Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
      • Doodle Gallery
      • Circulation Cover Doodle
        • → Blip the Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
      • Recently Published Guidelines
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
      • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Hartford Hospital
      • Hospital Santa Maria del Popolo, Naples, Italy
      • Instituto do Coração-INCOR (São Paulo, Brasil)
      • Minneapolis City Hospital
      • Parkland Hospital: Dallas, Texas
      • Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
      • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
      • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland
      • Tufts Medical Center
      • University of Michigan
      • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Vassar Brothers Medical Center (Poughkeepsie, NY)
      • Wroclaw Medical University
      • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
      • Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
      • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez – INCICh México City, México
      • Kuang-Tien General Hospital (Taichug, Taiwan)
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Original Articles

Rheb is a Critical Regulator of Autophagy During Myocardial IschemiaClinical Perspective

Pathophysiological Implications in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome

Sebastiano Sciarretta, Peiyong Zhai, Dan Shao, Yasuhiro Maejima, Jeffrey Robbins, Massimo Volpe, Gianluigi Condorelli, Junichi Sadoshima
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.078212
Circulation. 2012;125:1134-1146
Originally published March 5, 2012
Sebastiano Sciarretta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peiyong Zhai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dan Shao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasuhiro Maejima
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Robbins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Massimo Volpe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gianluigi Condorelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junichi Sadoshima
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Sources of Funding
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background—Rheb is a GTP-binding protein that promotes cell survival and mediates the cellular response to energy deprivation (ED). The role of Rheb in the regulation of cell survival during ED has not been investigated in the heart.

Methods and Results—Rheb is inactivated during cardiomyocyte (CM) glucose deprivation (GD) in vitro, and during acute myocardial ischemia in vivo. Rheb inhibition causes mTORC1 inhibition, because forced activation of Rheb, through Rheb overexpression in vitro and through inducible cardiac-specific Rheb overexpression in vivo, restored mTORC1 activity. Restoration of mTORC1 activity reduced CM survival during GD and increased infarct size after ischemia, both of which were accompanied by inhibition of autophagy, whereas Rheb knockdown increased autophagy and CM survival. Rheb inhibits autophagy mostly through Atg7 depletion. Restoration of autophagy, through Atg7 reexpression and inhibition of mTORC1, increased cellular ATP content and reduced endoplasmic reticulum stress, thereby reducing CM death induced by Rheb activation. Mice with high-fat diet–induced obesity and metabolic syndrome (HFD mice) exhibited deregulated cardiac activation of Rheb and mTORC1, particularly during ischemia. HFD mice presented inhibition of cardiac autophagy and displayed increased ischemic injury. Pharmacological and genetic inhibition of mTORC1 restored autophagy and abrogated the increase in infarct size observed in HFD mice, but they failed to protect HFD mice in the presence of genetic disruption of autophagy.

Conclusions—Inactivation of Rheb protects CMs during ED through activation of autophagy. Rheb and mTORC1 may represent therapeutic targets to reduce myocardial damage during ischemia, particularly in obese patients.

  • apoptosis
  • ischemia
  • obesity
  • signal transduction

Introduction

Heart failure is viewed as one of the major healthcare problems worldwide, with acute myocardial infarction (MI) as the most common predisposing cause.1 It is fundamental to clarify the mechanisms regulating cardiomyocyte (CM) death and survival during ischemic injury to find new therapies to reduce the amount of myocardial loss after a sudden coronary occlusion.

Clinical Perspective on p 1146

Ras homology enriched in brain (Rheb) is a small GTP-binding protein that has been shown to regulate the cellular stress response, both in lower organisms and in mammalian cell lines. In particular, Rheb appears to be a critical sensor of energy stress, being inactivated under this condition. Inhibition of Rheb during cellular stress promotes the upregulation of adaptive mechanisms, such as cell cycle arrest and growth inhibition, which may save energy, favor DNA repair, and thus be protective.2–4 On the contrary, Rheb is hyperactivated in cancer cells, where it promotes stress resistance and survival, and Rheb activation was found to directly inhibit apoptotic pathways induced by amino acid deprivation and genotoxic stress.5,6 Therefore, it is not clear whether Rheb activity is protective or detrimental during cellular stress. Remarkably, the role of Rheb in response to acute energy deprivation, and in regulation of cell death and survival, has never been investigated in the heart.

Rheb activity is regulated by upstream kinases, such as Akt, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and glycogen synthase kinase-3β, which control Rheb through direct modulation of the heterodimer composed of the tuberous sclerosis complex proteins 1 (TSC1) and 2 (TSC2). The TSC1/TSC2 complex inhibits Rheb by exerting a strong GTPase activity toward it.2,7 Rheb directly binds and selectively activates the multiprotein complex 1 of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTORC1), which in turn mediates many cellular functions, such as protein translation.8 mTORC1 is also inhibited in response to energy stress, and its inactivation reduces protein synthesis and upregulates autophagy.8 However, mTORC1 activation also promotes cell survival and inhibits apoptosis in several stress conditions, and, therefore, whether mTORC1 inhibition is detrimental or protective during cellular stress is stimulus dependent.5,8

The role of mTORC1 in mediating survival and death of CMs has only been investigated in models of chronic cardiac remodeling, with discordant results.9–11 Importantly, the effect of direct and selective mTORC1 versus mTORC2 modulation during CM acute energy deprivation, such as myocardial ischemia, remains to be elucidated. It is also unclear how mTORC1 is modulated during CM energy deprivation and whether Rheb, an immediate upstream regulator of mTORC1, is critically involved in such regulation in CMs.

In our study, we investigated the role of Rheb in the regulation of cell death and survival during CM starvation and ischemia, and the underlying molecular mechanisms. In particular, we studied whether a direct and selective modulation of mTORC1 induced by Rheb is involved in the effects exerted by Rheb on CM survival during energy stress. Recent reports have shown that obesity and metabolic syndrome, which are characterized by an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality12 and increased myocardial susceptibility to ischemic injury,13–16 are associated with a hyperactivation of tissue mTORC1.17,18 Therefore, we also evaluated whether cardiac mTORC1 is activated in obesity and metabolic syndrome, whether Rheb is involved in such phenomena, and whether a deregulated activation of Rheb and mTORC1 may be responsible for the increased susceptibility to ischemia associated with these conditions.

Methods

Experimental Procedures

Experimental procedures and animal models are described in the expanded Methods section in the online-only Data Supplement. Experimental procedures, heterozygous GFP-LC3 transgenic mice, beclin-1 knockout mice, and conditional mTOR knockout mice have also been described elsewhere.9,19,20 All experimental procedures with animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey.

Statistics

Data are expressed as mean±SEM. When specified in the figure legends, presentation of bar charts was standardized by control mean×100, so that the presented bars represent the mean percentage of variation±SEM, with respect to the control mean. The difference in means between 2 groups was evaluated using the t test when sample size was appropriate and the population was normally distributed; otherwise, the Mann-Whitney U test was adopted. When differences among 3 or more groups were evaluated, the one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. The post hoc comparisons were performed by use of the Bonferroni post hoc test or the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. The shown statistical significance of differences between groups was always calculated by post hoc comparisons when multiple groups were compared. Statistical analyses were performed with the use of SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and GraphPad-Prism 5.00 (GraphPad-Software, San Diego, CA). Probability values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Rheb Mediates mTORC1 Inhibition During Starvation in CMs

To investigate whether Rheb acts as a sensor of energy deprivation in CMs, neonatal rat ventricular CMs were subjected to glucose deprivation (GD). GTP binding of Rheb was decreased significantly in response to GD (Figure 1A), indicating that Rheb is inactivated by GD. During GD, phosphorylation of p70S6K and 4E-BP1 was progressively reduced, indicating that mTORC1 was inhibited (Figure 1B). Knockdown of Rheb, with adenovirus harboring shRNA-Rheb, inhibited phosphorylation of p70S6K at baseline, suggesting that inactivation of Rheb is sufficient to inactivate mTORC1 (online-only Data Supplement Figure IA). Transduction of CMs with adenovirus harboring wild-type Rheb abolished the GD-induced decreases in phosphorylation of p70S6K and 4E-BP1 (Figure 1C through 1E and online-only Data Supplement Figure IB), suggesting that Rheb inactivation is required for GD-induced suppression of mTORC1. In addition, Rheb physically interacts with mTOR both at baseline and during GD (online-only Data Supplement Figure IC), thus indicating that Rheb directly regulates mTORC1 in CMs.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

mTORC1 is downregulated during GD through Rheb inactivation. A, Rheb activity was assessed by the ratio of Rheb-bound GTP to Rheb-bound GTP+GDP levels at baseline and during GD; n=5. B, CMs were subjected to GD for different periods of time. Phosphorylation statuses of p70S6K (Thr 389) and 4E-BP1 (Thr 37/46) were evaluated. C through E, CMs were transduced with adenovirus harboring wild-type Rheb or LacZ. After 48 hours, phosphorylation statuses of p70S6K and 4E-BP1 were evaluated at baseline and after GD. Immunoblots and densitometric analyses are presented. n=5. GD indicates glucose deprivation; CM, cardiomyocyte.

Rheb is negatively regulated by the GTPase-activating protein activity of the TSC1/TSC2 complex.7 Downregulation of TSC2, with adenovirus harboring shRNA-TSC2 (online-only Data Supplement Figure ID), induced phosphorylation of p70S6K, suggesting that endogenous TSC2 negatively regulates mTORC1 in CMs (online-only Data Supplement Figure IE and IF). Activation of mTORC1 by downregulation of TSC2 was abolished in the presence of Rheb knockdown, suggesting that TSC2 regulates mTORC1 through Rheb (online-only Data Supplement Figure IE and IF). On the other hand, as indicated by the phosphorylation status of Akt, the activity of mTORC2, another branch of the mTOR pathway, was unaffected by GD, and overexpression of Rheb failed to activate Akt (online-only Data Supplement Figure IG and IH). These results suggest that GD inhibits mTORC1, but not mTORC2, by inactivating Rheb.

Activation of Rheb Sensitizes CMs to Cell Death During GD, Whereas Inhibition Is Protective

We then investigated the role of Rheb in regulating CM survival during GD. Although Rheb is cell protective in other cell types, CMs in which the activity of mTORC1 was normalized with overexpressed Rheb displayed decreased survival after 10 and 18 hours of GD in comparison with control virus–treated CMs (Figure 2A). CMs overexpressed with Rheb displayed significantly more apoptosis and necrosis, as assessed by TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assays and propidium iodide staining, respectively (Figure 2B and 2C, online-only Data Supplement Figure IIA). TSC2 knockdown also decreased survival and increased apoptosis of CMs in response to GD (Figure 2D and online-only Data Supplement Figure IIB). Conversely, downregulation of endogenous Rheb increased the survival of CMs during GD and rescued the decrease in cell survival in the presence of TSC2 knockdown during GD (Figure 2E). Furthermore, selective inhibition of mTORC1, through Raptor downregulation, with adenovirus harboring shRNA-Raptor, significantly increased CM survival during GD in Rheb-overexpressing CMs. In contrast, selective mTORC2 inhibition, through Rictor depletion, did not increase survival in Rheb-overexpressing CMs during GD (Figure 2F). Collectively, these data suggest that Rheb negatively regulates CM survival during GD through mTORC1 activation. Thus, inactivation of endogenous Rheb during GD is an adaptive mechanism that promotes survival of CMs.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Rheb activation during GD increases CM death and apoptosis. A, Cell viability was evaluated in CMs transduced with Ad-Rheb or Ad-LacZ at baseline and during GD. n=4. B and C, Percentage of TUNEL-positive cells was also evaluated after GD. n=4, bar=50 μm. D, CMs were transduced with Ad harboring sh-RNA-TSC2 or with sh-scramble. After 96 hours, cell viability was evaluated at baseline and after GD. n=5. E, Cell viability was evaluated in CMs transduced with sh-scramble (sh-CT), sh-Rheb, sh-TSC2, or sh-Rheb plus sh-TSC2 at baseline and after GD. n=5. F, Cell viability was evaluated in CMs transduced with Ad-LacZ, Ad-Rheb, or Ad-Rheb plus sh-Raptor or sh-Rictor, at baseline and after GD. n=3. Cell viability was assessed by Cell Titer Blue assay. Data are presented as a percentage of the relevant control (regular medium), with the control being set at 100%. *P<0.05 with respect to relevant control (regular medium). Ad indicates adenovirus; sh, short hairpin; GD, glucose deprivation; CM, cardiomyocyte; DAPI, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-2-HCl; TUNEL, TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling.

Rheb Regulates CM Autophagy

We investigated the molecular mechanism through which inactivation of Rheb protects CMs during GD. Because Rheb inactivation causes mTORC1 inhibition during GD, and because mTOR is a negative regulator of autophagy,21 we hypothesized that downregulation of Rheb during GD is required for stimulation of autophagy, which may be protective in this context.19 As shown previously, GD increased LC3-II and decreased p62, a protein degraded by autophagy,21 suggesting that GD activates autophagy in CMs. However, in Rheb-overexpressing CMs, LC3-II expression was lower and expression of p62 was greater, both at baseline and during GD (Figure 3A through 3C). The number of GFP-LC3 dots, an indicator of autophagosome accumulation, during GD was significantly smaller in Rheb-overexpressing CMs than in control CMs (Figure 3D and 3E). Rheb overexpression induced significant downregulation of autophagy genes, including beclin-1, ulk-1, atg4, and atg7 (Figure 3F). Conversely, downregulation of endogenous Rheb significantly increased autophagy at baseline and during GD (online-only Data Supplement Figure III). These results suggest that endogenous Rheb negatively regulates autophagy and that inactivation of Rheb is necessary and sufficient for stimulation of autophagy in CMs during GD.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Rheb is a negative regulator of autophagy. A through C, CMs were transduced with Ad-LacZ or Ad-Rheb for 48 hours. LC3 isoforms and p62 accumulation were evaluated at baseline or after 4 hours of GD. A representative immunoblot is shown (A), together with densitometric analyses of LC3-II (B) and p62 (C). n=5. D and E, CMs were transduced with Ad-GFP-LC3 together with Ad-LacZ or Ad-Rheb. GFP-LC3 puncta were evaluated after 4 hours of GD (bar=10 μm). n=3. F, Expression of autophagic genes was evaluated in CMs transduced with Ad-LacZ or Ad-Rheb. G, Cell viability was evaluated in CMs transduced with sh-scramble, sh-Rheb, or with sh-Rheb plus sh-Beclin-1. n=4. Data are presented as a percentage of the relevant CT (baseline), with CT being set at 100%. H, Cell viability was evaluated in CMs transduced with Ad-LacZ, Ad-Rheb, and with Ad-Rheb together with Ad-Atg7 or trehalose. Sucrose treatment (100 mmol/L) was used as control treatment for trehalose. n=3. Atg7=Ad-Atg7. Tre indicates trehalose; Ad, adenovirus; sh, short hairpin; GD, glucose deprivation; CM, cardiomyocyte; CT, control. *P<0.05 with respect to cells cultured with a normal medium.

We then asked if autophagy mediates the cell-protective effect of Rheb inactivation. The protective effect of Rheb downregulation during GD was completely abrogated when Beclin-1 was downregulated with adenovirus harboring shRNA-beclin1 (Figure 3G). These results suggest that autophagy plays an important role in mediating the protective effect of Rheb inactivation during GD. Conversely, to restore autophagy during GD in Rheb-overexpressing CMs, we expressed Atg7 with adenovirus transduction (online-only Data Supplement Figure IVA). We took this approach because Atg7 is a crucial protein for autophagosome formation, because Atg7 is markedly downregulated in Rheb-overexpressing CMs, and because overexpression of Atg7 is sufficient to reinduce autophagy when autophagy is inhibited.21,22 Atg7 overexpression significantly restored autophagy in Rheb-overexpressing CMs during GD (online-only Data Supplement Figure IVB through IVD). We also used trehalose, which induces autophagy without affecting the mTORC1 pathway.23 Trehalose restored Atg7 and Beclin-1 expression in Rheb-overexpressing CMs without affecting the mTORC1 pathway, thereby restoring autophagy during GD (online-only Data Supplement Figure IVE and IVF). Importantly, both Atg7 expression and trehalose pretreatment significantly increased the survival of Rheb-overexpressing CMs during GD (Figure 3H). Collectively, these results suggest that Rheb regulates the survival and death of CMs during GD through regulation of autophagy in vitro.

Rheb Overexpression Increases Energy Stress and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress During GD

Important consequences of autophagy include restoration of ATP contents and protein quality control. Rheb overexpression during GD significantly enhanced ATP depletion, whereas Rheb disruption significantly increased ATP content (Figure 4A). Overexpression of Rheb increased GRP78, phosphorylation of protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase and upregulation of Ccaat-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP), and Caspase-12 (fragment), markers of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, in CMs during GD (Figure 4B and 4C). Conversely, upregulation of the ER stress markers during GD was significantly attenuated in CMs in which Rheb was knocked down (Figure 4B and 4C). Restoration of autophagy in Rheb-overexpressing CMs, through Atg7 overexpression, significantly attenuated ATP depletion (Figure 4D) and ER stress during GD, indicating that autophagy inhibition is responsible for these derangements (Figure 4E and 4F).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Rheb activation increases ATP depletion and ER stress during GD. A, CM ATP content at baseline and after 18 hours of GD was evaluated in CMs with Rheb overexpression or depletion. Data are presented as the fluorescence of each sample as a percentage of the control. *P<0.05 vs control (regular medium). n=4. B and C, Unfolded protein response markers were evaluated at baseline and after GD. *P<0.05 vs LacZ after GD. n=5. D through F, ATP content (D, n=5) and GRP78 accumulation (E and F, n=3) were evaluated in Rheb-overexpressing CMs with or without Ad-Atg7, after GD. Ad indicates adenovirus; sh, short hairpin; GD, glucose deprivation; CM, cardiomyocyte; CHOP, C/EBP homologous protein.

Inhibition of Rheb Is Protective During Prolonged Myocardial Ischemia

To investigate the role of Rheb in regulating CM survival and death in response to energy deprivation in vivo, we used a mouse model of prolonged ischemia, in which the left descending coronary artery was ligated for 3 hours. During ischemia, the GTP-bound form of Rheb was significantly decreased, whereas the total expression of Rheb was not altered, suggesting that Rheb is inactivated by prolonged ischemia in vivo (Figure 5A and 5B). The activity of mTORC1, as evaluated with p70S6K phosphorylation, was also decreased during ischemia (Figure 5C and 5D).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Rheb activation is detrimental during prolonged myocardial ischemia in vivo. A, Rheb-bound GTP levels were evaluated at baseline and after 30 minutes of ischemia. n=7. B, The amount of Rheb expression was evaluated at baseline and during ischemia. C and D, Cardiac p70S6K phosphorylation was evaluated in Tg-Rheb mice and controls, both at baseline and after 30 minutes of ischemia. n=4 for each group. E, Cardiac Rheb expression was evaluated in Tg-Rheb mice and control mice (FVB background). F through H, Tg-Rheb and control mice (Rheb+/tTA− and Rheb-/tTA+) were subjected to 3 hours of ischemia. Left ventricular myocardial sections after Alcian blue and triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining is shown (F; bar=1 mm), as well as the AAR (G) and MI size/AAR (H) quantification. AAR indicates area at risk; MI, myocardial infarct; CT, control.

To evaluate the significance of Rheb inhibition during ischemia in vivo, we generated transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of Rheb (Tg-Rheb) with use of a Tet-off system. In these mice, expression of the Rheb transgene in the heart was induced in the absence of doxycycline. Doxycycline was administered to the mice during the gestational period and for the first 3 to 4 weeks of life to avoid the effect of transgene expression during cardiac development in Tg-Rheb (Figure 5E and online-only Data Supplement Figure VA and VB). Doxycycline was terminated 6 to 8 weeks before the experiment to allow full transgene expression and eliminate possible actions of doxycycline on cell death/survival. In this protocol, expression of Rheb was 2.3-fold greater in Tg-Rheb than in control littermates (Rheb+/tTA− mice). Rheb exhibited diffuse cytoplasmic distribution in CMs of both control mice and Tg-Rheb (online-only Data Supplement Figure VC and VD). Tg-Rheb presented a normal cardiac phenotype at 3 months of age (online-only Data Supplement Table I). In Tg-Rheb mice, mTORC1 activity was significantly increased, both at baseline and during prolonged ischemia, in comparison with control mice (Figure 5C and 5D), suggesting that Rheb inactivation is required for mTORC1 inhibition during prolonged ischemia. After 3 hours of ischemia, Tg-Rheb mice exhibited a significantly greater MI size than control mice (Figure 5F through 5H). The extent of CM apoptosis and necrosis after prolonged ischemia was also greater in Tg-Rheb than in controls, as evaluated with TUNEL and Hairpin-2 staining, respectively (online-only Data Supplement Figure VI). Tg-Rheb presented increased ischemic injury even after a brief period of ischemia (30 minutes), as evaluated with Hairpin-2 staining. Tg-Rheb also exhibited significantly enhanced myocardial damage even after a longer coronary occlusion (6 hours; online-only Data Supplement Figure VII).

There was less induction of autophagy in Tg-Rheb than in control mice at baseline and during ischemia, as indicated by reduced LC3-II and increased p62 accumulation (online-only Data Supplement Figure VIIIA through VIIIC). Expression of p62 did not differ at the mRNA level between controls and Tg-Rheb, indicating that increased p62 accumulation was due to reduced degradation (mRNA expression in Tg-Rheb 0.96-fold versus controls, P=NS). The level of myocardial ATP in the ischemic area after ischemia was significantly lower in Tg-Rheb than in controls (online-only Data Supplement Figure VIIID). The level of CHOP, an indicator of ER stress, after ischemia was also significantly greater in Tg-Rheb than in control mice (online-only Data Supplement Figure VIIIE and VIIIF). These results indicate that inhibition of endogenous Rheb is protective during prolonged ischemia in vivo.

To evaluate whether the deleterious effect of Rheb overexpression during prolonged ischemia is due to the lack of mTORC1 inactivation and activation of autophagy, rapamycin, a selective inhibitor of mTORC1 and stimulator of autophagy, was administered to Tg-Rheb and control mice just before the prolonged ischemia. Rapamycin inhibited mTORC1 activity and stimulated autophagy in Tg-Rheb mice after prolonged ischemia (Figure 6A). Rapamycin significantly reduced the size of MI in response to prolonged ischemia in Tg-Rheb mice in comparison with vehicle administration (Figure 6B through 6D). Rapamycin treatment also significantly reduced CHOP accumulation and caspase-3 cleavage in Tg-Rheb hearts after prolonged ischemia (Figure 6E and 6F). These results suggest that Rheb promotes myocardial injury during prolonged ischemia by stimulating mTORC1, inhibiting autophagy and stimulating ER stress.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Rapamycin-induced autophagy limits myocardial damage in Rheb-overexpressing mice. A, Rapamycin (1 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally to Tg-Rheb and control mice (Rheb+/tTA−) 60 minutes before coronary ligation. p70S6K phosphorylation and LC3 expression levels were evaluated after 30 minutes of ischemia, whereas p62 expression levels were evaluated after 3 hours of ischemia. B through D, The MI/ AAR ratio in Tg-Rheb and controls treated, or not treated, with rapamycin was evaluated. Bar=1 mm. E and F, CHOP expression and caspase-3 cleavage were also evaluated after 3 hours of ischemia. n=3 for each group. AAR indicates area at risk; MI, myocardial infarct; CT, control; CHOP, C/EBP homologous protein,

High-Fat Diet–Induced Obesity Is Associated With Deregulation of Rheb and Increased Myocardial Susceptibility to Prolonged Ischemia

Obesity and metabolic syndrome are associated with high cardiovascular mortality and reduced cardiac function after MI.12–16 Complications of obesity are associated with deregulated mTORC1 activation and inhibition of autophagy in other organs.17,18,22 We therefore investigated whether obesity is associated with deregulated Rheb activation, which in turn mediates an increased susceptibility to myocardial ischemia.

To induce obesity, C57BL/6J mice were fed with high-fat diet (HFD) mice for 18 to 20 weeks. HFD mice developed obesity and exhibited a significant increase in serum levels of glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and nonesterified fatty acid in comparison with mice fed with control diet (CD) mice, suggesting that HFD mice develop metabolic syndrome (online-only Data Supplement Table II). Insulin levels and the HOMA index were significantly elevated in HFD mice, consistent with the notion that these mice develop insulin resistance. HFD mice presented increases in mTOR-dependent IRS-1 phosphorylation (serine 636), which is a marker of decreased insulin sensitivity18 at baseline (online-only Data Supplement Figure IXA). HFD mice showed a significant increase in left ventricular mass and left ventricular wall thickness but preserved left ventricular systolic function (online-only Data Supplement Table III). Both cell size and expression of atrial natriuretic factor, a fetal-type gene, were increased, suggesting that HFD mice develop cardiac hypertrophy (online-only Data Supplement Figure IXB through IXD). After prolonged (3 hours) ischemia, HFD mice exhibited a significantly greater MI size than CD mice (Figure 7A through 7C), which was accompanied by greater numbers of TUNEL-positive and Hairpin-2-positive cells (online-only Data Supplement Figure X), signifying that HFD increases myocardial susceptibility to ischemic injury. HFD mice also presented a greater percentage of hairpin-2–positive cells with respect to control mice after 30 minutes of ischemia (11.5±1.3% versus 4.2±1.0%, P<0.05).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

HFD-induced obesity is associated with greater myocardial injury and deregulated Rheb/mTORC1 activation. A through C, MI/AAR was evaluated in CD and HFD mice after ischemia. Bar=1 mm. D, Phosphorylation statuses of p70S6K and AMPK (Thr 172) were evaluated both at baseline and after 30 minutes of ischemia (densitometric analysis is shown in online-only Data Supplement Figure XIA). E, Myocardial Rheb-bound GTP content was evaluated in CD and HFD mice, both at baseline and after 30 minutes of ischemia. n=5 for each group. F, Myocardial autophagy in HFD mice was significantly inhibited in comparison with control mice, both at baseline and after 30 minutes (LC3-II levels) or 3 hours of ischemia (p62 levels). Representative immunoblots are presented, and densitometric analysis is reported in online-only Data Supplement Figure XIB and XIC. G and H, Tg-GFP-LC3 mice fed with CD or HFD were subjected to ischemia. Representative heart sections are shown. Bar=50 μm. Arrows indicate autophagosomes (G). The number of autophagosomes per microscopic field in the 2 groups after 30 minutes of ischemia is reported (H). n=4 each group. HFD indicates high-fat diet; CD, control diet; AAR, area at risk; MI, myocardial infarct.

In HFD mice, the activity of mTORC1 was greater at baseline and remained elevated during prolonged ischemia (Figure 7D and online-only Data Supplement Figure XIA). Thus, the suppression of mTORC1 in response to prolonged ischemia observed in CD mice was attenuated in HFD mice. Although the GTP-bound form of Rheb was significantly reduced during prolonged ischemia in CD mice, it was increased at baseline and not significantly diminished during prolonged ischemia in HFD mice (Figure 7E), suggesting that the activity of Rheb and mTORC1 is elevated at baseline and remains greater in HFD mice than in CD mice during prolonged ischemia. Intriguingly, the activity of AMPK, a negative regulator of the Rheb/mTORC1 pathway, was reduced in HFD mice both at baseline and during ischemia, as indicated by a reduction in its phosphorylation status. Conversely, it was activated in CD mice during ischemia (Figure 7D and online-only Data Supplement Figure XIA).

Consistent with activation of the mTORC1 pathway, autophagy in the heart was significantly suppressed in HFD mice both at baseline and during ischemia, as indicated by decreased LC3-II and increased p62 accumulation (Figure 7F, online-only Data Supplement Figure XIB and XIC). p62 mRNA expression was unchanged (0.84-fold versus CD mice, P=NS). Accumulation of autophagosomes, as evaluated by use of GFP-LC3 dots, was significantly less in HFD mice than in CD mice (Figure 7G and 7H). The number of GFP-LC3 dots was significantly reduced in HFD mice during ischemia, also after administration of chloroquine, which inhibits lysosomal enzyme activity. These data indicate reduced autophagosome formation in HFD mice (online-only Data Supplement Figure XID and XIE).

To investigate if deregulated activation of the mTORC1 pathway is responsible for the reduced tolerance to prolonged ischemia of HFD mice, we administered rapamycin to these animals and evaluated its effect on ischemic injury. As we observed with Tg-Rheb, rapamycin treatment increased autophagy (online-only Data Supplement Figure XIF) and significantly reduced the MI size of both HFD mice and CD mice (Figure 8A through 8C). Rapamycin administration failed to reduce ischemic injury in heterozygous beclin-1 knockout mice (beclin-1+/−), in which autophagy cannot be activated, when fed with HFD (Figure 8D and 8E). These results indicate that autophagy reactivation mediates the beneficial effect of mTORC1 inhibition in HFD mice.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

mTORC1 inhibition is protective in HFD mice through autophagy activation. A through C, Rapamycin (1 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally to HFD and CD mice 60 minutes before coronary ligation. Mice were subjected to 3 hours of ischemia. The MI/AAR ratio was evaluated. Bar=1 mm. *P<0.05 vs CD. D and E, Either control or beclin-1+/− mice fed with HFD were subjected to 3 hours of ischemia. The MI/AAR ratio was evaluated. R indicates rapamycin. F through H, After feeding with HFD or CD, tamoxifen (30 mg/kg) was administered to α-MHC-MerCreMer-mTOR flox/+ mice (mTOR+/−) and α-MHC-MerCreMer-mTOR +/+ mice (controls) for 7 days. The mice were subjected to 3 hours of ischemia. The MI/AAR ratio was evaluated. HFD indicates high-fat diet; CD, control diet; AAR, area at risk; MI, myocardial infarct; MHC, myosin heavy chain.

To further demonstrate that deregulated mTORC1 activation increases the ischemic susceptibility of HFD mice, we subjected mice, with inducible cardiac-specific heterozygous mTOR knockout, that were fed with HFD, to prolonged ischemia. This strategy allowed us to partially inhibit the mTOR pathway and to normalize the increased activation of mTORC1 observed in HFD mice. Tamoxifen was administered to α-myosin heavy chain promoter-MerCreMer-mTOR flox/+ mice (mTOR+/−) for 7 days. Cardiac mTOR protein levels were reduced in mTOR+/− mice 3 weeks after tamoxifen administration (online-only Data Supplement Figure XIIA). Cardiac mTOR deletion reduced mTORC1 activity and increased autophagy in mTOR+/− mice fed with control diet or HFD (online-only Data Supplement Figure XIIB through XIID). Remarkably, cardiac mTOR deletion reduced MI size in mice fed with control diet and HFD with respect to controls (Figure 8F through 8H). In summary, cardiac activation of the Rheb-mTORC1 pathway in HFD-induced obesity is detrimental during prolonged ischemia because of the inhibition of autophagy.

Discussion

We have demonstrated that Rheb is inhibited in response to GD and prolonged ischemia, and inhibition of Rheb, in turn, inhibits mTORC1 in CMs. Forced activation of Rheb in such conditions stimulates ATP depletion and ER stress by suppression of autophagy, thereby inducing cell death. Thus, Rheb acts as a sensor of energy stress and as a critical regulator of CM survival in response to energy starvation.

We have shown previously that both GD and ischemia in CMs and in the heart, respectively, induce suppression of mTOR.19,20 It should be noted that mTOR is inhibited by both Rheb-dependent and -independent mechanisms.19,20 For example, several upstream kinases, including AMPK and glycogen synthase kinase-3β, which indirectly regulate mTOR, inhibit Rheb through phosphorylation and consequent activation of GTPase-activating protein activity in TSC2.2,3,8 It should be noted, however, that mTOR is also inhibited through Rheb-independent mechanisms, such as Akt-dependent phosphorylation of mTOR and PRAS40, and AMPK-dependent Raptor phosphorylation.8 Our results indicate that Rheb interacts with mTOR, that Rheb is inhibited during GD and myocardial ischemia, and that its inactivation is required for mTORC1 inhibition. Conversely, neither overexpression of Rheb nor GD affected the activity of mTORC2. We therefore propose that Rheb acts as a central and direct regulator of mTORC1 during energy starvation in CMs.

Our results suggest that forced Rheb activation exacerbates cell death and apoptosis during GD and prolonged ischemia, but it does not affect cell survival at baseline. On the other hand, downregulation of Rheb increased survival of CMs during GD, intimating the involvement of endogenous Rheb in the regulation of survival/death during GD and prolonged ischemia. Previous studies have indicated that Rheb promotes cell survival and inhibits apoptotic cell death in response to stress in several cancer cells.5,6 Activation of Rheb in unstressed conditions also induces hypertrophy without cell death in CMs (not shown). Thus, the function of Rheb in cells appears to be context dependent.

Importantly, we found that downregulation of mTORC1 mediates the protective effects of Rheb inhibition during energy deprivation, because depletion of Raptor but not of Rictor, which are the adaptor proteins of complex 1 and complex 2 of mTOR, respectively, increased survival of Rheb-overexpressing CMs during GD in vitro. In addition, pharmacological and genetic inhibition of mTORC1 reduced the susceptibility to ischemic myocardial damage of Rheb-overexpressing and obese mice, and a protective effect was also observed in control animals in vivo. These results suggest that Rheb is an obvious therapeutic surrogate of mTORC1, to achieve increased CM survival during energy deprivation.

The role of mTOR in regulating the stress response is poorly understood in terminally differentiated cell types such as CMs. In particular, the role of mTOR in the regulation of CM survival has been primarily investigated through indirect means, eg, the use of pharmacological inhibitors, which may have mTOR-independent effects.19,20 In addition, the role of mTOR in cardiac stress has been mostly studied in animal models of chronic ventricular remodeling in which mTORC1 is activated, whereas we observed mTORC1 inhibition during CM energy deprivation.9–11 Interestingly, mTORC1 activation has been indicated as protective during cardiac mechanical overload.9,11 On the other hand, in our study, we demonstrated that selective and direct mTORC1 activation is detrimental during acute cardiac energy deprivation, whereas both pharmacological and genetic mTORC1 inhibitions are protective. In particular, we provided the first evidence that genetic mTOR inhibition is protective during myocardial ischemia. Thus, the function of mTORC1 in CMs appears to be context dependent. mTORC1 activation might be required for cell growth in response to mechanical overload, whereas mTORC1 inhibition is important for preservation of energy status in response to energy deprivation.

Rheb inhibition during energy deprivation is required for autophagy activation, which is protective in this condition. In fact, suppression of autophagy by knockdown of Beclin-1 completely abrogated the protective effect of Rheb knockdown in CMs during GD. Restoration of autophagy through treatment with trehalose or overexpression of Atg7, which stimulates autophagy through mTOR-independent mechanisms, significantly reduced CM death induced by forced Rheb activation. Therefore, although it is still debated whether autophagy is protective or detrimental during cardiac stress,24 we have demonstrated that Rheb-regulated autophagy is protective during CM nutrient starvation and ischemia. In particular, we showed that Rheb-regulated autophagy is protective through the preservation of ATP content and reduction of misfolded protein accumulation, namely ER stress.

Rheb-induced inhibition of autophagy was accompanied by downregulation of Atg7 protein levels. Overexpression of Atg7 was sufficient to restore autophagy and to suppress Rheb-induced cell death during GD, suggesting that Rheb regulates autophagy, in part, through Atg7. mTORC1 was suggested to modulate autophagy through Ulk1/2 regulation.21 The role of Ulk1/2 in mediating expression of Atg7 remains to be elucidated.

Interestingly, inadvertent activation of the Rheb/mTORC1 pathway is observed in HFD-induced obesity. Obesity is characterized by glucose intolerance and dyslipidemia, and it is associated with an increased susceptibility to myocardial ischemia.13–16 We demonstrated that autophagy is reduced in the hearts of mice with HFD-induced obesity. These mice exhibited exacerbated myocardial injury in response to prolonged ischemia, which was normalized by rapamycin treatment or genetic mTOR inhibition, suggesting that increased mTORC1 activity may be responsible for the increased susceptibility. Remarkably, inhibition of Beclin-1 was associated with the failure of pharmacological mTORC1 inhibition to reduce ischemic injury in HFD mice, indicating that reactivation of autophagy is the crucial mechanism mediating the beneficial effects of mTORC1 inhibition in HFD-induced obesity.

Severe obesity and metabolic syndrome are associated with increased cardiovascular risk events and a poor prognosis in patients after acute MI.12,14,15,25,26 If our results hold true in humans, it may be helpful to treat patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome by use of pharmacological inhibitors of Rheb or mTORC1 to stimulate autophagy during an acute episode of myocardial ischemia. Our results are also supported by an interesting previous study that showed that obesity increases vascular senescence and vascular dysfunction in response to mTOR activation.27

Other previous studies showed increased basal mTORC1 activity in the liver,17,28 adipose tissue,29 vasculature,27 skeletal muscle,17,28,30,31 and cardiac muscle32–34 in both genetic and diet-induced models of obesity and dysmetabolic conditions. AMPK inhibition has been proposed as the main intracellular mechanism leading to mTORC1 activation.18,30–34 Our study extends this previous evidence, suggesting that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 induced by AMPK downregulation.

Several stimuli may enhance the activity of the Rheb/mTORC1 pathway in the tissues of obese and dysmetabolic animals. High caloric intake may represent one possible cause. High levels of circulating and cardiac lipids may also represent potential mechanisms. In addition, increases in circulating insulin, amino acids, cytokines, and adipokines may contribute to the increased Rheb/mTORC1 activity in HFD mice.17,18,28,31,32,35

In summary, our study demonstrates that inactivation of Rheb protects CMs during energy deprivation through activation of autophagy, reduction of energy expenditure, and attenuation of ER stress (online-only Data Supplement Figure XIIE). Rheb and mTORC1 may represent therapeutic targets to reduce myocardial damage during acute myocardial ischemia, particularly in patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome.

Sources of Funding

Dr Sciarretta is supported by the American Heart Association Founders Affiliate FDA Spring 2010 postdoctoral fellowship 10POST4260019. This work was supported in part by US Public Health Service grants HL59139, HL67724, HL69020, HL91469, HL102738, and AG27211 and by the Foundation of Leducq Transatlantic Network of Excellence.

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Christopher D. Brady and Daniela Zablocki for their critical revisions of the article.

Footnotes

  • The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at http://circ.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.078212/-/DC1.

  • Received August 15, 2011.
  • Accepted January 23, 2012.
  • © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Velagaleti RS,
    2. Pencina MJ,
    3. Murabito JM,
    4. Wang TJ,
    5. Parikh NI,
    6. D'Agostino RB,
    7. Levy D,
    8. Kannel WB,
    9. Vasan RS
    . Long-term trends in the incidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;118:2057–2062.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Inoki K,
    2. Ouyang H,
    3. Zhu T,
    4. Lindvall C,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Zhang X,
    7. Yang Q,
    8. Bennett C,
    9. Harada Y,
    10. Stankunas K,
    11. Wang CY,
    12. He X,
    13. MacDougald OA,
    14. You M,
    15. Williams BO,
    16. Guan KL
    . TSC2 integrates Wnt and energy signals via a coordinated phosphorylation by AMPK and GSK3 to regulate cell growth. Cell. 2006;126:955–968.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Aspuria PJ,
    2. Sato T,
    3. Tamanoi F
    . The TSC/Rheb/TOR signaling pathway in fission yeast and mammalian cells: temperature sensitive and constitutive active mutants of TOR. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:1692–1695.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Karassek S,
    2. Berghaus C,
    3. Schwarten M,
    4. Goemans CG,
    5. Ohse N,
    6. Kock G,
    7. Jockers K,
    8. Neumann S,
    9. Gottfried S,
    10. Herrmann C,
    11. Heumann R,
    12. Stoll R
    . Ras homolog enriched in brain (Rheb) enhances apoptotic signaling. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:33979–33991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Babcock JT,
    2. Quilliam LA
    . Rheb/mTOR Activation and regulation in cancer: novel treatment strategies beyond rapamycin. Curr Drug Targets. 2011;12:1223–1231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ma D,
    2. Bai X,
    3. Zou H,
    4. Lai Y,
    5. Jiang Y
    . Rheb GTPase controls apoptosis by regulating interaction of FKBP38 with Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:8621–8627.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Inoki K,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Xu T,
    4. Guan KL
    . Rheb GTPase is a direct target of TSC2 GAP activity and regulates mTOR signaling. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1829–1834.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sengupta S,
    2. Peterson TR,
    3. Sabatini DM
    . Regulation of the mTOR complex 1 pathway by nutrients, growth factors, and stress. Mol Cell. 2010;40:310–322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Zhang D,
    2. Contu R,
    3. Latronico MV,
    4. Zhang JL,
    5. Rizzi R,
    6. Catalucci D,
    7. Miyamoto S,
    8. Huang K,
    9. Ceci M,
    10. Gu Y,
    11. Dalton ND,
    12. Peterson KL,
    13. Guan KL,
    14. Brown JH,
    15. Chen J,
    16. Sonenberg N,
    17. Condorelli G
    . MTORC1 regulates cardiac function and myocyte survival through 4E-BP1 inhibition in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:2805–2816.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Buss SJ,
    2. Muenz S,
    3. Riffel JH,
    4. Malekar P,
    5. Hagenmueller M,
    6. Weiss CS,
    7. Bea F,
    8. Bekeredjian R,
    9. Schinke-Braun M,
    10. Izumo S,
    11. Katus HA,
    12. Hardt SE
    . Beneficial effects of Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition on left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2435–2446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Song X,
    2. Kusakari Y,
    3. Xiao CY,
    4. Kinsella SD,
    5. Rosenberg MA,
    6. Scherrer-Crosbie M,
    7. Hara K,
    8. Rosenzweig A,
    9. Matsui T
    . mTOR attenuates the inflammatory response in cardiomyocytes and prevents cardiac dysfunction in pathological hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010;299:C1256–C1266.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Flegal KM,
    2. Carroll MD,
    3. Ogden CL,
    4. Curtin LR
    . Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:235–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Clavijo LC,
    2. Pinto TL,
    3. Kuchulakanti PK,
    4. Torguson R,
    5. Chu WW,
    6. Satler LF,
    7. Kent KM,
    8. Suddath WO,
    9. Pichard AD,
    10. Waksman R
    . Metabolic syndrome in patients with acute myocardial infarction is associated with increased infarct size and in-hospital complications. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2006;7:7–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Zeller M,
    2. Steg PG,
    3. Ravisy J,
    4. Laurent Y,
    5. Janin-Manificat L,
    6. L'Huillier I,
    7. Beer JC,
    8. Oudot A,
    9. Rioufol G,
    10. Makki H,
    11. Farnier M,
    12. Rochette L,
    13. Verges B,
    14. Cottin Y
    . Prevalence and impact of metabolic syndrome on hospital outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1192–1198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Abdulla J,
    2. Kober L,
    3. Abildstrom SZ,
    4. Christensen E,
    5. James WP,
    6. Torp-Pedersen C
    . Impact of obesity as a mortality predictor in high-risk patients with myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure: a pooled analysis of five registries. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:594–601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. du Toit EF,
    2. Smith W,
    3. Muller C,
    4. Strijdom H,
    5. Stouthammer B,
    6. Woodiwiss AJ,
    7. Norton GR,
    8. Lochner A
    . Myocardial susceptibility to ischemic-reperfusion injury in a prediabetic model of dietary-induced obesity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;294:H2336–H2343.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Khamzina L,
    2. Veilleux A,
    3. Bergeron S,
    4. Marette A
    . Increased activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in liver and skeletal muscle of obese rats: possible involvement in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Endocrinology. 2005;146:1473–1481.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Um SH,
    2. D'Alessio D,
    3. Thomas G
    . Nutrient overload, insulin resistance, and ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1, S6K1. Cell Metab. 2006;3:393–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Matsui Y,
    2. Takagi H,
    3. Qu X,
    4. Abdellatif M,
    5. Sakoda H,
    6. Asano T,
    7. Levine B,
    8. Sadoshima J
    . Distinct roles of autophagy in the heart during ischemia and reperfusion: roles of AMP-activated protein kinase and Beclin 1 in mediating autophagy. Circ Res. 2007;100:914–922.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Zhai P,
    2. Sciarretta S,
    3. Galeotti J,
    4. Volpe M,
    5. Sadoshima J
    . Differential roles of GSK-3β during myocardial ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion. Circ Res. 2011;109:502–511.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ravikumar B,
    2. Futter M,
    3. Jahreiss L,
    4. Korolchuk VI,
    5. Lichtenberg M,
    6. Luo S,
    7. Massey DC,
    8. Menzies FM,
    9. Narayanan U,
    10. Renna M,
    11. Jimenez-Sanchez M,
    12. Sarkar S,
    13. Underwood B,
    14. Winslow A,
    15. Rubinsztein DC
    . Mammalian macroautophagy at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:1707–1711.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Yang L,
    2. Li P,
    3. Fu S,
    4. Calay ES,
    5. Hotamisligil GS
    . Defective hepatic autophagy in obesity promotes ER stress and causes insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2010;11:467–478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sarkar S,
    2. Davies JE,
    3. Huang Z,
    4. Tunnacliffe A,
    5. Rubinsztein DC
    . Trehalose, a novel mTOR-independent autophagy enhancer, accelerates the clearance of mutant huntingtin and alpha-synuclein. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5641–5652.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hamacher-Brady A,
    2. Brady NR,
    3. Gottlieb RA
    . Enhancing macroautophagy protects against ischemia/reperfusion injury in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:29776–29787.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Romero-Corral A,
    2. Montori VM,
    3. Somers VK,
    4. Korinek J,
    5. Thomas RJ,
    6. Allison TG,
    7. Mookadam F,
    8. Lopez-Jimenez F
    . Association of bodyweight with total mortality and with cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease: a systematic review of cohort studies. Lancet. 2006;368:666–678.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Aronson D,
    2. Nassar M,
    3. Goldberg T,
    4. Kapeliovich M,
    5. Hammerman H,
    6. Azzam ZS
    . The impact of body mass index on clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2010;145:476–480.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Wang CY,
    2. Kim HH,
    3. Hiroi Y,
    4. Sawada N,
    5. Salomone S,
    6. Benjamin LE,
    7. Walsh K,
    8. Moskowitz MA,
    9. Liao JK
    . Obesity increases vascular senescence and susceptibility to ischemic injury through chronic activation of Akt and mTOR. Sci Signal. 2009;2:ra11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Um SH,
    2. Frigerio F,
    3. Watanabe M,
    4. Picard F,
    5. Joaquin M,
    6. Sticker M,
    7. Fumagalli S,
    8. Allegrini PR,
    9. Kozma SC,
    10. Auwerx J,
    11. Thomas G
    . Absence of S6K1 protects against age- and diet-induced obesity while enhancing insulin sensitivity. Nature. 2004;431:200–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ranieri SC,
    2. Fusco S,
    3. Panieri E,
    4. Labate V,
    5. Mele M,
    6. Tesori V,
    7. Ferrara AM,
    8. Maulucci G,
    9. De Spirito M,
    10. Martorana GE,
    11. Galeotti T,
    12. Pani G
    . Mammalian life-span determinant p66shcA mediates obesity-induced insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:13420–13425.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Drake JC,
    2. Alway SE,
    3. Hollander JM,
    4. Williamson DL
    . AICAR treatment for 14 days normalizes obesity-induced dysregulation of TORC1 signaling and translational capacity in fasted skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;299:R1546–R1554.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Rivas DA,
    2. Yaspelkis BB III.,
    3. Hawley JA,
    4. Lessard SJ
    . Lipid-induced mTOR activation in rat skeletal muscle reversed by exercise and 5′-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D-ribofuranoside. J Endocrinol. 2009;202:441–451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Glazer HP,
    2. Osipov RM,
    3. Clements RT,
    4. Sellke FW,
    5. Bianchi C
    . Hypercholesterolemia is associated with hyperactive cardiac mTORC1 and mTORC2 signaling. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:1738–1746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Sung MM,
    2. Koonen DP,
    3. Soltys CL,
    4. Jacobs RL,
    5. Febbraio M,
    6. Dyck JR
    . Increased CD36 expression in middle-aged mice contributes to obesity-related cardiac hypertrophy in the absence of cardiac dysfunction. J Mol Med (Berl). 2011;89:459–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Turdi S,
    2. Kandadi MR,
    3. Zhao J,
    4. Huff AF,
    5. Du M,
    6. Ren J
    . Deficiency in AMP-activated protein kinase exaggerates high fat diet-induced cardiac hypertrophy and contractile dysfunction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;50:712–722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Hay N,
    2. Sonenberg N
    . Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1926–1945.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Clinical Perspective

The incidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains very high in patients. This highlights the necessity to clarify the mechanism regulating the survival and death of cardiomyocytes in response to ischemia and to find new cardioprotective therapies reducing ischemic injury. We discovered that Rheb, a small GTP-binding protein, plays a pivotal role in regulating the survival of cardiomyocytes during prolonged myocardial ischemia. Rheb activity is reduced in the ischemic heart, thereby causing the suppression of the mTORC1 pathway. Inhibition of the Rheb/mTORC1 pathway is an adaptive response during ischemia, because forced restoration of cardiac Rheb activity is detrimental under this condition. Rheb inhibition is required for the activation of autophagy, an intracellular degradation process for proteins and organelles, which is protective during energy stress through preservation of cellular energy and relief of ER stress. We discovered that obesity and metabolic syndrome (Ob/MS) are associated with cardiac activation of Rheb/mTORC1 at baseline and during ischemia. In obese mice, autophagy in the heart was suppressed and ischemic injury was exacerbated. Remarkably, inhibition of mTORC1 restores autophagy and reduces infarct size in these animals after prolonged ischemia. Thus, our results suggest that Rheb and mTORC1 may be promising therapeutic targets to reduce myocardial damage after prolonged ischemia in patients with Ob/MS who display deregulated activation of the Rheb/TORC1 pathway and consequent inhibition of autophagy.

View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation
March 6, 2012, Volume 125, Issue 9
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Sources of Funding
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Rheb is a Critical Regulator of Autophagy During Myocardial IschemiaClinical Perspective
    Sebastiano Sciarretta, Peiyong Zhai, Dan Shao, Yasuhiro Maejima, Jeffrey Robbins, Massimo Volpe, Gianluigi Condorelli and Junichi Sadoshima
    Circulation. 2012;125:1134-1146, originally published March 5, 2012
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.078212

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Rheb is a Critical Regulator of Autophagy During Myocardial IschemiaClinical Perspective
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Rheb is a Critical Regulator of Autophagy During Myocardial IschemiaClinical Perspective
    Sebastiano Sciarretta, Peiyong Zhai, Dan Shao, Yasuhiro Maejima, Jeffrey Robbins, Massimo Volpe, Gianluigi Condorelli and Junichi Sadoshima
    Circulation. 2012;125:1134-1146, originally published March 5, 2012
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.078212
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Ischemia
    • Cell Signaling/Signal Transduction

Circulation

  • About Circulation
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Circulation CME
  • Statements and Guidelines
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: circ@circulationjournal.org
 

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured