| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 2, 2007
From the Divisions of Cardiology (D.-W.P., S.-W.L., Y.-H.K., C.W.L., M.-K.H., J.-J.K., S.-W.P., S.-J.P.), and Cardiac Surgery (S.J.C., H.S., C.H.C., J.-W.L.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; and Division of Biostatistics (S.-C.Y.), Center for Medical Research and Information, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sjpark{at}amc.seoul.kr.
Background—Although previous studies have compared the treatment effects of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the long-term outcomes beyond 1 year among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES) or CABG have not been evaluated. Methods and Results—Between January 2003 and December 2005, 3042 patients with multivessel disease underwent coronary implantation of DES (n=1547) or CABG (n=1495). The primary end point was all-cause mortality. In a crude analysis, the rate of long-term mortality was significantly higher in patients who underwent CABG than in those who underwent DES implantation (3-year unadjusted mortality rate, 7.0% for CABG versus 4.4% for percutaneous coronary intervention; P=0.01). However, after adjustment for baseline differences, the overall risks of death were similar among all patients (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.30; P=0.45), diabetic patients (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.82 to 3.78; P=0.15), and patients with compromised ventricular function (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.41 to 4.65; P=0.60). In the anatomic subgroups, mortality benefit with DES implantation was noted in patients with 2-vessel disease with involvement of the nonproximal left anterior descending artery (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.78; P=0.016). The rate of revascularization was significantly higher in the DES than in the CABG group (hazard ratio, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.11 to 3.75; P<0.001). Conclusions—For the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention with DES implantation showed equivalent long-term mortality as CABG.
Accepted on February 20, 2008
Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Duk-Woo Park MD,
Related Article:
Circulation 2008 117: 2041.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D.-W. Park, S.-C. Yun, J.-Y. Lee, W.-J. Kim, S.-J. Kang, S.-W. Lee, Y.-H. Kim, C. W. Lee, J.-J. Kim, S.-W. Park, et al. C-Reactive Protein and the Risk of Stent Thrombosis and Cardiovascular Events After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Circulation, November 17, 2009; 120(20): 1987 - 1995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bastarrika, Y. S. Lee, W. Huda, B. Ruzsics, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf CT of Coronary Artery Disease Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 317 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Benedetto, G. Melina, E. Angeloni, S. Refice, A. Roscitano, B. Fiorani, G. D. Di Nucci, and R. Sinatra Coronary artery bypass grafting versus drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary disease. A meta-analysis on 24,268 patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 36(4): 611 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gulati, C. S. Rihal, and B. J. Gersh The SYNTAX Trial: A Perspective Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 463 - 467. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-J. Kim, D.-W. Park, S.-C. Yun, J.-Y. Lee, S.-W. Lee, Y.-H. Kim, C. W. Lee, S.-W. Park, and S.-J. Park Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on the Treatment Effect of Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization for Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Subgroup Analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2009; 2(10): 956 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Frutkin, J. B. Lindsey, S. K. Mehta, J. A. House, J. A. Spertus, D. J. Cohen, J. S. Rumsfeld, S. P. Marso, and on behalf of the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Dat Drug-Eluting Stents and the Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Class I Indications for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Undergoing Index Revascularization: Analysis From the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 614 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The year in interventional cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2080 - 2097. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Li, Z. Zheng, B. Xu, S. Zhang, W. Li, R. Gao, and S. Hu Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stents and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up Results From a Single Institution Circulation, April 21, 2009; 119(15): 2040 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pocar, F. Donatelli, A. Moneta, H. Tomoda, J. A. Tayek, J. R. Arnold, A. P. Banning, S.-J. Park, D.-W. Park, and Y.-H. Kim Stents versus Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease N. Engl. J. Med., July 24, 2008; 359(4): 423 - 425. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |