Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
      • Doodle Gallery
      • Circulation Cover Doodle
        • → Blip the Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
      • Recently Published Guidelines
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
      • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Hartford Hospital
      • Hospital Santa Maria del Popolo, Naples, Italy
      • Instituto do Coração-INCOR (São Paulo, Brasil)
      • Minneapolis City Hospital
      • Parkland Hospital: Dallas, Texas
      • Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
      • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
      • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland
      • Tufts Medical Center
      • University of Michigan
      • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Vassar Brothers Medical Center (Poughkeepsie, NY)
      • Wroclaw Medical University
      • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
      • Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
      • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez – INCICh México City, México
      • Kuang-Tien General Hospital (Taichug, Taiwan)
      • University Hospital “Policlinico Umberto I”
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Coronary Heart Disease

Local Gene Transfer of phVEGF-2 Plasmid by Gene-Eluting Stents

An Alternative Strategy for Inhibition of Restenosis

Dirk H. Walter, Manfred Cejna, Larry Diaz-Sandoval, Sean Willis, Laura Kirkwood, Peter W. Stratford, Anne B. Tietz, Rudolf Kirchmair, Marcy Silver, Cindy Curry, Andrea Wecker, Young-Sup Yoon, Regina Heidenreich, Allison Hanley, Marianne Kearney, Fermin O. Tio, Patrik Kuenzler, Jeffrey M. Isner, Douglas W. Losordo
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000133324.38115.0A
Circulation. 2004;110:36-45
Originally published July 6, 2004
Dirk H. Walter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manfred Cejna
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larry Diaz-Sandoval
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Willis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Kirkwood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter W. Stratford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne B. Tietz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rudolf Kirchmair
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcy Silver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cindy Curry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Wecker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Young-Sup Yoon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Regina Heidenreich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allison Hanley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marianne Kearney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fermin O. Tio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrik Kuenzler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey M. Isner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas W. Losordo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background— Drug-eluting stents represent a useful strategy for the prevention of restenosis using various antiproliferative drugs. These strategies share the liability of impairing endothelial recovery, thereby altering the natural biology of the vessel wall and increasing the associated risk of stent thrombosis. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that local delivery via gene-eluting stent of naked plasmid DNA encoding for human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-2 could achieve similar reductions in neointima formation while accelerating, rather than inhibiting, reendothelialization.

Methods and Results— phVEGF 2-plasmid (100 or 200 μg per stent)–coated BiodivYsio phosphorylcholine polymer stents versus uncoated stents were deployed in a randomized, blinded fashion in iliac arteries of 40 normocholesterolemic and 16 hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Reendothelialization was nearly complete in the VEGF stent group after 10 days and was significantly greater than in control stents (98.7±1% versus 79.0±6%, P<0.01). At 3 months, intravascular ultrasound analysis revealed that lumen cross-sectional area (4.2±0.4 versus 2.27±0.3 mm2, P<0.001) was significantly greater and percent cross-sectional narrowing was significantly lower (23.4±6 versus 51.2±10, P<0.001) in VEGF stents compared with control stents implanted in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Transgene expression was detectable in the vessel wall along with improved functional recovery of stented segments, resulting in a 2.4-fold increase in NO production.

Conclusions— Acceleration of reendothelialization via VEGF-2 gene–eluting stents provides an alternative treatment strategy for the prevention of restenosis. VEGF-2 gene–eluting stents may be considered as a stand-alone or combination therapy.

  • gene therapy
  • endothelium
  • restenosis

Received November 1, 2002; de novo received February 23, 2004; revision received March 16, 2004; accepted March 19, 2004.

Local drug delivery by drug-eluting stents may represent a useful strategy for the prevention of restenosis based on studies demonstrating promising results in animal models as well as clinical trials using antiproliferative drugs like rapamycin or taxol.1,2 However, these strategies share the liability of impairing endothelial recovery and increasing the associated risk of stent thrombosis.

Prior studies have suggested that acceleration of reendothelialization can attenuate restenosis and inhibit stent thrombosis.3–6 These effects have been mainly attributed to the potency of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to serve as an endothelial mitogen. However, delivery of naked plasmid DNA encoding for VEGF to the vessel wall using gene-eluting stents has not been demonstrated thus far.

Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that delivery, via gene-eluting stent, of naked plasmid DNA encoding for human VEGF could achieve reductions in neointima formation while accelerating, rather than inhibiting, reendothelialization.

Methods

Animals

All procedures were performed under general anesthesia and sterile conditions in accordance with the St Elizabeth’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. New Zealand White rabbits weighing 4.5 to 5 kg with iliac artery dimension of 2.2±0.04 mm were used. A subset of animals (n=16) was placed on 1% cholesterol diet with 3% peanut oil for 4 weeks before initial intervention, which was maintained throughout the follow-up period.

BiodivYsio Phosphorylcholine Polymer Stents

The 15-mm BiodivYsio stent was electropolished, cleaned, and coated with a phosphorylcholine polymer (PC)7,8 with or without phVEGF-2 plasmid (100 to 200 μg) under sterile conditions. Coating and manufacturing was performed by Biocompatibles UK Ltd, and the stent was premounted on a 3-mm balloon catheter covered by a 5F protection sleeve. The stents were shipped at room temperature and used within 6 months of manufacture. The stability and integrity of the plasmid were verified by sequencing of DNA eluted from randomly selected stents. No stability data are available on stents beyond 6 months because all stents were used within this time frame.

phVEGF-2 Plasmid

The plasmid phVEGF-2 (pVGI.I, Corautus Genetics) is a 5283-bp plasmid that contains the human VEGF-2 coding sequence.9,10

In Vivo Catheter Procedures

After surgical exposure of the external carotid artery, a 5F introducer sheath (Radifocus, Terumo) was advanced to the lower abdominal aorta followed by administration of 1000 U heparin. Balloon denudation of the external iliac artery was performed by sequential withdrawal (6 times) with a 2F Fogarty balloon catheter (Baxter Edwards). Stent implantation was performed by balloon inflation (20 seconds at 10 atm). In a subset of rabbits, stents were implanted bilaterally. A single dose of aspirin 50 mg (Aspisol, Bayer) was administered intravenously after procedure. For follow-up angiograms, the contralateral carotid artery was exposed surgically.

Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging and Analysis

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging was performed at baseline and 3 months follow-up using 2.5F 40-MHz transducers (Atlantis SR Plus, Boston Scientific Scimed) with motorized pull-back speed of 0.5 mm/s. Measurements were made twice every 1 mm and included in-stent area, lumen area, and intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional areas (CSAs).11,12

Histological and Ultrastructural Analysis

Specimens were embedded in methyl methacrylate and cut with a diamond blade followed by metachromatic staining. For 6 different sections, the extent of vessel injury quantified by the method of Schwartz et al,13 inflammation score, and areas of neointima, media, native vessel lumen, and stent lumen were measured. Macrophages were detected by RAM-11 staining.

Evaluation of Stent Endothelialization

Silver Staining and Scanning Electron Microscopy

Reendothelialization was determined by silver staining and scanning electron microscopy as previously described.5

Evans Blue

The extent of reendothelialization was observed by Evans blue staining5 in 2 animals. Seven microliters of 0.5% Evans blue was infused via the ear vein 30 minutes before euthanasia. After fixation in 100% methanol, the stent was opened and photographed.

Rabbit Endothelial Progenitor Cell Assay

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from blood of rabbits at predetermined time points by density gradient centrifugation as described previously.14

Detection of Transgene Expression

RT-PCR

RNA of whole-vessel segments was extracted using the RNeasy Kit (Quiagen). cDNA synthesis was performed with 1 μg of total RNA using the Superscript II kit (Life Technologies) and Advantage-GC cDNA polymerase (Clontech). For semiquantification, QuantumRNA 18S internal standards were used (Ambion). Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Specific primers for human VEGF-2 were as follows: sense, 5′ACGAGCTACCTCAGCAAGACGTTAT3′; antisense, 5′GGAATCCATCTGTTGAGTCATCTCC3′. A 298-bp PCR product was identified, which was not detectable in extracts of rabbit iliac arteries from the control group or cultured rabbit smooth muscle cells (data not shown).

In Situ Hybridization

VEGF-2 RNA expression was localized by in situ hybridization of frozen tissue sections under RNAse-free conditions. Sense or antisense riboprobes were designed based on the above-mentioned primers using T7 RNA polymerase (Promega) and digoxigenin labeling (Roche). Hybridization of the riboprobes (20 ng/mL) was performed at 55°C for 18 hours. Vessel cross sections were incubated with sheep anti-DIG POD antibody (Roche) in TNB (100 mmol/L Tris HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% blocking reagent) 1:100 overnight at 4°C, followed by fluorescent Cy 3 at 1:50 in diluent from kit (TSA, Plus Cy3 System, Perkin Elmer). Slides were mounted with Fluromount G (Southern Biotech Associates), and red fluorescent reaction products were visualized under fluorescent microscopy.

VEGF Protein Expression in Tissue

Western Blotting

Tissue samples from rabbit iliac arteries were homogenized in radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer and analyzed for VEGF-2 expression as described.10

Measurement of NO From Vessel Segments

NO production of excised stent segments was measured in an aerated organ bath containing Krebs buffer according to the modified Griess reaction (Sigma) as previously described.15

Statistical Analysis

All data are given as mean±SD or SEM as indicated. Continuous variables were compared by means of Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U Test. Multiple comparisons were performed by Kruskal-Wallis test or ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction using SPSS 9.0. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Animal Characteristics

A total of 62 stents were implanted in a randomized, blinded fashion in 56 male New Zealand White rabbits (n=16 hypercholesterolemic, mean cholesterol level 1349±220 mg/dL). Before stent implantation, denudation of the endothelium was performed. In 2 animals with acute follow-up, we demonstrated that balloon denudation with rotate/withdrawal technique was complete (98% to 100%) and reliable. Lumen diameter after stent implantation was 2.55±0.05, resulting in a stent/artery ratio of 1.16±0.04. Twenty-six BiodivYsio PC stents served as control group and were compared with PC stents coated with 100 μg VEGF-2 plasmid (n=18) or 200 μg (n=18).

Because no significant differences were observed between stents loaded with 100 or 200 μg plasmid DNA, VEGF-coated stents (n=36) were combined for additional analysis. There was no stent thrombosis in the follow-up period for either group.

Quantitative IVUS Analysis

Baseline and 3-month follow-up data of IVUS measurements are demonstrated in Figure 1. Postintervention measurements of stent and CSAs were similar in both groups (for normocholesterolemic rabbits, 6.2±0.4 versus 6.3±0.5 mm2, P=0.7, n=10; for hypercholesterolemic rabbits, 5.7±0.4 versus 5.75±0.4 mm2, P=0.7, n=10).

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. IVUS analysis of VEGF-2 gene–eluting stents. Representative IVUS imaging at 3-month follow-up in VEGF stent (A) or control stent (B) implanted in hypercholesterolemic rabbit. C, Stent lumen CSA after stent implantation and lumen CSA as well as intimal hyperplasia for both groups at 3-month of follow-up. *P<0.001.

IVUS imaging demonstrated trends toward reduced intimal hyperplasia (1.21±0.5 versus 1.41±0.4 mm2, P=0.5) and increased lumen areas (5.51±0.22 versus 4.88±0.68 mm2, P=0.1) in VEGF stents implanted in normocholesterolemic animals (n=5 per group). In hypercholesterolemic rabbits, minimal lumen cross-sectional areas were significantly greater (4.2±0.4 versus 2.27±0.3 mm2, P<0.001) and percent cross-sectional narrowing was significantly lower (23.4±6% versus 51.2±10%, P<0.001) in VEGF stents (n=4) compared with control stents (n=4), as illustrated in Figure 1.

Histomorphometric Analysis

Morphometric analysis confirmed data obtained by IVUS, demonstrating a trend toward larger lumen cross-sectional areas and reduced neointimal hyperplasia (1.31±0.12 versus 1.42±0.19 mm2, P=0.2) in normocholesterolemic animals in the VEGF stent group (n=4) versus the control stent (n=4). However, in hypercholesterolemic animals (n=4), neointimal lesion cross-sectional area and percent area stenosis were significantly greater in the control stents (Figure 2) whereas lumen cross-sectional area was significantly greater in the VEGF-stented vessels at 3-month follow-up.

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. Histomorphometric analysis. Representative cross-sectional histology of VEGF stent (A and B) and control stent (C and D) at 3-month follow-up.

The extent of vessel injury at the stent site (injury score) was similar in both groups (for normocholesterolemic rabbits, 1.67±0.47 versus 1.61±0.5; for hypercholesterolemic rabbits, 2.1±0.3 versus 2.0±0; P=0.4). There was no excess inflammation observed in the normocholesterolemic rabbits. In contrast, the inflammation score in the hypercholesterolemic animals receiving a VEGF-2–coated stent was slightly lower compared with uncoated PC stents (0.75±0.43 versus 1.33±1.1, P=0.1).

Reendothelialization

Reendothelialization as assessed by Silver staining was nearly complete in the normocholesterolemic VEGF stent group after 10 days and was significantly greater than in control stents (98.7±1% versus 79±6%, P<0.01, n=4 and n=3 stents per group) (Figure 3). Reendothelialization was delayed in hypercholesterolemic animals receiving control stents; however, VEGF gene transfer to the vessel wall significantly accelerated the reendothelialization process at 10 days (81.87±4 versus 29.7±3%, P<0.01, n=12 segments of each of 2 stents per group), as illustrated by scanning electron microscopy (Figure 3).

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 3. Effects on reendothelialization (A). Representative photographs of silver staining showing luminal surface of VEGF gene-eluting stent at 10 days. Note that the confluent endothelial cell monolayer almost completely covers the stent. B, Silver staining of control stent at 10 days. Note areas with disrupted, nonconfluent endothelial cells (C). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of VEGF stent surface revealing uniform and complete endothelial coverage. D, SEM of control stented artery revealing incomplete endothelial coverage in interstrut region. E, Quantification of reendothelialization reveals significant acceleration of endothelial recovery in hypercholesterolemic rabbits.

Evans blue staining also supported that functional endothelialization appeared accelerated in the VEGF stent group (Figure 4).

Figure4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 4. Functional recovery of iliac artery segments. A, Functional assessment with Evans blue staining demonstrates accelerated endothelialization in VEGF stents, which was almost complete at 14 days compared with control stent (n=2 per group) (B). White areas represent functionally intact endothelium that prevents the uptake of Evans blue dye. C, NO release of stented segments measured by modified Griess reaction. n=3 per study group, mean±SEM at 10 days after implantation. *P<0.01. D, Quantification of DiI/BS1-lectin double-positive endothelial progenitor cells from VEGF-stented (n=10) and control-stented (n=8) rabbits at baseline and 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after stent implantation. *P<0.05, mean±SEM.

