on April 24, 2006
Published online before print April 24, 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.603522
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 23, 2005
From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (M.K.C.N., A.C.Y., W.F.F.), Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif, and the Department of Cardiology (M.K.C.N.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wfearon{at}stanford.edu.
Background--A simple, reproducible invasive method for assessing the coronary microcirculation is lacking. A novel index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) has been shown in animals to correlate with true microvascular resistance and, unlike coronary flow reserve (CFR), to be independent of the epicardial artery. We sought to compare the reproducibility and hemodynamic dependence of IMR with CFR in humans. Methods and Results--Using a pressure-temperature sensor-tipped coronary wire, thermodilution-derived CFR and IMR were measured, along with fractional flow reserve (FFR), in 15 coronary arteries (15 patients) under the following hemodynamic conditions: (1) twice at baseline; (2) during right ventricular pacing at 110 bpm; (3) during intravenous infusion of nitroprusside; and (4) during intravenous dobutamine infusion. Mean CFR did not change during baseline measurements or during nitroprusside infusion but decreased during pacing (from 3.1±1.1 at baseline to 2.3±1.2 during pacing, P<0.05) and during dobutamine infusion (from 3.0±1.0 to 1.7±0.6 with dobutamine, P<0.0001). By comparison, mean values for IMR and FFR remained similar throughout all hemodynamic conditions. The mean coefficient of variation between 2 baseline measurements was significantly lower for IMR (6.9±6.5%) and FFR (1.6±1.6%) than for CFR (18.6±9.6%; P<0.01). Mean correlation between baseline measurements and each hemodynamic intervention was superior for IMR (r=0.90±0.05) and FFR (r=0.86±0.12) compared with CFR (r=0.70±0.05; P<0.05). Conclusions--Compared with CFR, IMR provides a more reproducible assessment of the microcirculation, which is independent of hemodynamic perturbations. Simultaneous measurement of FFR and IMR may provide a comprehensive and specific assessment of coronary physiology at both epicardial and microvascular levels, respectively.
Revised on February 2, 2006
Accepted on March 2, 2006
Invasive Assessment of the Coronary Microcirculation. Superior Reproducibility and Less Hemodynamic Dependence of Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Compared With Coronary Flow Reserve
Martin K.C. Ng MBBS, PhD,
Key words: microcirculation • pressure • coronary disease
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  H.-S. Lim, M.-H. Yoon, S.-J. Tahk, H.-M. Yang, B.-J. Choi, S.-Y. Choi, S.-S. Sheen, G.-S. Hwang, S.-J. Kang, and J.-H. Shin Usefulness of the index of microcirculatory resistance for invasively assessing myocardial viability immediately after primary angioplasty for anterior myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2009; 30(23): 2854 - 2860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Escaned, A. Flores, P. Garcia-Pavia, J. Segovia, J. Jimenez, P. Aragoncillo, C. Salas, F. Alfonso, R. Hernandez, D. J. Angiolillo, et al. Assessment of Microcirculatory Remodeling With Intracoronary Flow Velocity and Pressure Measurements: Validation With Endomyocardial Sampling in Cardiac Allografts Circulation, October 20, 2009; 120(16): 1561 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P Wexberg, W Sperker, N G Morgenthaler, H Heinzl, C Adlbrecht, C Plass, H D Glogar, I M Lang, and T Neunteufl Inhomogeneous vasomotor effects of moderate selective and non-selective endothelin-receptor blockade in stable coronary artery disease Heart, August 1, 2009; 95(15): 1258 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Di Mario, G. R. Heyndrickx, F. Prati, and N. H.J. Pijls CHAPTER 8 Invasive Imaging and Haemodynamics ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Beleslin, M. Ostojic, A. Djordjevic-Dikic, V. Vukcevic, S. Stojkovic, M. Nedeljkovic, G. Stankovic, D. Orlic, N. Milic, J. Stepanovic, et al. The value of fractional and coronary flow reserve in predicting myocardial recovery in patients with previous myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2008; 29(21): 2617 - 2624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Beohar, A. K. Erdogan, D. C. Lee, H. N. Sabbah, M. J. Kern, J. Teerlink, R. O. Bonow, and M. Gheorghiade Acute heart failure syndromes and coronary perfusion. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2008; 52(1): 13 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Cuisset, M. Hamilos, N. Melikian, E. Wyffels, J. Sarma, G. Sarno, E. Barbato, J. Bartunek, W. Wijns, and B. De Bruyne Direct stenting for stable angina pectoris is associated with reduced periprocedural microcirculatory injury compared with stenting after pre-dilation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1060 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. F. Fearon, M. Shah, M. Ng, T. Brinton, A. Wilson, J. A. Tremmel, I. Schnittger, D. P. Lee, R. H. Vagelos, P. J. Fitzgerald, et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 560 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Sezer, H. Oflaz, T. Goren, I. Okcular, B. Umman, Y. Nisanci, A. K. Bilge, Y. Sanli, M. Meric, and S. Umman Intracoronary Streptokinase after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention N. Engl. J. Med., May 3, 2007; 356(18): 1823 - 1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|