.553
Postoperative survival in CHD patients may be improved with prenatal diagnosis. Infants with a prenatal diagnosis of d-TGA were shown to have improved survival after an arterial switch operation,546 and infants with HLHS had improved survival after the second-stage surgical palliation in a small cohort.539 This has not been a consistent observation; several other studies have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage among infants with a prenatal diagnosis for lesions such as d-TGA, congenitally corrected TGA, PA/IVS, TOF with pulmonary atresia, HLHS, heterotaxy syndrome, or double-inlet left ventricle.176,539–542,545,554–557
In Utero Management
Prenatal diagnosis of CHD may improve fetal and perinatal outcome associated with intrauterine heart failure or sudden intrauterine demise by guiding the initiation of intrauterine medical therapy and optimization of perinatal management strategies, including early delivery when necessary. As discussed in the Fetal Therapy for Cardiovascular Conditions Before Birth section, fetuses with tachyarrhythmias, particularly when incessant, occurring early in pregnancy, or in association with CHD, will benefit from the initiation of transplacental medical therapy.449,491 Although data are limited, fetal autoimmune-mediated myocardial disease, which is associated with death or need for transplantation in 85% of affected fetuses and infants,170,440,558 may be successfully ameliorated with maternal corticosteroid and IVIG therapy.439 Finally, fetal transplacental digoxin may improve signs of heart failure in select cases.465 The potential impact of prenatal diagnosis and management for other conditions associated with the evolution of fetal heart failure and sudden demise, including Ebstein anomaly, TOF with absent pulmonary valve, and other less common lesions, has not, to date, been fully evaluated. Limited patient numbers at any single institution and significant variability in management algorithms from one institution to another contribute to the challenges of documenting improvements in morbidity and mortality.
When fetal CHD is found, intrapartum care should be coordinated between obstetric, neonatal, and cardiology services, with specialty teams, including cardiac intensive care, interventional cardiology, electrophysiology, and cardiac surgery, as appropriate. There is evidence that overall neonatal condition and surgical outcomes are improved by delivery in close proximity to a cardiac center with the resources needed to provide medical and surgical interventions for infants with specific major cardiac defects.145,539,546,554,559 Appropriate planning of delivery location should therefore be made for patients in whom there is a prenatal diagnosis of CHD at risk for postnatal compromise.
Delay of elective delivery until 39 completed weeks of gestation has been shown to improve neonatal outcomes560; however, waiting beyond 42 weeks has been shown to be detrimental.561–563 Similar results have been reported for neonates with CHD, with improved outcomes for every week of gestation added up to 39 weeks.564,565 These observations are juxtaposed to concerning data from recent studies that have identified a small but significant negative trend in gestational age at delivery in infants with single-ventricle defects when diagnosed prenatally.544,551,566 Close communication between obstetric and cardiology services is essential in this setting because elective induction for fetuses with CHD before 39 weeks is not recommended unless there are patient-specific obstetric or logistic issues or fetus-specific concerns about well-being.
No randomized trials have evaluated outcome on the basis of route of delivery for infants with severe CHD. The data that are available do not show any inherent advantage to cesarean section over vaginal birth.567,568 Fetuses with lesions that have significant risk for fetal demise such as severe Ebstein anomaly or CHB with or without CHD may benefit from interval surveillance, although this has not been critically investigated. Interrogation of the fetus for signs of cardiovascular wellness in addition to testing with the BPP or nonstress testing may aid in difficult decisions about delivery of the preterm fetus with compromised physiology, although this has not been studied systematically in the CHD population.
Delivery Room and Neonatal Care Planning
Risk assessment for anticipated compromise in the delivery room or during the first few days of life is based largely on postnatal disease-specific clinical experience. However, for some diagnoses, reports in the literature highlighting specific findings on fetal echocardiogram have facilitated more comprehensive planning to prevent the intrapartum hemodynamic compromise that may occur with specific high-risk CHD. Disease-specific delivery room care recommendations for newborns with CHD have been created for neonatologists and are well accepted in clinical practice.569,570 For many newborns with CHD, no specialized care is needed in the delivery room, and infants can be discharged from the nursery to be seen for follow-up as outpatients. For all others, delivery care planning must define the specialized treatment and follow-up required, the possible need for transport to a specialized cardiac center, the likelihood of neonatal catheter intervention or surgery, or the need for intervention in the delivery room in the small subset of patients in whom compromise is likely to occur at the time of circulatory transition with cord clamping.
Specialized care plans can be created for delivery room management that are based on cardiac diagnoses and identifiable features noted during the extended fetal cardiac examination. Models of risk assessment that include stratification of patients and specific postnatal care recommendations have been reported.571,572 In practice, anticipated postnatal level of care should be assigned by the fetal diagnostic team, with concomitant delivery room and neonatal care recommendations made before delivery. Table 19 summarizes risk-stratified level of care assignment and coordinating action plans based on reported algorithms.
Disease-Specific Recommendations for Transitional Care
Past studies have shown that the fetal diagnosis of CHD prevents the postnatal hemodynamic instability that occurs during transition at delivery for a variety of high-risk cardiac anomalies.539,541,543,546,573–575 In general, 2 major systems play a role in a successful fetal-neonatal transition: the circulatory system and the respiratory system. If it is expected that 1 or both of these systems cannot transition normally, then a specialized plan of care is needed. In-utero, oxygenated blood from the placenta reaches the fetus via the umbilical vein. The open fetal shunt pathways of the ductus venosus and the foramen ovale allow this more highly oxygenated blood to stream to the left side of the heart, and the left ventricle then pumps this blood to the systemic circulation. Venous return is directed mostly to the right ventricle, which pumps the deoxygenated blood across the third fetal shunt pathway, the ductus arteriosus, to return to the placenta via the umbilical artery. In the fetus, the placenta is a low-resistance circuit, and the branch pulmonary arteries are a high-resistance circuit, with only ≈10% to 20% of the combined cardiac output entering the pulmonary arteries during fetal life.576 With delivery, 2 events occur. First, the fetus is separated from the low-resistance placental circulation with cord clamping. Second, as spontaneous respiration occurs, the pulmonary vessels dilate in response to oxygen. These events lead to an acute increase in systemic vascular resistance, a decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance, an increase in pulmonary blood flow, closure of the foramen ovale as a result of an abrupt increase in left atrial pressure from pulmonary venous return, closure of the ductus arteriosus (usually over 12–72 hours),577 and change in the circulation from fetoplacental (combined right and left cardiac output supplying the fetus and the placenta) to a circulation in series (cardiac output going first to the lungs and then to the body).
CHD With Minimal Risk During Transition
Infants with left-to-right shunt lesions such as ventricular septal defects or AVSDs will be stable until the pulmonary resistance decreases enough to create hemodynamic compromise from a significant left-to-right shunt. This usually takes weeks after delivery to occur.578 Infants with a mild valve abnormality and normal cardiac function are unlikely to display any symptoms in the neonatal period, although progression of valve dysfunction may occur relatively rapidly486,579–582 and close follow-up is prudent. For these minimal-risk newborns, no specialized care is recommended in the delivery room.
Structural CHD Requiring Specialized Management
The diagnostic challenge for fetal specialists is to determine in which fetuses patency of the fetal shunt pathways will be essential for postnatal stability and to ascertain the in utero predictors that will identify which patients will require additional support or intervention to maintain the circulation postnatally. In addition, identifying fetuses in whom cardiac function is impaired, who will be further challenged by the stress of delivery and the transitional circulation, is equally important. Current recommendations for postnatal management based on fetal echocardiogram predictors, including COR and LOE, are summarized in Table 20.
