Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
      • Doodle Gallery
      • Circulation Cover Doodle
        • → Blip the Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
      • Recently Published Guidelines
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
      • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Hartford Hospital
      • Hospital Santa Maria del Popolo, Naples, Italy
      • Instituto do Coração-INCOR (São Paulo, Brasil)
      • Minneapolis City Hospital
      • Parkland Hospital: Dallas, Texas
      • Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
      • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
      • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland
      • Tufts Medical Center
      • University of Michigan
      • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Vassar Brothers Medical Center (Poughkeepsie, NY)
      • Wroclaw Medical University
      • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
      • Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
      • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez – INCICh México City, México
      • Kuang-Tien General Hospital (Taichug, Taiwan)
      • University Hospital “Policlinico Umberto I”
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Clinical Investigation and Reports

Prevalence of Complicated Carotid Atheroma as Detected by Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging in Patients With Suspected Carotid Artery Stenosis and Previous Acute Cerebral Ischemia

Rachael E. Murphy, Alan R. Moody, Paul S. Morgan, Anne L. Martel, G.S. Delay, Steve Allder, Shane T. MacSweeney, William G. Tennant, John Gladman, John Lowe, Beverley J. Hunt
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000074204.92443.37
Circulation. 2003;107:3053-3058
Originally published June 24, 2003
Rachael E. Murphy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan R. Moody
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul S. Morgan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne L. Martel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.S. Delay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve Allder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shane T. MacSweeney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William G. Tennant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Gladman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Lowe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beverley J. Hunt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background— It is recognized that complicated plaque largely accounts for the morbidity and mortality from atherosclerosis. Ideally, investigation of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients would identify atheromatous plaques independently of stenosis. We have previously shown that a magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) technique demonstrates complicated atheroma as high signal within the carotid arterial wall. We used this technique to examine the prevalence of complicated carotid plaque in vivo in the ipsilateral arteries of recently symptomatic patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis and to compare this with their contralateral arteries and with those of healthy age- and sex-matched controls.

Methods and Results— The carotid arteries of 120 patients with suspected severe carotid artery stenosis and previous acute cerebral ischemia were imaged using MRDTI, as were 28 control arteries. High signal was not seen in any control artery. However, there was a 60% prevalence of high signal, suggestive of complicated plaque in the patients’ ipsilateral arteries. The prevalence of high signal was significantly greater in the patients’ ipsilateral vessels compared with the contralateral, asymptomatic side (60% versus 36%, χ2 P<0.001), particularly for vessels of only moderate stenosis.

Conclusions— MRDTI high signal suggestive of complicated plaque is prevalent in the ipsilateral carotid arteries of patients with carotid stenosis and recent cerebral ischemic events. MRDTI has a potential role in identifying “at risk” plaque, studying atherogenesis and the effects of plaque-modifying strategies.

  • plaque
  • carotid arteries
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • cerebral ischemia

Received August 6, 2002; revision received December 23, 2002; accepted April 2, 2003.

Complicated plaque largely accounts for the morbidity and mortality from atherosclerosis1 and is defined by the presence of intraplaque hemorrhage, thrombus, and surface disruption. We have developed a magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging technique (MRDTI) that shows high signal in the carotid arterial wall of patients with recent cerebrovascular ischemia. Examination of carotid endarterectomy specimens demonstrated that this MRDTI high signal is an in vivo marker of carotid complicated plaque.1a MRDTI high signal represents methemoglobin, an intermediate breakdown product of blood, and the sequence highlights the intraplaque hemorrhage component of complicated plaque. One application of such a technique is to ascertain the prevalence of carotid complicated plaque in vivo.

Much of what is known about the prevalence of complicated plaque is from specimen collection at interventional procedures, such as coronary, aortic, and carotid surgery or postmortem series looking at vessel atherosclerosis. Imaging studies have attempted to characterize complicated atheromatous lesions to look at the prevalence of these “dangerous” plaque morphologies in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations. Assessment of complicated plaque prevalence in vivo requires a reliable, noninvasive, well-tolerated imaging procedure that is low risk. Many techniques used are invasive, such as coronary and carotid angiography and transesophageal echocardiography for aortic complicated plaque.2–4 B-mode ultrasound can noninvasively characterize carotid atherosclerotic lesion morphology using echogenicity, defined as the reflectance of the ultrasound signal. However, at present there is much subjectivity in ultrasound diagnosis of vessel surface, wall, and plaque features,5 which makes applicability to prevalence studies difficult.

MRDTI is a technique that can noninvasively image carotid plaque morphology in vivo. MRDTI high signal was a marker of complicated plaque in our endarterectomy study, with a positive predictive value of 93% (Moody et al, unpublished data). The technique highlights the pathology as bright signal against a suppressed background, and scan interpretation is therefore relatively simple. The scan takes <5 minutes, and the sequence can be added to most commercially available scanners. These features mean that MRDTI is ideal as a noninvasive technique that could be applied to an in vivo prevalence study of carotid complicated plaque.

The aim of the present study was to use MRDTI to ascertain the prevalence of complex plaque in vivo in the carotid arteries of patients with suspected severe carotid artery stenosis after acute cerebral ischemic events. We then aimed to test the hypothesis that MRDTI-defined complex plaque is associated with previous recent ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events in a group of patients with carotid stenosis. This would be achieved by comparing the patients’ symptomatic artery with their nonsymptomatic side and with the arteries of a small group of control patients.

Methods

Patients

Patients with symptomatic carotid disease who were undergoing assessment for carotid endarterectomy were targeted for recruitment. All patients gave informed consent, and the local ethics committee approved the study. Patients were identified through the surgical “one-stop” vascular clinics. At these clinics, patients undergo a duplex ultrasonographic assessment of the carotid arteries. Patients were referred for MRI if they had 60% to 100% carotid artery stenosis ipsilateral to the affected cerebral hemisphere. The subset of patients imaged who had 70% to 99% stenosis ipsilateral to the affected cerebral hemisphere underwent carotid endarterectomy and have been reported previously. The time taken from the patients’ first symptoms to the MRI scan was calculated for the group as a whole as well as separately for patients with ipsilateral positive scans and patients with ipsilateral negative MRDTI scans.

Controls

We also imaged age- and sex-matched subjects with the MRDTI sequence to act as external controls. The subjects were patients undergoing cervical spine imaging and were selected to reflect, as much as possible, the age distribution in the patient population. The notes of the matches were examined to ensure there was no carotid or other vascular disease. Local ethical committee approval was obtained, and the patients gave informed written consent to have the MRDTI and MR angiography scans performed. Time of flight MR angiography was used to determine whether there was carotid vessel stenosis.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MRI scanning was performed on a 1.5T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen) using a receive-only quadrature neck array cervical spine coil. Patients underwent MRDTI and MR angiography. The MRDTI sequence used a T1-weighted magnetization-prepared 3D gradient-echo sequence, acquired in the coronal plane. The sequence included a selective water-excitation radio frequency pulse to abolish fat signal, and the effective inversion time was chosen to null the blood signal. The pixel size and effective slice thickness were 1.2 mm. The resulting acquisition time was 3.5 minutes. Assessment of the images involved reading of coronal source data together with standard image reconstruction techniques.

A positive scan was diagnosed if high signal material (brighter than the adjacent muscle) was seen within the wall or lumen of the carotid artery in the region and 1 cm to either side of the stenosis. The presence or absence of high signal was recorded in both the ipsilateral (symptomatic) artery and the contralateral (asymptomatic) artery for each patient (Figure 1). The prevalence of high signal in the ipsilateral and contralateral arteries in the patient group was ascertained for the patient group as a whole, patients with ipsilateral severe stenosis (70% to 100%), and those with ipsilateral stenosis <70%. Vessel stenosis measurements used were the clinic ultrasound measurements, which were calculated by NASCET criteria.6 Contrast MR angiography was used to confirm or refute suspected arterial occlusion on ultrasound, and in these cases MR assessment of vessel stenosis was taken as the measurement. A 3D rapid contrast enhanced angiography sequence was acquired in the coronal plane. Four volumes, taking 10 seconds each, were acquired from the point of intravenous gadolinium injection. This allowed the subtraction of the arterial phase from background. The pixel size was 1 mm, and effective slice thickness was 1.88 mm. Postprocessing used maximum intensity projection to visualize the vessel bifurcation in any plane. For controls, a time of flight angiography sequence was used using a multiple overlapping thin slab angiography technique acquired in the axial plane. The pixel size was 0.8 mm, and the slice thickness was 0.9 mm. The scan duration was 10 minutes 40 seconds. Postprocessing visualized the carotid bifurcation and enabled stenosis calculation by NASCET criteria. Stenosis was dichotomized into greater or equal to 70% and <70%.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. A, High signal material within right internal carotid artery (symptomatic side) as well as a smaller volume of asymptomatic complicated plaque on the left. B, Extensive unilateral right internal carotid disease. No high signal is seen on the left (asymptomatic) side.

Statistical Analysis

All analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 9 for Windows. χ2 test was used to assess differences between the prevalence of high signal in patients’ ipsilateral and contralateral arteries, between high signal at severe (70% to 100%) and lesser (<70%) ipsilateral stenoses in patients, and in comparing high signal in patients’ arteries overall with controls’ arteries. Symptom to scan time was found to have a nonparametric distribution when analyzed with a histogram on SPSS. Therefore, a log transformation of the data was performed, and the independent samples’ t test was then used to seek any differences between the time taken for scan in MRDTI-positive and -negative symptomatic patient groups. A significance level of P<0.05 was used.

Results

A total of 120 patients and 14 controls (Table 1) were recruited as outlined in Figure 2. All patients had previous focal neurological symptoms in the cerebral hemisphere ipsilateral to the stenosis. Because no patient had bilateral symptoms, the contralateral arteries acted as internal controls for the relationship of MRDTI high signal to symptoms.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

TABLE 1. Details of Patients and Controls Scanned

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. Flowchart for numbers of patients in the study.

None of the controls had MRDTI high signal in their carotid arteries (Table 3). Three control arteries had mild (20%) stenosis, and the rest had no stenosis. The prevalence of MRDTI high signal in the ipsilateral arteries of 120 symptomatic patients was 60%. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of MRDTI high signal between the ipsilateral and contralateral arteries of patients (Table 2). The difference was most marked in the arteries that were <70% stenosed. Thirty-three patients (27%) had bilateral high signal, 39 (33%) had only ipsilateral high signal, and 38 (32%) had neither. Only 10 (8%) had contralateral high signal without ipsilateral high signal. In those patients with <70% stenosis, there were 9 patients (38%) with bilateral high signal, 7 (29%) with only ipsilateral high signal, 6 (25%) with neither, and only 2 (8%) had contralateral high signal without its presence in the ipsilateral artery.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

TABLE 3. Comparison of High-Signal Prevalence in Patients and Controls

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

TABLE 2. Tabulation of MRDTI High-Signal Prevalence (Scan Positive) in Patients

Patients who had ipsilateral high signal had a median time of 12 weeks from first symptom to scan (range, 4 days to 82 weeks). For those with no ipsilateral high signal, this median time was 17 weeks (range, 4 to 109 weeks). There was a significant difference between the time taken from first symptoms to scan between the symptomatic MRDTI-positive and -negative groups (P=0.041). Eighteen patients were known to have had recurrent symptoms in the symptomatic artery territory. The median time from last symptoms to scan for patients with ipsilateral high signal was 4 weeks, and that for those with no ipsilateral high signal was 6 weeks. This difference was not significant.

