Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;95:1642-1645

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garber, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Browner, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garber, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Browner, W. S.

(Circulation. 1997;95:1642-1645.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Cholesterol Screening Guidelines

Consensus, Evidence, and Common Sense

Alan M. Garber, MD, PhD; Warren S. Browner, MD, MPH

From the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University (A.M.G.), Stanford, Calif; and San Francisco Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco (W.S.B.).

Correspondence to Alan M. Garber, MD, PhD, 204 Junipero Serra Blvd, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail garber@camis.stanford.edu.


Key Words: cholesterol • tests • hypercholesterolemia


*    Introduction
 
In a previous issue of Circulation,1 the Task Force on Risk Reduction criticized the updated American College of Physicians (ACP) Guidelines for Cholesterol Screening2 for "advocating change in the NCEP [National Cholesterol Education Program]/AHA [American Heart Association] guidelines." Implicit in this claim are the beliefs that the NCEP guidelines represent the standard against which all cholesterol screening guidelines should be compared and that the ACP guidelines constitute a reaction to that standard. Neither belief is justified. Furthermore, the task force's comments reflect misunderstandings about the purpose, content, and scientific foundation of the ACP guidelines.

The ACP produced new cholesterol guidelines as part of a periodic review of all of its guidelines. The updated guidelines and background paper3 focused on the questions addressed in the original background paper and guidelines4 5 : Which adults should undergo screening for lipoprotein disorders? What tests should be used initially? These questions are more narrowly focused than the range of issues addressed in the NCEP report,6 which considered not only the initial screening test but also the sequence of follow-up testing, the criteria for initiation of treatment, and the choice of interventions. Because the effectiveness of screening depends on the steps taken after the result of the screening test is obtained, the ACP implicitly considered some of these issues, but the additional steps were not the subject of recommendations. Thus, the task force mistakenly inferred that the ACP recommended against certain practices proposed by the NCEP (eg, measuring lipoprotein levels in patients with elevated total . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. L. Navas-Nacher, L. Colangelo, C. Beam, and P. Greenland
Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease in Men 18 to 39 Years of Age
Ann Intern Med, March 20, 2001; 134(6): 433 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. M. Grundy
Early Detection of High Cholesterol Levels in Young Adults
JAMA, July 19, 2000; 284(3): 365 - 367.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. A. Milner and R. G. Allison
The Role of Dietary Fat in Child Nutrition and Development: Summary of an ASNS Workshop
J. Nutr., November 1, 1999; 129(11): 2094 - 2105.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
B. M. Psaty, C. D. Furberg, L. H. Kuller, D. E. Bild, P. M. Rautaharju, J. F. Polak, E. Bovill, and J. S. Gottdiener
Traditional Risk Factors and Subclinical Disease Measures as Predictors of First Myocardial Infarction in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study
Arch Intern Med, June 28, 1999; 159(12): 1339 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. P. Lowe, P. Greenland, K. J. Ruth, A. R. Dyer, R. Stamler, and J. Stamler
Impact of Major Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, Particularly in Combination, on 22-Year Mortality in Women and Men
Arch Intern Med, October 12, 1998; 158(18): 2007 - 2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. N. Lemaitre, C. D. Furberg, A. B. Newman, S. B. Hulley, D. J. Gordon, J. S. Gottdiener, R. H. McDonald Jr, and B. M. Psaty
Time Trends in the Use of Cholesterol-Lowering Agents in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study
Arch Intern Med, September 14, 1998; 158(16): 1761 - 1768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. M. Grundy, G. J. Balady, M. H. Criqui, G. Fletcher, P. Greenland, L. F. Hiratzka, N. Houston-Miller, P. Kris-Etherton, H. M. Krumholz, J. LaRosa, et al.
Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: Guidance From Framingham : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the AHA Task Force on Risk Reduction
Circulation, May 19, 1998; 97(18): 1876 - 1887.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. I. Cleeman and S. M. Grundy
National Cholesterol Education Program Recommendations for Cholesterol Testing in Young Adults : A Science-Based Approach
Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1646 - 1650.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. C. LaRosa and T. A. Pearson
Cholesterol Screening Guidelines : Consensus, Evidence, and the Departure From Common Sense
Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1651 - 1653.
[Full Text]