Fetuses with ductal-dependent pulmonary or systemic blood flow require institution of a prostaglandin infusion soon after birth to prevent ductal closure. Because the ductus arteriosus does not close at delivery, these newborns are not expected to be compromised in the delivery room569,570,580 and can be stabilized by neonatologists guided by pediatric cardiology input before transfer for surgical intervention. For fetuses with pulmonary blood flow dependent on the ductus arteriosus such as those with critical pulmonary stenosis or atresia, severe tricuspid valve stenosis or atresia without a ventricular septal defect, or severe TOF, reversed shunting (aorta to pulmonary) in the ductus arteriosus in utero205 and reversed orientation of the ductus arteriosus defined as an inferior angle of the aortic junction of <90°583 have been shown to be predictive of the need to maintain ductal patency. For fetuses with ductal-dependent systemic flow such HLHS, critical AS, or interrupted aortic arch, reversed flow across the foramen ovale (left atrium to right atrium) has been shown to be predictive of the need to maintain ductal patency.205 For these fetuses, delivery at a center with a neonatologist who has access to pediatric cardiology consultation is recommended.
Foramen Ovale–Dependent Lesions
Fetuses with critical left heart obstruction such as HLHS are dependent on both foramen ovale and ductus arteriosus patency for delivery of pulmonary venous blood to the systemic circulation. Management of these fetuses, who are at significant risk of compromise with foramen ovale restriction or closure, can benefit from coordination of care in the delivery room.175,176,481,547,572,584,585,588–594 Fetuses with HLHS identified to have a severely restrictive or intact atrial septum are at increased risk for compromise in the delivery room if fetal pulmonary vein flow shows significant reversed flow suggesting severe left atrial hypertension in the third trimester.175,176,481,549,572 In 2 studies,176,481 the ratio of pulmonary vein forward to reversed velocity-time integral was used to determine potential need for intervention. These studies suggest that a ratio <3 is predictive of an increased likelihood of needing emergent opening of the atrial septum by catheterization or surgery and therefore should prompt delivery room management to include immediate access to a cardiac team for the procedure if it is indicated. In addition, the use of a maternal hyperoxia challenge test in the third trimester in which 100% O2 is delivered via nonrebreather facemask to the expectant mother has been shown to predict fetuses with HLHS at risk for delivery room compromise. Lack of pulmonary vasodilation as measured by the calculated Doppler pulsatility index of the branch pulmonary arteries during the hyperoxia challenge predicted fetuses who needed intervention to open the atrial septum at delivery.482
Fetuses with d-TGA are dependent on an open foramen ovale for stability at delivery. Fetal echocardiogram features that predict the risk of postnatal closure of the foramen ovale by assessing the anatomy and flow across both the foramen ovale and ductus arteriosus have been reported.547,585,588,591,592 The foramen ovale was found to be at risk for closure in 1 study585 if the angle of septum primum was <30° to the atrial septum, if there was bowing of the septum primum into the left atrium >50%, or if there was a lack of normal swinging motion of the septum primum. In another study,547 a hypermobile septum primum, especially in the presence of an abnormal ductus arteriosus, was shown to be predictive of compromise. Of note, a recent study of high-risk fetuses with CHD found that using the criteria of a tethered or bowing septum primum in d-TGA fetuses did not predict postnatal compromise and need for emergent intervention with an acceptable sensitivity or specificity.572 In this study, if there were any concerning foramen ovale findings with a ductus arteriosus that was small or had abnormal flow, risk of postnatal compromise and need for urgent balloon atrial septostomy and possible treatment of pulmonary hypertension were high. Given the difficulty in predicting which fetuses with d-TGA will develop foramen ovale restriction and compromise at birth, all fetuses with d-TGA with a concerning septum primum should be delivered in a hospital that can manage the hypoxia and hemodynamic compromise that occur with foramen ovale closure and possible associated pulmonary hypertension. Care should be coordinated so that immediate transfer to a center that can perform a balloon atrial septostomy is possible or, preferably, delivery can occur at a site where the physiological circulatory transition and the catheterization procedure can be managed in either the delivery room or the intensive care unit. In addition, it is reasonable to recommend that the delivery of all fetuses with d-TGA and no associated atrial septal defects be coordinated at a hospital that can efficiently execute the management of these potentially critically ill newborns, including either planning for the possibility of urgent balloon atrial septostomy or coordinating rapid transport to facilitate urgent intervention
