| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 19, 2007
From the Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany (R.E.S.); Department of Nephrology, University Hospital, Essen, Germany (T.P.); Department of Nephrology, Hospital San Agustin, Avilés, Spain (J.G., M.G.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ (B.S., M.M.); and Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland (N.W., J.B., H.v.I.). * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Roland.Schmieder{at}rzmail.uni-erlangen.de.
Background—Diuretics are recommended as first-line agents for the treatment of hypertension. This randomized, double-blind, multicenter study assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in comparison with the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. Methods and Results—After a 2- to 4-week placebo run-in, 1124 patients (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [BP] 95 to 109 mm Hg) were randomized to aliskiren 150 mg (n=459), hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (n=444), or placebo (n=221) once daily. Forced titration (to aliskiren 300 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg) occurred at week 3; at week 6, patients receiving placebo were reassigned (1:1 ratio) to aliskiren 300 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg. From week 12, amlodipine 5 mg was added and titrated to 10 mg from week 18 for patients whose BP remained uncontrolled. Efficacy variables were analyzed for the intent-to-treat population with the use of the last observation carried forward method. BP reductions (mean sitting systolic BP/mean sitting diastolic BP) were significantly greater with aliskiren- versus hydrochlorothiazide-based treatment at week 26 (-20.3/-14.2 versus -18.6/-13.0 mm Hg; P<0.05) and were also greater at week 52 (-22.1/-16.0 versus -21.2/-15.0 mm Hg; P<0.05 for mean sitting diastolic BP). At the end of the monotherapy period (week 12), aliskiren 300 mg was superior to hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in reducing BP (-17.4/-12.2 versus -14.7/-10.3 mm H; P<0.001). Adverse event rates were similar with aliskiren- (65.2%) and hydrochlorothiazide-based therapy (61.5%). Hypokalemia was more frequent with hydrochlorothiazide-based therapy than aliskiren-based therapy (17.9% versus 0.9%; P<0.0001). Conclusions—Aliskiren treatment, both as monotherapy and with optional addition of amlodipine, provided significantly greater BP reductions than the respective hydrochlorothiazide regimens. Aliskiren-based therapy was well tolerated. Direct renin inhibition with aliskiren therefore represents an effective option for the long-term treatment of essential hypertension.
Accepted on October 14, 2008
Long-Term Antihypertensive Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Direct Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren. A 12-Month Randomized, Double-Blind Comparator Trial With Hydrochlorothiazide
Roland E. Schmieder MD*,
Related Article:
Circulation 2009 119: 359-361.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. M. Kaplan The Choice of Thiazide Diuretics: Why Chlorthalidone May Replace Hydrochlorothiazide Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): 951 - 953. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |