Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on December 22, 2008

Circulation. 2008
Published online before print December 22, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808402
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 6, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/1/71    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808402v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Airoldi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Airoldi, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
*Coronary Artery Disease
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on July 18, 2008
Accepted on October 22, 2008

Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations. The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study

Antonio Colombo MD*, Ezio Bramucci MD, Salvatore Saccà MD, Roberto Violini MD, Corrado Lettieri MD, Roberto Zanini MD, Imad Sheiban MD, Leonardo Paloscia MD, Eberhard Grube MD, Joachim Schofer MD, Leonardo Bolognese MD, Mario Orlandi MD, Giampaolo Niccoli MD, Azeem Latib MD, and Flavio Airoldi MD

From the Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute (A.C., A.L., F.A.), Milan, Italy; Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus (A.C.), Milan, Italy; Department of Cardiology, Policlinico S. Matteo (E.B), Pavia, Italy; Department of Cardiology, P.O. di Mirano (S.S.), Mirano, Italy; Department of Cardiology, Ospedale S. Camillo (R.V.), Rome, Italy; Department of Cardiology, A.O. Carlo Poma (C.L., R.Z.), Mantova, Italy; Department of Cardiology, A.O. Molinette (I.S.), Torino, Italy; Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Santo Spirito (L.P), Pescara, Italy; Interventional Cardiology Unit, Helios Heart Center (E.G.), Siegburg, Germany; Interventional Cardiology Unit, Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center (J.S.), Hamburg, Germany; Azienda USL 8 (L.B.), Arezzo, Italy; Department of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Lodi (M.O.), Lodi, Italy; Department of Cardiology, Policlinico A. Gemelli (G.N.), Rome, Italy; and Interventional Cardiology Unit, Multimedica IRCCS (F.A.), S.S. Giovanni, Milan, Italy.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: info{at}emocolumbus.it.

Background—Sirolimus-eluting stents have been reported to be effective in the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Still, it has not been fully clarified which strategy would provide the best results with true bifurcation lesions.

Methods and Results—The CACTUS trial (Coronary bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-eluting stents) is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing 2 different techniques of stenting, with mandatory final kissing-balloon inflation, in true bifurcations: (1) elective "crush" stenting and (2) stenting of only the main branch, with provisional side-branch T-stenting. From August 2004 to June 2007, 350 patients were enrolled in 12 European centers. The primary angiographic end point was the in-segment restenosis rate, and the primary clinical end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization) at 6 months. At 6 months, angiographic restenosis rates were not different between the crush group (4.6% and 13.2% in the main branch and side branch, respectively) and the provisional stenting group (6.7% and 14.7% in the main branch and side branch, respectively; P=NS). Additional stenting on the side branch in the provisional stenting group was required in 31% of lesions. Rates of major adverse cardiac events were also similar in the 2 groups (15.8% in the crush group versus 15% in the provisional stenting group, P=NS).

Conclusions—In most bifurcations with a significant stenosis in both branches, a provisional strategy of stenting the main branch only is effective, with the need to implant a second stent on the side branch occurring in approximately one third of cases. The implantation of 2 stents does not appear to be associated with a higher incidence of adverse events at 6 months.


Key words: angioplasty • restenosis • follow-up studies • drug-eluting stents


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 1-4. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
F Zhang, L Dong, and J Ge
Simple versus complex stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era: a meta-analysis of randomised trials
Heart, October 15, 2009; 95(20): 1676 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
D. G. Katritsis, G. C.M. Siontis, and J. P.A. Ioannidis
Double Versus Single Stenting for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 409 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. R. Movahed
Letter by Movahed Regarding Article, "Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study"
Circulation, August 25, 2009; 120(8): e63 - e63.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Colombo, A. Latib, F. Airoldi, E. Bramucci, S. Sacca, R. Violini, C. Lettieri, R. Zanini, I. Sheiban, L. Paloscia, et al.
Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study"
Circulation, August 25, 2009; 120(8): e64 - e64.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Which Stenting Technique Is Best for Bifurcation Lesions?
Journal Watch Cardiology, January 28, 2009; 2009(128): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]