Fetuses with severe right heart obstruction also are dependent on the foramen ovale and ductal patency; however, given the elevation of right atrial pressure in these patients, foramen ovale restriction is rarely observed. Late development of hydrops in the third trimester with foramen ovale restriction has been reported in a small series of patients.590
Fetuses with tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias may require intervention in the delivery room, particularly if the delivery is occurring because of impending heart failure, hydrops, or fetal distress.440,550,592 Delivery planning that includes medical or electric conversion to sinus rhythm or the initiation of medicines for rhythm control in the delivery room is indicated for fetuses with uncontrolled tachycardias. For fetuses with CHB, planned intervention with chronotrope infusion or pacing in the immediate neonatal period has been shown to contribute to survival of affected neonates440,550 and therefore is reasonable. Deterioration of cardiac function by CVP score, prompting the decision for early delivery and pacing in the delivery room, has been reported but only in a limited number of cases.587
Complex CHD With Heart Failure
Minimal data are available for delivery planning in diseases such as TOF with absent pulmonary valve or severe Ebstein anomaly in which there is heart failure and, in some cases, significant pulmonary comorbidities from bronchial or lung compression or lung hypoplasia. Additional imaging of the airways and lungs with fetal MRI may be considered to assist in risk stratification of fetuses who will have severe airway obstruction or lung disease, including lobar emphysema, that prevents adequate ventilation and oxygenation at birth.586 Fetal monitoring with BPP or nonstress testing in select high-risk patients may be indicated and play a role in determining the timing of delivery in those with defects at risk for fetal demise as a result of compromised cardiac output such as Ebstein anomaly or CHB with low ventricular rate, endocardial fibroelastosis, or hydrops. The presence of hydrops is an ominous sign. If determined to be caused by heart failure, delivery may be considered if the gestational age is appropriate and the primary pathology is treatable or reversible, with preparations made for the immediate treatment of potential hemodynamic collapse at delivery and for the availability of mechanical cardiac or cardiopulmonary support.
Fetal Cardiac Evaluation
Referral for fetal cardiac evaluation is indicated for maternal conditions including pregestational DM or DM diagnosed in the first trimester (Class I; Level of Evidence A), uncontrolled phenylketonuria (Class I; Level of Evidence A), SSA/SSB+ autoantibodies with a previously affected child (Class I; Level of Evidence B), medications including retinoic acid (Class I; Level of Evidence B) or NSAIDs used in the third trimester (Class I; Level of Evidence A), first-trimester rubella (Class I; Level of Evidence C), or an infection with suspicion of fetal myocarditis (Class I; Level of Evidence C).
Referral for fetal cardiac evaluation is indicated if there is CHD in a first-degree relative of the fetus (maternal, paternal, or sibling) with CHD (Class I; Level of Evidence B) or a relative with a disorder with mendelian inheritance that has a CHD association (Class I; Level of Evidence C) or if there is a suspected fetal cardiac abnormality identified by obstetric ultrasound (Class I; Level of Evidence B), an extracardiac abnormality identified by obstetric ultrasound (Class I; Level of Evidence B), a suspected or confirmed chromosome abnormality (Class I; Level of Evidence C), fetal tachycardia or bradycardia or frequent or persistent irregular heart rhythm (Class I; Level of Evidence C), an increased NT >99% (≥3.5 mm) or an increased NT >95% (≥3 mm) with abnormal ductus venosus flow (Class I; Level of Evidence A), monochorionic twinning (Class I; Level of Evidence A), or evidence of fetal hydrops or effusions (Class I; Level of Evidence B).
Referral for fetal cardiac evaluation is reasonable for maternal conditions including SSA/SSB+ autoantibodies without a previously affected child (Class IIa; Level of Evidence B) or medications including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (Class IIa; Level of Evidence B), if the pregnancy is a result of assisted reproduction technology (Class IIa; Level of Evidence A), or if there is an increased NT >95% (≥3.0 mm) (Class IIa; Level of Evidence A).
Referral for fetal cardiac evaluation may be considered for maternal medication use including anticonvulsants (Class IIb; Level of Evidence A), lithium (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B), vitamin A (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B), SSRIs (paroxetine only) (Class IIb; Level of Evidence A), or NSAIDs used in the first or second trimester (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B); if there is CHD in a second-degree relative of the fetus (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B); or if there is an abnormality of the umbilical cord, placenta, or intra-abdominal venous anatomy (Class IIb; Level of Evidence C).
Referral for fetal cardiac evaluation is not indicated for maternal gestational DM with HbA1c <6% (Class III; Level of Evidence B), maternal medications including SSRIs (other than paroxetine) (Class III; Level of Evidence A), vitamin K agonists (although fetal survey is recommended) (Class III; Level of Evidence B), maternal infection other than rubella with seroconversion only (Class III; Level of Evidence C), or isolated CHD in a relative other than first or second degree (Class III; Level of Evidence B).
6. A fetal echocardiogram should include standard views using both still frame and moving cine clip acquisition of the 4-chamber view sweeping posterior to anterior, left and right ventricular outflow tracts, 3 vessels and trachea view, aortic and ductal arch view, superior and inferior vena cava view (Class I; Level of Evidence A), and short-axis and long-axis views (Class I; Level of Evidence B).
7. A fetal echocardiogram should include 2D still and cine clips of the atria (including size and anatomy of septum), ventricles (including size with right to left comparison, function, and anatomy of septum), AV valves (comparing size of right to left), semilunar valves (comparing size of right to left), great arteries (including size and position to each other and the trachea), ductal and aortic arches, systemic veins, and pulmonary veins (Class I; Level of Evidence A).
8. A fetal echocardiogram should include color Doppler to evaluate the systemic veins (including the superior and inferior vena cava), pulmonary veins, AV valves, atrial and ventricular septae, semilunar valves, ductus arteriosus, aortic arch, and ductus venosus (Class I; Level of Evidence B), and pulsed Doppler to evaluate the AV and semilunar valves and the ductus venosus (Class I; Level of Evidence B/C).
9. A fetal echocardiogram should include an assessment of heart rate and rhythm with pulsed Doppler, M-mode, or tissue Doppler and a qualitative assessment of cardiac function with the exclusion of cardiomegaly or hydrops fetalis (Class I; Level of Evidence B).
10. A fetal echocardiogram should include in specific clinical situations measure of valves using gestational age z scores, measure of the cardiothoracic ratio, detailed rhythm assessment, advanced cardiac function assessment including left and right cardiac output, AV valve inflow for diastolic function, systemic vein Doppler, pulmonary vein Doppler, MPI, isovolumic relaxation and contraction times, shortening fraction, and CVP score (Class I; Level of Evidence B/C).
11. It is reasonable to include in a fetal echocardiogram measures of the valves (with comparison of right to left valves) and ventricular length (with comparison of right to left ventricle) and pulsed Doppler of the systemic and pulmonary veins, aortic and ductal arches, and umbilical artery and vein (Class IIa; Level of Evidence B).
12. A fetal echocardiogram using pulsed Doppler of the middle cerebral artery or branch pulmonary arteries may be useful in specific clinical situations (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B/C).
13. Advanced techniques that currently are research tools but are reasonable to use in clinical practice for specific indications include cardiac MRI (for assessment of heterotaxy, venous anatomy, and extracardiac anomalies), tissue Doppler (for time interval and rhythm assessment), fetal electrocardiography (for fetal monitoring after rupture of membranes), and fMCG (for assessment of cardiac conduction and rhythm in fetuses with known or suspected conduction system abnormalities) (Class IIa; Level of Evidence B/C).
14. Extracardiac assessment in fetuses with known CHD should include genetic counseling with an offer of testing for aneuploidy and a detailed fetal ultrasound anatomy survey (Class I; Level of Evidence A).
15. It is reasonable to include extracardiac assessment using fetal brain MRI if a brain abnormality is suspected in fetuses with known CHD or fetal chest/lung MRI to assess lung volume in fetuses with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (Class IIa; Level of Evidence B).
16. It may be reasonable to include extracardiac assessment using fetal brain MRI for cerebral anomaly screening in fetuses with known CHD or fetal chest/lung MRI to assess lung volumes in fetuses with diagnoses in whom there is a suspicion for pulmonary hypoplasia (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B).
Fetal Wellness Assessment
17. Fetal wellness assessment in fetuses with known CHD may be reasonable and can include fetal movement assessment by mother (“kick counts”), nonstress testing beginning in the third trimester for fetuses at risk for hypoxemia or acidosis, and BPP beginning in the third trimester for fetuses at risk for hypoxemia or acidosis (Class IIb; Level of Evidence C).
Fetal Medical Therapy
18. Fetal medical therapy should be offered for fetuses with sustained SVT or VT or sustained tachycardias including multifocal atrial tachycardia, atrial ectopic tachycardia, persistent junctional reciprocating tachycardia, or junctional ectopic tachycardia with average heart rates >200 bpm if the fetus is not near term, and hydropic fetuses with an arrhythmia believed to be the cause of the fetal compromise (Class I; Level of Evidence A).
19. Fetal medical therapy with sympathomimetics is reasonable to consider for fetuses with AV block with ventricular rates <55 bpm or AV block at a higher ventricular rate with associated severe CHD or signs of fetal heart failure or hydrops fetalis (Class IIa; Level of Evidence B).
20. Fetal medical therapy is reasonable to consider for fetuses with intermittent VT at rates >200 bpm (Class IIa; Level of Evidence B).
21. Fetal medical therapy with dexamethasone may be considered for fetuses with immune-mediated second-degree AV block or first-degree AV block with signs of cardiac inflammation (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B). Fetal medical therapy with digoxin may be considered for fetuses with signs of heart failure (Class IIb; Level of Evidence A).
22. Fetal medical therapy is of no benefit for fetuses with sinus bradycardia, irregular rhythms caused by extrasystolic beats (Class III; Level of Evidence A), intermittent SVT without fetal compromise or hydrops, or intermittent VT < 200 bpm (accelerated ventricular rhythm) without fetal compromise or hydrops fetalis (Class III; Level of Evidence B/C).
23. Fetal catheter intervention may be considered for fetuses with AS with antegrade flow and evolving HLHS; fetuses with AS, severe mitral regurgitation, and restrictive atrial septum; fetuses with HLHS with a severely restrictive or intact atrial septum; or fetuses with PA/IVS (Class IIb; Level of Evidence B/C).
Specialized Delivery Room Care
24. Specialized delivery room care should be planned for fetuses with d-TGA or fetuses with sustained or uncontrolled tachyarrhythmias with heart failure or hydrops fetalis (Class I; Level of Evidence B/C).
25. Specialized delivery room care planning is reasonable for fetuses with HLHS with restrictive or intact atrial septum and abnormal pulmonary vein flow (pulmonary vein forward/reversed flow ratio <3) or abnormal hyperoxia test in the third trimester or in fetuses with CHB and low ventricular rate, cardiac dysfunction, or hydrops fetalis (Class IIa; Level of Evidence B/C).
26. Specialized delivery room care planning may be considered for fetuses with TOF with absent pulmonary valve or Ebstein anomaly with hydrops fetalis (Class IIb; Level of Evidence C).
27. Specialized delivery room care is not needed for fetuses with shunt lesions, most ductal-dependent lesions, or controlled arrhythmias (Class III; Level of Evidence B/C).
In the modern era, it is expected that structural heart disease and arrhythmias will be diagnosed with precise detail in utero. The goal of the fetal cardiologist has now become to understand the fetus as a patient, knowing that the fetal circulation is different from the postnatal circulation, that CHD may progress in utero, and that cardiac function and stability of the cardiovascular system play important roles in fetal wellness. In fetuses at risk for cardiovascular disease, collaboration among all caregivers is essential. This document has been created using what is currently known and practiced in the rapidly advancing and highly specialized field of fetal cardiac care. Further study is needed to determine more precise indications for referral, better diagnostic protocols for the detection of CHD, and standardized treatment strategies to prevent cardiovascular compromise and disease progression. Given the rarity of many conditions, national and international multidisciplinary collaboration is essential as we embrace our role as specialized caregivers for fetuses with cardiovascular disease.
This article is dedicated to the memory of Dr Charles S. Kleinman. Dr Kleinman was slated to be the senior author of this work but died before he could bring the project to fruition. He was a mentor, friend, and colleague of many of the document’s authors. In many ways, this document reflects his ideal that, for a fetal cardiologist, the primary issue of importance is the well-being of the patients, both mother and fetus, and he spent his career collaborating with other disciplines to achieve that aim. This document that he envisioned is an attempt to embrace the many disciplines and to provide common standards of practice and treatment to those treating fetuses with cardiovascular disease.
The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit a Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest.
This statement was approved by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee on October 21, 2013. A copy of the document is available at http://my.americanheart.org/statements by selecting either the “By Topic” link or the “By Publication Date” link. To purchase additional reprints, call 843-216-2533 or e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
The American Heart Association requests that this document be cited as follows: Donofrio MT, Moon-Grady AJ, Hornberger LK, Copel JA, Sklansky MS, Abuhamad A, Cuneo BF, Huhta JC, Jonas RA, Krishnan A, Lacey S, Lee W, Michelfelder EC Sr, Rempel GR, Silverman NH, Spray TL, Strasburger JF, Tworetzky W, Rychik J; on behalf of the American Heart Association Adults With Congenital Heart Disease Joint Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129:2183–2242.
Expert peer review of AHA Scientific Statements is conducted by the AHA Office of Science Operations. For more on AHA statements and guidelines development, visit http://my.americanheart.org/statements and select the “Policies and Development” link.
Permissions: Multiple copies, modification, alteration, enhancement, and/or distribution of this document are not permitted without the express permission of the American Heart Association. Instructions for obtaining permission are located at http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/General/Copyright-Permission-Guidelines_UCM_300404_Article.jsp. A link to the “Copyright Permissions Request Form” appears on the right side of the page.
- © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.
- Ferencz C,
- Rubin JD,
- McCarter RJ,
- Brenner JI,
- Neill CA,
- Perry LW,
- Hepner SI,
- Downing JW
- Wren C,
- Richmond S,
- Donaldson L
- Ray JG,
- O’Brien TE,
- Chan WS
- Koch R,
- Friedman E,
- Azen C,
- Hanley W,
- Levy H,
- Matalon R,
- Rouse B,
- Trefz F,
- Waisbren S,
- Michals-Matalon K,
- Acosta P,
- Guttler F,
- Ullrich K,
- Platt L,
- de la Cruz F
- Brucato A,
- Frassi M,
- Franceschini F,
- Cimaz R,
- Faden D,
- Pisoni MP,
- Muscara M,
- Vignati G,
- Stramba-Badiale M,
- Catelli L,
- Lojacono A,
- Cavazzana I,
- Ghirardello A,
- Vescovi F,
- Gambari PF,
- Doria A,
- Meroni PL,
- Tincani A
- Buyon JP,
- Hiebert R,
- Copel J,
- Craft J,
- Friedman D,
- Katholi M,
- Lee LA,
- Provost TT,
- Reichlin M,
- Rider L,
- Rupel A,
- Saleeb S,
- Weston WL,
