| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on May 18, 2008
From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (D.S.F.), Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; the General Medicine Division (J.B.M.) and the Cardiology Division (C.J.O.), Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study (J.M.M., C.J.O., R.B.D), Framingham, Mass; the Division of Cardiology (P.W.F.W.), Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga; the Department of Biostatistics (J.M.M., R.B.D.), Boston University, Boston, Mass; and the Royal North Shore Hospital (G.H.T.), Sydney, Australia. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jmeigs{at}partners.org.
Background—Von Willebrand factor (vWF) is inconsistently associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This might be explained by associations of vWF with type 2 diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance. Methods and Results—We tested whether vWF predicted incident CVD in 3799 Framingham Offspring Study participants, and in particular, among those with type 2 diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance. During 11 years of follow-up, 351 participants developed CVD. In proportional hazards models (with adjustment for age, sex, blood pressure, smoking, body mass index, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and treatment with aspirin, insulin, antihypertensives, and lipid-lowering medications) with the lowest quartile of the vWF distribution as the referent, the hazard ratio (HR) for CVD was 0.94 in the second quartile, 0.98 in the third, and 1.32 in the highest (P=0.04 for trend). Additional adjustment for type 2 diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance (homeostasis model) partially attenuated the association (multivariable HRs for top quartile 1.28 and 1.21, respectively). We then stratified the models by diabetes status or the homeostasis model of insulin resistance distribution (top quartile versus lower 3 quartiles). vWF was associated with CVD among participants with diabetes mellitus (HR for top quartile relative to bottom 1.47, P=0.04 for trend) but not among nondiabetic participants (HR 1.15, P=0.5) and similarly among insulin-resistant (HR 1.50, P=0.01) but not insulin-sensitive (HR 1.02, P=0.9) participants. Conclusions—Higher levels of vWF were associated with risk of CVD in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance, which suggests that vWF may be a risk factor unique to these populations.
Accepted on September 30, 2008
Von Willebrand Factor, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. The Framingham Offspring Study
David S. Frankel MD,
Related Article:
Circulation 2008 118: 2485-2487.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Voora, S. H. Shah, I. Spasojevic, S. Ali, C. R. Reed, B. A. Salisbury, and G. S. Ginsburg The SLCO1B1*5 genetic variant is associated with statin-induced side effects. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 20, 2009; 54(17): 1609 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |