(Circulation. 1996;94:1934-1940.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Importance of Pressure Recovery for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Doppler Ultrasound
Role of Aortic Size, Aortic Valve Area, and Direction of the Stenotic Jet In Vitro
the Department of Cardiology and the Center of Biomedical Research/Ludwig Boltzmann Research Institute of Cardiac Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Universitiy of Vienna, Austria.
Correspondence to Helmut Baumgartner, MD, Department of Cardiology, Vienna General Hospital, University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, A-1090 Wien, Austria.
Background Pressure recovery has been shown to occur distal to aortic stenoses in experimental and clinical studies. However, its clinical relevance in this setting has not yet been evaluated.
Methods and Results To address the hypothesis that pressure recovery can cause significant differences between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic stenosis and to examine the effects of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet on these differences, stenoses with valve areas from 0.5 to 1.25 cm2 and aortic diameters from 1.8 to 5.0 cm were studied in a pulsatile flow model. Jets entered the aorta centrally or eccentrically with angles of 15°, 30°, or 45°. Overall, good correlation was found between Doppler and catheter gradients. However, when the various combinations of orifices and aortas were analyzed separately, slopes varied from 1.0 to 1.86, and the Doppler-catheter gradient differences ranged from -2 (small valve area with a large aorta) to 66 mm Hg (80% overestimation by Doppler echocardiography) when the stenosis was moderate and the aorta was small. Mild eccentricity of the jet did not significantly alter the results. However, overestimation by Doppler decreased with increasing jet eccentricity. Finally, differences between Doppler and catheter gradients could be predicted by estimating pressure recovery from Doppler measurements.
Conclusions Significant pressure recovery can occur in aortic stenosis and can cause differences between Doppler and catheter gradients. These differences may reach clinical relevance, particularly when the stenosis is moderate and the aorta is small and can be predicted from Doppler measurements.
Key Words: echocardiography • hemodynamics • valves
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Mascherbauer, C. Fuchs, M. Stoiber, H. Schima, E. Pernicka, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro Eur. Heart J., May 22, 2008; (2008) ehn209v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Giardini and T. A. Tacy Non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients in regurgitant jets: an overdue consideration Eur J Echocardiogr, May 7, 2008; (2008) jen156v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Della Corte, C. Bancone, C. Quarto, G. Dialetto, F. E. Covino, M. Scardone, G. Caianiello, and M. Cotrufo Predictors of ascending aortic dilatation with bicuspid aortic valve: a wide spectrum of disease expression Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 397 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L Kadem, J G Dumesnil, R Rieu, L-G Durand, D Garcia, and P Pibarot Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis Heart, March 1, 2005; 91(3): 354 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. E. Richards, D. Deserranno, E. Donal, N. L. Greenberg, J. D. Thomas, and M. J. Garcia Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1410 - H1416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Garcia, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, L. Kadem, and P. Pibarot Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 435 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Levine and E. Schwammenthal Stenosis is in the eye of the observer: impact of pressure recovery on assessing aortic valve area J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 443 - 445. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gilon, E. G. Cape, M. D. Handschumacher, J.-K. Song, J. Solheim, M. VanAuker, M. E. E. King, and R. A. Levine Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: Three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1479 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1131 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. D. Maslow, J. M. Haering, S. Heindel, J. Mashikian, R. Levine, and P. Douglas An Evaluation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Using Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Double-Envelope Technique Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 509 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Garcia, P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, F. Sakr, and L.-G. Durand Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity : A New Index Based on the Energy Loss Concept Circulation, February 22, 2000; 101(7): 765 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. G. DeGroff, R. Shandas, and L. Valdes-Cruz Pressure recovery and aortic stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 260 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Baumgartner Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 260 - 261. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Isaaz The ratio of post-valvular aorta to valvular orifice cross-sectional areas: a new haemodynamic index of clinical importance in patients with aortic stenosis? Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1294 - 1296. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, K.K. Haase, and K.-R. Karsch Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Baumgartner, T. Stefenelli, J. Niederberger, H. Schima, and G. Maurer "overestimation" of catheter gradients by doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1655 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|