Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
      • Doodle Gallery
      • Circulation Cover Doodle
        • → Blip the Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
      • Recently Published Guidelines
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
      • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Hartford Hospital
      • Hospital Santa Maria del Popolo, Naples, Italy
      • Instituto do Coração-INCOR (São Paulo, Brasil)
      • Minneapolis City Hospital
      • Parkland Hospital: Dallas, Texas
      • Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia
      • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
      • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland
      • Tufts Medical Center
      • University of Michigan
      • Uppsala University Hospital
      • Vassar Brothers Medical Center (Poughkeepsie, NY)
      • Wroclaw Medical University
      • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
      • Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
      • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez – INCICh México City, México
      • Kuang-Tien General Hospital (Taichug, Taiwan)
      • University Hospital “Policlinico Umberto I”
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Circulation Doodle
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Subscribe to AHA Journals
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Bridging Disciplines
    • Circulation at Major Meetings
    • Special Themed Issues
    • Global Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines
    • Circulation Supplements
    • Cardiovascular Case Series
    • ECG Challenge
    • Hospitals of History
    • On My Mind
    • Podcast Archive
    • → Subscribe to Circulation on the Run
    • →Circulation FIT Podcast 2018
    • → #FITFAVs
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • Circulation CME
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Clinical Investigation and Reports

Incremental Prognostic Value of Rest-Redistribution 201Tl Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

Tali Sharir, Daniel S. Berman, Howard C. Lewin, John D. Friedman, Ishac Cohen, Romalisa Miranda, Raluca D. Agafitei, Guido Germano
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.19.1964
Circulation. 1999;100:1964-1970
Originally published November 9, 1999
Tali Sharir
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel S. Berman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Howard C. Lewin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. Friedman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ishac Cohen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Romalisa Miranda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raluca D. Agafitei
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido Germano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background—The incremental prognostic value of rest-redistribution 201Tl compared with stress and rest perfusion abnormalities has not been defined.

Methods and Results—We identified 458 patients who underwent rest 201Tl /stress (exercise or adenosine) 99mTc sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and had late (18 to 24 hours) 201Tl imaging, were not revascularized within 60 days of SPECT, and were followed up at >1 year. SPECT images were visually analyzed with the use of a 20-segment model on a scale of 0 to 4. Thirty-seven cardiac deaths (CDs) and 17 nonfatal myocardial infarctions occurred. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the presence of a large amount of rest 201Tl reversibility (rest-late summed difference score [SDS] of >8) was a significant predictor of CD (χ2=5.77, P=0.02) and CD or myocardial infarction (χ2=5.3, P=0.02). The CD rate was 9.3% y−1 in patients with rest-late SDS of >8 compared with 3.6% y−1 in patients with a mild/moderate amount of rest reversibility (rest-late SDS 3 to 8) and 3.4% y−1 in patients with no rest reversibility (rest-late SDS <3) (P=0.029). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly lower cumulative survival rates in patients with rest-late SDS of >8 (P=0.01). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that the presence of a large amount of resting reversibility was an independent and incremental predictor of CD after adjustment for stress and rest perfusion information. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that resting reversibility was not an independent predictor of referral to coronary angiography and revascularization.

Conclusions—The identification of a large amount of resting 201Tl reversibility is an independent predictor of CD over stress and rest perfusion abnormalities.

  • myocardial perfusion
  • imaging
  • Tl-201
  • rest redistribution
  • prognosis

Rest-redistribution 201Tl scintigraphy is widely considered the single-photon nuclear technique of choice for the identification of viable myocardium. This technique has been shown to be highly sensitive but to have low specificity for the prediction of contractile improvement after revascularization1 2 3 4 5 ; however, its prognostic value has not been fully investigated. Although the presence of redistribution on rest 201Tl single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been demonstrated to be an independent predictor of cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction,6 the incremental prognostic value over stress/rest perfusion scintigraphy has not been assessed.

The aim of this study was to determine whether additional, delayed (18 to 24 hours after injection) 201Tl SPECT adds an incremental prognostic value to rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc sestamibi SPECT and to determine the prognostic value of the amount of resting 201Tl reversibility for the prediction of coronary events. We also examined the impact of resting 201Tl reversibility on referral of patients to coronary angiography and revascularization.

Methods

Study Population

We identified 736 patients who underwent dual-isotope rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT and had late (18 to 24 hours after injection) 201Tl imaging between January 1991 and December 1996 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Of these patients, 709 (96.3%) were followed >1 year for cardiac events. Of these 709 patients, 564 who had ≥2 myocardial segments with a moderate perfusion defect (see visual interpretation below) on their initial resting 201Tl images were included in the study. The 106 patients who underwent coronary revascularization within 60 days of the nuclear testing were excluded from the analysis.7 Thus, the prognostic data are based on 458 patients, of whom 254 underwent exercise stress testing and 204 underwent adenosine stress testing.

Acquisition Protocol

All patients underwent separate acquisition, dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT.8 Initially, 201Tl (3 to 4.5 mCi) was injected intravenously at rest, and SPECT imaging was initiated 10 minutes later, with 2 energy windows: 30% centered over the 68- to 80-keV energy peak and 20% centered over the 167-keV energy peak. 99mTc sestamibi (25 to 40 mCi) was then injected at peak stress, and SPECT imaging was initiated 15 to 30 minutes after exercise or 30 to 60 minutes after adenosine stress. Additional SPECT 201Tl images were obtained 18 to 24 hours after injection. Acquisitions were performed with a 2-detector (Vertex; ADAC), 3-detector (Prism, Picker, or Multi-SPECT 3; Siemens), or 1-detector (Orbiter, Siemens) camera, with 60 to 64 projections acquired over 180 degrees. Acquisition times of early and late 201Tl were 20 to 35 and 30 to 50 s/projection, respectively, and that of 99mTc sestamibi was 15 to 25 s/projection.

Exercise Protocol

A symptom-limited treadmill exercise test was performed according to standard protocols. Patients received an injection of 99mTc sestamibi at peak exercise and exercised at the same level for an additional 60 seconds and at 1 level lower for 2 additional minutes. ECG response was considered positive when horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression was ≥1 mm or the upsloping ST-segment depression was ≥1.5 mm at 80 ms after the J point was observed or nondiagnostic when ST/T abnormalities were present at baseline ECG. Failure to achieve 85% of maximal predicted heart rate or ischemic ECG response was followed by conversion to adenosine stress.

Adenosine Protocol

Caffeine-containing products were discontinued 24 hours before the test. Adenosine (140 μg · kg−1 · min−1) was infused over 6 minutes, and 99mTc sestamibi was injected at the end of the 3rd minute. Whenever possible, patients performed low-level treadmill exercise during adenosine infusion.

Image Analysis

Perfusion SPECT images were scored semiquantitatively based on a 20-segment model of the left ventricle8 with the use of a 5-point scale in which 0 indicates normal; 1, mildly abnormal; 2, moderately abnormal; 3, severely abnormal; and 4, no uptake. The summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), and summed late score (SLS) were calculated by adding the 20 segment scores in the stress, initial resting, and late resting images, respectively. We also calculated the stress-rest summed difference score (SDS), which represents the amount of stress-induced ischemia; rest-late SDS, which represents resting reversibility; and stress-late SDS, which represents the total (stress plus rest) amount of ischemia. Negative segmental score differences (rest score higher than stress score and late score higher than rest score) were set at 0.

Patient Follow-Up

Patient follow-up consisted of scripted and blinded telephone interviews corroborated through the use of objective methods.9 The mean follow-up interval was 726±242 days (range 365 to 2141 days).

Prescan Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease

Prescan likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) was calculated with the use of CADENZA,10 which is based on bayesian analysis of patient data. For patients undergoing exercise stress, the prescan likelihood of CAD included historical and exercise information, whereas for patients undergoing adenosine stress, prescan likelihood was based on historical data only.

Statistical Analysis

Comparisons between patient groups were performed with 1-way ANOVA for continuous variables and a χ2 test for categorical variables. Continuous variables were described as mean±SD values. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was applied to determine significant predictors of cardiac death and of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). The variables tested were prescan likelihood of CAD, history of MI, history of coronary revascularization, type of stress (exercise or adenosine), and perfusion variables: SSS, SRS, SLS, stress-rest SDS, rest-late SDS, and stress-late SDS. The rest-late SDS was converted into a binary variable, which tested multiple thresholds. The value yielding the highest global χ2 for the prediction of cardiac death was defined as the best threshold and was selected for further analysis. Stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to identify independent variables in the prediction of cardiac death and to assess the incremental value of rest redistribution. A value of P<0.05 was required for entry into multivariate analysis. Variables were removed from the model until all the remaining variables were significant (P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival analysis with stratification by the rest-late SDS was performed. Survival curves were compared with the use of the Wilcoxon test. Determinants of referral of patients to coronary angiography were evaluated through the use of stepwise logistic regression analysis.

Results

Coronary Events

During the follow-up period, 37 cardiac deaths (8.1%) and 17 nonfatal MIs (3.7%) occurred. Forty-one patients (9.0%) underwent late coronary revascularization (>60 days): CABG (n=25, 5.5%) and PTCA (n=16, 3.5%).

Patient Characteristics

Of the 458 patients included in the prognostic analysis, 288 (62.9%) had a history of MI, 119 (26%) had prior coronary angioplasty, and 86 (18.8%) had CABG. Pathological Q waves on baseline ECG were present in 229 patients (50%). Compared with patients with no event, patients who had cardiac death were older, had a higher prescan likelihood of CAD, and underwent exercise test less frequently (Table 1⇓). Patients who had MI had a higher rate of diabetes mellitus than did patients with no event.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics

Of the 9160 myocardial segments in 458 patients, 1858 demonstrated mild/moderate initial resting perfusion defect (score 1 or 2). Of these segments, 676 (37%) showed redistribution (score difference ≥1) on 18- to 24-hour images. Severe initial resting perfusion defect (score 3) was detected in 1015 segments, of which 226 (22%) demonstrated reversibility. A complete absence of initial resting 201Tl uptake (score 4) was observed in 432 segments, of which 105 (24%) were reversible on delayed 201Tl images. Although reversibility was significantly more frequent in mild/moderate than in severe (score 3 or 4) initial perfusion defects (P<0.000001), severe perfusion defects demonstrated a considerable frequency of reversibility.

Univariate Analysis

Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression for the prediction of cardiac death (Table 2⇓) demonstrated that the most powerful predictor was the SRS (χ2=13.15, P=0.0003). The SSS and SLS were also highly significant. The 3 variables that represent defect reversibility, stress-rest, rest-late, and stress-late SDSs, were not significant predictors of cardiac death. Significant predictors of cardiac death or nonfatal MI were SSS and SRS.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Univariate Cox Proportional Hazards Regression for Prediction of Cardiac Events

The prognostic value of the rest-late SDS as a binary variable, with different thresholds for dichotomy of the patient population into significant and nonsignificant amounts of resting reversibility, is demonstrated in Figure 1⇓. Increasing cutoff values from >1 to >8 yielded progressively higher χ2 values for the prediction of cardiac death and of cardiac death or MI. The best threshold, which yielded the highest prognostic power, was >8 (χ2=5.8, P<0.02 for cardiac death; χ2=5.3, P<0.02 for cardiac death or MI). Threshold values of >8 yielded less efficient risk stratification (significantly lower global χ2), because patients with a considerable amount of resting reversibility who had cardiac death were classified as having nonsignificant reversibility (below the threshold), reducing the prognostic power of the model.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for prediction of cardiac death and nonfatal MI by amount of rest reversibility. Global χ2 is shown as function of threshold used for dichotomy of patient population by rest-late SDS.

Incremental Value of Rest-Redistribution 201Tl

The addition of the rest-late SDS as a binary variable (threshold for presence of significant rest redistribution of >8) to either the SRS or the SSS resulted in a significant improvement in the prognostic power of the model in the prediction of cardiac death (Figure 2⇓). The best prediction of cardiac death was provided by either of the 2 models: (1) SSS plus rest-late SDS and (2) SRS plus rest-late SDS. These 2 models contained comparable prognostic information (χ2=15.53 and 16.37, respectively; P=NS). Table 3⇓ summarizes the statistical results for these models. The rest-late SDS was an independent predictor of cardiac death after adjustment for rest (SRS) or stress (SSS) perfusion abnormalities. Figure 3⇓ demonstrates the exponential increase in relative risk of cardiac death as a function of the SRS (Figure 3A⇓) and the SSS (Figure 3B⇓) and the increased risk associated with the presence of a large amount of rest reversibility (rest-late SDS >8).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Incremental prognostic value of resting reversibility over stress and rest perfusion abnormalities.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Exponential increase in relative risk as function of SRS (A) and SSS (B). Relationship is shifted upward by presence of rest-late SDS of >8.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Analysis: Best Models for Prediction of Cardiac Death

Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis: Stratification by Amount of Rest-Redistribution 201Tl

Figure 4⇓ shows cumulative survival rates with stratification by the amount of rest redistribution of 201Tl. Patients with a mild/moderate amount of resting reversibility (rest-late SDS of 3 to 8) had a survival function similar to that of patients with no rest reversibility (rest-late SDS of <3). However, patients with a large amount of rest redistribution (rest-late SDS of >8) had significantly lower cumulative survival rates (P=0.01) compared with the other 2 groups. Mean cardiac death rate was significantly higher in patients with a large amount of rest-late redistribution (9.3% y−1) compared with patients without (3.6% y−1) or with a small/moderate amount (3.4% y−1; P=0.029) (Figure 5⇓).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with stratification by amount of reversibility at rest.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Cardiac death rate as function of amount of resting reversibility. Number of patients is indicated below each category.

Effect on Referral to Coronary Angiography

One hundred thirty-seven patients were referred to coronary angiography within 60 days of the nuclear test. Univariate logistic regression analysis for the identification of significant predictors for referral to coronary angiography (Table 4⇓) revealed that the stress-rest and stress-late SDSs were the most powerful. The rest-late SDS was also a significant but less powerful predictor. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the most powerful independent predictor was the stress-late SDS (Wald χ2=19.43, P=0.00001) (Table 5⇓). The amount of resting reversibility (rest-late SDS) was not an independent predictor of referral to coronary angiography as a continuous or binary variable.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis for Prediction of Referral to Coronary Angiography

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Best Model by Multivariate Logistic Regression for Prediction of Referral to Coronary Angiography

Discussion

In the present study, we assessed the incremental prognostic information gained from additional, delayed 201Tl imaging compared with conventional rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc sestamibi SPECT. We further defined the relation between the amount of rest 201Tl reversibility and the risk of cardiac events, and we assessed the impact of resting reversibility on referral of patients to coronary angiography.

Mechanism of 201Tl Rest Redistribution

The initial myocardial uptake of 201Tl is proportional to the coronary blood flow11 and depends on intact cell membrane function for active transport against an electrochemical gradient.12 After the injection of 201Tl at rest, initial perfusion defects may disappear over time through the process of redistribution. These reversible resting perfusion abnormalities are related to chronic hypoperfusion, in conjunction with preserved cell membrane function. A slower intrinsic clearance rate of 201Tl from chronically underperfused compared with normally perfused regions appears to result in equalization of 201Tl concentration in these regions and resolution of perfusion defects.13 Previous studies have demonstrated that the presence of resting 201Tl reversibility was related to severe coronary stenosis, which produced chronic hypoperfusion and persistent systolic dysfunction (myocardial hibernation).14 15 16

Prediction of Recovery of Myocardial Dysfunction

Several studies have shown that rest redistribution 201Tl imaging has high negative predictive value but low positive predictive value for the prediction of recovery of regional myocardial dysfunction after revascularization.3 4 17 Combined analysis of these studies yielded negative and positive predictive values of 92% and 69%, respectively.5 Thus, a substantial number of patients with rest 201Tl reversibility do not demonstrate improvement in function after revascularization. However, rest redistribution 201Tl imaging should not be assessed only as a tool for prediction of short-term improvement in regional wall motion but also, more importantly, for the identification of patients at an increased risk of cardiac death, who might benefit more than others from revascularization.

Rest-Redistribution 201Tl and Cardiac Death

The prognostic value of rest-redistribution 201Tl imaging has been previously demonstrated in relatively small patient groups. Gioia et al6 showed in a group of 80 patients with left ventricular dysfunction that patients who demonstrate redistribution on rest 201Tl imaging had a higher cardiac death rate than did patients with a similar degree of left ventricular dysfunction but no rest redistribution. Recently, Petretta et al18 showed in 82 patients with previous MI and left ventricular dysfunction that the combination of rest redistribution 201Tl and echocardiographic data added incremental prognostic value over clinical data and compared with each technique alone in the prediction of cardiac events.

In the present study, we evaluated the prognostic power of the rest-late SDS, which represents the total amount of complete and partial reversibility of resting perfusion defects over time. We found that this reversibility score was not a predictor of cardiac events when evaluated as a continuous variable; however, when converted into a binary variable, a threshold effect was identified: the presence of rest-late SDS of >8 as a significant predictor of cardiac death. This amount of redistribution is substantially large, because translation to number of reversible segments yields mild reversibility (a score difference of 1) in >8 segments or moderate reversibility (a score difference of 2) in >4 segments. Patients who demonstrated a large amount of rest reversibility (>8) were at a higher risk of cardiac death (9.3% y−1) than were patients with a smaller amount (3.4% y−1) or with no rest redistribution (3.6% y−1). Multivariate stepwise analysis demonstrated that the presence of a large amount of rest redistribution was an independent and incremental predictor of cardiac death after the consideration of perfusion data derived from stress and rest images. The increased risk of cardiac death in patients with chronically hypoperfused but viable myocardium might be related to a high rate of fatal ischemic events, malignant arrhythmias, or progressive ventricular dilatation and remodeling, leading to heart failure and death. Chen et al19 demonstrated in an animal study that severe left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis with chronic reduction of ≈40% in resting blood flow induced progressive left ventricular dilatation and remodeling in the absence of infarction.

Comparison With Other Techniques

Studies with positron emission tomography have shown that the presence of flow-metabolism mismatch in patients with impaired left ventricular function identified patients at a higher risk of adverse outcome compared with patients with the same degree of ventricular dysfunction but without evidence of myocardial viability.20 21 Di Carli et al21 found that the extent of mismatch had a negative effect on survival rates. Viable myocardium identified through the use of dobutamine echocardiography has also been demonstrated to be a predictor of cardiac events in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.22 Thus, there is a consensus across various techniques that the presence of viability is a predictor of an adverse outcome in patients with chronic CAD and left ventricular dysfunction.6 18 20 21 22

Ventricular function was not assessed in the present study, because most of the SPECT acquisitions were not gated. We recently showed that the poststress ejection fraction and the end-systolic volume have incremental prognostic value compared with perfusion in the prediction of cardiac death.23 Future studies will determine whether resting 201Tl reversibility adds prognostic information to the poststress ejection fraction and the end-systolic volume. Based on previous studies, which demonstrated that patients with left ventricular dysfunction and viability had a higher coronary event rate than did patients with the same degree of dysfunction but without evidence of viability,6 18 20 21 22 we believe that the presence of a large amount of resting 201Tl reversibility will demonstrate incremental value over the poststress ejection fraction and will improve risk stratification of patients with ventricular dysfunction. An alternative to rest/24-hour 201Tl redistribution discussed in the present study might be rest/4-hour 201Tl redistribution imaging before stress 99mTc sestamibi injection or nitroglycerin-augmented rest 99mTc sestamibi SPECT.24

Referral to Coronary Angiography and Revascularization

Previous studies have demonstrated the positive correlation between the extent of myocardial viability and postrevascularization improvement in global ventricular function.2 25 Others have shown that patients with left ventricular dysfunction and viability have better survival rates when revascularized compared with patients without viability.20 26 27 The presence of a large amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium on dobutamine echocardiography identifies patients with dysfunctional myocardium who have the best prognosis after revascularization compared with patients with a small amount or no viability.27 In the present study, we evaluated the impact of the identification of chronically underperfused but viable myocardium on the referral of patients to coronary angiography. We found that although stress-induced ischemia and “total” ischemia (stress plus rest) were independent predictors of referral to coronary angiography, resting reversibility was not an independent predictor. Thus, patients with predominantly stress-induced ischemia or combined stress and “resting” ischemia were referred for invasive strategy, whereas patients with predominantly resting reversibility were treated medically. Because the presence of a large amount of resting reversibility is an independent predictor of cardiac death, it appears that this parameter should be incorporated in the decision-making process and favors the referral of patients to invasive procedures, even when the amount of stress-induced ischemia is relatively small.

Study Limitations

In the present study, we did not use a quantitative analysis of myocardial 201Tl uptake. We have previously shown that semiquantitative visual analysis of stress and rest perfusion images provides powerful prognostic information.9 Because our purpose was to examine the incremental prognostic value of delayed 201Tl imaging over rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc sestamibi, we used the same method of visual analysis in this study. Quantification of relative rest-redistribution 201Tl uptake has been shown to provide accurate information for the prediction of postrevascularization improvement in systolic function3 ; however, the importance of quantitative 201Tl uptake in the assessment of prognosis has yet to be defined.

In this study, we assessed only the importance of late redistribution 201Tl.28 29 Whether the same added value of redistribution imaging could be derived from rest and 4-hour redistribution imaging performed before stress testing using a potential practical protocol is a question that was not addressed here.

Conclusions

The presence of a large amount of rest 201Tl reversibility is associated with a high risk of cardiac death and has an incremental and independent prognostic value over conventional rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc sestamibi in the prediction of cardiac death. The identification of a large amount of reversibility at delayed 201Tl images ought to influence the decision regarding the referral of patients for invasive treatment strategy.

  • Received May 24, 1999.
  • Revision received July 12, 1999.
  • Accepted July 14, 1999.
  • Copyright © 1999 by American Heart Association

References

  1. ↵
    Iskandrian AS, Hakki AH, Kane SA, Goel IP, Mundth ED, Segal BL. Rest and redistribution thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy to predict improvement in left ventricular function after coronary arterial bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51:1312–1316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Ragosta M, Beller G, Watson D, Kaul S, Gimple L. Quantitative planar rest-redistribution Tl-201 imaging in detection of myocardial viability and prediction of improvement in left ventricular function after coronary bypass surgery in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function. Circulation. 1993;87:1630–1641.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Udelson JE, Coleman PS, Metherall J, Pandian NG, Gomez AR, Griffith JL, Shea NL, Oates E, Konstam MA. Predicting recovery of severe regional ventricular dysfunction. Comparison of resting scintigraphy with 201Tl and 99mTc-sestamibi. Circulation. 1994;89:2552–2561.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Perrone-Filardi P, Pace L, Prastaro M, Squame F, Betocchi S, Soricelli A, Piscione F, Indolfi C, Crisci T, Salvatore M, Chiariello M. Assessment of myocardial viability in patients with chronic artery disease: rest–4-hour–24-hour 201Tl tomography versus dobutamine echocardiography. Circulation. 1996;94:2712–2719.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Bonow RO. Identification of viable myocardium. Circulation. 1996;94:2674–2680.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Gioia G, Milan E, Giubbini R, DePace N, Heo J, Iskandrian A. Prognostic value of tomographic rest-redistribution thallium 201 imaging in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol. 1996;3:150–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Staniloff HM, Forester JS, Berman DS, Swan HJC. Prediction of death, myocardial infarction, and worsening chest pain using thallium scintigraphy and exercise electrocardiography. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:1842–1848.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Berman DS, Kiat H, Friedman JD, Wang FP, Van Train K, Matzer L, Maddahi J, Germano G. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99 m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1455–1464.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico A, Friedman J, Diamond GA. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death. Circulation. 1998;97:535–543.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Diamond GA, Staniloff HM, Foreester JS, Pollock BH, Swan HJC. Computer assisted diagnosis in the noninvasive evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:444–455.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Nielsen AP, Morris KG, Murdock R, Bruno FP, Cobb FR. Linear relationship between the distribution of thallium-201 and blood flow in ischemic and non-ischemic myocardium during exercise. Circulation. 1980;61:797–801.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    McCall D, Zimmer LJ, Katz AM. Kinetics of thallium exchange in cultured rat myocardial cells. Circ Res. 1985;56:370–376.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Grunwald AM, Watson DD, Holzgrefe HH Jr, Irving JF, Beller GA. Myocardial thallium-201 kinetics in normal and ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1981;64:610–618.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Berger BC, Watson DD, Burwell LR, Crosby IK, Wellons HA, Teates CD, Beller GA. Redistribution of thallium at rest in patients with stable and unstable angina and the effect of coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 1979;60:1114–1125.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Gerwitz H, Beller GA, Strauss HW, Dinsmore RE, Zir LM, McKusick KA, Pohost GM. Transient defects of resting thallium scans in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1979;59:707–713.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Pohost GM, Okada RD, O’Keefe DD, Gerwitz H, Beller G, Strauss HW, Chaffin JS, Leppo J, Daggett WM. Thallium redistribution in dogs with severe coronary artery stenosis of fixed caliber. Circ Res. 1981;48:439–446.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Charney R, Schwinger ME, Chun J, Cohen MV, Nanna M, Menegus MA, Wexler J, Franco HS, Grenberg MA. Dobutamine echocardiography and resting-redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy predicts recovery of hibernating myocardium after coronary revascularization. Am Heart J. 1994;128:864–869.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Petretta M, Cuocolo A, Nicolai E, Acampa W, Salvatore M, Bonaduce D. Combined assessment of left ventricular function and rest-redistribution regional myocardial thallium-201 activity for prognostic evaluation of patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5:378–386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Chen C, Ma L, Dyckman W, Santos F, Lai T, Gillam LD, Waters DD. Left ventricular remodeling in myocardial hibernation. Circulation. 1997;96(suppl II):II-46–II-50.
  20. ↵
    Eitzman D, Al-Aouar Z, Kanter HL, von Dahl J, Kirsh M, Deeb GM, Schwaiger M. Clinical outcome of patients with advanced coronary artery disease after viability studies with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:559–565.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Di Carli MF, Davidson M, Little R, Khanna S, Mody FV, Brunken RC, Czernin J, Rokhsar S, Stevenson LW, Laks H, Hawkins R, Schelbert HR, Phelps ME, Maddahi J. Value of metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography for evaluating prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:527–533.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Williams MJ, Odabashian J, Lauer MS, Thomas JD, Marwick TH. Prognostic value of dobutamine echocardiography in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:132–139.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Lai S, Cohen I, Lewin HC, Friedman JD, Zellweger MJ, Berman DS. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. In press.
  24. ↵
    Maurea S, Cuocolo A, Soricelli A, Castelli L, Nappi A, Squame F, Imbriaco M, Trimarco B, Salvatore M. Enhanced detection of viable myocardium by technetium-99 m-MIBI imaging after nitrate administration in chronic coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1945–1952.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Meluzin J, Cigarroa CG, Brickner ME, Cerny J, Spinarova L, Frelich M, Stetka F, Groch L, Grayburn PA. Dobutamine echocardiography in predicting improvement in global left ventricular systolic function after coronary bypass or angioplasty in patients with healed myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:877–880.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Pagley PR, Beller GA, Watson DD, Gimple LW, Ragosta M. Improved outcome after coronary bypass surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and residual myocardial viability. Circulation. 1997;96:793–800.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Meluzin J, Cerny J, Frelich M, Stetka F, Spinarova L, Popelova J, Stipal R. Prognostic value of the amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium in revascularized patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:912–920.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Gutman J, Berman DS, Freeman M, Rozanski A, Maddahi J, Waxman A, Swan HJC. Time to completed redistribution of thallium-201 is exercise myocardial scintigraphy: relationship to the degree of coronary artery stenosis. Am Heart J.. 1983;106:989–995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Kiat H, Berman DS, Maddahi J, Yang LD, Van Train K, Rozanski A, Friedman JD. Late reversibility of tomographic myocardial thallium-201 defects: an accurate marker of myocardial viability. J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1988;12:1456–1463.
    OpenUrlPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation
November 9, 1999, Volume 100, Issue 19
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Incremental Prognostic Value of Rest-Redistribution 201Tl Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography
    Tali Sharir, Daniel S. Berman, Howard C. Lewin, John D. Friedman, Ishac Cohen, Romalisa Miranda, Raluca D. Agafitei and Guido Germano
    Circulation. 1999;100:1964-1970, originally published November 9, 1999
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.19.1964

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Incremental Prognostic Value of Rest-Redistribution 201Tl Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Incremental Prognostic Value of Rest-Redistribution 201Tl Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography
    Tali Sharir, Daniel S. Berman, Howard C. Lewin, John D. Friedman, Ishac Cohen, Romalisa Miranda, Raluca D. Agafitei and Guido Germano
    Circulation. 1999;100:1964-1970, originally published November 9, 1999
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.19.1964
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease
  • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Diagnostic Testing
    • Nuclear Cardiology and PET
  • Cardiology
    • Etiology
      • Chronic ischemic heart disease

Circulation

  • About Circulation
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Circulation CME
  • Statements and Guidelines
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: circ@circulationjournal.org
 

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured