Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on June 8, 2009

Circulation. 2009
Published online before print June 8, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.815944
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 23, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Circulation: June 23, 2009, Volume 119, Number 24
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/24/3070    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.815944v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Levy, D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Failure
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Articles

Submitted on August 19, 2008
Accepted on April 6, 2009

Relation of Disease Pathogenesis and Risk Factors to Heart Failure With Preserved or Reduced Ejection Fraction. Insights From the Framingham Heart Study of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Douglas S. Lee MD, PhD, Philimon Gona PhD, Ramachandran S. Vasan MD, Martin G. Larson ScD, Emelia J. Benjamin MD, ScM, Thomas J. Wang MD, Jack V. Tu MD, PhD, and Daniel Levy MD*

From the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (D.S.L., J.V.T.); University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (D.S.L.); Framingham Heart Study of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Framingham, Mass (P.G., R.S.V., M.G.L., E.J.B., T.J.W., D.L.); Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, Mass (P.G., M.G.L.); Cardiology Section and Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (E.J.B., R.S.V.); Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (T.J.W.); Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (J.V.T.); and Center for Population Studies of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md (D.L.).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: levyd{at}nih.gov.

Background—The contributions of risk factors and disease pathogenesis to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) versus heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) have not been fully explored.

Methods and Results—We examined clinical characteristics and risk factors at time of heart failure onset and long-term survival in Framingham Heart Study participants according to left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (n=314; 59%) versus >45% (n=220; 41%) and hierarchical causal classification. Heart failure was attributed to coronary heart disease in 278 participants (52%), valvular heart disease in 42 (8%), hypertension in 140 (26%), or other/unknown causes in 74 (14%). Multivariable predictors of HFPEF (versus HFREF) included elevated systolic blood pressure (odds ratio [OR]=1.13 per 10 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.22), atrial fibrillation (OR=4.23; 95% CI, 2.38 to 7.52), and female sex (OR=2.29; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.90). Conversely, prior myocardial infarction (OR=0.32; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.53) and left bundle-branch block QRS morphology (OR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.46) reduced the odds of HFPEF. Long-term prognosis was grim, with a median survival of 2.1 years (5-year mortality rate, 74%), and was equally poor in men and women with HFREF or HFPEF.

Conclusions—Among community patients with new-onset heart failure, there are differences in causes and time-of-onset clinical characteristics between those with HFPEF versus HFREF. In people with HFREF, mortality is increased when coronary heart disease is the underlying cause. These findings suggest that heart failure with reduced left ventricular systolic function and heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function are partially distinct entities, with potentially different approaches to early detection and prevention.


Key words: coronary disease • epidemiology • heart diseases • heart failure • hypertension • mortality • ventricles


Related Articles:

Circulation: Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 3041-3043. [Extract] [Full Text]

The Heart Failure Spectrum: Time for a Phenotype-Oriented Approach
Gilles W. De Keulenaer and Dirk L. Brutsaert
Circulation 2009 119: 3044-3046. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Heart FailHome page
D. S. Lee and J. V. Tu
Are Multiple Biomarker Testing Strategies Ready for Prime Time in Heart Failure?
Circ Heart Fail, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 387 - 388.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. W. De Keulenaer and D. L. Brutsaert
The Heart Failure Spectrum: Time for a Phenotype-Oriented Approach
Circulation, June 23, 2009; 119(24): 3044 - 3046.
[Full Text] [PDF]