- Skovron ML
- Costedoat-Chalumeau N,
- Amoura Z,
- Lupoglazoff JM,
- Huong DL,
- Denjoy I,
- Vauthier D,
- Sebbouh D,
- Fain O,
- Georgin-Lavialle S,
- Ghillani P,
- Musset L,
- Wechsler B,
- Duhaut P,
- Piette JC
- Friedman DM,
- Kim MY,
- Copel JA,
- Davis C,
- Phoon CK,
- Glickstein JS,
- Buyon JP
- Jaeggi E,
- Laskin C,
- Hamilton R,
- Kingdom J,
- Silverman E
- Spence D,
- Hornberger L,
- Hamilton R,
- Silverman ED
- Ambrosi A,
- Salomonsson S,
- Eliasson H,
- Zeffer E,
- Skog A,
- Dzikaite V,
- Bergman G,
- Fernlund E,
- Tingstrom J,
- Theander E,
- Rydberg A,
- Skogh T,
- Ohman A,
- Lundstrom U,
- Mellander M,
- Winqvist O,
- Fored M,
- Ekbom A,
- Alfredsson L,
- Kallberg H,
- Olsson T,
- Gadler F,
- Jonzon A,
- Kockum I,
- Sonesson SE,
- Wahren-Herlenius M
- Jenkins KJ,
- Correa A,
- Feinstein JA,
- Botto L,
- Britt AE,
- Daniels SR,
- Elixson M,
- Warnes CA,
- Webb CL
- Huhta JC,
- Moise KJ,
- Fisher DJ,
- Sharif DS,
- Wasserstrum N,
- Martin C
- Koren G,
- Florescu A,
- Costei AM,
- Boskovic R,
- Moretti ME
- Stuckey D
- Bahtiyar MO,
- Campbell K,
- Dulay AT,
- Kontic-Vucinic O,
- Weeks BP,
- Friedman AH,
- Copel JA
- Lie RT,
- Lyngstadaas A,
- Orstavik KH,
- Bakketeig LS,
- Jacobsen G,
- Tanbo T
- Reefhuis J,
- Honein MA,
- Schieve LA,
- Correa A,
- Hobbs CA,
- Rasmussen SA
- Burn J,
- Brennan P,
- Little J,
- Holloway S,
- Coffey R,
- Somerville J,
- Dennis NR,
- Allan L,
- Arnold R,
- Deanfield JE,
- Godman M,
- Houston A,
- Keeton B,
- Oakley C,
- Scott O,
- Silove E,
- Wilkinson J,
- Pembrey M,
- Hunter AS
- Oyen N,
- Poulsen G,
- Boyd HA,
- Wohlfahrt J,
- Jensen PK,
- Melbye M
- Emanuel R,
- Somerville J,
- Inns A,
- Withers R
- Pierpont ME,
- Basson CT,
- Benson DW Jr.,
- Gelb BD,
- Giglia TM,
- Goldmuntz E,
- McGee G,
- Sable CA,
- Srivastava D,
- Webb CL
- McBride KL,
- Pignatelli R,
- Lewin M,
- Ho T,
- Fernbach S,
- Menesses A,
- Lam W,
- Leal SM,
- Kaplan N,
- Schliekelman P,
- Towbin JA,
- Belmont JW
- Carvalho JS,
- Mavrides E,
- Shinebourne EA,
- Campbell S,
- Thilaganathan B
- Kleinman CS,
- Donnerstein RL,
- Jaffe CC,
- DeVore GR,
- Weinstein EM,
- Lynch DC,
- Talner NS,
- Berkowitz RL,
- Hobbins JC
- Allan LD,
- Anderson RH,
- Sullivan ID,
- Campbell S,
- Holt DW,
- Tynan M
- Fouron JC,
- Fournier A,
- Proulx F,
- Lamarche J,
- Bigras JL,
- Boutin C,
- Brassard M,
- Gamache S
- Carvalho JS,
- Prefumo F,
- Ciardelli V,
- Sairam S,
- Bhide A,
- Shinebourne EA
- Jaeggi E,
- Fouron JC,
- Fournier A,
- van Doesburg N,
- Drblik SP,
- Proulx F
- Greenwood RD,
- Rosenthal A,
- Nadas AS
- Greenwood RD,
- Rosenthal A,
- Nadas AS
- Martinez-Frias ML,
- Bermejo E,
- Rodriguez-Pinilla E,
- Prieto D
- Tennstedt C,
- Chaoui R,
- Korner H,
- Dietel M
- Simpson LL,
- Malone FD,
- Bianchi DW,
- Ball RH,
- Nyberg DA,
- Comstock CH,
- Saade G,
- Eddleman K,
- Gross SJ,
- Dugoff L,
- Craigo SD,
- Timor-Tritsch IE,
- Carr SR,
- Wolfe HM,
- Tripp T,
- D’Alton ME
- Bahtiyar MO,
- Dulay AT,
- Weeks BP,
- Friedman AH,
- Copel JA
- Herberg U,
- Gross W,
- Bartmann P,
- Banek CS,
- Hecher K,
- Breuer J
- Moore T
- Ylinen K,
- Aula P,
- Stenman UH,
- Kesaniemi-Kuokkanen T,
- Teramo K
- Shields LE,
- Gan EA,
- Murphy HF,
- Sahn DJ,
- Moore TR