Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on December 11, 2006

Circulation. 2006
Published online before print December 11, 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.642892
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 19, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
114/25/2766    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.642892v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saxon, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ecklund, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saxon, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ecklund, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cardiac Arrest
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery

Submitted on August 26, 2005
Revised on October 5, 2006
Accepted on October 13, 2006

Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Death and Appropriate Shock in the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Trial

Leslie A. Saxon MD*, Michael R. Bristow MD, John Boehmer MD, Steven Krueger MD, David A. Kass MD, Teresa De Marco MD, Peter Carson MD, Lorenzo DiCarlo MD, Arthur M. Feldman MD, PhD, Elizabeth Galle MS, and Fred Ecklund MS

From the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California (L.A.S.), Los Angeles; University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (M.R.B.), Denver; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (J.B.), Hershey, Pa; Bryan Memorial Hospital (S.K.), Lincoln, Neb; Johns Hopkins Hospital (D.A.K.), Baltimore, Md; University of California at San Francisco (T.D.M.), San Francisco; Veterans Affairs Medical Center (P.C.), Washington, DC; Pfizer Global Research and Development (L.D.), Ann Arbor, Mich; Jefferson Medical College (A.M.F.), Philadelphia, Pa; and Guidant Corporation (E.G., F.E.), St. Paul, Minn.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: saxon{at}usc.edu.

Background--The factors that determine the risk for sudden death or implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) therapies are largely unknown.

Methods and Results--We hypothesized that clinical measures of heart failure severity and the presence of comorbid conditions would predict the risk of malignant arrhythmias in the 1520 patients enrolled in the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Trial. Outcomes in the CRT group after implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy were also evaluated. The CRT-defibrillator device reduced the risk of sudden death by 56% compared with drug therapy (17 of 595 [2.9%] versus 18 of 308 [5.8%], P<0.02). CRT therapy was not associated with sudden death risk reduction (48 of 617 [7.8%]). Other factors associated with reduced sudden death risk were left ventricular ejection fraction >20% (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.87]; P=0.01), QRS duration >160 ms (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.997]; P=0.05), and female gender (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.94]; P=0.003). The risk for sudden death was increased by advanced New York Heart Association class IV heart failure (HR, 2.62 [95% CI, 1.61 to 4.26]; P<0.011) and renal dysfunction (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.06 to 2.69]; P=0.03). An appropriate shock was experienced in 88 (15%) of the 595 CTR-D patients. In the CRT-defibrillator patients, female gender (HR, 0.54 [95 % CI, 0.31 to 0.94]; P=0.03) and use of neurohormonal antagonists were associated with reduced risk. Class IV heart failure status increased risk. Appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy was positively associated with risk of death or all-cause hospitalization (HR, 1.57; P<0.002), pump failure death or hospitalization (HR, 2.35; P<0.001), and sudden death (HR, 2.99; P=0.03), but not total mortality (HR, 1.3; P=0.28).

Conclusions--In CRT candidates, sudden cardiac death risk is associated with higher New York Heart Association class and renal dysfunction. In CRT-defibrillator recipients, reduction in the risk of an appropriate shock is associated with medical therapy with neurohormonal antagonists, female gender, and New York Heart Association functional class III versus IV clinical status. Shock therapy was associated with worse outcome.


Key words: arrhythmia • death, sudden • defibrillation • electrophysiology • heart failure • implantable cardioverter-defibrillators




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
J. G F Cleland, A. Tageldien, N. Maarouf, and N. Hobson
Patients with heart failure who require an implantable defibrillator should have cardiac resynchronisation routinely
Heart, August 1, 2008; 94(8): 963 - 966.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. Deo, F. Lin, E. Vittinghoff, Z. H. Tseng, S. B. Hulley, and M. G. Shlipak
Kidney Dysfunction and Sudden Cardiac Death Among Women With Coronary Heart Disease
Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1578 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Kloner and D. S. Cannom
Uncertainty on the Use of Aldosterone Antagonists for Primary Therapy for Sudden Cardiac Death in the Setting of Implanted Devices
Circulation, June 12, 2007; 115(23): 2983 - 2989.
[Full Text] [PDF]