Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
      • Doodle Gallery
      • Circulation Cover Doodle
        • → Blip the Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
      • Recently Published Guidelines
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
      • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Hartford Hospital
      • Hospital Santa Maria del Popolo, Naples, Italy
      • Instituto do Coração-INCOR (São Paulo, Brasil)
      • Minneapolis City Hospital
      • Parkland Hospital: Dallas, Texas
      • Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
      • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
      • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland
      • Tufts Medical Center
      • University of Michigan
      • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Vassar Brothers Medical Center (Poughkeepsie, NY)
      • Wroclaw Medical University
      • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
      • Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
      • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez – INCICh México City, México
      • Kuang-Tien General Hospital (Taichug, Taiwan)
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Clinical Investigation and Reports

Effects of a Residential Exercise Training on Baroreflex Sensitivity and Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

A Randomized, Controlled Study

Ferdinando Iellamo, Jacopo M. Legramante, Michele Massaro, Gianfranco Raimondi, Alberto Galante
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.102.21.2588
Circulation. 2000;102:2588-2592
Originally published November 21, 2000
Ferdinando Iellamo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacopo M. Legramante
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Massaro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gianfranco Raimondi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Galante
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background—Myocardial ischemia and infarction impair baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), which when depressed is predictive of future cardiac events after myocardial infarction (MI). The main objective of this study was to determine whether exercise training improves BRS in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods and Results—Ninety-seven male patients with and without a previous MI were recruited after myocardial revascularization surgery and randomized into trained (TR) or untrained (UTR) groups. TR patients underwent a residential exercise program at 85% of maximum heart rate (HRmax) consisting of 2 daily sessions 6 times a week for 2 weeks. Eighty-six patients (45 TR and 41 UTR) completed the study. BRS was assessed at baseline and at the end of the protocol by the spontaneous baroreflex method. The standard deviation of mean R-R interval (RRSD) was also assessed as a measure of heart rate variability. At baseline, there were no significant differences between TR and UTR patients in any variable. In TR patients, BRS increased from 3.0±0.3 to 5.3±0.7 ms/mm Hg (P<0.001), RRSD from 18.7±1.4 to 23.6±1.6 ms (P<0.01), and R-R interval from 792.0±15.5 to 851.3±20.5 ms (P<0.001). No significant changes occurred in UTR patients. Increases in BRS and RRSD were significant in patients either with or without a previous MI.

Conclusions—Exercise training increases BRS and heart rate variability in patients with coronary artery disease. Improved cardiac autonomic function might add to the other benefits of exercise training in secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease.

  • reflex
  • heart rate
  • exercise
  • coronary disease

Patients with extensive coronary artery disease are at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden death.1 It is well recognized that alterations in the neural control of the heart characterized by decreased vagal activity and relative sympathetic predominance play a major role in the occurrence of arrhythmic events during myocardial ischemia or infarction.2 3 4 5 6 7 More specifically, several animal studies have indicated that a depressed baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), an index of the reflex vagal control of the sinoatrial node, and a reduced heart rate variability (HRV), considered as a measure of the tonic vagal control of the heart,7 are associated with a greater risk for ventricular fibrillation during transient ischemia after myocardial infarction (MI).6 8 9 10 The unfavorable effect of a depressed BRS on ventricular arrhythmias during myocardial ischemia also extends to animals without prior MI.6 Clinical studies have clearly demonstrated that both BRS and HRV are reduced after MI11 12 13 and that BRS is markedly depressed during spontaneous episodes of transient myocardial ischemia14 and in patients without an MI who experienced out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation.15 Finally, a recent large prospective trial has definitively indicated that a reduced BRS has prognostic value for cardiac mortality and cardiac events after MI,16 independent of other risk factors (eg, low ejection fraction and serious arrhythmias). An emerging concept from the above studies is that strategies that increase these indirect markers of autonomic activity might be an important target for intervention in coronary artery disease.

Exercise training, as a part of a comprehensive rehabilitation program, has been shown to produce beneficial effects in many cardiovascular diseases17 and to improve prognosis after MI.18 In conscious dogs with or without a healed MI, exercise training was able to increase BRS and HRV, effects associated with a protective action against ventricular fibrillation during myocardial ischemia.19 20 Small clinical studies seem to confirm the effectiveness of exercise training in improving some measures of HRV in post-MI patients.21 22 To date, there has been only 1 published study on the effect of exercise training on BRS in post-MI patients, and the results were not definitive.22 The effects of exercise training on cardiac autonomic function in coronary patients without previous MI have not been addressed.

The primary objective of the present study, therefore, was to determine whether a structured exercise training program improves BRS in coronary patients with or without a previous MI who had been referred to a formal rehabilitation program. The effect on HRV was also assessed.

Methods

The study population consisted of patients with coronary artery disease referred after myocardial revascularization surgery to our cardiac rehabilitation center between January and December 1997. Patients had undergone CABG on the basis of symptomatic and/or abnormal findings on diagnostic procedures and arteriographically documented coronary artery disease. All patients came from the same cardiac surgery division, so that they had undergone the same surgical procedures and preoperative and postoperative clinical management.

Criteria for eligibility were male sex, in sinus rhythm, and with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, as determined by preoperative cardiac catheterization and by echocardiographic examination before hospital discharge and at the rehabilitation center. Exclusion criteria were age >70 years, coexisting valvular and/or peripheral vascular diseases, concomitant endarterectomy, contraindications to exercise stress testing, frequent atrial or ventricular premature beats, conduction defects, insulin-dependent diabetes, arterial blood pressure >160/90 mm Hg, pericarditis, peripheral neuropathy, orthopedic or neurological limitations, and perioperative MI or any serious postoperative complication.

The patients were admitted to the rehabilitation center during the first postoperative week, and after the initial screening, which included a 24-hour Holter recording, they were randomly assigned to a supervised, residential exercise training program (TR) or to an untrained group (UTR). Initially, 97 patients met the study criteria, but 7 dropped out from the study because of personal reasons (n=5) or intercurrent illness (n=2). Four patients were also excluded because of discomfort in breathing within the face mask that prevented measurements of gas exchange during the exercise stress test (n=2) or for unexpected frequent premature beats at the time of recordings for autonomic evaluation (n=2).

Eighty-six patients (45 TR and 41 UTR) completed the study. In post-MI patients, the time elapsed after MI ranged from 9 years to 2 months. However, in 66% of patients, MI occurred in the last year before the study. Clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1⇓. Medications were not altered throughout the study. All patients gave written informed consent to participate in this study, which was approved by the Scientific and Ethical Committee of the rehabilitation center.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients in the 2 Groups

Protocol

Fourteen to 16 days after CABG, all patients underwent a functional (symptom-limited) incremental exercise test in the upright position on a bicycle ergometer (Corival 400, Lode) with monitoring of gas exchange (CPX). Exercise started with 1 minute of unloaded pedaling and increased by 20 W every 2 minutes. A 12-lead ECG and oxygen consumption (Vmax 29 C, SensorMedics) were recorded continuously. At the end of the study, all patients repeated the symptom-limited exercise test.

BRS and HRV Assessment

BRS and HRV assessment was made the day before CPX and repeated after the training period. The patients were studied in the morning ≥2 hours after breakfast. Patients were studied at rest while supine in a quiet room at ambient temperature and were asked to relax and to avoid sleeping or talking. Recordings were begun after 10 to 15 minutes of acclimatization and were continued for 10 minutes. Patients were connected to an analogue multichannel signal conditioner and amplifier/filter (Marazza). The ECG signal was recorded from a precordial chest lead. Arterial blood pressure was continuously and noninvasively measured by Finapres (Finapres 2300, Ohmeda). This device provides accurate estimates of changes of intra-arterial pressure during laboratory tests, including the BRS testing used in the present investigation.23 The analogue signals were sampled at 300 Hz per channel and stored on hard disk for subsequent analyses.

BRS was dynamically assessed by the spontaneous baroreflex method.24 Details of this technique have been described previously.25 26 27 Briefly, beat-by-beat time series of systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and R-R interval are scanned by a computer to identify sequences of ≥3 consecutive beats in which SAP and R-R interval change in the same direction (either increasing or decreasing). A linear regression is applied to each individual sequence, similar to the technique that uses bolus injections of phenylephrine, and the mean slope of the SAP/R-R interval relationship, obtained by averaging all slopes computed within a given test period, is calculated and taken as a measure of spontaneous BRS for that period. This method allows a quantification of the BRS-cardiac reflex sensitivity at the current prevailing levels of arterial pressure and R-R interval and reflects vagally mediated baroreflex responses.24 28

The time-domain measure of HRV considered in the present study was the standard deviation of mean R-R interval (RRSD).

Exercise Training Program

All patients resided at the rehabilitation center for a period of 3 weeks. Cardiac rehabilitation regimens lasting 2 to 4 weeks for patients in residential programs after a coronary event are standard in the Italian National Health Service. Before CPX, the program consisted of 2 daily sessions of calisthenics and walking. After CPX, the training program consisted of 2 daily sessions of 30 minutes of stationary cycling 6 times a week for 2 weeks (24 sessions overall) combined with calisthenics. Training intensity was graded according to 85% of the maximum heart rate (HRmax) attained in the initial CPX (or to 75% of HRmax in patients older than 65 years). Heart rate (HR) was tracked by a Polar chest-belt HR monitor (Polar Electro Oy) that simultaneously controlled the computer-driven workload of the bicycle ergometer (Bikerace, Technogym) to maintain the target HR.

Subjects in the control group continued to perform walking and calisthenics with the same daily schedule as the TR group for 2 weeks as inpatients. The activity for the control group was not designed to improve cardiovascular performance. All sessions were held under the supervision of a cardiologist.

Statistical Analysis

Differences in baseline characteristics between TR and UTR groups were evaluated by χ2 and unpaired t tests. Within-group changes in the reported variables were evaluated by paired t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test for nonnormally distributed variables. Between-group comparisons were performed by unpaired t tests and Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Relations between variables were assessed by Pearson product-moment correlation. Data were expressed as mean±SE unless otherwise specified. Statistical significance was assumed at P<0.05.

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between TR and UTR patients with respect to all variables, including peak V̇o2, arterial pressure, R-R interval, RRSD, and BRS (Tables 1⇑ and 2⇓).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Metabolic, Cardiovascular, and Autonomic Results at Baseline and After Training

Exercise training resulted in a significant increase in peak V̇o2 (Table 2⇑). A small increase in peak V̇o2 was also observed in the UTR group and can be explained in part by normal recovery from surgery and by the fact that our controls performed some amount of daily physical activity. However, the magnitude of V̇o2 increase was significantly and markedly greater in the TR group (181.3±27.2 versus 73.9±18.0 mL/min, P=0.001). In TR patients, resting R-R interval was significantly increased by 7%, BRS by 73%, and RRSD by 26%. No significant changes in these variables were observed in UTR patients (Table 2⇑).

No correlations were found between peak V̇o2 and BRS either at baseline for the study population as a whole (r=0.18, P=0.10) or after training in the TR group (r=0.09, P=0.55). Similarly, no relationships were found between peak V̇o2 and RRSD at baseline in the whole population or after training in the TR group (r=0.15, P=0.16 and r=0.11, P=0.49, respectively).

No significant differences were observed in baseline BRS and RRSD between MI and non-MI patients in the overall population. BRS was 3.4±0.4 versus 3.0±0.3 ms/mm Hg and RRSD was 18.0±1.3 versus 17.9±1.3 ms in MI and non-MI patients, respectively. Mean age did not differ significantly between MI and non-MI patients (59.0±6.6 versus 58.9±8.5 years), nor did the number of coronary vessels with a critical stenosis (2.4±0.7 versus 2.6±0.6). BRS increased significantly in both MI and non-MI trained patients, as did RRSD (Figure⇓), and the magnitude of the increase in both variables did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (2.8±1.0 versus 1.7±0.5 ms/mm Hg, P=0.53 and 5.4±2.3 versus 4.3±1.8 ms, P=0.72, for BRS and RRSD, respectively).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Effects of exercise training on BRS (top) and RRSD (SDRR; bottom) in post-MI patients (n=22, solid lines) and in patients without previous MI (n=23, dashed lines). *P<0.05, †P<0.01, and ‡P<0.001 vs baseline. Rehab indicates rehabilitation.

No significant cardiovascular events occurred during the training sessions.

Discussion

The present study indicates that a structured exercise training program is able to enhance BRS and increase HRV in patients with coronary artery disease. The relevance of this finding should be placed in the context of the growing evidence indicating the adverse effect of a depressed vagal cardiac modulation and the protective role exerted by high vagal activity in the setting of ischemic heart disease.

Animal studies have clearly indicated that the presence of depressed vagal reflexes and enhanced sympathetic activation is associated with a greater risk for life-threatening arrhythmias during myocardial ischemia.6 8 9 10 Clinical studies confirmed the adverse effect of impaired vagal modulation by showing that both BRS and HRV are reduced early after MI11 12 13 and that this has an independent prognostic value.16 Moreover, a depressed BRS may play a role in the occurrence of malignant arrhythmias, even long after MI.29 30

Conversely, interventions capable of increasing vagal activity exert a protective effect against ischemia-related arrhythmias.31 32 Among these interventions, exercise training has been shown to increase both BRS and HRV and to prevent ventricular fibrillation, concomitantly improving cardiac electrical stability, in conscious dogs with and without healed MI.19 20 Thus, exercise training might be an effective nonpharmacological tool to increase the vagal contribution to autonomic control of the heart in patients with coronary artery disease, as has been observed in other pathological states.33 34 Indeed, recent studies have suggested the effectiveness of exercise training in improving HRV in post-MI patients,21 22 and this was confirmed by the present investigation. However, the potential for exercise training to improve BRS in patients with coronary artery disease had not been clearly established. One small study22 reported an improvement in BRS after exercise training in post-MI patients, but the lack of an untrained control group prevented a definitive conclusion from being reached. Thus, this is the first randomized, controlled study obtained in a relatively large population showing that exercise training results in marked enhancement of both BRS and HRV in patients with coronary artery disease. This is important information, because BRS and HRV reflect different, although possibly related,35 aspects of the autonomic modulation of the heart and are not clinically redundant.16 36 Although both BRS and HRV effectively discriminate individuals at high and low risk for cardiac mortality,16 experimental and clinical studies have indicated that BRS is more useful in the prediction of future events. In an animal model, analysis of BRS before MI was able to predict outcome during ischemic episodes that occurred after MI, whereas HRV was not.6 10 Similarly, BRS but not HRV was reduced in patients who developed malignant arrhythmias long after MI.29 30 Thus, the increase in BRS induced by exercise training, reflecting more powerful vagally mediated baroreflex responses, might result in a condition less favorable for the development of malignant arrhythmias in the event of ischemic episodes by conferring protection against increases in sympathetic activity.4 19 20

The results of the present study also indicate that the improvement of BRS associated with exercise training is not limited to patients with prior MI but extends to coronary patients without MI, in whom measures that could reduce the risk of subsequent lethal events might be of paramount importance.1 37 The potential clinical relevance of increasing BRS in coronary patients without MI is also outlined by the observation that a depressed BRS present before MI affected the susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation during myocardial ischemia that occurred after MI in an animal model of sudden death.6

No significant differences were observed in baseline BRS between patients with and without a previous MI. This finding could be explained by the severity of coronary artery disease, which was similar in MI and non-MI patients, as evaluated by the number of vessels with critical stenosis, because the extent of coronary narrowing negatively affects BRS.11 12 38

Our study confirms the improvement in cardiovascular performance induced by exercise, and the 14% increase in peak V̇o2 obtained after this short-term yet intensive, concentrated endurance exercise training is in line with expectations. However, no relationship was observed between changes in functional capacity and indexes of autonomic function after training, a finding that is in line with the hypothesis that the mechanisms responsible for the improvements may differ for each variable.39 The mechanisms through which exercise training affects these markers of cardiac vagal modulation are still unclear and cannot be defined by the present investigation. They may involve adaptations in peripheral and central neural pathways, although modifications in the responsiveness of the heart might also contribute.

Some possible limitations of the present investigation deserve comment. The first is the generalization of the reported effects to other coronary patient populations, namely, those who have not undergone CABG. However, it is reasonable to speculate that the benefits of exercise training should also extend to patients who have not undergone CABG but are eligible for a formal exercise training program. Moreover, there are no data indicative that CABG per se positively affects BRS and HRV in patients without MI or in the recovery phase after MI. Consistent with this assumption is the lack of spontaneous increase in BRS and HRV in the control group. In any case, the patients of the present study are representative of a large population of ischemic patients for whom cardiac rehabilitation is highly recommended40 and who could benefit from improved cardiac autonomic function.

Second, we do not know whether improving markers of autonomic activity by exercise actually affects the outcome of patients with coronary artery disease. The present study was not designed for this purpose. Instead, it was aimed at addressing the question of whether exercise training improves autonomic markers that have been shown to carry adverse effects and negative prognosis in ischemic heart disease. The answer to this question is affirmative. In fact, the increase in BRS is in a direction that has been associated with a better outcome in coronary patients.11 16 29 30 However, the potential for exercise-induced enhancement of BRS and HRV to improve the risk profile in coronary artery patients remains to be demonstrated. This would require a large, multicenter trial. Nevertheless, among the many beneficial effects of exercise training in secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease, improvement in markers of cardiac autonomic function should also be considered.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the physical therapist, Oriana Moroni, for her care of the patients. We also thank the cardiac surgeons of Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, for their cooperation.

  • Received June 27, 2000.
  • Revision received July 7, 2000.
  • Accepted July 7, 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 by American Heart Association

References

  1. ↵
    Zipes DP, Wellens HJJ. Sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1998;98:2334–2351.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Lown B, Verrier RL. Neural activity and ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1976;294:1165–1170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Schwartz PJ, Foreman RD, Stone HL, et al. Effect of dorsal root section on the arrhythmias associated with coronary occlusion. Am J Physiol. 1976;231:923–928.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Malliani A, Schwartz PJ, Zanchetti A. Neural mechanisms in life-threatening arrhythmias. Am Heart J. 1980;100:705–715.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Zipes DP. Influence of myocardial ischemia and infarction on autonomic innervation of heart. Circulation. 1990;82:1095–1105.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Stramba-Badiale M, et al. Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death: new insights from analysis of baroreceptor reflexes in conscious dogs with and without a myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1988;78:969–979.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Barron HV, Lesh MD. Autonomic nervous system and sudden cardiac death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1053–1060.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Billman GE, Schwartz PJ, Stone HL. Baroreceptor reflex control of heart rate: a predictor of sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1982;66:874–880.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Schwartz PJ, Billman GE, Stone HL. Autonomic mechanisms in ventricular fibrillation induced by myocardial ischemia during exercise in dogs with healed myocardial infarction: an experimental preparation for sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1984;69:790–800.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Hull SS Jr, Evans AR, Vanoli E, et al. Heart rate variability before and after myocardial infarction in conscious dogs at high and low risk of sudden death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:978–985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    La Rovere MT, Specchia G, Mortara A, et al. Baroreflex sensitivity, clinical correlates and cardiovascular mortality among patients with a first myocardial infarction: a prospective study. Circulation. 1988;78:816–824.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Farrel TG, Odemuyiwa O, Bashir Y, et al. Prognostic value of baroreflex sensitivity testing after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1992;67:129–137.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT Jr, et al, and the Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;89:256–262.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Pomidossi G, Saino A, Perondi R, et al. Impairment of the arterial baroreflex during symptomatic and silent myocardial ischemia in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1866–1872.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Schwartz PJ, Zaza A, Pala M, et al. Baroreflex sensitivity and its evolution during the first year after a myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:629–636.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, et al, for the ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1998;351:478–484.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Fletcher GF, Balady G, Blair SN, et al. Statement on exercise: benefits and recommendations for physical activity programs for all Americans. Circulation. 1996;94:857–862.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    O’Connor GT, Buring JE, Yusuf S, et al. An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1989;80:234–244.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Billman GE, Schwartz PJ, Stone HL. The effects of daily exercise on susceptibility to sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1984;69:1182–1189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Hull SS Jr, Vanoli E, Adamson PB, et al. Exercise training confers anticipatory protection from sudden death during acute myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 1994;89:548–552.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Malfatto G, Facchini M, Sala L, et al. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation and beta-blocker therapy on heart rate variability after first acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:834–840.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Leitch JW, Newling RP, Basta M, et al. Randomized trial of a hospital-based exercise training program after acute myocardial infarction: cardiac autonomic effects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1263–1268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Omboni S, Parati G, Frattola A, et al. Spectral and sequence analysis of finger blood pressure variability: comparison with analysis of intra-arterial recordings. Hypertension. 1993;22:26–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Bertinieri G, Di Rienzo M, Cavallazzi A, et al. Evaluation of baroreceptor reflex by blood pressure monitoring in unanesthetized cats. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:H377–H383.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Iellamo F, Legramante JM, Raimondi G, et al. Evaluation of reproducibility of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during laboratory tests. J Hypertens. 1996;14:1099–1104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Iellamo F, Legramante JM, Raimondi G, et al. Baroreflex control of sinus node during dynamic exercise in humans: effects of central command and muscle reflexes. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H1157–H1164.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Iellamo F, Pizzinelli P, Massaro M, et al. Muscle metaboreflex contribution to sinus node regulation during static exercise: insights from spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Circulation. 1999;100:27–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Parlow J, Viale JP, Annat A, et al. Spontaneous cardiac baroreflex in humans: comparison with drug-induced responses. Hypertension. 1995;25:1058–1068.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Hohnloser SH, Klingenheben T, van de Loo A, et al. Reflex versus tonic vagal activity as a prognostic parameter in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 1994;89:1068–1073.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    De Ferrari GM, Landolina M, Mantica M, et al. Baroreflex sensitivity, but not heart rate variability, is reduced in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias long after myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1995;130:473–480.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Vanoli E, De Ferrari GM, Stramba-Badiale M, et al. Vagal stimulation and prevention of sudden death in conscious dog with a healed myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 1991;68:1471–1481.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    De Ferrari GM, Salvati P, Grossoni M, et al. Pharmacological modulation of the autonomic nervous system in the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a study with propranolol, methacholine and oxotremorine in conscious dogs with a healed myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:283–290.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    Pagani M, Somers VK, Furlan R, et al. Changes in autonomic regulation induced by physical training in mild hypertension. Hypertension. 1988;12:600–610.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Somers VK, Conway J, Johnston J, et al. Effects of endurance training on baroreflex sensitivity and blood pressure in borderline hypertension. Lancet. 1991;337:1363–1368.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Piepoli M, Sleight P, Leuzzi S, et al. Origin of respiratory sinus arrhythmia in conscious humans: an important role for arterial carotid baroreceptors. Circulation. 1997;95:1813–1821.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Bigger JT Jr, La Rovere MT, Steinman RC, et al. Comparison of baroreflex sensitivity and heart period variability after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:1511–1518.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Myerburg RJ, Kessler KM, Castellanos A. Sudden cardiac death: structure, function, and time-dependence of risk. Circulation. 1992;85(suppl 1):2–10.
  38. ↵
    Katsube Y, Saro H, Naka M, et al. Decreased baroreflex sensitivity in patients with stable coronary artery disease is correlated with the severity of coronary narrowing. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:1007–1010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Shephard RJ, Balady GJ. Exercise as cardiovascular therapy. Circulation. 1999;99:963–972.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 1999;100:1464–1480.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation
November 21, 2000, Volume 102, Issue 21
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Effects of a Residential Exercise Training on Baroreflex Sensitivity and Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
    Ferdinando Iellamo, Jacopo M. Legramante, Michele Massaro, Gianfranco Raimondi and Alberto Galante
    Circulation. 2000;102:2588-2592, originally published November 21, 2000
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.102.21.2588

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Effects of a Residential Exercise Training on Baroreflex Sensitivity and Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Effects of a Residential Exercise Training on Baroreflex Sensitivity and Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
    Ferdinando Iellamo, Jacopo M. Legramante, Michele Massaro, Gianfranco Raimondi and Alberto Galante
    Circulation. 2000;102:2588-2592, originally published November 21, 2000
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.102.21.2588
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Exercise
    • Secondary Prevention
  • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Autonomic Nervous System

Circulation

  • About Circulation
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Circulation CME
  • Statements and Guidelines
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: circ@circulationjournal.org
 

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured