Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
      • Doodle Gallery
      • Circulation Cover Doodle
        • → Blip the Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
      • Recently Published Guidelines
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
      • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Hartford Hospital
      • Hospital Santa Maria del Popolo, Naples, Italy
      • Instituto do Coração-INCOR (São Paulo, Brasil)
      • Minneapolis City Hospital
      • Parkland Hospital: Dallas, Texas
      • Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
      • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
      • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland
      • Tufts Medical Center
      • University of Michigan
      • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Vassar Brothers Medical Center (Poughkeepsie, NY)
      • Wroclaw Medical University
      • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
      • Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
      • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez – INCICh México City, México
      • Kuang-Tien General Hospital (Taichug, Taiwan)
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Clinical Investigation and Reports

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy as an Independent Predictor of Acute Cerebrovascular Events in Essential Hypertension

Paolo Verdecchia, Carlo Porcellati, Gianpaolo Reboldi, Roberto Gattobigio, Claudia Borgioni, Thomas A. Pearson, Giuseppe Ambrosio
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4201.097944
Circulation. 2001;104:2039-2044
Originally published October 23, 2001
Paolo Verdecchia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlo Porcellati
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gianpaolo Reboldi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Gattobigio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia Borgioni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas A. Pearson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giuseppe Ambrosio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background It is uncertain whether left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) confers an increased risk for cerebrovascular disease in apparently healthy patients with essential hypertension.

Methods and Results A total of 2363 initially untreated hypertensive patients (mean age 51±12 years, 47% women) free of previous cardiovascular disease were followed up for up to 14 years (mean 5 years). At entry, all patients underwent diagnostic tests, including ECG, echocardiography, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring. At entry, the prevalence of LVH was 17.6% by ECG (Perugia score) and 23.7% by echocardiography (LVM >125 g/m2). Over the subsequent years, 105 patients experienced a first stroke or transient ischemic attack. The cerebrovascular event rate was higher among patients with LVH at entry, diagnosed by either ECG or echocardiography, than among those without hypertrophy (both P<0.01). After control for the significant influence of age, sex, diabetes, and 24-hour mean ambulatory BP, LVH by ECG conferred an increased risk for cerebrovascular events (relative risk [RR] 1.79; 95% CI 1.17 to 2.76). LVH by echocardiography also conferred a higher risk for cerebrovascular events (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.68). For each increase in LV mass of 1 SD (29 g/m2), there was a significant independent increase in the risk for cerebrovascular events (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.58).

Conclusions In apparently healthy patients with essential hypertension, LVH diagnosed by ECG or echocardiography confers an excess risk for stroke and transient ischemic attack independently of BP and other individual risk factors.

  • hypertension
  • stroke
  • hypertrophy
  • prognosis
  • blood pressure
  • epidemiology

Received May 21, 2001; revision received August 15, 2001; accepted August 17, 2001.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a well-recognized risk factor for cardiovascular disease.1,2 Studies in the general population1 and in cohorts of hypertensive patients2 have documented a several-fold increase in the risk of cardiovascular events in subjects with LVH.

The reasons behind the robust association between LVH and cardiac morbidity and mortality are unclear. LVH predisposes to arrhythmias3,4 and may aggravate the consequences of acute myocardial ischemia.5 A widely held contention is that LVH may provide a time-integrated measure of the exposure to elevated blood pressure (BP). In fact, given the intrinsic variability of BP and possible errors in measurements, in a single individual the risk conferred by BP might be overestimated or underestimated.6 Accordingly, use of an indicator such as LVH, which may provide a better estimate of chronic exposure to elevated BP than standard BP measurements, would afford a more accurate prediction of risk. As an alternative explanation, LVH could reflect longitudinal exposure to the combined effects of various risk factors for atherosclerosis,7 in which case hypertension would be only one factor.

The hypothesis that LVH may act as an independent risk factor is particularly attractive when it comes to explaining the association between LV mass (LVM) and cerebrovascular disease, because noncardiac events are free of most confounding effects of the consequences that LVH per se may exert on cardiac structure and function. In an autopsy series, heart weight was significantly greater in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage than those without.8 Increased LVM correlates with carotid artery diameters.9 Epidemiological data on a possible correlation between LVH cerebrovascular risk, however, are scanty. An association between LVH and stroke has been reported.10,11 Those studies, however, analyzed elderly subjects at high risk of cerebrovascular events, and only office BP measurements were available. Because cerebrovascular events are also well-recognized consequences of elevated BP, which in turn may lead to LVH, it may be difficult to differentiate the relative role of elevated BP from a direct contribution of LVH to the increased risk of developing stroke. As pointed out by Devereux,12 long-term prognostic studies of stroke in populations with baseline measurements of both LVM and ambulatory BP are needed to resolve this uncertainty.

In the present study, we investigated whether LV hypertrophy at baseline predicts acute cerebrovascular events at follow-up in a large cohort of initially untreated, uncomplicated hypertensive patients of a wide range of ages in whom basal measurements of LVM and ambulatory BP had been obtained.

Methods

The Progetto Ipertensione Umbria Monitoraggio Ambulatoriale (PIUMA) study was established in 1986 as an observational registry of morbidity and mortality in initially untreated subjects with essential hypertension.13,14 Approximately 50 family doctors are involved in referring their patients with elevated BP for complete diagnostic checkup and therapeutic advice. At entry, all patients had office BP ≥140 mm Hg systolic and/or ≥90 mm Hg diastolic on ≥3 visits. BP was measured by a physician with a mercury sphygmomanometer with subjects sitting and relaxed for ≥10 minutes. Three measurements were averaged for analysis. Ambulatory BP was recorded with an oscillometric device (SpaceLabs) set to take a reading every 15 minutes throughout 24 hours.

A standard 12-lead ECG was recorded at 25 mm/s, 1 mV/cm calibration. None of the subjects were receiving digitalis. An ECG score previously developed and validated in our laboratory (Perugia score)14,15 was used for diagnosis of LVH. The score requires positivity of ≥1 of the following: SV3+RaVL >2.4 mV (men) or >2.0 mV (women), typical LV strain, or a Romhilt-Estes score of ≥5.14,15

M-mode echocardiographic study of the LV was performed under cross-sectional control.16 Details about reading procedures and reproducibility in our laboratory are reported elsewhere.13,14 LVM was calculated according to Devereux17 and corrected by body surface area expressed in square meters. LVH was defined by an LVM >125 g/m2, a cutoff supported by prognostic evidence.2,13,18,19

Follow-Up

Follow-up was primarily the responsibility of family doctors, in cooperation with our hospital staff. Treatment was aimed at reducing office BP to <140/90 mm Hg by use of lifestyle and pharmacological measures. Diuretics, β-blockers, ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and α1-blockers, alone or combined, were the antihypertensive drugs most frequently used. Periodic contacts with family doctors and phone interviews with patients were arranged to ascertain vital status and occurrence of major cardiovascular events.

