Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 15, 2008

Circulation. 2008
Published online before print October 13, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.787598
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 28, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
118/18/1793    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.787598v2
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.787598v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsui, H.
Right arrow Articles by Gardiner, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsui, H.
Right arrow Articles by Gardiner, H. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery

Submitted on November 18, 2007
Accepted on August 27, 2008

Morphological and Physiological Predictors of Fetal Aortic Coarctation

Hikoro Matsui MD, Mats Mellander PhD, MD, Michael Roughton PhD, Hana Jicinska MD, and Helena M. Gardiner PhD, MD*

From the Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College at Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital (H.M., H.M.G.); Brompton Fetal Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital (H.M., M.M., H.J., H.M.G.); and Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust (M.R.), London, UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: helena.gardiner{at}imperial.ac.uk.

Background—Prenatal diagnosis of aortic coarctation suffers from high false-negative rates at screening and poor specificity.

Methods and Results—This retrospective study tested the applicability of published aortic arch and ductal Z scores (measured just before the descending aorta in the 3-vessel and tracheal view) and their ratio on 200 consecutive normal controls at a median of 22±0 gestational weeks (range, 15±4 to 38±4 weeks). Second, this study tested the ability of serial Z scores to distinguish fetuses with coarctation within a cohort with ventricular and/or great arterial disproportion detected at screening or fetal echocardiography. Third, it evaluated the diagnostic significance of associated cardiac lesions, coarctation shelf, and isthmal flow disturbance. We studied 44 fetuses with suspected coarctation at 24±0 weeks (range, 17±3 to 37±4 weeks). Receiver-operating characteristic curves were created. Logistic regression tested the association between z scores, additional cardiac diagnoses, and coarctation. Good separation was found of isthmal Z scores for cases requiring surgery from controls and false-positive cases, and receiver-operating characteristic curves showed an excellent area under the curve for isthmal Z score (0.963) and isthmal-to-ductal ratio (0.969). Serial isthmal Z scores improved to >-2 in suspected cases with normal outcomes; those requiring surveillance or surgery remained <-2. Minor lesions did not increase the diagnostic specificity of coarctation, but isthmal flow disturbance increased the odds ratio of true coarctation versus arch hypoplasia 16-fold.

Conclusions—Isthmal Z scores and isthmal-to-ductal ratio are sensitive indicators of fetal coarctation. Serial measurements and abnormal isthmal flow patterns improve diagnostic specificity and may reduce false positives.


Key words: coarctation • fetus • pediatrics