This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hsieh, M.-H. Articles by Chang, M.-S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hsieh, M.-H. Articles by Chang, M.-S.

(Circulation. 1998;98:2296-2300.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Absence of Junctional Rhythm During Successful Slow-Pathway Ablation in Patients With Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Ming-Hsiung Hsieh, MD; Shih-Ann Chen, MD; Ching-Tai Tai, MD; Wen-Chung Yu, MD; Yi-Jen Chen, MD; ; Mau-Song Chang, MD

From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, and Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, Taiwan.

Correspondence to Shih-Ann Chen, MD, Division of Cardiology, Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, 201 Sec 2, Shih-Pai Rd, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail sachen{at}vghtpe.gov.tw

Background—The presence of junctional rhythm has been considered to be a sensitive marker of successful slow-pathway ablation. However, in rare cases, junctional rhythm was absent despite multiple radiofrequency applications delivered over a large area in the Koch's triangle, and successful ablation was achieved in the absence of a junctional rhythm.

Methods and Results—This study included 353 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (143 men and 210 women; mean age, 50±17 years) who underwent catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Combined anatomic and electrogram approaches were used to guide ablation. Inducibility of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was assessed after each application of radiofrequency energy. Successful sites were located in the posterior area in 18 (90%) of 20 patients without junctional rhythm during slow-pathway ablation compared with 200 (60%) of 333 patients with junctional rhythm (P<0.001). The fast-slow form of tachycardia was more common in patients without than in those with junctional rhythm (30% versus 3%; P=0.001). At the successful ablation sites, patients with junctional rhythm had a higher incidence of a multicomponent or slow-pathway potential (51% versus 10%; P<0.001), a longer duration of the atrial electrogram (64±8 versus 50±9 ms; P=0.04), and a smaller atrial/ventricular electrogram amplitude ratio (0.29±0.18 versus 0.65±0.27; P<0.001) than those without junctional rhythm. Mean temperatures at successful sites (56±6°C versus 58±9°C; P=0.57) and incidence of transient AV block (2% versus 0%; P=0.86) were similar between patients with and without junctional rhythms. By multivariate analysis, location of ablation sites, atrial/ventricular electrogram amplitude ratio, absence of a multicomponent or slow-pathway potential, and occurrence of the fast-slow form of tachycardia were independent predictors of the absence of a junctional rhythm during successful slow-pathway ablation.

Conclusions—In some rare cases, successful slow-pathway ablation is possible in the absence of a junctional rhythm.

Key Words: atrioventricular node • catheter ablation • tachyarrhythmias