Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 23, 2006

Circulation. 2006
Published online before print October 23, 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.641779
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 31, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
114/18/1940    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.641779v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pacella, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pacella, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Villanueva, F. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques
Right arrow Imaging
Right arrow Coronary circulation

Submitted on May 24, 2006
Revised on August 22, 2006
Accepted on September 1, 2006

Effect of Coronary Stenosis on Adjacent Bed Flow Reserve. Assessment of Microvascular Mechanisms Using Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography

John J. Pacella MS, MD and Flordeliza S. Villanueva MD*

From the Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: villanuevafs{at}msx.upmc.edu.

Background--During coronary stenosis, flow reserve in the adjacent nonstenotic bed decreases, but the microvascular mechanisms are unknown. Because myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) assesses microvascular physiology, we used it to relate flow reserve to intramyocardial blood volume in the adjacent bed.

Methods and Results--A noncritical left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis was created in 10 dogs. MCE was performed and myocardial blood flow was measured with neutron-activated microspheres and flow probes. Data were collected at baseline, hyperemia, and hyperemia and stenosis. Hyperemia was induced with an A2A receptor agonist. MCE acoustic intensity in the LAD and left circumflex (LCx) regions were fit to the following: y=A(1-e-{beta}t), where A, {beta}, and Ax{beta} reflect intramyocardial blood volume, red cell velocity, and flow, respectively. During hyperemia alone, LCx probe and microsphere flows and MCE-derived red cell velocity increased from baseline (30±14 versus 125±62 mL/min, P<0.0005; 1.5±0.5 versus 6.6±2.0 mL · min-1 · g-1, P<0.0005; and 0.53±0.14 versus 0.96±0.45 second-1, P=0.030, respectively); intramyocardial blood volume was unchanged. LAD stenosis during hyperemia decreased LCx probe flow (125±62 versus 110±57 mL/min; P<0.05), microsphere flow (6.6±2.0 versus 4.2±2.1 mL · min-1 · g-1; P<0.0005), and MCE-derived flow (0.57±0.29 versus 0.45±0.33 second-1; P=0.032). LCx bed intramyocardial blood volume concurrently increased (0.61±0.14 versus 0.70±0.15; P<0.01).

Conclusions--Coronary stenosis impairs flow reserve in the adjacent nonstenotic bed, in which intramyocardial blood volume increases. MCE suggests compensatory recruitment of microvascular anastomotic collateral networks that augment stenotic bed flow reserve, but at the expense of the adjacent bed. Adjacent bed collateral microcirculation thus participates in the regulation of collateral flow and appears functionally significant during coronary stenosis.


Key words: collateral circulation • contrast media • coronary disease • echocardiography • imaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Weyman
The Year in Echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 20, 2007; 49(11): 1212 - 1219.
[Full Text] [PDF]