Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:2997-3005

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albiero, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albiero, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, A.

(Circulation. 1997;96:2997-3005.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Comparison of Immediate and Intermediate-Term Results of Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Palmaz-Schatz Stent Implantation in Matched Lesions

Remo Albiero, MD; Thomas Rau, MD; Michael Schlüter, PhD; Carlo Di Mario, MD; Bernhard Reimers, MD; Detlef G. Mathey, MD; Jonathan M. Tobis, MD; Joachim Schofer, MD; ; Antonio Colombo, MD

From the Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy (R.A., C.D., B.R., A.C.); the Center for Cardiology Othmarschen, Hamburg, Germany (T.R., M.S., D.G.M., J.S.); and the University of California, Irvine (J.M.T.).

Correspondence to Antonio Colombo, MD, Centro Cuore Columbus, Via M. Buonarroti 48, 20145 Milan, Italy. E-mail columbus{at}micronet.it

Background Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides more precise information than angiography about vascular dimensions. This information is used by some centers to optimize intracoronary stent implantation. There are no direct comparisons of the effects on restenosis of optimal IVUS-guided versus angiography-directed high-pressure stenting.

Methods and Results Lesions of patients who had a 6-month angiographic follow-up study were eligible for matching. From 445 consecutive lesions treated by Palmaz-Schatz (P-S) stenting guided by IVUS (IVUS group) in Milan, 173 lesions were individually matched with 173 of 476 consecutive lesions treated by P-S stenting directed by angiography (Angio group) in Hamburg. Lesions were selected by a computerized program according to baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables. Immediate and 6-month angiographic results were retrospectively compared, distinguishing an "early phase" from a "late phase." This distinction was based on the more aggressive dilation strategy with larger balloons and more demanding IVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion used in Milan in the early phase. In both phases, a larger minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately after stenting and after 6 months was achieved in the IVUS group than in the Angio group. In the early phase, the dichotomous restenosis rate was lower in the IVUS group than in the Angio group (9.2% versus 22.3%; P=.04). In the late phase, there was no difference in restenosis between the groups (22.7% versus 23.7%; P=1.0).

Conclusions In matched lesions treated with high-pressure stenting, IVUS guidance achieved a larger MLD than angiographic guidance. However, in the IVUS group, the restenosis rate was lower only in the early phase, when balloons larger than currently used were selected to maximize the stent lumen area.


Key Words: stents • coronary disease • ultrasonics • angiography • restenosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
K. S. Bhalla and H. V. Anderson
Drug-Eluting Stents: Careful Deployment Required
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 435 - 436.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
C. Di Mario and P. Barlis
Optical Coherence Tomography: A New Tool to Detect Tissue Coverage in Drug-Eluting Stents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 174 - 175.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
E. Romagnoli, G. M. Sangiorgi, J. Cosgrave, E. Guillet, and A. Colombo
Drug-eluting stenting the case for post-dilation.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., February 1, 2008; 1(1): 22 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. L. Orford, A. Lerman, and D. R. Holmes
Routine intravascular ultrasound guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention: A critical reappraisal
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1335 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A L Gaster, U Slothuus Skjoldborg, J Larsen, L Korsholm, C von Birgelen, S Jensen, P Thayssen, K E Pedersen, and T H Haghfelt
Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study
Heart, September 1, 2003; 89(9): 1043 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S Miketic, J Carlsson, and U Tebbe
Clinical and angiographic outcome after conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation compared with direct stenting without predilatation
Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 622 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. Takano, L. A. Yeatman, J. R. Higgins, J. W. Currier, E. Ascencio, K. A. Kopelson, and J. M. Tobis
Optimizing stent expansion with new stent delivery systems
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2001; 38(6): 1622 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. F. Fearon, J. Luna, H. Samady, E. R. Powers, T. Feldman, N. Dib, E. M. Tuzcu, M. W. Cleman, T. M. Chou, D. J. Cohen, et al.
Fractional Flow Reserve Compared With Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Optimizing Stent Deployment
Circulation, October 16, 2001; 104(16): 1917 - 1922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Mudra, C. di Mario, P. de Jaegere, H. R. Figulla, C. Macaya, R. Zahn, B. Wennerblom, W. Rutsch, V. Voudris, E. Regar, et al.
Randomized Comparison of Coronary Stent Implantation Under Ultrasound or Angiographic Guidance to Reduce Stent Restenosis (OPTICUS Study)
Circulation, September 18, 2001; 104(12): 1343 - 1349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A L MCLEOD, D B NORTHRIDGE, and N G UREN
Ultrasound guided stenting
Heart, June 1, 2001; 85(6): 605 - 606.
[Full Text]


Home page
HeartHome page
D Fukuda, T Kawarabayashi, A Tanaka, Y Nishibori, H Taguchi, Y Nishida, K Shimada, and J Yoshikawa
Lesion characteristics of acute myocardial infarction: an investigation with intravascular ultrasound
Heart, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 402 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Hibi, A. Takagi, X. Zhang, T.-J. Teo, H. N. Bonneau, P. G. Yock, and P. J. Fitzgerald
Feasibility of a Novel Blood Noise Reduction Algorithm to Enhance Reproducibility of Ultra-High-Frequency Intravascular Ultrasound Images
Circulation, October 3, 2000; 102(14): 1657 - 1663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. J. Fitzgerald, A. Oshima, M. Hayase, J. A. Metz, S. R. Bailey, D. S. Baim, M. W. Cleman, E. Deutsch, D. J. Diver, M. B. Leon, et al.
Final Results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) Study
Circulation, August 1, 2000; 102(5): 523 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Albiero, T. Nishida, M. Adamian, A. Amato, M. Vaghetti, N. Corvaja, C. Di Mario, and A. Colombo
Edge Restenosis After Implantation of High Activity 32P Radioactive {beta}-Emitting Stents
Circulation, May 30, 2000; 101(21): 2454 - 2457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Albiero, M. Adamian, N. Kobayashi, A. Amato, M. Vaghetti, C. Di Mario, and A. Colombo
Short- and Intermediate-Term Results of 32P Radioactive {beta}-Emitting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease : The Milan Dose-Response Study
Circulation, January 4, 2000; 101(1): 18 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. J. de Feyter, P. Kay, C. Disco, and P. W. Serruys
Reference Chart Derived From Post-Stent-Implantation Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors of 6-Month Expected Restenosis on Quantitative Coronary Angiography
Circulation, October 26, 1999; 100(17): 1777 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]