Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on December 17, 2007

Circulation. 2007
Published online before print December 17, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678789
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 15, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/2/136    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678789v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pratola, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrari, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pratola, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrari, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on November 28, 2006
Accepted on October 5, 2007

Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Is the Persistence of All Intraprocedural Targets Necessary for Long-Term Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm?

Claudio Pratola MD, Elisa Baldo MD*, Pasquale Notarstefano MD, Tiziano Toselli MD, and Roberto Ferrari MD, PhD, FESC

From the Chair of Cardiology, St Anna University Hospital (C.P., E.B., P.N., T.T., R.F.), Ferrara, Italy, and Cardiovascular Research Centre (R.F.), Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, Gussago, Italy.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ltt{at}unife.it.

Background—Several approaches have been developed for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, but the correct intraprocedural end point is still under debate, and few data exist about the destiny of ablation lesions over time. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term maintenance of intraprocedural end points of ablation procedures.

Methods and Results—Inclusion criteria were (1) a previous ablation procedure of pulmonary vein (PV) encircling performed for drug-refractory persistent atrial fibrillation; (2) a "complete" intraprocedural end point, which consisted of voltage abatement inside the lesions, PV disconnection, and exit-block pacing from inside the lesions, attained in all PVs; and (3) stable sinus rhythm documented during a minimum follow-up of 2.5 years after the procedure. Twenty volunteers were selected (12 males, mean age 59±7 years) and underwent a repeat electrophysiological study. After a follow-up of 36.4±4.7 months, complete voltage abatement was maintained around 32 PVs (40.0%), PV disconnection persisted in 12 (37.5%) of the previously isolated PVs, and exit block was present in 39 PVs (48.7%). Ten patients who underwent a redo ablation procedure because of recurrences of atrial fibrillation were used as the control group. Differences in intraprocedural end-point maintenance between the 2 groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions—Common intraprocedural end points such as voltage abatement, PV disconnection, and exit block persist only in a limited number of patients, even when the outcome is favorable during follow-up. Further investigation will be required to determine whether such data will have implications for ablation strategies.


Key words: atrial fibrillation • pulmonary veins • radiofrequency catheter ablation


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 127. [Full Text]