Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on February 9, 2009

Circulation. 2009
Published online before print February 9, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.793273
A more recent version of this article appeared on February 24, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/7/969    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.793273v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anand, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bristow, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anand, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bristow, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Pacemaker
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on May 22, 2008
Accepted on November 7, 2008

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Reduces the Risk of Hospitalizations in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure. Results From the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Trial

Inder S. Anand MD, FRCP, DPhil (Oxon)*, Peter Carson MD, Elizabeth Galle MPH, Rui Song PhD, John Boehmer MD, Jalal K. Ghali MD, Brian Jaski MD, JoAnn Lindenfeld MD, Christopher O'Connor MD, Jonathan S. Steinberg MD, Jill Leigh BS, Patrick Yong MSEE, Michael R. Kosorok PhD, Arthur M. Feldman MD, PhD, David DeMets PhD, and Michael R. Bristow MD, PhD

From the Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn (I.S.A.); Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC (P.C.); Boston Scientific Corporation, St Paul, Minn (E.G., J.L., P.Y.); University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (R.S., M.R.K.); Penn State/Hershey Medical Center, Hershey (J.B.); Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Mich (J.K.G.); Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, Calif (B.J.); University of Colorado, Denver (J.L., M.R.B.); Duke University, Durham, NC (C.O.); St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY (J.S.S.); Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pa (A.M.F.); and University of Wisconsin, Madison (D.D.).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: anand001{at}umn.edu.

Background—In the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial, 1520 patients with advanced heart failure were assigned in a 1:2:2 ratio to optimal pharmacological therapy or optimal pharmacological therapy plus cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-P) or CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D). Use of CRT-P and CRT-D was associated with a significant reduction in combined risk of death or all-cause hospitalizations. Because mortality also was significantly reduced (optimal pharmacological therapy versus CRT-D only), an assessment of the true reduction in hospitalization rates must consider the competing risk of death and varying follow-up times.

Methods and Results—To overcome the challenges of comparing treatment groups, we used a nonparametric test of right-censored recurrent events that accounts for multiple hospital admissions, differential follow-up time between treatment groups, and death as a competing risk. An end-point committee adjudicated and classified all hospitalizations. Compared with optimal pharmacological therapy, CRT-P and CRT-D were associated with a 21% and 25% reduction in all-cause, 34% and 37% reduction in cardiac, and 44% and 41% reduction in heart failure hospital admissions per patient-year of follow-up, respectively. Similar reductions were seen in hospitalization days per patient-year. The reduction in hospitalization rate for heart failure in the CRT groups appeared within days of randomization and remained sustained. Noncardiac hospitalization rates were not different between groups.

Conclusion—Use of CRT with or without a defibrillator in advanced heart failure patients was associated with marked reductions in all-cause, cardiac, and heart failure hospitalization rates in an analysis that accounted for the competing risk of mortality and unequal follow-up time.


Key words: cardiac resynchronization therapy • defibrillators, implantable • heart failure • hospitalizations • prognosis


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 909-911. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
F. Cabrera-Bueno, M. J. Molina-Mora, J. Alzueta, J. Pena-Hernandez, M. Jimenez-Navarro, J. Fernandez-Pastor, A. Barrera, and E. de Teresa
Persistence of secondary mitral regurgitation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Eur J Echocardiogr, November 24, 2009; (2009) jep184v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. W. Yancy and G. Filardo
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure: Has the Time Come?
Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 916 - 918.
[Full Text] [PDF]