Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
      • Doodle Gallery
      • Circulation Cover Doodle
        • → Blip the Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
      • Recently Published Guidelines
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
      • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Hartford Hospital
      • Hospital Santa Maria del Popolo, Naples, Italy
      • Instituto do Coração-INCOR (São Paulo, Brasil)
      • Minneapolis City Hospital
      • Parkland Hospital: Dallas, Texas
      • Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
      • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
      • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland
      • Tufts Medical Center
      • University of Michigan
      • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Vassar Brothers Medical Center (Poughkeepsie, NY)
      • Wroclaw Medical University
      • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
      • Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
      • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez – INCICh México City, México
      • Kuang-Tien General Hospital (Taichug, Taiwan)
      • University Hospital “Policlinico Umberto I”
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Genetics

Lack of Association Between the MEF2A Gene and Myocardial Infarction

Wolfgang Lieb, Björn Mayer, Inke R. König, Iris Borwitzky, Anika Götz, Silke Kain, Christian Hengstenberg, Patrick Linsel-Nitschke, Marcus Fischer, Angela Döring, H. -Erich Wichmann, Thomas Meitinger, Reinhold Kreutz, Andreas Ziegler, Heribert Schunkert, Jeanette Erdmann
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728485
Circulation. 2008;117:185-191
Originally published January 14, 2008
Wolfgang Lieb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Björn Mayer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inke R. König
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iris Borwitzky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anika Götz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silke Kain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Hengstenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Linsel-Nitschke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus Fischer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Döring
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. -Erich Wichmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Meitinger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reinhold Kreutz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Ziegler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heribert Schunkert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeanette Erdmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background— Coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction (MI) are caused in part by genetic factors. Recently, the MEF2A gene was linked to MI/CAD in a single pedigree with autosomal-dominant pattern of inheritance. In addition, genetic variants within the gene have been associated with MI in case-control settings, producing inconsistent results.

Methods and Results— The MEF2A gene was sequenced in MI patients from 23 MI families (≥5 affected members per family), but no mutation was identified in any of these extended families. Moreover, the Pro279Leu variant in exon 7 was analyzed in 1181 unrelated MI patients with a positive family history for MI/CAD, in 533 patients with sporadic MI, and in 2 control populations (n=1021 and n=1055), showing no evidence for association with MI/CAD. In addition, a (CAG)n repeat in exon 11 was genotyped in 543 sporadic MI patients and in 1190 controls without evidence for association with MI. Finally, analyzing 11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms from the GeneChip Mapping 500K Array, genotyped in 1644 controls and 753 cases, failed to provide evidence for association (region-wide P=0.23).

Conclusions— Studying independent samples of >1700 MI patients, 2 large control populations, and multiple families with apparently mendelian inheritance of the disease, we found no evidence for any linkage or association signal in the MEF2A gene.

  • coronary disease
  • epidemiology
  • genetics
  • myocardial infarction

Received July 17, 2007; accepted October 26, 2007.

The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction (MI) is influenced by complex interactions of environmental and genetic factors. Genetic epidemiological approaches, including genome-wide linkage and molecular association studies, identified several chromosomal regions and polymorphisms related to MI and/or CAD.1–6 However, independent validations and mechanistic explanations of the underlying functional basis for many of these findings are still under investigation.

Clinical Perspective p 191

In addition to these studies, families with mutations in genes affecting classic cardiovascular risk factors such as lipid levels leading to abnormal lipid levels and therefore promoting the development of CAD have been described.7–9 Recently, Wang and coworkers10 reported an exceptional CAD family displaying an autosomal-dominant pattern of inheritance. Interestingly, this family is the first to suggest that MI or CAD may be inherited in a mendelian fashion regardless of classic risk factors. The family provided significant evidence of linkage to chromosome 15q26. Subsequently, the MEF2A gene, encoding the myocyte enhancer factor-2A, a transcription factor with high expression in vascular endothelium, was sequenced, and a 21-bp deletion was identified in all living affected family members but was absent in 119 controls with normal angiograms.10 Functional studies revealed that this deletion blocks the nuclear localization of the MEF2A protein and suppresses MEF2A-mediated transcription activation.10 These studies lead to the conclusion that this genetic variant is causative for MI/CAD in this particular family.10 The same group identified genetic variants in the MEF2A gene in 4 of 207 CAD/MI patients (1.9%), in part without a positive family history for CAD, suggesting that MEF2A also may play a role in the pathogenesis of MI/CAD in nonfamilial (sporadic) cases.11 The role of MEF2A was subsequently studied in a few small molecular genetic association studies on sporadic MI patients, producing inconsistent results.12–15 Thus far, no families with autosomal-dominant inheritance of MI were available for genetic investigations, so the MEF2A gene was never analyzed in the specific context that initially allowed the identification of the genetic variant. To further clarify the role of MEF2A, we performed a comprehensive analysis in both familial and sporadic MI cases and in exceptional families with up to 22 affected members with MI.16

Methods

We sequenced the MEF2A gene in representative members of extended MI families with ≥5 affected family members. In addition, 2 previously associated genetic variants, P279L in exon 7 and (CAG)n repeat in exon 11, were investigated for association with MI using 2 large populations of patients with or without a positive family history for MI/CAD, respectively, and 2 control populations. Finally, we analyzed 11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), comprehensively covering the MEF2A gene from a large genome-wide association study conducted in 753 MI patients and 1644 controls.

MI Patients

Patients With Familial MI (German MI Family Study)

MI families were ascertained through index patients at 15 cardiac rehabilitation centers throughout Germany. All index patients had suffered an MI before 60 years of age.17 If at least 1 sibling presented with MI or severe CAD (defined as percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) before 70 years of age, the nuclear family (index patient, available parents, and all affected and unaffected siblings) was contacted and invited to participate in the study. All study participants answered a standardized questionnaire about medical history, presence of coronary risk factors, clinical events, medication, anthropometric data, and socioeconomic background. This information was validated by retrospective analyses of medical records. Additionally, all patients underwent a medical examination during a visit scheduled at their primary care physician’s office.17 For the present study, 1181 unrelated MI patients with a positive family history for MI/CAD were genotyped for the P279L polymorphism.

Extended MI Families

As part of the German MI Family Study, 23 extended MI families were identified.16 Families were classified as extended MI families if they had at least 3 living MI siblings (index patient plus 2 affected siblings) and at least 2 additional second- or third-degree affected relatives. As a result, in addition to the index patient, these families included on average 3 first-degree affected relatives (range, 2 to 6), 2 second-degree affected relatives (range, 0 to 7), and 2 third-degree affected relatives (range, 0 to 11). Linkage analyses were carried out using a modified Weber 9 screening set with 402 markers. In our set, there was only 1 marker (D15S966) within the locus at 15q26 (markers D15S1014, D15S212, D15S120, D15S87) described by Wang et al.10 Because this marker was not informative in most of our families, we could not exclude linkage to this chromosomal region in our families. We therefore sequenced the MEF2A gene in representative members of all 23 extended families.

Patients With Sporadic (Nonfamilial) MI (Cooperative Research in the Region of Augsburg Heart Study)

A total of 609 patients suffering premature MI before 60 years of age were identified through the Augsburg Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) MI register,18 which is now continued in the framework of the Cooperative Research in the Region of Augsburg (KORA) study. The diagnosis of MI was established according to the MONICA diagnostic criteria. MI patients were studied by physical examination, blood testing, echocardiography, ECG, and a standardized interview that included medical history, physical activity, medication, and personal habits. Resting blood pressure was taken according to MONICA guidelines using the random-zero method and standard mercury sphygmomanometers after subjects had been resting in a seated position. For the present study, the P279L SNP was genotyped in 533 individuals, and the (CAG)n repeat was genotyped in 543 MI patients.

Control Populations

First Control Population (Married-In Spouses From the German MI Family Study)

Healthy married-in spouses served as a control group for the MI patients with a positive family history of MI. For the present study, 1021 controls were genotyped for the P279L polymorphism.

Second Control Population (Population-Based; MONICA/Cooperative Research in the Region of Augsburg Survey S3)

The controls for the sporadic MI cases came from the same geographical area (Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany) and participated in the echocardiographic substudy (total n=1674) of the MONICA/KORA survey S3 (1994–1995),19 which is now continued in the framework of KORA.20 S3 represents a gender- and age-stratified random sample of all German residents of the Augsburg area and consists of individuals 25 to 74 years of age, with ≈500 participants for each 10-year increment. The population was studied by the same protocol as the sporadic MI patients. A total of 34 individuals with MI were excluded. For the present study, the P279L SNP was genotyped in 1055 individuals, and the (CAG)n repeat was genotyped in 1190 individuals.

Sequencing of the MEF2A Gene in Extended MI Families

Sequencing of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products was performed on both strands by a commercial sequencing service (Geneart, Regensburg, Germany). Primer sequences can be obtained from the authors on request. From each extended family, 1 MI patient with a low PROCAM risk score was chosen for sequencing of the MEF2A gene. The PROCAM score estimates the risk for an acute coronary event (fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction or acute coronary death) within 10 years based on results from the German PROCAM Münster Heart Study.21 By choosing MI patients with low PROCAM scores, we aimed to focus on patients with a low MI risk based on traditional risk factors and thus probably a high genetic susceptibility for MI.

Genotyping the P279L Polymorphism in Exon 7 and the (CAG)n Repeat in Exon 11

The Pro279Leu polymorphism was genotyped with a 5′-exonuclease activity (TaqMan) assay on an HT7900 (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). The SNP assay was ordered from Applied Biosystems as Custom TaqMan SNP genotyping assay. Probes were labeled with the fluorophores FAM or VIC. Genotyping was done on 384-well plates prepared with the GENESIS Freedom pipetting robot from TECAN (Crailsheim, Germany). The Universal PCR Master Mix from Applied Biosystems was used in a 5-μL total reaction volume with 10 ng DNA per reaction. Allelic discrimination was measured automatically on the ABI Prism HT7900 (Applied Biosystems) using the Sequence Detection Systems 2.1 software (autocaller confidence level, 95%).

Genetic determination of the (CAG)n repeat in exon 11 (rs3138597) was performed by amplification of genomic DNA with primers MEF-2A-F (5′-ATC AGC ATC AAG TCC GAA CC-3′) and MEF-2A-R (5′-AGA GCT GCT CAG ACT GTC CAC-3′) by PCR as previously described.22 In brief, the forward primer was labeled with [γ-32P]ATP by T4 polynucleotide kinase. PCR products were processed on PTC-100 Thermal Controllers (MJ Research, Watertown, Mass) according to the following protocol: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 15 seconds, annealing for 30 seconds with temperatures between 61°C and 55°C using a touchdown protocol, extension periods at 72°C for 2 minutes, and a final extension step for 10 minutes. Subsequently, amplicons were analyzed by autoradiography after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.22 Ten percent of all genotypes were repeated in independent PCR reactions to check for consistency and to ensure intraplate and interplate genotype quality control. No genotyping discrepancies were detected between the repeated samples.

Genotyping SNPs Covering the MEF2A Gene From the GeneChip Mapping 500K Array

A genome-wide association study was performed on 753 MI patients from the German MI Family Study and 1644 controls from the MONICA/KORA Survey S3 who participated in the follow-up examination F3 (2004–2005) (KORA 500K Study) using the GeneChip Mapping 500K Array from Affymetrix. The calling algorithm BRLMM was used to determine genotypes. For the present work, we analyzed SNPs covering the MEF2A gene for association with MI. Eleven SNPs covering the MEF2A gene were selected. A call rate (the percentage of successfully genotyped individuals for a given SNP) >97%, a minor allele frequency ≥0.01, and values of P>0.001 for test of deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were used as quality criteria. Two of these 11 SNPs (RS2290446, RS325410) that initially did not fulfill the quality criteria have been regenotyped using 5′-exonuclease activity (TaqMan) assays.

All studies (German MI Family Study, KORA Heart Study, MONICA/KORA study) were approved by local institutional review committees. All subjects gave written informed consent, and every attempt was made to ensure the anonymity of the participants.

Statistical Analysis

To determine whether the investigated genotypes deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, actual and predicted genotype frequencies were compared by a χ2 goodness-of-fit test.

Except for the P279L SNP, differences in genotype frequencies between MI cases and controls were tested with the Cochran-Armitage trend test. To account for the multiple testing of 11 SNPs covering the MEF2A gene, the resulting nominal probability values were adjusted according to the Šidak-Holm procedure. Associations with adjusted values of P≤0.05 were regarded as significant. Because the single SNPs are tightly linked, we also calculated an adjusted overall probability value for the 11 SNPs using a permutation procedure by Becker and Knapp.23 Because of the low number of individuals carrying the rare allele, genotype frequencies for the P279L polymorphism were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Odds ratios and 95% CIs are reported.

The authors had full access to and take responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.

Results

The baseline characteristics of all study populations are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the MI Patients With a Positive Family History for MI/CAD and Controls (Married-In Spouses), Sporadic MI Patients (No Family History for MI), and Population-Based Controls of the MONICA/KORA Echocardiographic Substudy and 23 MI Patients From Extended MI Families

Sequencing of the MEF2A Gene in Patients From Extended MI Families

All exons of the MEF2A gene with flanking intronic boundaries and the 5′ untranslated region and 3′ untranslated region were sequenced in 1 representative MI patient per extended family (n=23). No mutation in the MEF2A gene was found in any of these MI patients. Accordingly, the 21-bp deletion in exon 11 described by Wang et al10 was not observed in any of the 23 representative MI patients.

Several polymorphisms in introns 1, 8, 9, and 11 and in the 3′ untranslated region and 1 synonymous point mutation in exon 10 were identified (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 2. Genetic Variants in the MEF2A Gene Found by Sequencing of 23 MI Patients (1 per Family) From Families With an Autosomal-Dominant Pattern of Inheritance (Extended MI Families Within the German MI Family Study)

Evaluation of Defined MEF2A Gene Variants in Patients With Familial and Sporadic MI and in Controls

The Pro279Leu polymorphism was genotyped in 2 independent MI patient populations and in 2 control groups (Table 3). The genotype frequencies were not different between sporadic MI patients and population-based controls (OR for PL versus PP, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.01 to 8.23; P=1.00) or between MI cases with a positive family history for MI and controls (OR for PL versus PP, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.12 to 6.47; P=1.00).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 3. Genotype Frequencies of the P279L Polymorphism in Patients With Familial and Sporadic MI and Controls

The (CAG)n repeat in exon 11 was genotyped in 543 patients with sporadic (nonfamilial) MI and in 1190 population-based controls (Table 4). The frequencies of the different (CAG)n alleles were similar in MI patients and controls.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 4. Alleles of the (CAG)n Repeat in Exon 11 (rs3138597) in Patients With Sporadic MI (KORA Heart Study) and Population-Based Controls of the MONICA/KORA Echocardiographic Substudy

Evaluation of SNPs Covering the MEF2A Gene From the GeneChip Mapping 500K Array

A total of 11 SNPs within the MEF2A gene fulfilled our quality criteria (Table 5). The linkage disequilibrium structure of these SNPs is demonstrated in the Figure. After adjustment for multiple testing, none of the SNPs displayed evidence for association (Table 5). Moreover, the region-wide analysis of all 11 SNPs in the MEF2A gene displays no evidence for association (P=0.23).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 5. SNPs Covering the MEF2A Gene From a Genome-Wide Association Scan (GeneChip Mapping 500K Array) of 1644 Controls of the KORA 500K Study and 753 MI Patients of the German MI Family Study

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure. Linkage disequilibrium structure of 11 SNPs covering the MEF2A gene (data from a genome-wide association scan using the GeneChip Mapping 500K Array), including 1644 controls of the KORA 500K Study and 753 cases of the German MI Family Study with pairwise D′ between SNPs.

Power analyses revealed that we had a power of 73.7% in the sporadic sample and a power of 88.2% in our familial sample to detect effects similar to those described in the Spanish MI population (assuming the same genotype frequencies of 0.8% in controls and 2.3% in cases, as well as a 1-sided Pearson χ2 test at α=0.0514). Within our extended MI families, we had a power of 80% to detect at least 1 mutation in the MEF2A gene, which occurs with a frequency of 3.6% in comparable families.

Discussion

The present study on large independent samples of familial and sporadic MI patients displayed no evidence that either the Pro279Leu variant in exon 7 or the (CAG)n repeat in exon 11 of the MEF2A gene is associated with MI. Furthermore, no mutations in the MEF2A gene were found in any of the 23 representative patients from extended MI families with ≥5 affected family members. Finally, analyzing SNPs covering the MEF2A gene from the GeneChip Mapping 500K Array genotyped in 753 MI patients and 1644 controls revealed no evidence for association.

The research on the role of genetic variants within the MEF2A gene for the pathogenesis of MI/CAD has been stimulated by Wang et al,10 who described a 21-bp deletion as the first disease-causing gene mutation for familial MI/CAD, regardless of classic risk factors. In a large kindred with 13 affected family members, genome-wide linkage analysis revealed a positive linkage signal with a logarithm of the odds score of 4.19 at chromosome 15q26. In the MEF2A gene, located within this critical region, a 21-bp deletion was identified in all living affected family members. This variant was absent in 119 controls with normal coronary angiograms.10 Subsequently, 3 genetic variants in the MEF2A gene (N263S, P279L, and G283D) were found in 4 of 207 independent patients (1.9%) with MI/CAD (in part without a positive family history for CAD), suggesting that the MEF2A gene could even play a significant role in the pathogenesis of MI/CAD in nonfamilial (sporadic) cases.11 In accordance with these results, the P279L variant also was associated with the prevalence of MI in a Spanish case-control study (483 cases, 1189 controls14). In the present study, by contrast, no association of this genetic variant with MI was detected in 2 large samples of patients with sporadic and familial MI, respectively. A (CAG)n repeat in exon 11 displayed some evidence for association with CAD in a small Chinese case-control study, the (CAG)(9)-allele being overrepresented in the cases.15 However, this variant was not associated with MI in our much lager sample of patients with nonfamilial MI and displayed no association with MI in the above-mentioned Spanish MI population.14

Our findings are in line with the results obtained by Weng et al12 and Horan et al.24 Weng and colleagues found no causative MI mutation in 300 CAD cases, and Horan and associates failed to detect the 21-bp deletion described by Wang et al10 in 1481 individuals with a positive family history for ischemic heart disease. Similarly, we found no disease-causing mutation in our 23 extended MI families, suggesting that MEF2A mutations are responsible for only a relatively small proportion of familial MI cases. By sequencing the MEF2A gene in 1 MI patient from each of our 23 extended MI families, we identified several genetic variants within the MEF2A gene, in part so far unpublished (Table 2). However, these variants do not seem to be pathogenic because of their intronic localization or because they are not leading to a change in the amino acid sequence.

Comparable results were obtained by Kajimoto and colleagues,13 who found several genetic variants but no clearly pathogenic mutation within the MEF2A gene in Japanese MI patients by sequencing the gene in 379 MI patients.

Study Strengths and Limitations

Some limitations of this comprehensive search for an association between the MEF2A gene and MI should be mentioned. By sequencing the MEF2A gene, we identified several genetic variants in introns and 1 synonymous polymorphism. It has recently been reported that synonymous polymorphisms and intronic genetic variants might have functional effects and could be disease causing.25,26 Therefore, we cannot entirely rule out that these variants might have a disease-causing effect. Furthermore, although using large study populations, we cannot entirely exclude associations of smaller degree, especially for infrequent variants. However, we had a power of 73.7% in the sporadic and a power of 88.2% in the familial MI patients to detect similar effects as previously described.14

Conclusion

The present study, the largest to date, revealed no evidence for a significant role of MEF2A mutations in MI/CAD.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Petra Bruse.

Sources of Funding

This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schu672/9–1, Schu672/10–1, Schu672/12–1, Schu672/14–1), the Federal Ministry of Research (Dr Schunkert, KBF-FKZ 01GB9403), the National Genome Network (01GS0418 to Drs Schunkert, Erdmann, and Hengstenberg; 01GS0416 to Dr Kreutz; 01GR0466 to Drs Ziegler and König), the Ernst- and Berta-Grimmke-Stiftung (Drs Hengstenberg and Schunkert), the Wilhelm-Vaillant-Stiftung (Drs Hengstenberg and Schunkert), the Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung (Drs Hengstenberg and Schunkert), and the European Union–sponsored project Cardiogenics (LSH-2005–037593). The KORA research platform was initiated and financed by the GSF–National Research Centre for Environment and Health, which is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and of the State of Bavaria. This genetic association study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research in the context of the German National Genome Research Network by grants to Drs Wichmann (01GR0464 and 01GS0499) and Meitinger (01GR0103).

Disclosures

None.

References

  1. ↵
    Mayer B, Erdmann J, Schunkert H. Genetics and heritability of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007; 96: 1–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Topol EJ, Smith J, Plow EF, Wang QK. Genetic susceptibility to myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2006; 15: R117–R123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Incalcaterra E, Hoffmann E, Averna MR, Caimi G. Genetic risk factors in myocardial infarction at young age. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2004; 52: 287–312.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Broeckel U, Hengstenberg C, Mayer B, Holmer S, Martin LJ, Comuzzie AG, Blangero J, Nurnberg P, Reis A, Riegger GA, Jacob HJ, Schunkert H. A comprehensive linkage analysis for myocardial infarction and its related risk factors. Nat Genet. 2002; 30: 210–214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Ye Z, Liu EH, Higgins JP, Keavney BD, Lowe GD, Collins R, Danesh J. Seven haemostatic gene polymorphisms in coronary disease: meta-analysis of 66,155 cases and 91,307 controls. Lancet. 2006; 367: 651–658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Wang Q. Advances in the genetic basis of coronary artery disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2005; 7: 235–241.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Dedoussis GV, Schmidt H, Genschel J. LDL-receptor mutations in Europe. Hum Mutat. 2004; 24: 443–459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Pisciotta L, Hamilton-Craig I, Tarugi P, Bellocchio A, Fasano T, Alessandrini P, Bon GB, Siepi D, Mannarino E, Cattin L, Averna M, Cefalu AB, Cantafora A, Calandra S, Bertolini S. Familial HDL deficiency due to ABCA1 gene mutations with or without other genetic lipoprotein disorders. Atherosclerosis. 2004; 172: 309–320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Ikewaki K, Matsunaga A, Han H, Watanabe H, Endo A, Tohyama J, Kuno M, Mogi J, Sugimoto K, Tada N, Sasaki J, Mochizuki S. A novel two nucleotide deletion in the apolipoprotein A-I gene, apoA-I Shinbashi, associated with high density lipoprotein deficiency, corneal opacities, planar xanthomas, and premature coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2004; 172: 39–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Wang L, Fan C, Topol SE, Topol EJ, Wang Q. Mutation of MEF2A in an inherited disorder with features of coronary artery disease. Science. 2003; 302: 1578–1581.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Bhagavatula MRK, Fan C, Shen GQ, Cassano J, Plow EF, Topol EJ, Wang Q. Transcription factor MEF2A mutations in patients with coronary artery disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2004; 13: 3181–3188.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Weng L, Kavaslar N, Ustaszewska A, Doelle H, Schackwitz W, Hebert S, Cohen JC, McPherson R, Pennacchio LA. Lack of MEF2A mutations in coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 1016–1020.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Kajimoto K, Shioji K, Tago N, Tomoike H, Nonogi H, Goto Y, Iwai N. Assessment of MEF2A mutations in myocardial infarction in Japanese patients. Circ J. 2005; 69: 1192–1195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Gonzalez P, Garcia-Castro M, Reguero JR, Batalla A, Ordonez AG, Palop RL, Lozano I, Montes M, Alvarez V, Coto E. The Pro279Leu variant in the transcription factor MEF2A is associated with myocardial infarction. J Med Genet. 2006; 43: 167–169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Han Y, Yang Y, Zhang X, Yan C, Xi S, Kang J. Relationship of the CAG repeat polymorphism of the MEF2A gene and coronary artery disease in a Chinese population. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007; 45: 987–992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Mayer B, Fischer M, Erdmann J, Holmer S, Lieb W, Hubauer U, Klein G, Loewel H, Nuernberg G, Nuernberg P, Saar K, Reis A, Broeckel U, Jacob H, Hengstenberg C, Schunkert H. Identification of rare forms of autosomal dominant heritability of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002; 106 (suppl II): II–290.Abstract.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Fischer M, Broeckel U, Holmer S, Baessler A, Hengstenberg C, Mayer B, Erdmann J, Klein G, Riegger G, Jacob HJ, Schunkert H. Distinct heritable patterns of angiographic coronary artery disease in families with myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2005; 111: 855–862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Lowel H, Meisinger C, Heier M, Hormann A. The population-based acute myocardial infarction (AMI) registry of the MONICA/KORA study region of Augsburg. Gesundheitswesen. 2005; 67 (suppl 1): S31–S37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Lieb W, Graf J, Gotz A, Konig IR, Mayer B, Fischer M, Stritzke J, Hengstenberg C, Holmer SR, Doring A, Lowel H, Schunkert H, Erdmann J. Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) gene polymorphisms with parameters of left ventricular hypertrophy in men: results of the MONICA Augsburg echocardiographic substudy. J Mol Med. 2006; 84: 88–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Wichmann HE, Gieger C, Illig T, for the MONICA/KORA Study Group. KORA-gen: resource for population genetics, controls and a broad spectrum of disease phenotypes. Gesundheitswesen. 2005; 67 (suppl 1): S26–S30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Assmann G, Cullen P, Schulte H. Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study. Circulation. 2002; 105: 310–315.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Kreutz R, Hubner N, James MR, Bihoreau MT, Gauguier D, Lathrop GM, Ganten D, Lindpaintner K. Dissection of a quantitative trait locus for genetic hypertension on rat chromosome 10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 8778–8782.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Becker T, Knapp M. A powerful strategy to account for multiple testing in the context of haplotype analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2004; 75: 561–570.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Horan PG, Allen AR, Hughes AE, Patterson CC, Spence M, McGlinchey PG, Belton C, Jardine TC, McKeown PP. Lack of MEF2A Delta7aa mutation in Irish families with early onset ischaemic heart disease: a family based study. BMC Med Genet. 2006; 7: 65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Oh JM, Kim IW, Sauna ZE, Calcagno AM, Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MM. A “silent” polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science. 2007; 315: 525–528.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Zhang L, Vincent GM, Baralle M, Baralle FE, Anson BD, Benson DW, Whiting B, Timothy KW, Carlquist J, January CT, Keating MT, Splawski I. An intronic mutation causes long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1283–1291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

After the initial report of a 21-bp deletion in the MEF2A gene as the disease-causing genetic variant in a large family with autosomal-dominant inheritance of coronary artery disease, case-control studies on single genetic variants within the MEF2A gene revealed controversial results. In the present, and thus far the largest, analysis, no evidence was found for a significant association of the MEF2A gene with myocardial infarction. We studied defined genetic variants in 2 large study populations of patients with familial and sporadic myocardial infarction and 2 control populations and also analyzed single-nucleotide polymorphisms from a genome-wide association study comprehensively covering the MEF2A gene. Thus, MEF2A is added to a growing list of candidate genes for complex diseases in which no consistent association with a defined phenotype across various populations could be observed. Therefore, results from molecular genetic association studies have to be interpreted with caution and should not yet be transferred or should be transferred in only a very limited fashion to clinical practice (eg, estimating the individual genetic risk for a complex disease). However, genome-wide association studies analyzing hundreds of thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphisms might offer new opportunities in this regard. Recently, 4 genome-wide association studies for myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease revealed very promising results in that chromosomal regions could be identified that displayed robust association with myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease in various independent populations.

View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation
January 15, 2008, Volume 117, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Lack of Association Between the MEF2A Gene and Myocardial Infarction
    Wolfgang Lieb, Björn Mayer, Inke R. König, Iris Borwitzky, Anika Götz, Silke Kain, Christian Hengstenberg, Patrick Linsel-Nitschke, Marcus Fischer, Angela Döring, H. -Erich Wichmann, Thomas Meitinger, Reinhold Kreutz, Andreas Ziegler, Heribert Schunkert and Jeanette Erdmann
    Circulation. 2008;117:185-191, originally published January 14, 2008
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728485

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Lack of Association Between the MEF2A Gene and Myocardial Infarction
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Lack of Association Between the MEF2A Gene and Myocardial Infarction
    Wolfgang Lieb, Björn Mayer, Inke R. König, Iris Borwitzky, Anika Götz, Silke Kain, Christian Hengstenberg, Patrick Linsel-Nitschke, Marcus Fischer, Angela Döring, H. -Erich Wichmann, Thomas Meitinger, Reinhold Kreutz, Andreas Ziegler, Heribert Schunkert and Jeanette Erdmann
    Circulation. 2008;117:185-191, originally published January 14, 2008
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728485
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Epidemiology
  • Genetics
    • Genetics
  • Cardiology
    • Etiology
      • Epidemiology

Circulation

  • About Circulation
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Circulation CME
  • Statements and Guidelines
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: circ@circulationjournal.org
 

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured