Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on September 21, 2009

Circulation. 2009
Published online before print September 21, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.865774
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 6, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
120/14/1380    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.109.865774v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verdecchia, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verdecchia, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Electrocardiology
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on December 5, 2008
Accepted on July 22, 2009

Effects of Telmisartan, Ramipril, and Their Combination on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Individuals at High Vascular Risk in the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination With Ramipril Global End Point Trial and the Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects With Cardiovascular Disease

Paolo Verdecchia MD*, Peter Sleight MD, Giuseppe Mancia MD, Robert Fagard MD, PhD, Bruno Trimarco MD, Roland E. Schmieder MD, Jae-Hyung Kim MD, Garry Jennings MBBS, PhD, Petr Jansky MD, Jyh-Hong Chen MD, Lisheng Liu MD, Peggy Gao MSc, Jeffrey Probstfield MD, Koon Teo MD, Salim Yusuf MD, DPhil, FRCPC, for the ONTARGET/TRANSCEND Investigators

From the Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Clinical Research Unit Preventive Cardiology, Perugia, Italy (P.V.); Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (P.V., P.G., K.T., S.Y.); Cardiovascular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK (P.S.); University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy (G.M.); Hypertension Unit, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (R.F.); Department of Clinical Medicine and Cardiovascular and Immunological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy (B.T.); Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Friedrich Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany (R.E.S.); Department of Cardiology, St Paul's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Division of Cardiology, Seoul, South Korea (J.-H.K.); Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia (G.J.); University Hospital Motol, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Prague, Czech Republic (P.J.); National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan (J.-H.C.); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Department of Hypertension, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China (L.L.); and University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle (J.P.).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: verdec{at}tin.it.

Background—Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers reduce left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The effect of these drugs on LVH in high-risk patients without heart failure is unknown.

Methods and Results—In the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination With Ramipril Global End Point Trial (ONTARGET), patients at high vascular risk and tolerant of ACE inhibitors were randomly assigned to ramipril, telmisartan, or their combination (n=23 165). In the Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects With Cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND), patients intolerant of ACE inhibitors were randomized to telmisartan or placebo (n=5343). Prevalence of LVH at entry in TRANSCEND was 12.7%. It was reduced by telmisartan (10.5% and 9.9% after 2 and 5 years) compared with placebo (12.7% and 12.8% after 2 and 5 years) (overall odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 0.91; P=0.0017). New-onset LVH occurred less frequently with telmisartan compared with placebo (overall odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.79; P=0.0001). LVH regression was similar in the 2 groups. In ONTARGET, prevalence of LVH at entry was 12.4%. At follow-up, it occurred slightly less frequently with telmisartan (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.01; P=0.07) and the combination (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.02; P=0.12) than with ramipril, but differences between the groups were not significant. New-onset LVH was associated with a higher risk of primary outcome during follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.50 to 2.07).

Conclusions—In patients at high vascular risk, telmisartan is more effective than placebo in reducing LVH. New-onset LVH is reduced by 37%. The effect of combination of the 2 drugs on LVH is similar to that of ramipril alone.


Key words: angiotensin • electrocardiography • epidemiology • hypertrophy • prognosis


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 120: 1337-1338. [Extract] [Full Text]