Published Online
on March 26, 2007

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 17, 2007

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 115/15/1999    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668863v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Burns, J. Articles by Greenwood, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Burns, J. Articles by Greenwood, J. P. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information High Blood Pressure Related Collections Hypertrophy CT and MRI

Submitted on October 24, 2006
Accepted on February 2, 2007

Relationship Between Central Sympathetic Drive and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Determined Left Ventricular Mass in Essential Hypertension

Joanna Burns MBBS, Mohan U. Sivananthan MBBS, MD, Stephen G. Ball MB BChir, PhD, Alan F. Mackintosh MA, MD, David A.S.G. Mary MB ChB, PhD, and John P. Greenwood MB ChB, PhD^*

From the Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.greenwood{at}leeds.ac.uk.

Background--Sympathetic activation has been implicated in the development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, the relationship between sympathetic activation and LV mass (LVM) has not been clearly defined across a range of arterial pressure measurements. The present study was planned to determine that relationship, using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to accurately quantify LVM, in hypertensive patients with and without LVH and in normal subjects.

Methods and Results--Twenty-four patients with uncomplicated and untreated essential hypertension (LVH[-]) were compared with 25 patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH[+]) and 24 normal control subjects. Resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity was quantified as multiunit bursts and single units. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-determined LVM was indexed to body surface area (LVM index); in the LVH[-] group, LVM index was 67±2.1 g/m², a value between those of the LVH[+] (91±3.4 g/m²) and normal control (57±2.2 g/m²) groups, respectively. The sympathetic activity in the LVH[-] group (53±1.3 bursts per 100 cardiac beats and 63±1.6 impulses per 100 cardiac beats) was between (at least P<0.001) those of the LVH[+] (66±1.7 bursts per 100 cardiac beats and 77±2.2 impulses per 100 cardiac beats) and normal control (39±3.0 bursts per 100 cardiac beats and 45±3.4 impulses per 100 cardiac beats) groups. Significant positive correlation existed between sympathetic activity and LVM index in the LVH[-] and LVH[+] groups (at least r=0.76, P<0.0001) but not in the normal control group. However, no consistent relationship existed between arterial blood pressure and sympathetic activity or LVM index.

Conclusions--These findings further support the hypothesis that central sympathetic activation is associated with the development of LVH in human hypertension.

Key words: action potentials • nervous system, sympathetic • hypertension • hypertrophy • magnetic resonance imaging

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. Schlaich, P. A. Sobotka, H. Krum, R. Whitbourn, A. Walton, and M. D. Esler Renal Denervation as a Therapeutic Approach for Hypertension: Novel Implications for an Old Concept Hypertension, December 1, 2009; 54(6): 1195 - 1201. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Grassi Assessment of Sympathetic Cardiovascular Drive in Human Hypertension: Achievements and Perspectives Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 690 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Grassi, G. Seravalle, F. Quarti-Trevano, R. Dell'Oro, F. Arenare, D. Spaziani, and G. Mancia Sympathetic and Baroreflex Cardiovascular Control in Hypertension-Related Left Ventricular Dysfunction Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): 205 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Fu, W. Vongpatanasin, and B. D. Levine Neural and Nonneural Mechanisms for Sex Differences in Elderly Hypertension: Can Exercise Training Help? Hypertension, November 1, 2008; 52(5): 787 - 794. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Grassi Qualitative Assessment of Sympathetic Neural Drive in Cardiometabolic Disease: A New Challenge Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 835 - 836. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Schlaich, G. W. Lambert, E. A. Lambert, and M. D. Esler Letter by Schlaich et al Regarding Article, "Relationship Between Central Sympathetic Drive and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Determined Left Ventricular Mass in Essential Hypertension" Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e416 - e416. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Burns, M. U. Sivananthan, S. G. Ball, A. F. Mackintosh, D. A.S.G. Mary, and J. P. Greenwood Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Relationship Between Central Sympathetic Drive and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Determined Left Ventricular Mass in Essential Hypertension" Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e417 - e417. [Full Text] [PDF]