Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
      • Doodle Gallery
      • Circulation Cover Doodle
        • → Blip the Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
      • Recently Published Guidelines
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
      • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Hartford Hospital
      • Hospital Santa Maria del Popolo, Naples, Italy
      • Instituto do Coração-INCOR (São Paulo, Brasil)
      • Minneapolis City Hospital
      • Parkland Hospital: Dallas, Texas
      • Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
      • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
      • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland
      • Tufts Medical Center
      • University of Michigan
      • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Vassar Brothers Medical Center (Poughkeepsie, NY)
      • Wroclaw Medical University
      • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
      • Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
      • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez – INCICh México City, México
      • Kuang-Tien General Hospital (Taichug, Taiwan)
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines

1999 Update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations

A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction)

Thomas J. Ryan, Elliott M. Antman, Neil H. Brooks, Robert M. Califf, L. David Hillis, Loren F. Hiratzka, Elliot Rapaport, Barbara Riegel, Richard O. Russell, Earl E. Smith, W. Douglas Weaver, Raymond J. Gibbons, Joseph S. Alpert, Kim A. Eagle, Timothy J. Gardner, Arthur Garson, Gabriel Gregoratos, Richard O. Russell, Thomas J. Ryan, Sidney C. Smith
and , Task Force Members
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.9.1016
Circulation. 1999;100:1016-1030
Originally published August 31, 1999
Thomas J. Ryan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elliott M. Antman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil H. Brooks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Califf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. David Hillis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Loren F. Hiratzka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elliot Rapaport
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Riegel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard O. Russell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Earl E. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Douglas Weaver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond J. Gibbons
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph S. Alpert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim A. Eagle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy J. Gardner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arthur Garson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel Gregoratos
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard O. Russell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas J. Ryan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sidney C. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics

Jump to

  • Article
    • Recommendations
    • Explanation of Classes
    • Prehospital Issues
    • Initial Recognition and Management in the Emergency Department
    • Oxygen
    • Intravenous Nitroglycerin
    • Aspirin
    • Atropine
    • Thrombolysis
    • Early Coronary Angiography in the ST-Segment Elevation or BBB Cohort Not Undergoing Primary PTCA
    • Emergency or Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery
    • Hospital Management
    • Identification and Treatment of the Patient at High Risk
    • Hemodynamic Monitoring
    • Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring
    • Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation
    • Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation
    • Bradyarrhythmias and Heart Block
    • Other Surgical Interventions
    • Rationale and Approach to Pharmacotherapy
    • Calcium Channel Blockers
    • Magnesium
    • Preparation for Discharge From the Hospital
    • Assessment of Ventricular Arrhythmia—Routine Testing
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading
  • AHA Scientific Statements
  • reperfusion
  • thrombolysis
  • myocardial infarction
  • angioplasty

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction have been reviewed over the past 2.5 years since their initial publication in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (1996;28:1328–1428) to ensure their continued relevancy. The guidelines have been updated to include the most significant advances that have occurred in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during that time frame. This update was developed to keep the guidelines current without republishing the entire document. This effort represents a new procedure of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. These guidelines will be reviewed and updated as necessary until it is deemed appropriate to revise and republish the entire document.

The guidelines, incorporating the update, are available on the Web sites of both the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org) and the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org). In the Web site version, deleted text is indicated by strikeout, and new/revised text is presented as double-underlined type. Reprints of the original document with the revised sections appended are available from both organizations (see information below).

Recommendations

The following is a listing of the recommendations made by the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines in the ACC/AHA Task Force Report “ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.” More detailed information regarding the evidence and the rationale for these recommendations can be found in the full text of the guidelines themselves, which appears in the November 1996 and September 1999 (update) issues of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Explanation of Classes

As in previous guidelines, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association have used the following classification system in which indications for a diagnostic procedure, a particular therapy, or intervention are designated as:

Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence for and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is beneficial, useful, and effective.

Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment.

Class IIa: Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy.

Class IIb: Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion.

Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful.

Prehospital Issues

Class I

1. Availability of 911 access. 2. Availability of an emergency medical services (EMS) system staffed by persons trained to treat cardiac arrest with defibrillation if indicated and to triage patients with ischemic-type chest discomfort.

Class IIa

1. Availability of a first-responder defibrillation program in a tiered response system. 2. Healthcare providers educate patients/families about signs and symptoms of AMI, accessing EMS, and medications.

Class IIb

1. Twelve-lead telemetry. 2. Prehospital thrombolysis in special circumstances (eg, transport time greater than 90 minutes).

Initial Recognition and Management in the Emergency Department

Class I

1. Emergency department (ED) AMI protocol that yields a targeted clinical examination and a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) within 10 minutes and a door-to-needle time that is less than 30 minutes.

Routine Measures

1. Supplemental oxygen, intravenous access, and continuous electrocardiographic monitoring should be established in all patients with acute ischemic-type chest discomfort. 2. An ECG should be obtained and interpreted within 10 minutes of arrival in the ED in all patients with suspected acute ischemic-type chest discomfort.

Oxygen

Class I

1. Overt pulmonary congestion. 2. Arterial oxygen desaturation (SaO2 less than 90%).

Class IIa

1. Routine administration to all patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction (MI) during the first 2 to 3 hours.

Class IIb

1. Routine administration of supplemental oxygen to patients with uncomplicated MI beyond 3 to 6 hours.

Intravenous Nitroglycerin

Class I

1. For the first 24 to 48 hours in patients with AMI and congestive heart failure (CHF), large anterior infarction, persistent ischemia, or hypertension. 2. Continued use (beyond 48 hours) in patients with recurrent angina or persistent pulmonary congestion.

Class IIa

None.

Class IIb

1. For the first 24 to 48 hours in all patients with AMI who do not have hypotension, bradycardia, or tachycardia. 2. Continued use (beyond 48 hours)*1 in patients with a large or complicated infarction.

Class III

1. Patients with systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg or severe bradycardia (less than 50 bpm).

Aspirin

Class I

1. A dose of 160 to 325 mg should be given on day 1 of AMI and continued indefinitely on a⇓ daily basis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Atropine

Class I

1. Sinus bradycardia with evidence of low cardiac output and peripheral hypoperfusion or frequent premature ventricular complexes at onset of symptoms of AMI. 2. Acute inferior infarction with type I second- or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block associated with symptoms of hypotension, ischemic discomfort, or ventricular arrhythmias. 3. Sustained bradycardia and hypotension after administration of nitroglycerin. 4. For nausea and vomiting associated with administration of morphine. 5. Ventricular asystole.

Class IIa

1. Symptomatic patients with inferior infarction and type I second- or third-degree heart block at the level of the AV node (ie, with narrow QRS complex or with known existing bundle-branch block [BBB]).

Class IIb

1. Administration concomitant with (before or after) administration of morphine in the presence of sinus bradycardia. 2. Asymptomatic patients with inferior infarction and type I second-degree heart block or third-degree heart block at the level of the AV node. 3. Second- or third-degree AV block of uncertain mechanism when pacing is not available.

Class III

1. Sinus bradycardia greater than 40 bpm without signs or symptoms of hypoperfusion or frequent premature ventricular contractions. 2. Type II AV block and third-degree AV block and third-degree AV block with new wide QRS complex presumed due to AMI.

Thrombolysis

Class I

1. ST elevation (greater than 0.1 mV, two or more contiguous leads),†2 time to therapy 12 hours or less,‡3 age less than 75 years. 2. BBB (obscuring ST-segment analysis) and history suggesting AMI.

Class IIa

1. ST elevation,*3 age 75 years or older.

Class IIb

1. ST elevation,†2 time to therapy greater than 12 to 24 hours.*3 2. Blood pressure on presentation greater than 180 mm Hg systolic and/or greater than 110 mm Hg diastolic associated with high-risk MI.

Class III

1. ST elevation,†2 time to therapy greater than 24 hours,*3 ischemic pain resolved. 2. ST-segment⇓ depression only.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA)

Early Coronary Angiography in the ST-Segment Elevation or BBB Cohort Not Undergoing Primary PTCA

Class I

None.

Class IIa

1. Patients with cardiogenic shock or persistent hemodynamic instability.

Class IIb

1. Patients with evolving large or anterior infarcts treated with thrombolytic agents in whom it is believed that the artery is not patent and adjuvant PTCA is planned.

Class III

1. Routine use of angiography and subsequent PTCA within 24 hours of administration of thrombolytic agents.

Emergency or Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery

Class I

1. Failed angioplasty with persistent pain or hemodynamic instability in patients with coronary anatomy suitable for surgery. 2. AMI with persistent or recurrent ischemia refractory to medical therapy in patients with coronary anatomy suitable for surgery who are not candidates for catheter intervention. 3. At the time of surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect (VSD) or mitral valve insufficiency.

Class IIa

1. Cardiogenic shock with coronary anatomy suitable for surgery.

Class IIb

1. Failed PTCA and small area of myocardium at risk; hemodynamically stable.

Class III

1. When the expected surgical mortality rate equals or exceeds the mortality rate associated with appropriate medical therapy.⇓

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Early Coronary Angiography and/or Interventional Therapy in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Cohort

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors⇓

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Hospital Management

Early, General Measures

Class I

1. Selection of ECG monitoring based on infarct location and rhythm. 2. Bed rest with bedside commode privileges for initial 12 hours in hemodynamically stable patients free of ischemic-type chest discomfort. 3. Avoidance of Valsalva. 4. Careful attention to maximum pain relief.

Class IIb

1. Routine use of anxiolytics.

Class III

1. Prolonged bed rest (more than 12 to 24 hours) in stable patients without complications.

Identification and Treatment of the Patient at High Risk

Management of Recurrent Chest Discomfort

Class I

1. Aspirin for pericarditis. 2. β-Adrenoceptor blockers intravenously, then orally for ischemic-type chest discomfort. 3. (Re)administration of thrombolytic therapy (alteplase) for patients with recurrent ST elevation. 4. Coronary arteriography for ischemic-type chest discomfort recurring after hours to days of initial therapy and associated with objective evidence of ischemia in patients who are candidates for revascularization.

Class IIa

1. Nitroglycerin intravenously for 24 hours, then topically or orally for ischemic-type chest discomfort.

Class IIb

1. Corticosteroids for pericarditis. 2. Indomethacin for pericarditis.

Hemodynamic Monitoring

Balloon Flotation Right-Heart Catheter Monitoring

Class I

1. Severe or progressive CHF or pulmonary edema. 2. Cardiogenic shock or progressive hypotension. 3. Suspected mechanical complications of acute infarction, ie, VSD, papillary muscle rupture, or pericardial tamponade.

Class IIa

1. Hypotension that does not respond promptly to fluid administration in a patient without pulmonary congestion.

Class III

1. Patients with acute infarction without evidence of cardiac or pulmonary complications.

Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring

Class I

1. Patients with severe hypotension (systolic arterial pressure less than 80 mm Hg) and/or cardiogenic shock. 2. Patients receiving vasopressor agents.

Class IIa

1. Patients receiving intravenous sodium nitroprusside or other potent vasodilators.

Class IIb

1. Hemodynamically stable patients receiving intravenous nitroglycerin for myocardial ischemia. 2. Patients receiving intravenous inotropic agents.

Class III

1. Patients with acute infarction who are hemodynamically stable.

Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation

Class I

1. Cardiogenic shock not quickly reversed with pharmacological therapy as a stabilizing measure for angiography and prompt revascularization. 2. Acute mitral regurgitation or VSD complicating MI as a stabilizing therapy for angiography and repair/revascularization. 3. Recurrent intractable ventricular arrhythmias with hemodynamic instability. 4. Refractory post-MI angina as a bridge to angiography and revascularization.

Class IIa

1. Signs of hemodynamic instability, poor LV function, or persistent ischemia in patients with large areas of myocardium at risk.

Class IIb

1. In patients with successful PTCA after failed thrombolysis or those with three-vessel coronary disease to prevent reocclusion. 2. In patients known to have large areas of myocardium at risk with or without active ischemia.

Rhythm Disturbances

Atrial Fibrillation

Class I

1. Electrical cardioversion for patients with severe hemodynamic compromise or intractable ischemia. 2. Rapid digitalization to slow a rapid ventricular response and improve LV function. 3. Intravenous β-adrenoceptor blockers to slow a rapid ventricular response in patients without clinical LV dysfunction, bronchospastic disease, or AV block. 4. Heparin should be given.

Class IIa

1. Either diltiazem or verapamil intravenously to slow a rapid ventricular response if β-adrenoceptor blocking agents are contraindicated or ineffective.

Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation

Class I

1. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) should be treated with an unsynchronized electric shock with an initial energy of 200 J; if unsuccessful, a second shock of 200 to 300 J should be given, and, if necessary, a third shock of 360 J. 2. Sustained (more than 30 seconds or causing hemodynamic collapse) polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) should be treated with an unsynchronized electric shock using an initial energy of 200 J; if unsuccessful, a second shock of 200 to 300 J should be given, and, if necessary, a third shock of 360 J. 3. Episodes of sustained monomorphic VT associated with angina, pulmonary edema, or hypotension (blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg) should be treated with a synchronized electric shock of 100 J initial energy. Increasing energies may be used if not initially successful. 4. Sustained monomorphic VT not associated with angina, pulmonary edema, or hypotension (blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg) should be treated with one of the following regimens: a. Lidocaine: bolus 1.0 to 1.5 mg/kg. Supplemental boluses of 0.5 to 0.75 mg/kg every 5 to 10 minutes to a maximum of 3 mg/kg total loading dose may be given as needed. Loading is followed by infusion of 2 to 4 mg/min (30 to 50 μg/kg per minute). b. Procainamide: 20 to 30 mg/min loading infusion, up to 12 to 17 mg/kg. This may be followed by an infusion of 1 to 4 mg/min. c. Amiodarone: 150 mg infused over 10 minutes followed by a constant infusion of 1.0 mg/min for 6 hours and then a maintenance infusion of 0.5 mg/min. d. Synchronized electrical cardioversion starting at 50 J (brief anesthesia is necessary).

Class IIa

1. Infusions of antiarrhythmic drugs may be used after an episode of VT/VF but should be discontinued after 6 to 24 hours and the need for further arrhythmia management assessed. 2. Electrolyte and acid-base disturbances should be corrected to prevent recurrent episodes of VF when an initial episode of VF has been treated.

Class IIb

1. Drug-refractory polymorphic VT should be managed by aggressive attempts to reduce myocardial ischemia, including therapies such as β-adrenoceptor blockade, intra-aortic balloon pumping, and emergency PTCA/CABG surgery. Amiodarone, 150 mg infused over 10 minutes followed by a constant infusion of 1.0 mg/min for up to 6 hours and then a maintenance infusion of 0.5 mg/min may also be helpful.

Class III

1. Treatment of isolated ventricular premature beats, couplets, runs of accelerated idioventricular rhythm, and nonsustained VT. 2. Prophylactic administration of antiarrhythmic therapy when using thrombolytic agents.

Bradyarrhythmias and Heart Block

Atropine

Class I

1. Symptomatic sinus bradycardia (generally, heart rate less than 50 bpm associated with hypotension, ischemia, or escape ventricular arrhythmia). 2. Ventricular asystole. 3. Symptomatic AV block occurring at the AV nodal level (second-degree type I or third-degree with a narrow-complex escape rhythm).

Class IIa

None.

Class III

1. AV block occurring at an infranodal level (usually associated with anterior MI with a wide-complex escape rhythm). 2. Asymptomatic sinus bradycardia.

Temporary Pacing

Placement of Transcutaneous Patches*4 and Active (Demand) Transcutaneous Pacing†5

Class I

1. Sinus bradycardia (rate less than 50 bpm) with symptoms of hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg) unresponsive to drug therapy.†5 2. Mobitz type II second-degree AV block.†5 3. Third-degree heart block.†5 4. Bilateral BBB (alternating BBB, or right BBB [RBBB] and alternating left anterior fascicular block [LAFB], left posterior fascicular block [LPFB]) (irrespective of time of onset).*4 5. Newly acquired or age-indeterminate LBBB, LBBB and LAFBa, RBBB, and LPFBa.*4 6. RBBB or LBBB and first-degree AV block.*4

Class IIa

1. Stable bradycardia (systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg, no hemodynamic compromise, or compromise responsive to initial drug therapy).*6 2. Newly acquired or age-indeterminate RBBB.*6

Class IIb

1. Newly acquired or age-indeterminate first-degree AV block.*6

Class III

1. Uncomplicated AMI without evidence of conduction system disease.

Temporary Transvenous Pacing†7

Class I

1. Asystole. 2. Symptomatic bradycardia (includes sinus bradycardia with hypotension and type I second-degree AV block with hypotension not responsive to atropine). 3. Bilateral BBB (alternating BBB or RBBB with alternating LAFB/LPFB) (any age). 4. New or indeterminate-age bifascicular block (RBBB with LAFB or LPFB, or LBBB) with first-degree AV block. 5. Mobitz type II second-degree AV block.

Class IIa

1. RBBB and LAFB or LPFB (new or indeterminate). 2. RBBB with first-degree AV block. 3. LBBB, new or indeterminate. 4. Incessant VT, for atrial or ventricular overdrive pacing. 5. Recurrent sinus pauses (greater than 3 seconds) not responsive to atropine.

Class IIb

1. Bifascicular block of indeterminate age. 2. New or age-indeterminate isolated RBBB.

Class III

1. First-degree heart block. 2. Type I second-degree AV block with normal hemodynamics. 3. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm. 4. BBB or fascicular block known to exist before AMI.

Permanent Pacing After AMI

Class I

1. Persistent second-degree AV block in the His-Purkinje system with bilateral BBB or complete heart block after AMI. 2. Transient advanced (second- or third-degree) AV block and associated BBB.‡8 3. Symptomatic AV block at any level.

Class IIb

1. Persistent advanced (second- or third-degree) block at the AV node level.

Class III

1. Transient AV conduction disturbances in the absence of intraventricular conduction defects. 2. Transient AV block in the presence of isolated LAFB. 3. Acquired LAFB in the absence of AV block. 4. Persistent first-degree AV block in the presence of BBB that is old or age indeterminate.

Other Surgical Interventions

Emergency or Urgent Cardiac Repair of Mechanical Defects

Class I

1. Papillary muscle rupture with severe acute mitral insufficiency.⇓

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Class III

1. Acute infarctectomy in hemodynamically stable patients.

Rationale and Approach to Pharmacotherapy

Antithrombotics/Anticoagulants

Heparin

Class I

1. Patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization.⇓

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 6.

Class IIb

1. Patients treated with nonselective thrombolytic agents, not at high risk, subcutaneous heparin, 7500 U to 12 500 U twice a day until completely ambulatory.

Class III

1. Routine intravenous heparin within 6 hours to patients receiving a nonselective fibrinolytic agent (streptokinase, anistreplase, urokinase) who are not at high risk for systemic embolism.⇓

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 7.

β-Adrenoceptor Blocking Agents

Early Therapy

⇓.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 8.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

⇓

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 9.

Class IIa

1. All other patients within the first 24 hours of a suspected or established AMI, provided significant hypotension or other clear-cut contraindications are absent. 2. Asymptomatic patients with mildly impaired LV function (ejection fraction 40% to 50%) and a history of old MI.

Class IIb

1. Patients who have recently recovered from MI but have normal or mildly abnormal global LV function.

Calcium Channel Blockers

Class I

None.

Class IIa

1. Verapamil or diltiazem may be given to patients in whom β-adrenoceptor blockers are ineffective or contraindicated (ie, bronchospastic disease) for relief of ongoing ischemia or control of a rapid ventricular response with AF after AMI in the absence of CHF, LV dysfunction, or AV block.

Class IIb

1. In non–ST-elevation infarction, diltiazem may be given to patients without LV dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, or CHF. It may be added to standard therapy after the first 24 hours and continued for 1 year.

Class III

1. Nifedipine (short acting) is generally contraindicated in routine treatment of AMI because of its negative inotropic effects and the reflex sympathetic activation, tachycardia, and hypotension associated with its use. 2. Diltiazem and verapamil are contraindicated in patients with AMI and associated LV dysfunction or CHF.

Magnesium

Class I

None.

Class IIa

1. Correction of documented magnesium (and/or potassium) deficits, especially in patients receiving diuretics before onset of infarction. 2. Episodes of torsade de pointes–type VT associated with a prolonged QT interval should be treated with 1 to 2 g of magnesium administered as a bolus over 5 minutes.

Class IIb

1. Magnesium bolus and infusion in high-risk patients such as the elderly and/or those for whom reperfusion therapy is not suitable.

Preparation for Discharge From the Hospital

Noninvasive Evaluation of Low-Risk Patients

Class I

1. Stress ECG

a. Before discharge for prognostic assessment or functional capacity (submaximal at 4 to 6 days or symptom limited at 10 to 14 days). b. Early after discharge for prognostic assessment and functional capacity (14 to 21 days). c. Late after discharge (3 to 6 weeks) for functional capacity and prognosis if early stress was submaximal. 2. Exercise, vasodilator stress nuclear scintigraphy, or exercise stress echocardiography when baseline abnormalities of the ECG compromise interpretation.*9

Class IIa

1. Dipyridamole or adenosine stress perfusion nuclear scintigraphy or dobutamine echocardiography before discharge for prognostic assessment in patients judged to be unable to exercise. 2. Exercise two-dimensional echocardiography or nuclear scintigraphy (before or early after discharge for prognostic assessment).

Class III

1. Stress testing within 2 to 3 days of AMI. 2. Either exercise or pharmacological stress testing at any time to evaluate patients with unstable postinfarction angina pectoris. 3. At any time to evaluate patients with AMI who have uncompensated CHF, cardiac arrhythmia, or noncardiac conditions that severely limit their ability to exercise. 4. Before discharge to evaluate patients who have already been selected for cardiac catheterization. In this situation, an exercise test may be useful after catheterization to evaluate function or identify ischemia in distribution of a coronary lesion of borderline severity.

Assessment of Ventricular Arrhythmia—Routine Testing

Class I

None.

Class IIa

None.

Class IIb

1. Ambulatory (Holter) monitoring, signal-averaged ECG, heart rate variability, baroreflex sensitivity monitoring, alone or in combination with these or other tests, including functional tests (ejection fraction, treadmill testing) for risk assessment after MI, especially in patients at higher perceived risk, when findings might influence management issues, or for clinical research purposes.

Invasive Evaluation

Coronary Angiography and Possible PTCA

Class I

1. Patients with spontaneous episodes of myocardial ischemia or episodes of myocardial ischemia provoked by minimal exertion during recovery from infarction. 2. Before definitive therapy of a mechanical complication of infarction such as acute mitral regurgitation, VSD, pseudoaneurysm, or LV aneurysm. 3. Patients with persistent hemodynamic instability.

Class IIa

1. When MI is suspected to have occurred by a mechanism other than thrombotic occlusion at an atherosclerotic plaque. This would include coronary embolism, certain metabolic or hematological diseases, or coronary artery spasm. 2. Survivors of AMI with depressed LV systolic function (LV ejection fraction less than or equal to 40%), CHF, prior revascularization, or malignant ventricular arrhythmias. 3. Survivors of AMI who had clinical heart failure during the acute episode but subsequently demonstrated well-preserved LV function.

Class IIb

1. Coronary angiography performed in all patients after infarction to find persistently occluded infarct-related arteries in an attempt to revascularize the artery or to identify patients with three-vessel disease. 2. All patients after a non–Q-wave MI. 3. Recurrent VT or VF or both, despite antiarrhythmic therapy in patients without evidence of ongoing myocardial ischemia.

Class III

1. Routine use of coronary angiography and subsequent PTCA of the infarct-related artery within days after receiving thrombolytic therapy. 2. Survivors of MI who are thought not to be candidates for coronary revascularization.

Routine Coronary Angiography and PTCA After Successful Thrombolytic Therapy

Class I

None.

Class IIa

None.

Class III

1. Routine PTCA of the stenotic infarct-related artery immediately after thrombolytic therapy. 2. PTCA of the stenotic infarct-related artery within 48 hours of receiving a thrombolytic agent in asymptomatic patients without evidence of ischemia.

Secondary Prevention

Management of Lipids

Class I

1. The AHA Step II diet, which is low in saturated fat and cholesterol (less than 7% of total calories as saturated fat and less than 200 mg/d cholesterol), should be instituted in all patients after recovery from AMI.

2. Paties with LDL cholesterol levels greater than 125 mg/dL despite the AHA Step II diet should be placed on drug therapy with the goal of reducing LDL to less than 100 mg/dL.

3. Patients with normal plasma cholesterol levels who have a high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level less than 35 mg/dL should receive nonpharmacological therapy (eg, exercise) designed to raise it.

Class IIa

1. Drug therapy may be added to diet in patients with LDL cholesterol levels less than 130 mg/dL but greater than 100 mg/dL after an appropriate trial of the AHA Step II diet alone.*10

2. Patients with normal total cholesterol levels but HDL cholesterol less than 35 mg/dL despite diet and other non-pharmacological therapy may be started on drugs such as niacin to raise HDL levels.

⇓.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 10.

Long-Term β-Adrenoceptor Blocker Therapy in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction

Class I

1. All but low-risk patients without a clear contraindication to β-adrenoceptor blocker therapy. Treatment should begin within a few days of the event (if not initiated acutely) and continue indefinitely.

Class IIa

1. Low-risk patients without a clear contraindication to β-adrenoceptor blocker therapy. ⇓.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 11.

Anticoagulants

Long-Term Anticoagulation After AMI

Class I

1. For secondary prevention of MI in post-MI patients unable to take daily aspirin.†11 2. Post-MI patients in persistent AF. 3. Patients with LV thrombus.

Class IIa

1. Post-MI patients with extensive wall motion abnormalities. 2. Patients with paroxysmal AF.

Class IIb

1. Post-MI patients with severe LV systolic dysfunction with or without CHF.

Estrogen Replacement Therapy and Myocardial Infarction

⇓

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 12.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Oral or topical preparations may be substituted.

  • ↵2 Repeat ECGs recommended during medical observation in clinical settings when initial ECG is nondiagnostic of ST elevation.

  • ↵3 Time of symptom onset is defined as beginning of continuous persistent discomfort that brought the patient to the hospital.

  • ↵4 Transcutaneous patches applied; system may be attached and activated within a brief time if needed. Transcutaneous pacing may be very helpful as an urgent expedient. Because it is associated with significant pain, high-risk patients likely to require pacing should receive a temporary pacemaker.

  • ↵5 Transcutaneous patches applied; system may be attached and activated within a brief time if needed. Transcutaneous pacing may be very helpful as an urgent expedient. Because it is associated with significant pain, high-risk patients likely to require pacing should receive a temporary pacemaker.

  • ↵6 Apply patches and attach system; system is in either active or standby mode to allow immediate use on demand as required. In facilities in which transvenous pacing or expertise are not available to place an intravenous system, consideration should be given to transporting the patient to one equipped and competent in placing transvenous systems.

  • ↵7 It should be noted that in choosing an intravenous pacemaker system, patients with substantially depressed ventricular performance, including right ventricular infarction, may respond better to atrial/AV sequential pacing than ventricular pacing.

  • ↵8 An electrophysiology study should be considered to assess the site and extent of heart block in uncertain cases.

  • ↵9 Marked abnormalities in the resting ECG such as LBBB, LV hypertrophy with strain, ventricular pre-excitation, or a ventricular paced rhythm render a displacement of ST segments virtually uninterpretable. For patients taking digoxin or who have less than 1 mm ST depression on their resting tracing who undergo standard stress ECG testing, it must be realized that further ST depression with exercise may have minimal diagnostic significance.

  • ↵10 HMG-CoA reductase drugs produce the greatest lowering of LDL cholesterol. Niacin is less effective in lowering LDL, although it is more effective in raising HDL levels. Resins are rarely sufficiently effective to be used alone, but they may be used to supplement lowering LDL with either niacin or HMG-CoA reductase drugs.

  • ↵11 See “Initial Recognition and Management in the Emergency Department,” “Aspirin.”

  • “1999 Update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction)” was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in June 1999 and by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in July 1999.

  • When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association request that the following citation format be used: Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH, Califf RM, Hillis LD, Hiratzka LF, Rapaport E, Riegel B, Russell RO, Smith EE III, Weaver WD. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 1999;100:1016–1030.

  • This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org) and the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org). A single reprint of the executive summary and recommendations is available by calling 800-242-8721 (US only) or writing the American Heart Association, Public Information, 7272 Greenville Ave, Dallas, TX 75231-4596. Ask for reprint No. 71-0169. To obtain a reprint of the complete guidelines update published in the September 1999 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, ask for reprint No. 71-0170. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342, or

  • Copyright © 1999 by American Heart Association
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation
August 31, 1999, Volume 100, Issue 9
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Recommendations
    • Explanation of Classes
    • Prehospital Issues
    • Initial Recognition and Management in the Emergency Department
    • Oxygen
    • Intravenous Nitroglycerin
    • Aspirin
    • Atropine
    • Thrombolysis
    • Early Coronary Angiography in the ST-Segment Elevation or BBB Cohort Not Undergoing Primary PTCA
    • Emergency or Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery
    • Hospital Management
    • Identification and Treatment of the Patient at High Risk
    • Hemodynamic Monitoring
    • Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring
    • Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation
    • Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation
    • Bradyarrhythmias and Heart Block
    • Other Surgical Interventions
    • Rationale and Approach to Pharmacotherapy
    • Calcium Channel Blockers
    • Magnesium
    • Preparation for Discharge From the Hospital
    • Assessment of Ventricular Arrhythmia—Routine Testing
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    1999 Update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations
    Thomas J. Ryan, Elliott M. Antman, Neil H. Brooks, Robert M. Califf, L. David Hillis, Loren F. Hiratzka, Elliot Rapaport, Barbara Riegel, Richard O. Russell, Earl E. Smith, W. Douglas Weaver, Raymond J. Gibbons, Joseph S. Alpert, Kim A. Eagle, Timothy J. Gardner, Arthur Garson, Gabriel Gregoratos, Richard O. Russell, Thomas J. Ryan and Sidney C. Smith , Task Force Members
    Circulation. 1999;100:1016-1030, originally published August 31, 1999
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.9.1016

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    1999 Update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    1999 Update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations
    Thomas J. Ryan, Elliott M. Antman, Neil H. Brooks, Robert M. Califf, L. David Hillis, Loren F. Hiratzka, Elliot Rapaport, Barbara Riegel, Richard O. Russell, Earl E. Smith, W. Douglas Weaver, Raymond J. Gibbons, Joseph S. Alpert, Kim A. Eagle, Timothy J. Gardner, Arthur Garson, Gabriel Gregoratos, Richard O. Russell, Thomas J. Ryan and Sidney C. Smith , Task Force Members
    Circulation. 1999;100:1016-1030, originally published August 31, 1999
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.9.1016
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Quality and Outcomes
    • Statements and Guidelines
    • Ethics and Policy
  • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Pharmacology
    • Catheter-Based Coronary and Valvular Interventions
    • Cardiovascular Surgery

Circulation

  • About Circulation
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Circulation CME
  • Statements and Guidelines
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: circ@circulationjournal.org
 

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured