Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 22, 2007

Circulation. 2007
Published online before print October 22, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.733428
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 6, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/19/2119    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.733428v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cull, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holman, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cull, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holman, R. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on September 5, 2006
Accepted on August 17, 2007

Impact of the Metabolic Syndrome on Macrovascular and Microvascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 78

Carole A. Cull PhD, Christine C. Jensen MD, Ravi Retnakaran MD, and Rury R. Holman FRCP*

From the Diabetes Trials Unit (C.A.C., R.R., R.R.H.), Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, and University of Washington School of Medicine (C.C.J.), Seattle, Wash.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rury.holman{at}dtu.ox.ac.uk.

Background—The metabolic syndrome (MetS) and type 2 diabetes mellitus are both associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk. We examined retrospectively the degree to which the presence of MetS in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus increased their risk of diabetic complications using United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study data.

Methods and Results—Of 5102 United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study patients recruited with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and followed up for a median of 10.3 years, 4542 had the requisite data for these analyses. After a 3-month dietary run-in, MetS, diagnosed with National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III, World Health Organization, International Diabetes Federation, or European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance criteria, was present in 61%, 38%, 54%, and 24%, respectively. Those with MetS by these criteria had increased cardiovascular disease risks relative to those without MetS of 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.54), 1.45 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 1.66), 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.42), and 1.31 (95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.57), respectively, but similar risks for microvascular complications. The positive predictive value of MetS for cardiovascular disease events, however, was only 18%, 13%, 18%, and 39%, respectively.

Conclusions—MetS, diagnosed by Adult Treatment Panel III, World Health Organization, or International Diabetes Federation criteria, identifies diabetic patients at greater risk of macrovascular but not microvascular complications. Poor discrimination by MetS with respect to cardiovascular disease outcomes means that it is of limited clinical value for cardiovascular disease risk stratification in type 2 diabetes mellitus.


Key words: diabetes mellitus • cardiovascular diseases • risk factors • metabolic syndrome X


Related Article:

Issue Highlights
Circulation 2007 116: 2095. [Full Text]