Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:3527-3533

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alberca, T.
Right arrow Articles by Delcán, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alberca, T.
Right arrow Articles by Delcán, J. L.

(Circulation. 1997;96:3527-3533.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Evaluation of the Specificity of Morphological Electrocardiographic Criteria for the Differential Diagnosis of Wide QRS Complex Tachycardia in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Defects

Teresa Alberca, MD; Jesús Almendral, MD; Petra Sanz, MD; Aureliano Almazan, MD; Jose Luis Cantalapiedra, MD; ; Juan Luis Delcán, MD

From the Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory, Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Background Although several ECG criteria have been described for the differential diagnosis of tachycardias with a wide QRS complex, their applicability in patients with preexisting intraventricular conduction defects (IVCDs) has been questioned. The specificity of previously described criteria in this context is unknown.

Methods and Results We analyzed prospectively the specificity of the QRS morphological criteria previously described in ECGs during sinus rhythm of 232 patients with IVCD. Only 5 of 12 analyzed criteria had a specificity >=0.90 among our patients: (1) a triphasic configuration (Rsr'or Rr') QRS complex in V1 in the presence of a right bundle-branch block morphology (BBBM); (2) a QS, QR, or R QRS pattern in V6 in the presence of a right BBBM; (3) any Q in V6 in the presence of a left BBBM; (4) a concordant pattern in all precordial leads; and (5) the absence of an RS complex in all precordial leads (particularly useful for left BBBM). The following criteria—QRS duration >140 ms; a left axis with right BBBM, right superior axis with right BBBM, monophasic or biphasic R wave in V1 with right BBBM, and a relation R/S <1 with right BBBM; an R >30 ms in lead V1 or V2 with left BBBM, >60 ms from QRS onset to S nadir with left BBBM, a notched downstroke S wave with left BBBM, and an R-to-S interval >100 ms in one precordial lead—had a specificity of 0.43, 0.54, 0.87, 0.80, 0.85, 0.78, 0.66, 0.69, and 0.63 (0.84 in right BBBM), respectively.

Conclusions Most of the previously described morphological criteria favoring ventricular tachycardia are present in a substantial percentage of patients with IVCD during sinus rhythm. These findings suggest a limited applicability of these criteria in this subset of patients.


Key Words: bundle-branch block • arrhythmia • diagnosis • electrocardiography • tachycardia




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular MedicineHome page
F. G. Cosío, J.#x. Palacios, A.#x.;n Pastor, and A. Núñez
CHAPTER 2 The Electrocardiogram
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]