Discussion

Summary of Findings

The aim of the present study was to examine the in vivo prevalence of complicated plaque, as detected by MRDTI high signal, in a group of recently symptomatic patients with suspected severe carotid stenosis. In so doing, we tested the hypothesis that complicated plaque in the ipsilateral artery is related to cerebrovascular symptoms in these patients. The prevalence of MRDTI high signal in the ipsilateral arteries of 120 symptomatic patients scanned was 60%. There was significantly greater prevalence of MRDTI high signal in the ipsilateral compared with the contralateral arteries (60% versus 36% prevalence, P<0.001). This difference was most marked in the vessels that were <70% stenosed, where the prevalence of high signal was 67% in ipsilateral and 31% in contralateral arteries (P<0.01). There was no carotid high signal seen in age- and sex-matched controls without history of stroke or other vascular events. MRDTI high signal in the patients’ contralateral artery was associated with the presence of high signal on the ipsilateral side. The time taken from first symptoms to scan was significantly less in the positive ipsilateral signal group than the negative ipsilateral signal group. For those patients in whom the timing of last symptoms was known, there was no difference in these groups.

Discussion of Findings

The 60% prevalence of MRDTI high signal in the ipsilateral artery of patients with cerebrovascular ischemia suggests that more than one half of the patients in this group have complicated plaque in their symptomatic artery. Because no patient had simultaneous cerebrovascular symptoms referable to both arteries, comparison was made between the patients’ ipsilateral and contralateral arteries. The significantly greater prevalence of high signal in our patients’ ipsilateral arteries compared with their contralateral side suggests that the presence of complicated plaque as identified by this technique is important in the production of their symptoms. This may be particularly so in the patients with a stenosis of <70%, where the prevalence of high signal in ipsilateral arteries was more than two thirds. The mechanism of symptom generation from complicated plaque is likely to be thromboembolism. Previous studies of coronary arteries have shown that coronary occlusion and myocardial infarction most frequently arise from mild to moderate rather than severe stenoses.7,8 In the ECST and NASCET trials, it was shown that there was no benefit of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenoses of <70%.9,10 Although the percentage risk of stroke from these moderate stenoses is less overall, they are more numerous than their severe counterparts, so there is a large stroke burden from stenoses that are presently not recommended for surgery.

The very presence of high signal in 36% of the contralateral, asymptomatic arteries suggests that the production of clinical symptoms is not inevitable when complex plaque is present. The presence of asymptomatic complicated plaque may reflect that many complications undergo healing without causing symptoms or that lesions can still be actively embolizing without clinical manifestations.11 Our findings showed that more than three quarters of patients who had contralateral high signal had ipsilateral signal (33 of 43 patients). This is in keeping with the recognition that atheroma is a systemic disease and is additionally supported by the absence of high signal in the carotid arteries of control subjects who had no history of any vascular events.

Strengths of the Present Study

The MRDTI sequence is an in vivo technique that is quick (3.5 minutes), well tolerated, and has good interobserver agreement. Any commercially available scanner can be set up for the technique, making it clinically applicable. Inclusion of this sequence in a brain and vessel imaging protocol for patients with cerebrovascular symptoms enables a comprehensive assessment of carotid stenosis, plaque complexity, and cerebral damage in one visit. This technique is well suited for use in large-scale observational studies, setting the scene for natural history and interventional studies.

Limitations of the Present Study

The number of patients in the symptomatic moderate stenosis group (<70%) was small at only 24, compared with 96 in the symptomatic severely stenosed group. This is attributable to the inherent bias in selection of patients scanned. The number of control subjects was much lower than that of patients, and it cannot yet be assumed that the prevalence of complicated plaque in a low risk group is zero. The timing from first symptoms to scan was long, and analysis suggested that the presence of MRDTI high signal might be related to this timing. The shorter time to study in the MRDTI-positive group could reflect more frequent or more significant ongoing symptoms causing the patient to seek earlier advice. Some patients continued to have symptoms long after the index event, and time to scan from this last event was therefore shorter for these patients, but there was no difference in this timing for scan-positive and scan-negative patients.

Relationship to Other Work

The present study provides an estimate of the prevalence (60%) of complicated plaque defined by intraplaque hemorrhage in a selected group of stenosed, symptomatic carotid arteries in vivo. In a histological study of endarterectomy specimens, Lusby et al12 found an 85% prevalence of intraplaque hemorrhage in symptomatic vessels of >50% stenosis. A recent meta-analysis of carotid endarterectomy studies found this figure was 48%.13 We do not yet know the duration of in vivo MRDTI high signal, and our technique may be detecting different ages of hemorrhage/thrombus. Application of a similar technique in the venous lumen has shown that MRDTI high signal can form in deep vein thrombus within hours and persist for several weeks once formed.14

Assessment of fibrous cap thickness and integrity, and therefore plaque vulnerability, has been achieved using T2-weighted and bright-blood imaging sequences to generate contrast between vessel wall and lumen.15–17 Full morphological characterization, however, relies on the use of more than one sequence.18 Thrombus and hemorrhage are plaque components previously shown to be detected with the least sensitivity using a variety of MR techniques, such as diffusion-weighted and T2 high spatial resolution imaging.18–20 However, in animal experiments, MRI has accurately identified and aged intra-arterial lumen thrombus.21,22 Recent work with multispectral MRI identified intraplaque hemorrhage and necrotic core with high accuracy in 18 human carotid endarterectomy subjects.23 Later work has demonstrated that in vivo high resolution multicontrast MRI is capable of classifying intermediate to advanced atherosclerotic lesions in the human carotid artery and found a 37% prevalence of histological complicated (type VI) plaque in 52 preendarterectomy patients.24 Yuan et al25 showed that multicontrast MRI identification of a ruptured fibrous cap is highly associated with a recent history of transient ischemic attack or stroke in 53 endarterectomy subjects. Our study has shown a 60% prevalence of MRDTI-defined ipsilateral complicated plaque and a significantly higher prevalence in symptomatic versus asymptomatic arteries.

Implications and Future

This technique has been used for the study of point prevalence of carotid complicated plaque. A natural history study will, however, give information regarding the persistence over time of high signal and its relationship to incident symptoms, and there is the potential to study the relationship of complicated plaque with clinical parameters and blood markers of endothelial cell dysfunction. The pilot data from this study suggest that additional investigation of symptomatic plaques specifically with <70% stenosis would be worthwhile.

Conclusion

Prevalence of MRDTI-defined complicated plaque in the ipsilateral arteries of 120 patients with previous cerebrovascular ischemia was 60%. MRDTI high signal suggestive of complicated plaque was more prevalent in the ipsilateral carotid arteries of patients compared with their contralateral arteries, particularly in arteries of <70% stenosis. The technique may have a role in identifying “at risk” plaque morphology and in natural history studies of plaque behavior.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Stroke Association of the United Kingdom. The authors thank the MRI radiographers at Queen’s Medical Center, Averil Fearon, secretary to Alan Moody, and the “one-stop” vascular clinic staff and secretaries.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995; 15: 1512–1531.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 1A.↵
    Moody AR, Murphy RE, Morgan PS, et al. Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation. 2003; 107: 3047–3052.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 2.↵
    Sharaf BL, Williams DO, Miele NJ, et al. A detailed angiographic analysis of patients with ambulatory electrocardiographic ischemia: results from the Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study angiographic core laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 78–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 3.↵
    Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP, on behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2000; 31: 615–621.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 4.↵
    Blackshear JL, Pearce LA, Hart RG, et al. Aortic plaque in atrial fibrillation: prevalence, predictors, and thromboembolic implications. Stroke. 1999; 30: 834–840.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 5.↵
    Gronholdt ML. Ultrasound and lipoproteins as predictors of lipid-rich, rupture-prone plaques in the carotid artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 2–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 6.↵
    Donnan GA, Davis SM, Chambers BR, et al. Surgery for prevention of stroke. Lancet. 1998; 351: 1372–1373.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 7.↵
    Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, et al. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 12: 56–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 8.↵
    Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, et al. Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation. 1988; 78: 1157–1166.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 9.↵
    European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991; 337: 1235–1243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 10.↵
    NASCET. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 445–453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 11.↵
    Davies MJ. The contribution of thrombosis to the clinical expression of coronary atherosclerosis. Thromb Res. 1996; 82: 1–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 12.↵
    Lusby RJ, Ferrell LD, Ehrenfeld WK, et al. Carotid plaque hemorrhage: its role in production of cerebral ischemia. Arch Surg. 1982; 117: 1479–1488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 13.↵
    Golledge J, Greenhalgh RM, Davies AH. The symptomatic carotid plaque. Stroke. 2000; 31: 774–781.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 14.↵
    Moody AR, Pollock JG, O’Connor AR, et al. Lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: direct MR imaging of the thrombus. Radiology. 1998; 209: 349–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 15.↵
    Toussaint JF, Southern JF, Fuster V, et al. T2-weighted contrast for NMR characterization of human atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995; 15: 1533–1542.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 16.↵
    Toussaint JF, LaMuraglia GM, Southern JF, et al. Magnetic resonance images lipid, fibrous, calcified, hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human atherosclerosis in vivo. Circulation. 1996; 94: 932–938.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 17.↵
    Hatsukami TS, Ross R, Polissar NL, et al. Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000; 102: 959–964.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 18.↵
    Shinnar M, Fallon JT, Wehrli S, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of ex vivo MRI for human atherosclerotic plaque characterization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 2756–2761.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 19.↵
    Toussaint JF, Southern JF, Fuster V, et al. Water diffusion properties of human atherosclerosis and thrombosis measured by pulse field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 542–546.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 20.↵
    Serfaty JM, Chaabane L, Tabib A, et al. Atherosclerotic plaques: classification and characterization with T2- weighted high-spatial-resolution MR imaging. An in vitro study. Radiology. 2001; 219: 403–410.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 21.↵
    Johnstone MT, Botnar RM, Perez AS, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental thrombosis in a rabbit model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1556–1560.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 22.↵
    Corti R, Osende JI, Fayad ZA, et al. In vivo noninvasive detection and age definition of arterial thrombus by MRI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 1366–1373.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 23.↵
    Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Ferguson MS, et al. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2051–2056.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 24.↵
    Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, et al. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1368–1373.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 25.↵
    Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL, et al. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation. 2002; 105: 181–185.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation
June 24, 2003, Volume 107, Issue 24
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Prevalence of Complicated Carotid Atheroma as Detected by Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging in Patients With Suspected Carotid Artery Stenosis and Previous Acute Cerebral Ischemia
    Rachael E. Murphy, Alan R. Moody, Paul S. Morgan, Anne L. Martel, G.S. Delay, Steve Allder, Shane T. MacSweeney, William G. Tennant, John Gladman, John Lowe and Beverley J. Hunt
    Circulation. 2003;107:3053-3058, originally published June 24, 2003
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000074204.92443.37

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Prevalence of Complicated Carotid Atheroma as Detected by Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging in Patients With Suspected Carotid Artery Stenosis and Previous Acute Cerebral Ischemia
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Prevalence of Complicated Carotid Atheroma as Detected by Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging in Patients With Suspected Carotid Artery Stenosis and Previous Acute Cerebral Ischemia
    Rachael E. Murphy, Alan R. Moody, Paul S. Morgan, Anne L. Martel, G.S. Delay, Steve Allder, Shane T. MacSweeney, William G. Tennant, John Gladman, John Lowe and Beverley J. Hunt
    Circulation. 2003;107:3053-3058, originally published June 24, 2003
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000074204.92443.37
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Mechanisms
  • Vascular Disease
    • Stenosis
    • Thrombosis
  • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Imaging
    • Computerized Tomography (CT)
  • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Cardiovascular Surgery

Circulation

  • About Circulation
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Circulation CME
  • Statements and Guidelines
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: circ@circulationjournal.org
 

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured