Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
      • Doodle Gallery
      • Circulation Cover Doodle
        • → Blip the Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
      • Recently Published Guidelines
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • → Articles Bridging Discplines
    • Go Red for Women Issue
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • Circulation at ESC
    • Circulation at AHA Scientific Sessions
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation at ACC 2018
    • Circulation Supplements
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
      • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Hartford Hospital
      • Hospital Santa Maria del Popolo, Naples, Italy
      • Instituto do Coração-INCOR (São Paulo, Brasil)
      • Minneapolis City Hospital
      • Parkland Hospital: Dallas, Texas
      • Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
      • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
      • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland
      • Tufts Medical Center
      • University of Michigan
      • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Vassar Brothers Medical Center (Poughkeepsie, NY)
      • Wroclaw Medical University
      • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
      • Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
      • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez – INCICh México City, México
      • Kuang-Tien General Hospital (Taichug, Taiwan)
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • → Articles Bridging Discplines
    • Go Red for Women Issue
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • Circulation at ESC
    • Circulation at AHA Scientific Sessions
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation at ACC 2018
    • Circulation Supplements
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Basic Science Reports

Mechanisms of Neointima Formation and Remodeling in the Porcine Coronary Artery

Thomas Christen, Vitali Verin, Marie-Luce Bochaton-Piallat, Youri Popowski, Frans Ramaekers, Philippe Debruyne, Edoardo Camenzind, Guillaume van Eys, Giulio Gabbiani
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.6.882
Circulation. 2001;103:882-888
Originally published February 13, 2001
Thomas Christen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vitali Verin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie-Luce Bochaton-Piallat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Youri Popowski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frans Ramaekers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Debruyne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edoardo Camenzind
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillaume van Eys
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giulio Gabbiani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background—To characterize the cells responsible for neointima formation after porcine coronary artery wall injury, we studied the expression of smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation markers in 2 models: (1) self-expanding stent implantation resulting in no or little interruption of internal elastic lamina and (2) percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) resulting in complete medial rupture and exposure of adventitia to blood components.

Methods and Results—The expression of α-smooth muscle (SM) actin, SM myosin heavy chain isoforms 1 and 2, desmin, and smoothelin was investigated by means of immunohistochemistry and Western blots in tissues of the arterial wall collected at different time points and in cell populations cultured from these tissues. The expression of smoothelin, a marker of late SMC differentiation, was used to discriminate between SMCs and myofibroblasts. Both stent- and PTCA-induced neointimal tissues and their cultured cell populations expressed all 4 markers. The adventitial tissue underlying PTCA-induced lesions temporarily expressed α-SM actin, desmin, and SM myosin heavy chain isoforms, but not smoothelin. When placed in culture, adventitial cells expressed only α-SM actin.

Conclusions—Our results suggest that SMCs are the main components of coronary artery neointima after both self-expanding stent implantation and PTCA. The adventitial reaction observed after PTCA evolves with a chronology independent of that of neointima formation and probably corresponds to a myofibroblastic reaction.

  • angioplasty
  • stents
  • muscle, smooth
  • myofibroblasts
  • smoothelin

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is essential in the treatment of coronary disease.1 Restenosis, occurring in 30% to 40% of patients, represents a major limitation of this procedure. The advent of coronary stenting has resulted in a significant (30% to 50%) decrease of restenosis rate.2 However, the new entity of “in-stent restenosis” resistant to any available therapy has emerged.3

According to a contemporary paradigm, several phenomena are involved in restenosis development after PTCA.4 One is proliferation and migration of medial smooth muscle cells (SMCs) into the intima.5 It was recently suggested that adventitial myofibroblasts are capable of traversing the ruptured media and thus participate in the formation of neointimal thickening.6 7 Another is unfavorable constrictive remodeling of the artery, possibly related to activation and proliferation of adventitial fibroblasts.4 6 7 It is noteworthy that stent implantation eliminates the constrictive remodeling of the artery but does not interfere with neointima formation.4

It is conceivable that implantation of a self-expanding stent (Wallstent) into a porcine coronary artery leads to a chronic injury of the wall, resulting in the migration of medial SMCs into the intima.8 Conversely, a balloon overstretch injury, resulting in complete rupture of the media and exposure of the adventitia to blood components, could lead (in addition to SMC stimulation) to activation and proliferation of adventitial fibroblasts, followed by their inward migration and participation in neointima formation.6 7 To acquire more knowledge on the origin of cells responsible for neointima formation in both models, we studied chronologically the expression of well-established SMC differentiation markers, ie, α-smooth muscle (SM) actin,9 SM myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms 1 and 2,9 desmin,9 and smoothelin,10 in the arterial wall layers after stent implantation or PTCA. We also studied the same differentiation markers in cell populations cultured from these tissues under normal conditions and after both injuries. The expression of smoothelin, a marker of late SMC differentiation, was used to discriminate between SMCs and myofibroblasts.11

We demonstrate that (1) a self-expanding stent induces a neointima composed of cells expressing all SMC markers tested, without producing a myofibroblastic reaction in the adventitia; (2) PTCA-induced neointima essentially contains cells with SMC features; and (3) the myofibroblastic reaction taking place in the adventitia after PTCA evolves independently of neointima formation.

Methods

Animals and Standard Procedure Protocol

Domestic crossbred pigs (Sus scrofa) weighing ≈40 kg were premedicated with azaperone (60 mg/10 kg; Janssen Pharmaceutical), midazolam (10 mg; Roche Pharma), and 0.25 mg atropine IM. The pigs were sedated by continuous injection of fentanyl (0.2 mg/h IV). After endotracheal intubation, the animals were ventilated with halothane (1.5 vol%; Zeneca), nitrous oxide, and oxygen to maintain anesthesia throughout the experiment. The left common carotid artery was surgically exposed, and after insertion of the introducer (8F, Input.PS; Bard), acetylsalicylic acid (1 g; Synthelabo) and heparin (Liquemine 100 IU/kg; Roche Pharma) were administered intra-arterially. The coronary ostia were cannulated, and arteries were then injured either by direct self-expanding stent implantation (Wallstent, Schneider) without subsequent balloon inflation or by an oversized PTCA balloon inflation (Bonnie, Schneider) with a balloon-to-artery diameter ratio of 1.2 to 1.3. The balloon was inflated 3 times for 30 seconds. Noninstrumented coronary arteries and coronary arteries of pigs from a nearby slaughterhouse served as controls. After closure of cervicotomy and local antibiotic treatment, the animals received 106 IU of penicillin G (Hoechst-Pharma) IM. The pigs were euthanized under general anesthesia by whole-heart explantation, and coronary arteries were dissected from the surrounding myocardium. Histology and immunohistochemistry were performed on specimens collected at 4 (stent and PTCA, n=1), 7 (stent, n=3; PTCA, n=4), 15 (stent and PTCA, n=3), and 30 (stent, n=3; PTCA, n=4) days. Tissues for digestion and protein extract preparation were harvested from normal media (n=5), 30-day-old stent- and PTCA-induced neointimas (stent, n=3; PTCA, n=1 for protein extraction and n=3 for digestion), and adventitial tissue either normal (n=3) or underlying 7-day-old PTCA-induced injury (n=3). As controls for adventitial fibroblasts, we placed in culture subcutaneous fibroblasts from the skin of the neck. All animal procedures were performed according to federal veterinary guidelines and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Geneva Medical Faculty.

Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Normal coronary arteries and segments containing a stent- or a PTCA-induced lesion were fixed with 4% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin or snap-frozen in precooled liquid isopentane and embedded in OCT resin (Miles Scientific). Paraffin-embedded sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Miller, Landrum, or Alcian blue stains. For indirect immunofluorescence, cryostat sections were stained with mouse monoclonal IgG2a specific for α-SM actin,9 mouse monoclonal IgG1 specific for desmin (Clone D33; Dako), rabbit polyclonal IgG specific for SM MHC (Biomedical Technologies Inc; this antibody does not recognize nonmuscle isoform B12 ), or mouse monoclonal IgG1 specific for smoothelin10 as previously described.9 Appropriate second antibodies coupled to fluorescein and rhodamine were applied as previously described.9 Slides were observed with a Zeiss Axiophot photomicroscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a Plan-Neofluar ×10/0.50 objective. Pictures were acquired with a high-sensitivity Coolview color camera (Photonic Science). For quantification of differentiation marker expression, neointimal cells were counted either with a Zeiss Axiophot photomicroscope with an oil immersion Plan-Apochromat ×40/1.3 or ×63/1.25 objectives or by overlaying pictures of double-stained tissues with the help of KS 400 software (Zeiss Vision).

To confirm coexpression of α-SM actin and smoothelin in vivo, slides were further examined with a confocal laser scan fluorescence inverted microscope (CLSM 410; Carl Zeiss) through an oil immersion Plan-Neofluar ×63/1.4 objective as previously described.9 A 3D image corresponding to the projection of all optical sections in 1 plane was reconstructed with the Imaris program (Bitplane) running on an Octane Silicon Graphics Workstation. Images were processed with Adobe Photoshop 5.0 (Adobe System).

Cell Culture

The intimal thickening present between the struts and the lumen was separated from the stent and the underlying media with 2 ophthalmologic tweezers. Lesion sites induced by PTCA were localized with the help of binoculars once the vessel was opened longitudinally, and the intimal thickening was collected with a sharp ophthalmologic curette. Normal adventitia was stripped free of medial tissue. All dissected tissues were validated by histology. Normal media, intimal thickenings, and adventitia were digested, and isolated cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies) containing 10% FCS (HyClone) as previously described.9

Protein Extraction, Electrophoresis, and Western Blotting

Dissected tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and crushed. Tissues and cell cultures were processed for SDS-PAGE, with protein load adjusted according to the method of Bradford, and immunoblotted as previously described.9 In separate experiments, filters were incubated with either anti–α-SM actin, anti–SM MHC, anti-desmin, or anti-smoothelin antibodies.9 10 12 Signals were digitized by means of an Arcus II scanner (Agfa) and analyzed with Image Quant software (Image Quant Analysis; Molecular Dynamics). Values were normalized to the pixel values measured in normal media.

Results

Histology of Neointima Formation After Stenting or PTCA

Representative pictures of coronary artery segments with stent- or PTCA-induced lesions, stained for elastin and collagen at 7, 15, and 30 days, are shown in Figure 1⇓. The internal elastic lamina was only slightly compressed in stented arteries (Figure 1⇓, a, c, and e), whereas both internal elastic lamina and media were interrupted in all arteries after balloon angioplasty (Figure 1⇓, b, d, and f). In both models, deposition of fibrin and accumulation of inflammatory cells were seen at 4 days (data not shown); from 7 days on, spindle-shaped cells started to accumulate within the neointima (Figure 1⇓, a and b) and gradually increased in quantity up to 30 days. Stent implantation induced an inflammatory reaction characterized by the presence of macrophages around the metallic struts. Fifteen days after PTCA, spindle-shaped cells infiltrated the space left by media interruption and extended below the external elastic lamina (Figure 1d⇓, arrow). Thirty days after stent implantation or PTCA, the neointima was always thicker than the adjacent media (Figure 1⇓, e and f).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Histological appearance of stent- vs PTCA-induced lesions. Miller staining of porcine coronary artery after 7 (a, b), 15 (c, d), and 30 (e, f) days of stent implantation (a, c, e) and PTCA (b, d, f). Intimal thickening is important in both conditions but is more exuberant after PTCA where it extends below the external elastic lamina (d, arrow). Bar=200 μm.

Remarkably, no significant changes were observed in the adventitia of stented arteries (Figure 2a⇓). In contrast, the adventitia underlying PTCA-induced lesions showed clear inflammatory and fibrotic changes with a progressive accumulation of collagen, whereas the neointima was strongly positive for Alcian blue staining, as previously described.13 At 30 days, the adventitia of PTCA-treated arteries was always thicker than that of noninjured or stented arteries (Figure 2b⇓).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Comparison of stent- vs PTCA-induced adventitial reaction. Miller staining after 30 days of stent implantation (a) and PTCA (b) shows that no significant changes are present after stent implantation, whereas an important fibrotic reaction is present in adventitia (A) and extends into surrounding connective tissue after PTCA. Bar=200 μm.

Expression of SMC Differentiation Markers After Stenting or PTCA

Stented coronary arteries were double-stained for either α-SM actin and smoothelin or SM MHC and desmin at 7, 15, and 30 days (Figure 3⇓; Table⇓). At 7 days, 16% of the cells of the thin neointima expressed α-SM actin and SM MHC (Figure 3⇓, a and g, respectively; Table⇓). The same pattern of staining was observed for smoothelin and desmin; however, only 44% and 58% of SMCs positive for α-SM actin and SM MHC were also positive for smoothelin and desmin, respectively (Figure 3⇓, d and j; Table⇓). At 15 days, 93% of the neointimal cells were positive for α-SM actin and SM MHC (Figure 3⇓, b and h; Table⇓), of which 99% and 76% were positive for smoothelin and desmin, respectively (Figure 3⇓, e and k; Table⇓). At 30 days, 95% of neointimal cells were positive for α-SM actin, SM MHC, and smoothelin (Figure 3⇓, c, i, and f, respectively; Table⇓), but only 49% were positive for desmin (Figure 3l⇓; Table⇓); areas negative for SMC markers were limited around the struts of the stent. Practically all SMCs in the underlying media expressed all 4 differentiation markers regardless of the time of study; only areas around the stent struts, containing inflammatory cells, remained negative. The adventitial fibroblasts in stented arteries remained negative for all differentiation markers at 4 (data not shown), 7, 15, and 30 days. Taken together, these data suggest that a self-expanding stent induces a neointima composed of SMCs derived from the underlying media.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Expression of differentiation markers in stented coronary arteries. Immunofluorescence staining showing expression of α-SM actin (a through c) and smoothelin (d through f) or SM MHC (g through i) and desmin (j through l) at 7 (a, d, g, j), 15 (b, e, h, k), and 30 (c, f, i, l) days. Cells of neointima express all differentiation markers, whereas cells of underlying adventitia do not. L indicates lumen. Bar=200 μm. Inset magnification is 3 times that of figure.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Percentages of Neointimal SMCs Expressing Differentiation Markers at Different Times After Injury

In 7-day-old PTCA-induced lesions, 26% of the cells filling in the gap induced by media interruption expressed α-SM actin and SM MHC (Figure 4⇓, a and g; Table⇑); of these, 44% were positive for smoothelin and 94% positive for desmin (Figure 4⇓, d and j, Table⇑). Smoothelin was more frequently observed in neointimal cells adjacent to the interrupted media (Figure 4d⇓). After 15 days, 94% of the cells filling the gap were expressing α-SM actin and SM MHC (Figure 4⇓, b and h; Table⇑), of which 95% and 70% were positive for smoothelin and desmin, respectively (Figure 4⇓, e and k; Table⇑). After 30 days, the pattern of staining was similar to that of 15 days (Figure 4⇓, c, f, i, and l). α-SM actin and SM MHC were present in 98% of neointimal cells (Figure 4⇓, c and i; Table⇑); of these, 96% and 55% coexpressed smoothelin and desmin, respectively (Figure 4⇓, f and l; Table⇑). The intensity of smoothelin staining was variable; in ≈23% of intimal cells, smoothelin staining, although appreciable, was weaker than that of the remaining intimal cells. This could be related to a variable degree of differentiation of intimal SMCs.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Expression of differentiation markers in coronary arteries after PTCA. Immunofluorescence staining showing expression of α-SM actin (a through c) and smoothelin (d through f) or SM MHC (g through i) and desmin (j through l) at 7 (a, d, g, j), 15 (b, e, h, k) and 30 (c, f, i, l) days. Cells in neointima express all differentiation markers, including smoothelin, whereas adventitial fibroblasts express differentiation markers to some extent, with exception of smoothelin. Note that at 30 days, adventitial staining has practically disappeared. This evolution is similar to that of a reactive granulation tissue. Dotted lines highlight limit of media/neointima. L indicates lumen. Bar=200 μm.

Seven days after PTCA, the adventitia contained cells positive for α-SM actin (Figure 4a⇑) and desmin (Figure 4j⇑), and to a lesser extent SM MHC (Figure 4g⇑). At 15 days, the adventitial cells expressing α-SM actin (Figure 4b⇑) were still numerous, whereas only a few expressed SM MHC and desmin (Figure 4⇑, h and k, respectively). At 30 days, only a few adventitial fibroblasts expressed α-SM actin, and all were negative for SM MHC and desmin (Figure 4⇑, c, i, and l, respectively). No smoothelin-positive cells were detected in the adventitia at any time point (Figure 4⇑, d, e, and f). These data are compatible with a myofibroblastic reaction of the adventitia after PTCA.

For a more detailed analysis of α-SM actin and smoothelin expression in PTCA-induced neointima, CLSM was used. In 7-day-old PTCA-induced neointima, all spindle-shaped cells expressed α-SM actin. Among them, some coexpressed smoothelin importantly (Figure 5⇓, double arrow, yellow color), and others showed either weak (single arrow, yellow and green) or no (arrowhead, only green) smoothelin expression.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

CLSM micrograph showing α-SM actin and smoothelin expression in 7-day-old PTCA-induced neointima. Cells were double-stained for α-SM actin (green) and smoothelin (red). 3D reconstruction shows SMCs coexpressing α-SM actin and smoothelin (yellow) to variable degrees. Some cells are negative for smoothelin (arrowhead), some have a low degree of coexpression (single arrow), and some show almost complete coexpression (double arrow). Note that there is no expression of smoothelin alone. Bar=15 μm.

Immunoblots of total protein extracts obtained from the normal media, intimal thickening 30 days after stent implantation or PTCA, normal adventitia, and adventitia underlying 7-day-old PTCA confirmed the results obtained by immunofluorescence staining (Figure 6⇓). α-SM actin, SM MHC isoforms 1 and 2, desmin, and smoothelin were clearly expressed in both stent-induced (Figure 6⇓, lane g) and PTCA-induced (Figure 6⇓, lane h) neointima. In stent-induced neointima, the content of α-SM actin was decreased to 70%, that of SM MHC 1 to 60% and of SM MHC 2 to 30%, that of desmin to 8%, and that of smoothelin to 25% compared with normal media (Figure 6⇓, lanes g and f).9 In PTCA-induced neointima, the content of α-SM actin was decreased to 40%, that of SM MHC 1 to 40% and of SM MHC 2 to 35%, that of desmin to 6%, and that of smoothelin to 20% compared with normal media (Figure 6⇓, lanes h and f).9 The normal adventitia was negative for all 4 differentiation markers (Figure 6⇓, lane i), whereas in adventitia underlying 7-day-old PTCA-induced lesions, the content of α-SM actin was 3% and that of desmin 8% compared with normal media (Figure 6⇓, lanes j and f), and no SM MHC (despite some cells positive by means of immunofluorescence, see Figure 4g⇑) or smoothelin was observed (Figure 6⇓, lane j).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Expression of differentiation markers in total protein extracts of coronary arteries. SDS-PAGE of total protein extracts (a through e) and immunoblots (f through j) showing α-SM actin, SM MHC, desmin, and smoothelin expression in normal media (a and f), stent-induced (b and g) and PTCA-induced (c and h) neointima at 30 days, and normal adventitia (d and i) and adventitia underlying a lesion resulting from PTCA (e and j) at 7 days. Like normal media, stent-induced and PTCA-induced neointimas show expression of 4 markers. Adventitia underlying PTCA-induced lesion expresses α-SM actin and desmin but not smoothelin and SM MHC.

Cells were isolated by enzymatic digestion from media and adventitia of normal coronary arteries and from stent- or PTCA-induced neointima at 30 days. At passage 5, immunoblots showed that cells from the stent-induced neointima expressed all 4 markers, including smoothelin (Figure 7⇓, lane f). The content of α-SM actin was decreased to 40%, that of SM MHC 1 to 70% and SM MHC 2 to 75%, that of desmin to 15%, and that of smoothelin to 40% compared with normal media (Figure 7⇓, lanes f and e).9 Cells derived from PTCA-induced neointima also expressed all 4 markers (Figure 7⇓, lane g). The content of α-SM actin was decreased to 50%, that of SM MHC 1 to 30% and SM MHC 2 to 2%, that of desmin to 15%, and that of smoothelin to 35% compared with normal media (Figure 7⇓, lanes g and e).9 At passage 5, adventitial fibroblasts cultured from the normal coronary artery showed an α-SM actin content of 7% compared with normal media, but SM MHC, desmin, and smoothelin were not detectable (Figure 7⇓, lanes h and e). Subcutaneous fibroblasts at passage 5 showed the same expression profile with regard to the 4 markers as that of adventitial fibroblasts (data not shown).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Expression of differentiation markers in total protein extracts of cultured coronary artery SMCs. SDS-PAGE of total protein extracts (a through d) and immunoblots (e through h) showing α-SM actin, SM MHC, desmin, and smoothelin expression in SMCs cultured from normal media (a and e), stent-induced neointima at 30 days (b and f), PTCA-induced neointima at 30 days (c and g), and fibroblasts cultured from normal coronary adventitia (d and h). Cultured medial (e) and neointimal (f, g) cells of 2 injury models express 4 markers. Cultured adventitial fibroblasts (h) express only α-SM actin.

Discussion

To efficiently prevent and/or cure restenosis, it is of paramount importance to identify cells responsible for both neointima formation and constrictive remodeling. For this purpose, we studied 2 distinct types of injury chronologically in the pig (currently a well-accepted animal model in this respect14 ): (1) self-expanding stent implantation, inducing a chronic injury without rupture of the internal elastic lamina and of the media and (2) PTCA-induced lesions, which result in complete medial interruption and expose the adventitia to the circulating blood, thus facilitating fibroblast activation in the adventitia.6 7 Our results suggest that SMCs are the main component of the neointima after both self-expanding stent and balloon overstretch injuries. They are in agreement with current views concerning the pathogenesis of stent-induced lesions,8 whereas the pathogenesis of PTCA-induced lesions has up to now remained controversial.6 7 15 16 17

SMC Marker Expression in Tissues of Porcine Coronary Arterial Wall

We have used well-established markers of SMC differentiation in general and of vascular SMC differentiation in particular, such as α-SM actin, SM MHC, desmin, and smoothelin. These markers have been extensively characterized during the embryonic and fetal development of smooth muscle.18 The notions that α-SM actin is the earliest marker to appear during SMC development18 and that smoothelin is a late differentiation marker of SMC are currently well accepted.10 11 These markers, with few exceptions for α-SM actin,19 are not expressed in fibroblasts of normal tissues but can be expressed in myofibroblasts present in granulation tissue or fibrocontractive diseases,19 with the exception of smoothelin, which represents a selective SMC marker.11

As previously described in other models,20 cells accumulating in the neointima after PTCA first dedifferentiated, then gradually acquired a positive staining for SMC differentiation markers, including smoothelin, with practically the same time course as neointimal cells after stent implantation. At no time after stent implantation did adventitial fibroblasts express 1 of the 4 markers. In contrast, after PTCA, adventitial fibroblasts modulated into myofibroblasts, as indicated by the positive staining for α-SM actin, SM MHC, and desmin and the negative staining for smoothelin. It is noteworthy that the chronology of adventitial myofibroblastic modulation was clearly different from that of SMC differentiation within the neointima; moreover, this adventitial reaction was reversible, as seen during granulation tissue formation or many fibrotic reactions.21

In an elegant study in which adventitial fibroblasts were labeled with bromodeoxyuridine, Shi et al15 showed that during the remodeling of an autologous vein graft, a proportion of neointimal cells was derived from perivascular fibroblasts. It has been shown that an important degree of apoptosis takes place in vein graft SMCs22 ; thus, the recruitment of perivascular fibroblasts could be specific for this procedure. Further studies using smoothelin antibodies may be useful to clarify this point.

When proliferation and SMC marker expression were investigated in the rabbit carotid artery injury model, a myofibroblastic reaction appeared to take place in the adventitia, and neointima formation consisted of medial SMCs with only a modest adventitia-to-media cell migration.16 When fibroblasts transduced with retroviral particles encoding β-galactosidase were implanted in the adventitia of the rat carotid artery, some of these cells could be found in neointima formation after balloon injury.17 The relative proportions of SMCs and fibroblasts participating in neointima formation in that model remain to be established.

SMC Marker Expression in Cultured Cells

We and others recently reported that cultured porcine coronary artery SMCs maintain a high degree of differentiation in vitro,9 23 contrary to what has been reported for rodent arterial SMCs.18 24 In the present study, SMC marker expression was very similar in the populations of neointimal SMCs cultured after either stent or PTCA. Both populations maintained the expression of all markers, including smoothelin, at passage 5, indicating a SMC rather than a fibroblastic origin. In contrast, cultured adventitial fibroblasts showed a SMC marker expression profile clearly different from that of neointimal cells and similar to that of subcutaneous fibroblasts; in particular, they did not show smoothelin expression. Moreover, it has been reported that porcine coronary SMCs behave differently in vitro from adventitial fibroblasts and from SMCs of elastic arteries.23 All these data support, albeit indirectly, the SMC origin of intimal lesions.

Study Limitations

We cannot exclude the possibility that in our model, a small proportion of fibroblasts participate actively in neointima formation. It is conceivable, although far from proven, that once myofibroblasts have migrated within the media, they are submitted to the influence of local microenvironmental factors facilitating full SMC differentiation, including smoothelin expression. As discussed above, this possibility is not reflected by the results of experiments in culture, where adventitial fibroblasts never expressed smoothelin, whereas neointimal cells derived from both stent lesions and balloon overstretch lesions expressed all SMC markers, including smoothelin. Coculture experiments of SMCs and adventitial fibroblasts may provide interesting information on the possibility that SMCs modulate the phenotypic profile of fibroblasts and vice versa. Another limitation of our study is that injuries were performed on nonatherosclerotic arteries.

Conclusions

Our results support the view that SMCs are the main contributor to neointima formation after stent implantation and balloon overstretch injury and thus appear to represent an appropriate target for preventive and therapeutic interventions based on the modulation of their mitotic, apoptotic, and motile activities. In contrast, adventitial fibroblast activation, and in particular the fibrotic and retractile activities of these cells,19 may be involved in negative remodeling after PTCA and hence should be considered in preventive and therapeutic strategies of restenosis after this intervention.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grants 31-050568.97 and 32-049849.96. We thank Dr. J. Belenger, M. Jorge-Costa, and S. Coutant-Zimmerli for their help in animal handling and surgery, P. Henchoz for expert technical assistance, J.-C. Rumbeli and E. Denkinger for photographic work, and S. Josseron for help in typing the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Reprint requests to Prof Giulio Gabbiani, University of Geneva-CMU, Department of Pathology, 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

  • Received May 15, 2000.
  • Revision received August 21, 2000.
  • Accepted August 23, 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 by American Heart Association

References

  1. ↵
    Bittl JA. Advances in coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1290–1302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489–495.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Eltchaninoff H, Koning R, Tron C, et al. Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: immediate results and 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:980–984.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Post MJ, de Smet BJ, van der Helm Y, et al. Arterial remodeling after balloon angioplasty or stenting in an atherosclerotic experimental model. Circulation. 1997;96:996–1003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM. Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury, I: smooth muscle growth in the absence of endothelium. Lab Invest. 1983;49:327–333.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Scott NA, Cipolla GD, Ross CE, et al. Identification of a potential role for the adventitia in vascular lesion formation after balloon overstretch injury of porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1996;93:2178–2187.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Shi Y, O’Brien JE, Fard A, et al. Adventitial myofibroblasts contribute to neointimal formation in injured porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1996;94:1655–1664.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Virmani R, Farb A. Pathology of in-stent restenosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999;10:499–506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Christen T, Bochaton-Piallat ML, Neuville P, et al. Cultured porcine coronary artery smooth muscle cells: a new model with advanced differentiation. Circ Res. 1999;85:99–107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    van der Loop FT, Schaart G, Timmer ED, et al. Smoothelin, a novel cytoskeletal protein specific for smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:401–411.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    van der Loop FT, Gabbiani G, Kohnen G, et al. Differentiation of smooth muscle cells in human blood vessels as defined by smoothelin, a novel marker for the contractile phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:665–671.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Hirschi KK, Rohovsky SA, D’Amore PA. PDGF, TGF-β, and heterotypic cell-cell interactions mediate endothelial cell-induced recruitment of 10T1/2 cells and their differentiation to a smooth muscle fate. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:805–814.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Shi Y, Pieniek M, Fard A, et al. Adventitial remodeling after coronary arterial injury. Circulation. 1996;93:340–348.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Muller DW, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. Experimental models of coronary artery restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:418–432.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Shi Y, O’Brien JE, Mannion JD, et al. Remodeling of autologous saphenous vein grafts: the role of perivascular myofibroblasts. Circulation. 1997;95:2684–2693.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Faggin E, Puato M, Zardo L, et al. Smooth muscle–specific SM22 protein is expressed in the adventitial cells of balloon-injured rabbit carotid artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:1393–1404.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Li G, Chen SJ, Oparil S, et al. Direct in vivo evidence demonstrating neointimal migration of adventitial fibroblasts after balloon injury of rat carotid arteries. Circulation. 2000;101:1362–1365.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Owens GK. Regulation of differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Physiol Rev. 1995;75:487–517.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Desmoulière A, Gabbiani G. The role of the myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. In: Clark RAF, ed. The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1996:391–423.
  20. ↵
    Sartore S, Franch R, Roelofs M, et al. Molecular and cellular phenotypes and their regulation in smooth muscle. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1999;134:235–320.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    Serini G, Gabbiani G. Mechanisms of myofibroblast activity and phenotypic modulation. Exp Cell Res. 1999;250:273–283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Kockx M, Cambier B, Bortier H, et al. Foam cell replication and smooth muscle cell apoptosis in human saphenous vein grafts. Histopathology. 1994;25:365–371.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Patel S, Shi Y, Niculescu R, et al. Characteristics of coronary smooth muscle cells and adventitial fibroblasts. Circulation. 2000;101:524–532.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Bochaton-Piallat ML, Gabbiani F, Ropraz P, et al. Age influences the replicative activity and the differentiation features of cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cell populations and clones. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1993;13:1449–1455.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation
February 13, 2001, Volume 103, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Mechanisms of Neointima Formation and Remodeling in the Porcine Coronary Artery
    Thomas Christen, Vitali Verin, Marie-Luce Bochaton-Piallat, Youri Popowski, Frans Ramaekers, Philippe Debruyne, Edoardo Camenzind, Guillaume van Eys and Giulio Gabbiani
    Circulation. 2001;103:882-888, originally published February 13, 2001
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.6.882

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Mechanisms of Neointima Formation and Remodeling in the Porcine Coronary Artery
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Mechanisms of Neointima Formation and Remodeling in the Porcine Coronary Artery
    Thomas Christen, Vitali Verin, Marie-Luce Bochaton-Piallat, Youri Popowski, Frans Ramaekers, Philippe Debruyne, Edoardo Camenzind, Guillaume van Eys and Giulio Gabbiani
    Circulation. 2001;103:882-888, originally published February 13, 2001
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.6.882
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Vascular Disease
    • Restenosis
  • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Catheter-Based Coronary and Valvular Interventions
  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Coronary Circulation
    • Smooth Muscle Proliferation and Differentiation
    • Animal Models of Human Disease

Circulation

  • About Circulation
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Circulation CME
  • Statements and Guidelines
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: circ@circulationjournal.org
 

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured