Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 3, 2008

Circulation. 2008
Published online before print March 3, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724005
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 18, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/11/1361    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naik, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Street, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naik, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Street, R. L., Jr
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Choosing a Doctor or Health Care Service
*Diabetes Complications
*Family Issues
*High Blood Pressure
*Talking With Your Doctor
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - treatment
Right arrow Type 2 diabetes
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on June 26, 2007
Accepted on December 26, 2007

Improving Hypertension Control in Diabetes Mellitus. The Effects of Collaborative and Proactive Health Communication

Aanand D. Naik MD*, Michael A. Kallen PhD, MPH, Annette Walder MS, and Richard L. Street Jr PhD

From the Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies (A.D.N., A.W., R.L.S.), Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Tex; Sections of Health Services Research (A.D.N., A.W., R.L.S.) and Geriatrics (A.D.N.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of General Internal Medicine (M.A.K.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; and Department of Communication (R.L.S.), Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: anaik{at}bcm.tmc.edu.

Background—Communication between patients and clinicians using collaborative goals and treatment plans may overcome barriers to achieving hypertension control in routine diabetes mellitus care. We assessed the interrelation of patient–clinician communication factors to determine their independent associations with hypertension control in diabetes care.

Methods and Results—We identified 566 older adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension at the DeBakey VA Medical Center in Houston, Tex. Clinical and pharmacy data were collected, and a patient questionnaire was sent to all participants. A total of 212 individuals returned surveys. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of patient characteristics, self-management behaviors, and communication factors on hypertension control. Three communication factors had significant associations with hypertension control. Two factors, patients' endorsement of a shared decision-making style (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.57) and proactive communication with one's clinician about abnormal results of blood pressure self-monitoring (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 3.26), had direct, independent associations in multivariate regression. Path analysis was used to investigate the direct and indirect effects of communication factors and hypertension control. Decision-making style ({beta}=0.20, P<0.01) and proactive communication ({beta}=0.50, P<0.0001) again demonstrated direct effects on hypertension control. A third factor, clinicians' use of collaborative communication when setting treatment goals, had a total effect on hypertension control of 0.16 (P<0.05) through its direct effects on decision-making style ({beta}=0.28, P<0.001) and proactive communication ({beta}=0.22, P<0.01).

Conclusions—Three communication factors were found to have significant associations with hypertension control. Patient–clinician communication that facilitates collaborative blood pressure goals and patients' input related to the progress of treatment may improve rates of hypertension control in diabetes care independent of medication adherence.


Key words: hypertension • diabetes mellitus • physician–patient relations • outcomes assessment • goals


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 1353. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
J. Boucher
Integrating Food and Medications as a Way of Life
Clin. Diabetes, September 1, 2009; 27(4): 129 - 130.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Schattner
The Silent Dimension: Expressing Humanism in Each Medical Encounter
Arch Intern Med, June 22, 2009; 169(12): 1095 - 1099.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. R. Horowitz, M. Robinson, and S. Seifer
Community-Based Participatory Research From the Margin to the Mainstream: Are Researchers Prepared?
Circulation, May 19, 2009; 119(19): 2633 - 2642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
J. Boucher
Integrating Food and Medications as a Way of Life
Diabetes Spectr, April 1, 2009; 22(2): 68 - 69.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Heisler
Actively Engaging Patients in Treatment Decision Making and Monitoring as a Strategy to Improve Hypertension Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus
Circulation, March 18, 2008; 117(11): 1355 - 1357.
[Full Text] [PDF]