In the article by Munoz et al that appeared in a previous issue of the journal (Circulation. 1999;99:81–89), Figure 2⇓ contained an error. The correct figure appears here.
Meta-analysis results evaluating ORs and 95% Cls for high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, and ε-aminocaproic acid with respect to the given outcome variables.
Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.
NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.