Functional Recovery of Endothelium (NO Measurements)

NO production by VEGF-2–treated arteries (n=3) was significantly greater than in control segments at 10 days after implantation, resulting in a 2.4-fold increase in NO production compared with vessel segments (n=3) with control stent implantation (0.122±0.018 versus 0.05±0.003 μmol/L, P<0.001). These data reveal that the anatomic improvement in endothelial recovery was accompanied by enhanced local functional endothelial recovery induced by VEGF-2 gene transfer (Figure 4).

Endothelial Progenitor Cell Assay

Prior studies have revealed that recruitment of circulating endothelial progenitors is an important mechanism for endothelial repair after arterial injury.14 To determine if VEGF gene transfer into the vessel wall via drug-eluting stent increases the number or differentiation of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) systemically, rabbit EPC culture assays were performed. These assays documented an increase in circulating EPC number in rabbits receiving VEGF-2 stents compared with control stents, peaking at day 7 after stent implantation (88±6 versus 64±3 per mm2 at day 7, P<0.01) (Figure 4D).

Detection of Transgene Expression

The pVGI.I plasmid was detected in the vessel wall after VEGF-2 stent placement 24 hours after implantation. None of the remote organs disclosed evidence for systemic plasmid or transgene expression (Figure 5).

Figure5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 5. Plasmid delivery and transgene expression. A, PCR of tissue retrieved from stented vessel segments was performed to identify the VEGF-2 plasmid, detecting 649-bp product. Twenty-four hours after VEGF stent delivery, the plasmid is detectable in the subjacent vessel wall but is undetectable in the vessel wall from control-stented arteries or from remote organs in the VEGF-stented animals. B, VEGF-2 mRNA expression at day 3, at day 7 in VEGF stent, and absent in sample from a control- stented artery at day 7. C, VEGF-2 mRNA at day 4 (lanes 1 and 2) and day 10 (lanes 3 and 4) in VEGF- stented iliac artery (lanes 1 and 4) versus contralateral side (control stent) (lanes 2 and 3), illustrating site-specific gene delivery. D, Human VEGF-2 mRNA expression in iliac artery detecting 298-bp product of VEGF-2 gene-eluting stent. VEGF-2 gene expression is documented in the vessel wall from a VEGF-stented artery on day 7 after implantation but is absent in VEGF-2–stented artery at 24 hours and 14 days. Gene expression is also absent in control-stented arteries from the iliac artery proximal to VEGF stent site and from native rabbit SMCs.

VEGF-2 gene expression was demonstrated by RT-PCR in the VEGF-stented iliac arteries as early as 72 hours, persisting for 10 days, and was undetectable after 2 weeks. (Figure 5). Detection of protein expression was performed by Western blotting for VEGF-2 from whole-vessel extracts (Figure 6).

Figure6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 6. Transgene expression (Western blot). Western blotting using anti-human VEGF-2 antibody, detecting the precursor form of VEGF-2 as a 58-kD band in samples from iliac arteries implanted with VEGF-2 stent or control stent. Cultured rabbit SMCs were used as negative control. Protein samples from rabbit skeletal muscle injected with VEGF-2 plasmid served as positive control (pos).

Histological demonstration of human VEGF-2 RNA is provided by in situ hybridizations, indicating that mRNA expression was localized predominantly to the adventitia and outer media of the vascular wall (Figure 7). Immunofluorescent staining documented that most gene expression is by cells that are negative for CD31 expression, ie, the transfected cells are primarily not endothelial cells (Figure 8).

Figure7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 7. Transgene expression (in situ hybridization). Localization of VEGF-2 was detected by hybridization probes on longitudinal rabbit iliac artery sections (stent was carefully removed and sections were frozen). Note expression of VEGF-2 mRNA (red fluorescence) in adventitia and outer media. Similar results were obtained at days 5 and 10.

Figure8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 8. Transgene expression (in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence). Localization of VEGF-2 was detected by hybridization probes as above (CY3, red), followed by immunofluorescent staining for CD31 (FITC-labeled, green). Although some transgene expression is detected along the surface of the artery, colocalized with CD31 expression, most VEGF-2 expression is by CD31-negative cells.

Discussion

Our results demonstrate the possibility of therapeutic local gene transfer using a stent platform technology and that VEGF-2 gene-eluting stents may be effective in the prevention of restenosis. The data show that VEGF-2 plasmid was effectively delivered to the vessel wall, where transcript and protein were detected for up to 10 days after stent implantation. Local VEGF-2 gene, delivered by PC-coated stents, not only improved early reendothelialization at the stented site but also reduced neointimal proliferation as assessed by IVUS at 3 months of follow-up. IVUS and histomorphometric assessment revealed significant differences in neointimal formation in hypercholesterolemic animals after implantation of VEGF stents compared with PC control stents. Moreover, and in contrast to all other currently marketed drug-eluting stents, VEGF-2–eluting stents result in acceleration of anatomic and functional endothelial recovery. These data, therefore, represent the first demonstration of an antirestenosis strategy using a gene-eluting stent, which ameliorates, rather than disrupts, the biology of the vessel wall after intervention.

Recent strategies to reduce restenosis using drug-coated stents have focused primarily on antiproliferative approaches. Although excellent results in animal models and clinical trials have been demonstrated,1,16 these strategies share the liability of impairing endothelial recovery and increasing the associated risk of stent thrombosis.17,18

Both endovascular radiation18 and drug-eluting antiproliferative stents show a decrease in neointimal growth in animal experiments. However, this is accompanied by delayed healing characterized by persistence of neointimal fibrin (with or without inflammation), a decrease in smooth muscle cells, and incomplete endothelialization.19

These findings indicate that the regenerative capacity of the vessel wall endothelial cells seems to be essential for the healing process and might be impaired in treatment strategies with antiproliferative agents.20,21

Prior studies have suggested that acceleration of reendothelialization by VEGF can consequently attenuate restenosis and inhibit stent thrombosis.3,22 Our findings are consistent with these prior data and additionally capitalize on the advent of technology that makes gene delivery a straightforward extension of the standard revascularization procedure.

The ability of locally delivered VEGF to accelerate reendothelialization has been primarily attributed to the ability of VEGF to serve as an endothelial mitogen. Similar effects on reendothelialization associated with suppression of neointimal proliferation have also been demonstrated for estradiol,15 tumor necrosis factor–soluble receptor,23 and HMG CoA reductase inhibitors,24,25 emphasizing the concept that acceleration of endothelial recovery may be an alternative strategy for the prevention of neointimal proliferation.

Indeed, we hereby provide insights into a potential mechanism accounting for the demonstrated effects seen with VEGF gene transfer delivered by gene-eluting stents. Improved endothelial recovery at the stented site after local VEGF gene transfer was demonstrated by Evans blue staining, silver staining, and scanning electron microscopy. These data are additionally supported by enhancement of functional recovery with an increase in NO production of VEGF-stented vessel segments after effective gene transfer to the injured vessel wall. The above findings were yielded from studies in normocholesterolemic rabbits. To investigate the potential for restenosis prevention, we used hypercholesterolemic rabbits generated by 1% cholesterol feeding. Although the cholesterol levels in these animals are far higher than those found clinically, this model has been shown to be more stringent, developing more aggressive neointimal lesions after angioplasty and stenting compared with the normocholesterolemic rabbit, and therefore more useful as a preclinical model.

VEGF gene transfer was more effective in reducing neointimal proliferation in hypercholesterolemic animals, a setting not only where control stents result in pronounced neointima formation but also where endothelial cell function is known to be impaired, thus providing a rationale for rescue therapy.

Several attempts in the past have been made to achieve local gene delivery via coated balloon catheters or infusion catheters using both naked plasmid DNA and adenoviral vectors for transfer of VEGF-1 or -2.3,4,26 Gene delivery from a DNA-releasing stent is a convenient approach that combines revascularization with gene delivery in a single procedure.27 The present study extends the findings of these previous investigations, now demonstrating for the first time that local gene delivery of a therapeutic gene via coated stents appears feasible, safe, and effective. VEGF-2 plasmid was only detected locally at the stented site within 24 hours of stent delivery. In addition, transgene expression was detectable locally up to 10 days after stent implantation, indicating that temporal transgene expression within a few days is sufficient to augment reendothelialization and thereby block subsequent neointimal proliferation. Histological evidence for human VEGF-2 RNA is provided by in situ hybridization, indicating that mRNA expression was localized predominantly to the adventitia and outer media of the vascular wall.

Neointimal thickening has been inferred to result most often from vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation.28–30 As a result, intense effort has been applied to discern the mechanisms that govern VSMC proliferation after angioplasty and to develop therapies to inhibit VSMC growth. The enthusiasm for this field is reflected by the 857 manuscripts (to date) that have been published examining the role of SMC proliferation in restenosis and, most importantly, by the advent of approaches that have demonstrated significant degrees of clinical success in addressing this aspect of the response to injury.31–34 Both brachytherapy and drug-eluting stents target proliferating VSMCs at the site of injury and have been successful in reducing neointimal lesion formation. However, the fate of the endothelium in humans after radiation or drug-eluting stent is uncertain at present, although evidence exists to suggest that endothelial recovery may be perturbed. The initial applications of intravascular brachytherapy were complicated by a significant incidence of stent thrombosis occurring up to 9 months after the revascularization procedure,35 despite the usual administration of dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 month after stent implantation. Subsequently, the incidence of late thrombosis was shown to be reduced by extending the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 to 12 months.33 These findings imply that endothelial recovery was inhibited by the antiproliferative approach, a hypothesis documented in animal studies that revealed protracted deendothelialization in irradiated arteries.36 Moreover, recent data have revealed direct inhibition of reendothelialization by paclitaxel2 and inhibition of endothelial cell (EC) proliferation by rapamycin.21

In this context, we have considered the alternative hypothesis that stents that develop intimal thickening, as well as a portion of restenosis lesions that originate in nonstented arteries after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, may result in part from belated reendothelialization. Previous studies carried out in a variety of animal species have repeatedly shown that extensive endothelial denudation of the artery wall promotes neointimal thickening.37 Because it is difficult to achieve extensive EC denudation without injuring the underlying media, it has been difficult to establish with certainty that the loss of endothelial integrity per se constitutes the sole or primary basis for neointimal thickening. In fact, in certain animal models, neointimal thickening can be reproducibly created by electrode stimulation38 or other forms of injury39,40 applied exclusively to the adventitial aspect of the vessel wall. Nevertheless, at least 4 studies41–43 in the rat model of arterial balloon injury have clearly established an inverse relationship between endothelial integrity and SMC proliferation.

Data regarding the relationship between endothelial integrity and neointimal thickening in human arteries, although limited, are consistent with the results of animal experiments. Davies et al44 harvested coronary arteries from explanted hearts of 6 transplant recipients and found that the severity and extent of EC defects varied directly with the severity and extent of intimal disease. Schwarcz et al45 found foci of, but not complete, reendothelialization in only 6 (38%) of 16 carotid specimens of patients with recurrent carotid artery narrowing after an initially successful endarterectomy. Perhaps most relevant to the proposed investigations, Gravanis and Roubin46 found no EC regeneration among 11 patients dying within 1 month of coronary angioplasty.

These studies thus support the notion that certain functions of the endothelium are critical to prevention of luminal narrowing by neointimal thickening.47 This concept has stimulated efforts to preserve intact the endothelium of native veins used for bypass surgery,48,49 accelerate reendothelialization after balloon-induced arterial injury,50,51 and facilitate endothelialization of prosthetic conduits52–54 or endovascular stents.55,56 The effect of VEGF-2 plasmid delivered via stent at the intimal surface is the likely result of VEGF-2 being a naturally secreted protein, but several other interesting questions are also brought to light by the interesting pattern of gene expression detected by in situ hybridization. For example, the finding of robust transgene expression in the adventitia focuses attention on mechanisms other than proliferation and migration of endothelial cells adjacent to the site of arterial injury and underscores the potential role of the adventitia in the response to arterial injury first noted after the adventitial injury models cited above. One interesting possibility is that the adventitia acts as a conduit for circulating endothelial progenitor cells that are recruited after denuding injury to help restore endothelial integrity.14,24,57 Indeed, our data also reveal that VEGF-2 expression after local gene delivery leads to significant mobilization of circulating progenitor cells, providing additional evidence for the contribution of these cells to reendothelialization.

The present study is limited to VEGF gene delivery in doses of 100 to 200 μg, a very narrow dose range in which no differences were detected between the doses. Additional studies are necessary to demonstrate dose dependency as well as influence of various polymers on plasmid release and kinetics. Another important limitation lies in the fact that the data regarding gene expression and EPC mobilization were derived from studies in normocholesterolemic rabbits, whereas the studies examining neointimal proliferation were in both subsets emphasizing hypercholesterolemic rabbits.

In summary, the present study constitutes an alternative and novel treatment strategy, acceleration of reendothelialization via VEGF-2 gene-eluting stents, for the prevention of restenosis. The data also provide additional evidence of a role for circulating endothelial progenitors in the process of endothelial repair.

This strategy addresses the liability common to all current strategies of restenosis prevention and may be considered as a stand-alone or combination therapy. Additional preclinical or clinical investigations of VEGF-plasmid–coated stents for local gene delivery are warranted.

Acknowledgments

This study is dedicated to our inspiring mentor, the late Jeffrey M. Isner. This study was supported in part by NIH grants (HL-53354, HL57515, HL-60911, HL-63414, HL-63695, and HL-66957) and the Shaughnessy center for clinical genetics. Dr Walter is the recipient of a research grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WA 1461/1). Dr Cejna is a recipient of a research grant from the Fonds zur Förderung von Wissenschaft and Forschung, Austria. BiodivYsio PC Stents were generously provided by Peter Stratford and Sean Willis, Biocompatibles UK Limited (Drug Delivery Division), Farnham, UK. We gratefully acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Hong Ma and Lindsay Heyd and the expert administrative assistance of Mickey Neely and Deirdre Costello.

Footnotes

  • ↵†Deceased.

References

  1. ↵
    Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, et al. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 192–195.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Farb A, Heller PF, Shroff S, et al. Pathological analysis of local delivery of paclitaxel via a polymer-coated stent. Circulation. 2001; 104: 473–479.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Asahara T, Chen D, Tsurumi Y, et al. Accelerated restitution of endothelial integrity and endothelium-dependent function after phVEGF165 gene transfer. Circulation. 1996; 94: 3291–3302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Van Belle E, Tio FO, Chen D, et al. Passivation of metallic stents following arterial gene transfer of phVEGF165 inhibits thrombus formation and intimal thickening. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1371–1379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Van Belle E, Maillard L, Tio FO, et al. Accelerated endothelialization by local delivery of recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor reduces in-stent intimal formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997; 235: 311–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Laitinen M, Zachary I, Breier G, et al. VEGF gene transfer reduces intimal thickening via increased production of nitric oxide in carotid arteries. Hum Gene Ther. 1997; 8: 1737–1744.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Whelan DM, van der Giessen WJ, Krabbendam SC, et al. Biocompatibility of phosphorylcholine coated stents in normal porcine coronary arteries. Heart. 2000; 83: 338–345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Galli M, Bartorelli A, Bedogni F, et al. Italian BiodivYsio open registry (BiodivYsio PC-coated stent): study of clinical outcomes of the implant of a PC-coated coronary stent. J Invasive Cardiol. 2000; 12: 452–458.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Witzenbichler B, Asahara T, Murohara T, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C/VEGF-2) promotes angiogenesis in the setting of tissue ischemia. Am J Pathol. 1998; 153: 381–394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Schratzberger P, Walter DH, Rittig K, et al. Reversal of experimental diabetic neuropathy by VEGF gene transfer. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 1083–1092.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Dussaillant GR, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26: 720–724.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996; 94: 1247–1254.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, et al. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19: 267–274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Iwakura A, Luedemann C, Shastry S, et al. Estrogen-mediated, endothelial nitric oxide synthase-dependent mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells contributes to reendothelialization after arterial injury. Circulation. 2003; 108: 3115–3121.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Krasinski K, Asahara T, Spyridopoulos I, et al. Estradiol accelerates endothelial recovery after arterial injury. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1768–1772.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1773–1780.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Liistro F, Colombo A. Late acute thrombosis after paclitaxel eluting stent implantation. Heart. 2001; 86: 262–264.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Teirstein PS. Living the dream of no restenosis. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1996–1998.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Virmani R, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Histopathologic alterations after endovascular radiation and antiproliferative stents: similarities and differences. Herz. 2002; 27: 1–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Belotti D, Vergani V, Drudis T, et al. The microtubule-affecting drug paclitaxel has antiangiogenic activity. Clin Cancer Res. 1996; 2: 1843–1849.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    Guba M, von Breitenbuch P, Steinbauer M, et al. Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 128–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Asahara T, Krasinski K, Chen D, et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood incorporate into re-endothelialization after vascular injury. Circulation. 1997; 96: I–725.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Krasinski K, Spyridopoulos I, Kearney M, et al. In vivo blockade of tumor necrosis factor-alpha accelerates functional endothelial recovery after balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1754–1756.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Walter DH, Rittig K, Bahlmann FH, et al. Statin therapy accelerates reendothelialization: a novel effect involving mobilization and incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2002; 105: 3017–3024.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Walter DH, Schachinger V, Elsner M, et al. Effect of statin therapy on restenosis after coronary stent implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 962–968.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Van Belle E, Chen D, Tio FO, et al. Accelerated endothelialization improves stent biocompatibility: feasibility and effects of VEGF-gene transfer. Circulation. 1996; 94: I–259.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    Klugherz BD, Jones PL, Cui X, et al. Gene delivery from a DNA controlled-release stent in porcine coronary arteries. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18: 1181–1184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Palmaz JC, Hunter G, Carson SN, et al. Postoperative carotid restenosis due to neointimal fibromuscular hyperplasia: clinical, angiographic, and pathological findings. Radiology. 1983; 148: 699–702.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    Pickering JG, Bacha P, Weir L, et al. Prevention of smooth muscle cell outgrowth from human atherosclerotic plaque by a recombinant fusion protein specific for epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Invest. 1993; 91: 724–729.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Kearney M, Pieczek A, Haley L, et al. Histopathology of in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1998–2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Teirstein PS, Massullo V, Jani S, et al. Three-year clinical and angiographic follow-up after intracoronary radiation: results of a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2000; 101: 360–365.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Leon MB, Teirstein PS, Moses JW, et al. Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 250–256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Waksman R, Ajani AE, White RL, et al. Intravascular gamma radiation for in-stent restenosis in saphenous-vein bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1194–1199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Liistro F, Stankovic G, Di Mario C, et al. First clinical experience with a paclitaxel derivate-eluting polymer stent system implantation for in-stent restenosis: immediate and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1883–1886.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Waksman RBB, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Late total occlusion after intracoronary brachytherapy for patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 65–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Farb A, Shroff S, John M, et al. Late arterial responses (6 and 12 months) after (32)P beta-emitting stent placement: sustained intimal suppression with incomplete healing. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1912–1919.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Scott-Burden T, Vanhoutte PM. The endothelium as a regulator of vascular smooth muscle proliferation. Circulation. 1993; 87: V-51–V-55.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    Hanke H, Strohschneider T, Oberhoff M, et al. Time course of smooth muscle cell proliferation in the intima and media of arteries following experimental angioplasty. Circulation. 1990; 67: 651–659.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    Webster S, Bishop SP, Geer JC. Experimental aortic intimal thickening, I: morphology and source of intima. Am J Pathol. 1974; 76: 245–264.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    Booth RFG, Martin JF, Honey AC, et al. Rapid development of atherosclerotic lesions in the rabbit carotid artery induced by perivascular manipulation. Atherosclerosis. 1989; 76: 257–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Clowes AW, Collazzo RE, Karnovsky MJ. A morphologic and permeability study of luminal smooth muscle cells after arterial injury in the rat. Lab Invest. 1978; 39: 141–150.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    Bjorkerud S, Bondjers G. Arterial repair and atherosclerosis after mechanical injury: tissue response after induction of a large superficial transverse injury. Atherosclerosis. 1973; 18: 235–255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Fishman JA, Ryan GB, Karnovsky JM. Endothelial regeneration in the rat carotid artery and the significance of endothelial denudation in the pathogenesis of myointimal thickening. Lab Invest. 1975; 32: 339–351.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    Davies MJ, Woolf N, Rrowles PM, et al. Morphology of the endothelium over atherosclerotic plaque in human coronary arteries. Br Heart J. 1988; 60: 459–464.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Schwarcz TH, Yates GN, Ghobrial M, et al. Pathologic characteristic of recurrent carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1987; 5: 280–288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Gravanis MB, Roubin GS. Histopathologic phenomena at the site of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: the problem of restenosis. Hum Pathol. 1989; 20: 477–485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Ross R. Atherosclerosis: a defense mechanism gone awry. Am J Pathol. 1993; 143: 985–1002.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    Haudenschild CC, Quist WC, LoGerfo FW. Protection of endothelium in vessel segments excised for grafting. Circulation. 1981; 64: II-101–II-107.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    LoGerfo FW, Quist WC, Cantelmo NL, et al. Integrity of vein grafts as a function of initial intimal and medial preservation. Circulation. 1983; 68: II-117–II-124.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    Nabel EG, Plautz G, Boyce FM, et al. Recombinant gene expression in vivo within endothelial cells of the arterial wall. Science. 1989; 244: 1342–1344.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    Berinyi LK, Conte MS, Mulligan RC. Repopulation of injured arteries with genetically modified endothelial cells. J Vasc Surg. 1992; 15: 932–934.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    Stanley JC, Ford JW, Vinter DW, et al. Enhanced patency of small-diameter, externally supported Dacron iliofemoral grafts seeded with endothelial cells. Surgery. 1982; 92: 994–1005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    Clowes AW, Gown AM, Hanson SR, et al. Mechanisms of arterial graft failure, 1: role of cellular proliferation in early healing of PTFE prostheses. Am J Pathol. 1985; 118: 43–54.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    Wilson JM, Birinyi LK, Salomon RN, et al. Implantation of vascular grafts lined with genetically modified endothelial cells. Science. 1989; 244: 1344–1346.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Van der Giessen WJ, Serruys PW, Visser WJ, et al. Endothelialization of intravascular stents. J Interv Cardiol. 1988; 1: 109–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    Dichek DA, Neville RF, Zwiebel JA, et al. Seeding of intravascular stents with genetically engineered endothelial cells. Circulation. 1989; 80: 1347–1353.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Cho HJ, Kim HS, Lee MM, et al. Mobilized endothelial progenitor cells by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor accelerate reendothelialization and reduce vascular inflammation after intravascular radiation. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2918–2925.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation
July 6, 2004, Volume 110, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Local Gene Transfer of phVEGF-2 Plasmid by Gene-Eluting Stents
    Dirk H. Walter, Manfred Cejna, Larry Diaz-Sandoval, Sean Willis, Laura Kirkwood, Peter W. Stratford, Anne B. Tietz, Rudolf Kirchmair, Marcy Silver, Cindy Curry, Andrea Wecker, Young-Sup Yoon, Regina Heidenreich, Allison Hanley, Marianne Kearney, Fermin O. Tio, Patrik Kuenzler, Jeffrey M. Isner and Douglas W. Losordo
    Circulation. 2004;110:36-45, originally published July 6, 2004
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000133324.38115.0A

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Local Gene Transfer of phVEGF-2 Plasmid by Gene-Eluting Stents
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Local Gene Transfer of phVEGF-2 Plasmid by Gene-Eluting Stents
    Dirk H. Walter, Manfred Cejna, Larry Diaz-Sandoval, Sean Willis, Laura Kirkwood, Peter W. Stratford, Anne B. Tietz, Rudolf Kirchmair, Marcy Silver, Cindy Curry, Andrea Wecker, Young-Sup Yoon, Regina Heidenreich, Allison Hanley, Marianne Kearney, Fermin O. Tio, Patrik Kuenzler, Jeffrey M. Isner and Douglas W. Losordo
    Circulation. 2004;110:36-45, originally published July 6, 2004
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000133324.38115.0A
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Genetics
    • Gene Expression & Regulation
  • Vascular Disease
    • Restenosis
  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Angiogenesis

Circulation

  • About Circulation
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Circulation CME
  • Statements and Guidelines
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: circ@circulationjournal.org
 

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured