| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on April 22, 2008
From the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (F.D., J.L., M.-N.G., J.S., H.T.) and Division of Angiology (C.K.), Inselspital, and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland; Imperial College Vascular Surgery Research Group, Division of Surgery, Oncology, Reproductive Biology and Anaesthetics, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK (F.D.); and Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Key Lab of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China (J.L.). * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: marie-noelle.giraud-flueck{at}insel.ch.
Background—Reperfusion injury is insufficiently addressed in current clinical management of acute limb ischemia. Controlled reperfusion carries an enormous clinical potential and was tested in a new reality-driven rodent model. Methods and Results—Acute hind-limb ischemia was induced in Wistar rats and maintained for 4 hours. Unlike previous tourniquets models, femoral vessels were surgically prepared to facilitate controlled reperfusion and to prevent venous stasis. Rats were randomized into an experimental group (n=7), in which limbs were selectively perfused with a cooled isotone heparin solution at a limited flow rate before blood flow was restored, and a conventional group (n=7; uncontrolled blood reperfusion). Rats were killed 4 hours after blood reperfusion. Nonischemic limbs served as controls. Ischemia/reperfusion injury was significant in both groups; total wet-to-dry ratio was 159±44% of normal (P=0.016), whereas muscle viability and contraction force were reduced to 65±13% (P=0.016) and 45±34% (P=0.045), respectively. Controlled reperfusion, however, attenuated reperfusion injury significantly. Tissue edema was less pronounced (132±16% versus 185±42%; P=0.011) and muscle viability (74±11% versus 57±9%; P=0.004) and contraction force (68±40% versus 26±7%; P=0.045) were better preserved than after uncontrolled reperfusion. Moreover, subsequent blood circulation as assessed by laser Doppler recovered completely after controlled reperfusion but stayed durably impaired after uncontrolled reperfusion (P=0.027). Conclusions—Reperfusion injury was significantly alleviated by basic modifications of the initial reperfusion period in a new in vivo model of acute limb ischemia. With this model, systematic optimizations of according protocols may eventually translate into improved clinical management of acute limb ischemia.
Accepted on September 3, 2008
Basic Control of Reperfusion Effectively Protects Against Reperfusion Injury in a Realistic Rodent Model of Acute Limb Ischemia
Florian Dick MD,
Related Article:
Circulation 2008 118: 1911-1912.
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |