(Circulation. 1998;98:1575-1582.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin
A Review of the Results of Recent Studies of the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism and Unstable Angina
Jack Hirsh, MD
From Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to Jack Hirsh, MD, Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8V 1C3.
Key Words: heparin angina venous thrombosis
Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are a new class of
anticoagulants derived from unfractionated heparin (UFH). They have a
number of advantages over UFH that have led to their increasing use for
a number of thromboembolic indications.1 This
article will review the limitations of UFH and the mechanisms by which
LMWHs overcome these limitations and discuss the results of recent
clinical trials evaluating LMWHs for the treatment of venous
thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and unstable angina.
Limitations of UFH
Heparin has pharmacokinetic, biophysical, and biological
limitations.2 LMWHs overcome the pharmacokinetic
and some of the biological limitations of UFH, but they share the same
biophysical limitations.
Pharmacokinetic Limitations of UFH
The pharmacokinetic limitations of heparin are caused by its
nonspecific binding to proteins and cells.2 3
Because heparin is highly negatively charged, it binds in a
pentasaccharide-independent fashion to a variety of plasma
proteins (including histidine-rich glycoprotein,
vitronectin, lipoproteins, fibronectin, and fibrinogen) and
to proteins secreted by platelets (platelet factor 4 [PF4]
and high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor) and
endothelial cells (high-molecular-weight von
Willebrand factor).2 Some heparin-binding
proteins are acute-phase reactants, the levels of which are elevated in
sick patients.4 In addition, during the clotting
process, PF4 and von Willebrand factor are released from
platelets and endothelial cells, respectively.
The variability in plasma levels of heparin-binding proteins in
patients with thromboembolic diseases4 is
responsible for both the unpredictable anticoagulant response to
UFH4 and the very high heparin requirements in
some of these patients (heparin resistance).5
Biophysical Limitations
The biophysical limitations of heparin reflect the inability of
the heparin-antithrombin complex to inactivate
thrombin-bound to fibrin6 and . . . [Full Text of this Article]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Chaer, R. Dayal, S. C. Lin, S. Trocciola, N. J. Morrissey, J. McKinsey, K. C. Kent, and P. L. Faries
Multimodal Therapy for Acute and Chronic Venous Thrombotic and Occlusive Disease
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery,
September 1, 2005;
39(5):
375 - 380.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Kanne and T. A. Lalani
Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
Circulation,
March 30, 2004;
109(12_suppl_1):
I-15 - I-21.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Rich
The Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Older Adults
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.,
January 1, 2004;
59(1):
M34 - 41.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Bourriot, T. Couffinhal, V. Bernard, M. Montaudon, J. Bonnet, and F. Laurent
Clinical Outcome After a Negative Spiral CT Pulmonary Angiographic Finding in an Inpatient Population From Cardiology and Pneumology Wards
Chest,
February 1, 2003;
123(2):
359 - 365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Tillie-Leblond, I. Mastora, F. Radenne, S. Paillard, A.-B. Tonnel, J. Remy, and M. Remy-Jardin
Risk of Pulmonary Embolism after a Negative Spiral CT Angiogram in Patients with Pulmonary Disease: 1-year Clinical Follow-up Study
Radiology,
May 1, 2002;
223(2):
461 - 467.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hirsh, S. S. Anand, J. L. Halperin, and V. Fuster
Guide to Anticoagulant Therapy: Heparin : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,
July 1, 2001;
21
(7):
e9 - e9.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hirsh, S. S. Anand, J. L. Halperin, and V. Fuster
Guide to Anticoagulant Therapy: Heparin : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
Circulation,
June 19, 2001;
103(24):
2994 - 3018.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kaul and P. K. Shah
Low molecular weight heparin in acute coronary syndrome: evidence for superior or equivalent efficacy compared with unfractionated heparin?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
June 1, 2000;
35(7):
1699 - 1712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Goodman, R. J. Lipchik, R. S. Kuzo, Y. Liu, T. L. McAuliffe, and D. J. O'Brien
Subsequent Pulmonary Embolism: Risk after a Negative Helical CT Pulmonary Angiogram- Prospective Comparison with Scintigraphy
Radiology,
May 1, 2000;
215(2):
535 - 542.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. W. Wakefield
The Safety, Efficacy, and Cost Efficiency of Outpatient Treatment of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis with Low Molecular Weight Heparin
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy,
January 1, 2000;
13(2):
19 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Aguilar and S. Z. Goldhaber
Clinical Uses of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Chest,
May 1, 1999;
115(5):
1418 - 1423.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|