Assessment of End Points

Hospital records and other source documents of patients who died or suffered an end-point event were reviewed in conference by the authors. Stroke was defined as a new neurological deficit lasting >24 hours, in the absence of underlying potentially important nonvascular causes. Patients with stroke were hospitalized during the acute phase, and brain imaging and other diagnostic tests were carried out for determination of stroke type (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or unknown) according to the classification of the Stroke Data Bank.20 Transient ischemic attack (TIA) was diagnosed by a neurologist or internist in the presence of a rapid onset of a focal neurological deficit lasting >30 seconds and <24 hours and presumably due to ischemia. The PIUMA protocol required the deficit to be present during the qualifying clinical examination to be accepted and coded as a terminating event.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS (SPSS Inc) and SAS-Stat (SAS Institute). Parametric data are reported as mean±SD. For subjects who experienced multiple events, analysis was restricted to the first event. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and compared by the Mantel (log-rank) test. The effect of prognostic factors on survival was evaluated with stepwise Cox models. We first tested a baseline model using the following covariates: age (years), sex (female, male), family history of premature cerebrovascular disease (no, yes), diabetes (no, yes), serum cholesterol (mmol/L), serum triglycerides (mmol/L), smoking habits (nonsmokers, current smokers), body mass index (kg/m2), left atrial dimension (cm), antihypertensive treatment at follow-up (lifestyle measures alone, diuretics, and β-blockers alone or combined, ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists alone or combined, other drug combinations), and incident atrial fibrillation during follow-up (no, yes). Subsequent improvements in the model fitting were tested by entering, one at a time, office BP and average 24-hour ambulatory BP. Mean BP was calculated as diastolic BP+(pulse pressure/3). Finally, LVH diagnosed by ECG or echocardiography (no, yes) was entered into different models. LVM (g/body surface area) was also entered as a continuous variable. Population-attributable risk, an estimate of the proportion of outcome events that can be attributed to a given risk marker taking into account its prevalence and hazard ratio, was defined as 100×{[prevalence×(hazard ratio−1)]/[prevalence× (hazard ratio−1)+1]}. Prevalence was the number of patient-years of observation with a risk marker present divided by the total observation time. In 2-tailed tests, values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Follow-up data were available in 2363 of 2390 subjects (98.9%), and only 1.1% were lost to follow-up. The main baseline characteristics of the study population are reported in Table 1. Systolic and mean BP, both office and ambulatory, were higher in the subgroup with future events than in subjects without events (all P<0.01). Diastolic BP did not differ between the subgroups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1097944.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients With and Without Future Occurrence of Cerebrovascular Events

In the overall population, the prevalence of LVH by ECG at entry was 17.6%. LVH by ECG was present in 37.5% of patients who subsequently developed a cerebrovascular event and 16.7% of those who did not (P<0.01).

Echocardiograms were not obtained because of administrative reasons in 103 subjects. In the remaining 2260, echocardiographic tracings were of good quality for determination of LVM in 87.3% of subjects (n=1972). Prevalence of LVH by echocardiography was 23.7% in the total population and significantly more frequent in patients with future events (46.7%) than in those without events (22.8%; P<0.01).

Over a mean follow-up period of 5 years (range 0 to 14 years), there were 105 new cases of stroke (n=76) or TIA (n=29). Brain imaging was carried out during hospitalization in all subjects with stroke. Stroke was ischemic in 58 subjects, hemorrhagic in 12, and of unknown origin in 6. The overall rate of cerebrovascular events (per 100 person-years) was 0.89 in the total population, 0.73 in the subgroup without, and 2.04 in that with LVH by ECG (P<0.001). Similarly, event rate was 0.57 in the subgroup without versus 1.50 in that with LVH by echocardiography (P<0.001). Figure 1 reports survival curves and event rates in either group. The increased risk of cerebrovascular events associated with LVH was significant both over and under the age of 60 years (Figure 2). .

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. Cumulative incidence and crude rate of cerebrovascular events in hypertensive subjects with and without LVH determined by ECG (left) and echocardiography (right).

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. Cumulative incidence and crude rate of cerebrovascular events in hypertensive subjects <60 (left) and >60 (right) years old with and without LVH determined by ECG (top) and echocardiography (bottom).

The incidence of cerebrovascular events (per 100 person-years) was 1.12 among the subjects with suboptimal echocardiographic tracings versus 0.80 among those with optimal tracings (P=0.20; log-rank test).

At the time of the terminating event or censoring contact, 41.7% of the subjects were receiving lifestyle measures alone, 10.8% β-blockers alone or combined with diuretics, 20.0% ACE inhibitors or calcium antagonists alone or combined, and 27.5% other drug combinations.

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation

All patients were in sinus rhythm at entry. During follow-up, there were 50 new cases of atrial fibrillation, and 9 of these patients subsequently developed a cerebrovascular event. The rate of events (per 100 person-years) was 1.23 among patients without atrial fibrillation during follow-up and 3.23 among patients with incident atrial fibrillation (log-rank test, P=0.013). At entry, patients with future atrial fibrillation were older (58±11 years) and had higher values of 24-hour ambulatory BP (145±15/89±11 mm Hg) and LVM (129±40 g/m2) than subjects who stayed in sinus rhythm (51±12 years, 138±15/87±10 mm Hg, and 108±29 g/m2, respectively; all P<0.05).

Multivariate Analysis

The relative risk (RR) for cerebrovascular events (Table 2) was 1.17 (95% CI 0.98 to 3.90; P=NS) for every 10 mm Hg increase in office mean BP and 1.31 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.57; P=0.004) for every 10 mm Hg increase in 24-hour mean BP. After control for age, sex, diabetes, and 24-hour mean BP, LVH diagnosed by ECG conferred an increased risk for cerebrovascular events (RR 1.79; 95% CI 1.17 to 2.76). When echocardiographic data entered the equation in place of ECG data, for each increase in LVM of 1 SD (29 g/m2) there was a significant independent increase in the risk for cerebrovascular events (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.58). When LVH by echocardiography entered the model as a binary (yes-no) variable, the associated RR for cerebrovascular events was 1.64 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.68). When LVH by ECG and LVM as a continuous variable or categorized as >125 versus <125 g/m2 were forced into the same model, the echocardiographic measures lost statistical significance (P=0.41 and 0.56, respectively).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2097944.

Independent Predictors of Cerebrovascular Events

When the 3 components of the Perugia score were separately forced into the same model, after control for age, sex, diabetes, and 24-hour mean BP, the association of typical strain with future cerebrovascular events was significant (RR 2.14; 95% CI 1.14 to 4.07; P=0.018), that of modified Cornell voltage bordered significance (RR 1.62; 95% CI 0.97 to 2.70; P=0.06), and that of the Romhilt-Estes score (5 points) was not significant (P=0.64).

The population-attributable risk for cerebrovascular events was 13.2% for LVH by ECG and 12.2% for LVH by echocardiography.

Figure 3 shows that the age-adjusted 5-year probability of cerebrovascular events markedly increased with LVM at any level of mean 24-hour ambulatory BP. The other tested covariates (see Statistical Analysis), including incident atrial fibrillation, did not yield significance.

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 3. Age-adjusted 5-year probability of cerebrovascular events in relation to mean 24-hour ambulatory BP and LVM at echocardiography in hypertensive patients.

Discussion

In our large sample of patients of all ages with essential hypertension, LVH diagnosed by ECG or echocardiography identified a large subgroup at increased risk of stroke and TIA over a subsequent follow-up lasting up to 14 years. To maximize assessment of the predictive value of BP, thereby providing a more precise estimate of the independent prognostic value of LVH, ambulatory BP was used. In a previous study from our group, 24-hour mean BP was the most important ambulatory BP component for prediction of stroke.21 Even after a control for 24-hour mean BP, the link between LVH and cerebrovascular events remained strong and independent.

Previous Studies

An association between LVH and risk of stroke had been reported previously in studies limited to elderly subjects (mean age 68 years in the report from Framingham10 and 82 years in the study by Aronow et al11) and without ambulatory BP data. The present study extends such observations and provides novel information. For the first time, the prognostic value of LVM for stroke risk is recognized in the specific setting of patients with essential hypertension without previous cardiovascular disease. Second, our observations were not limited to elderly subjects, because the age span covered 8 decades. Third, and perhaps most important, our data provide the first consistent evidence that LVM is independent of BP for prediction of cerebrovascular events because its prognostic value remained significant after not only office but also 24-hour ambulatory BP had been taken into account.

Role of ECG

Our findings also provide evidence that the standard ECG may have an important role for prediction of stroke in patients with uncomplicated hypertension. The prevalence of LVH by ECG is generally believed to be low, being <3% in the general population7 and only slightly higher in hypertensive subjects.22 In contrast, although the prevalence of LVH by echocardiography in our population was comparable to that in the literature, the prevalence of LVH by ECG was as high as 17.6% owing to use of a score characterized by greater sensitivity15 and prognostic value14 than traditional ECG criteria and whose performance is not affected by obesity.23 By this criterion, a consistent subset of patients was identified as being at increased risk of cerebrovascular events (2.04 events/100 person-years versus 0.73 events in those without hypertrophy).

Possible Mechanisms

Our study was not designed to clarify the mechanisms by which LVH confers a higher risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with hypertension. Atrial fibrillation, a potential precursor of stroke, is predicted by LVH.24 In our study, which enrolled only subjects in sinus rhythm at entry, cases of atrial fibrillation occurring during follow-up were not excluded, so as to avoid a potential source of selection bias of the sample. This was unlikely to affect the link between LVH and cerebrovascular events, however, because only a small fraction of events (9 of 105) occurred in patients who eventually experienced atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, when incident atrial fibrillation was analyzed as a covariate in the Cox model, it did not yield significance.

In the present study, the predictive value of LVH was independent of that of BP. This is not surprising, because it is known that interindividual variation in LVM is explained only slightly by BP.25 Thus, LVM might reflect long-term exposure to several factors in addition to BP (such as genetic, hormonal, or metabolic7,25) that might be active both in the growth of LVM and progression of atherosclerosis. In our experience,25 only 5% of LVM variability was accounted for by 24-hour systolic BP, whereas 60% of variability was associated with postload insulin, sex, insulin-like growth factor 1, and body mass index. In other studies, LVH showed an association with carotid structural changes9 and asymptomatic cerebrovascular lesions,26 and a connection between dyslipidemia and development of LVH was recently reported.27

Limitations

Because the PIUMA population includes only white subjects, caution is needed in extrapolating our results to different ethnic groups. Another limitation, inherent to observational cohort studies, is the lack of control for occasional changes in antihypertensive regimen over time. Furthermore, because TIAs had to be symptomatic at the time of clinical examination, their incidence may have been underestimated. Finally, because only 31.4% of subjects repeated baseline tests during follow-up before the terminating event, we could not assess the prognostic impact of serial changes of risk factors.

Implications

Our data provide a rationale for intervention studies to assess the value of pharmacological measures to prevent stroke in high-risk subjects with LVH. It will also be important to establish whether regression of LVH per se confers a lesser risk for stroke and whether prevention of LVH by control of hypertension and obesity may reduce the burden of stroke. In stroke-prone hypertensive rats, LVH regression induced by treatment reduced stroke incidence.28 Finally, our findings show for the first time that hypertensive patients at increased risk of cerebrovascular events can be identified by improved interpretation of the traditional ECG.

Conclusions

In a large cohort of patients with essential hypertension, the association between LVH diagnosed by ECG or echocardiography and subsequent cerebrovascular events was independent of multiple risk markers, including age, sex, diabetes, and, most notably, ambulatory BP. These findings indicate that LVH represents an independent risk factor for acute cerebrovascular disease in hypertensive patients.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by grants from the Associazione Umbra Cuore e Ipertensione, Perugia, and by grant 9906104773-006 from MURST, Rome, Italy. We thank Mariano Cecchetti and Paolo De Luca for nursing assistance.

References

  1. ↵
    Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham heart study. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322: 1561–1566.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, et al. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med . 1991; 114: 345–352.
  3. ↵
    Messerli FH, Ventura HO, Elizardi DJ, et al. Hypertension and sudden death: increased ventricular ectopic activity in left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Med. 1984; 77: 18–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    McLenachan JM, Henderson E, Morris KI, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 787–792.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Koyanagi S, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, et al. Increased size of myocardial infarction in dogs with chronic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. Circ Res . 1982; 50: 55–62.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Verdecchia P. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure: current evidence and clinical implications. Hypertension . 2000; 35: 844–851.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Why is left ventricular hypertrophy so predictive of morbidity and mortality? Am J Med Sci . 1999; 317: 168–175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Bahemuka M. Primary intracerebral hemorrhage and heart weight: a clinicopathologic case-control review of 218 patients. Stroke . 1987; 18: 531–536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Okin PM, Roman MJ, Devereux RB, et al. Association of carotid atherosclerosis with electrocardiographic myocardial ischemia and left ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertension . 1996; 28: 3–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Bikkina M, Levy D, Evans JC, et al. Left ventricular mass and risk of stroke in an elderly cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA . 1994; 272: 33–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I, et al. Association of extracranial carotid arterial disease, prior atherothrombotic brain infarction, systemic hypertension, and left ventricular hypertrophy with the incidence of new atherothrombotic brain infarction at 45-month follow-up in 1,482 older patients. Am J Cardiol . 1997; 79: 991–993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Devereux RB. Left ventricular mass and stroke: what is the connection? JAMA . 1994; 272: 71–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Circulation . 1998; 97: 48–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, et al. Prognostic validation of a new electrocardiographic method for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol . 1998; 31: 383–390.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Schillaci G, Verdecchia P, Borgioni C, et al. Improved electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol . 1994; 74: 714–719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, et al, The Committee on M-Mode Standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation . 1978; 58: 1072–1083.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol . 1986; 57: 450–458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Muiesan ML, Salvetti M, Rizzoni D, et al. Association of change in left ventricular mass with prognosis during long-term antihypertensive treatment. J Hypertens . 1995; 13: 1091–1095.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Schillaci G, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure: an independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension. Hypertension . 1994; 24: 793–801.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, et al. The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke . 1988; 19: 547–554.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Reboldi G, et al. Different prognostic impact of 24-hour mean and pulse pressure on stroke and coronary artery disease in essential hypertension. Circulation . 2001; 103: 2579–2584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Casale PN, Devereux RB, Kligfield P, et al. Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: development and prospective validation of improved criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol . 1985; 6: 572–580.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Okin PM, Jern S, Devereux RB, et al, for the LIFE Study Group. Effect of obesity on electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension study. Hypertension . 2000; 35: 13–18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, et al. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol . 1998; 82: 2N–9N.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Schillaci G, et al. Circulating insulin and insulin-growth-factor-1 are independent determinants of left ventricular mass and geometry in essential hypertension. Circulation . 1999; 100: 1802–1807.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Kohara K, Zhao B, Jiang Y, et al. Relation of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry to asymptomatic cerebrovascular damage in essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol . 1999; 83: 367–370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Sundström J, Lind L, Vessby B, et al. Dyslipidemia and an unfavorable fatty acid profile predict left ventricular hypertrophy 20 years later. Circulation . 2001; 103: 836–841.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Linz W, Heitsch H, Scholkens BA, et al. Long-term angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade with fonsartan doubles lifespan of hypertensive rats. Hypertension . 2000; 35: 908–913.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation
October 23, 2001, Volume 104, Issue 17
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Left Ventricular Hypertrophy as an Independent Predictor of Acute Cerebrovascular Events in Essential Hypertension
    Paolo Verdecchia, Carlo Porcellati, Gianpaolo Reboldi, Roberto Gattobigio, Claudia Borgioni, Thomas A. Pearson and Giuseppe Ambrosio
    Circulation. 2001;104:2039-2044, originally published October 23, 2001
    https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4201.097944

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Left Ventricular Hypertrophy as an Independent Predictor of Acute Cerebrovascular Events in Essential Hypertension
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Left Ventricular Hypertrophy as an Independent Predictor of Acute Cerebrovascular Events in Essential Hypertension
    Paolo Verdecchia, Carlo Porcellati, Gianpaolo Reboldi, Roberto Gattobigio, Claudia Borgioni, Thomas A. Pearson and Giuseppe Ambrosio
    Circulation. 2001;104:2039-2044, originally published October 23, 2001
    https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4201.097944
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Epidemiology
  • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertrophy
  • Cardiology
    • Etiology
      • Epidemiology
  • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Echocardiography
    • Electrocardiology (ECG)
  • Stroke
    • Ischemic Stroke
    • Intracranial Hemorrhage
    • Cerebrovascular Disease/Stroke

Circulation

  • About Circulation
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Circulation CME
  • Statements and Guidelines
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: circ@circulationjournal.org
 

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured