on May 18, 2009
Published online before print May 18, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.833665
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 4, 2008
From the TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (D.A.M., S.D.W., S.A.M., M.P.B., C.T.R., B.M.S., C.H.M., E.M.A., E. Braunwald); Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand (H.D.W.); Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil (J.C.N.); and Division of Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy (E. Bramucci). * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dmorrow{at}partners.org.
Background—Prasugrel is a novel thienopyridine that reduces new or recurrent myocardial infarctions (MIs) compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This effect must be balanced against an increased bleeding risk. We aimed to characterize the effect of prasugrel with respect to the type, size, and timing of MI using the universal classification of MI. Methods and Results—We studied 13 608 patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention randomized to prasugrel or clopidogrel and treated for 6 to 15 months in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38). Each MI underwent supplemental classification as spontaneous, secondary, or sudden cardiac death (types 1, 2, and 3) or procedure related (Types 4 and 5) and examined events occurring early and after 30 days. Prasugrel significantly reduced the overall risk of MI (7.4% versus 9.7%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.85; P<0.0001). This benefit was present for procedure-related MIs (4.9% versus 6.4%; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.88; P=0.0002) and nonprocedural (type 1, 2, or 3) MIs (2.8% versus 3.7%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88; P=0.0013) and consistently across MI size, including MIs with a biomarker peak Conclusion—Treatment with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel for up to 15 months in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces the risk of MIs that are procedure related and spontaneous and those that are small and large, including new MIs occurring during maintenance therapy.
Accepted on March 12, 2009
Effect of the Novel Thienopyridine Prasugrel Compared With Clopidogrel on Spontaneous and Procedural Myocardial Infarction in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38. An Application of the Classification System From the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
David A. Morrow MD, MPH*,
5 times the reference limit (HR. 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.86; P=0.0001). In landmark analyses starting at 30 days, patients treated with prasugrel had a lower risk of any MI (2.9% versus 3.7%; HR, 0.77; P=0.014), including nonprocedural MI (2.3% versus 3.1%; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92; P=0.0069).
Key words: angioplasty • myocardial infarction • platelets • prasugrel • unstable angina
Related Article:
Circulation 2009 119: 2749-2751.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. Heusch, P. Kleinbongard, D. Bose, B. Levkau, M. Haude, R. Schulz, and R. Erbel Coronary Microembolization: From Bedside to Bench and Back to Bedside Circulation, November 3, 2009; 120(18): 1822 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|