Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;94:882-890

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruygrok, P. N.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruygrok, P. N.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.

(Circulation. 1996;94:882-890.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Intracoronary Stenting

From Concept to Custom

Peter N. Ruygrok, MB, ChB, FRACP; Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD

the Catheterization Laboratory, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

Correspondence to Patrick W. Serruys, MD, Catheterization Laboratory, Thoraxcenter BD 432, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands.


Key Words: stents • angioplasty • atherosclerosis • coronary disease


*    Introduction
 
When Charles Stent, a 19th century English dentist, developed a mold with which to form an impression of the teeth and oral cavity, he would never have imagined that his name would become synonymous with the management of obstructive vascular disease, in particular coronary artery disease (Fig 1Down).1 The term "stent" became associated with a device that held a skin graft in position, a support for tubular structures that were being anastomosed, and, more recently, an endovascular scaffolding to relieve and prevent vascular obstructions.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Charles Stent (1845-1901), an English dentist who lent his name to a tooth mold (bottom) and more recently to endoluminal scaffolding devices.

The management of coronary atherosclerosis has shifted from "masterly inactivity" to medical therapy, coronary bypass surgery, and, more recently, percutaneous techniques introduced by Gruentzig et al in 1977.2 Intracoronary stenting with continuing refinements appears poised to become the mainstay of the mechanical treatment of obstructive coronary disease.


*    Preclinical Evaluation
 
In his 1912 Nobel lecture, laureate Alexis Carrel described experiments with glass and metal tubes covered with paraffin that were introduced into canine thoracic aortae. Coagulation did not occur provided the aortic wall was not ulcerated, with one animal surviving for 90 days with a glass tube. He concluded that the presence of foreign bodies within vessels did not necessarily produce thrombus.

The concept of using an implantable prosthetic device to maintain the luminal integrity of diseased vessels was reintroduced by Charles Dotter in 1964, when he suggested that the temporary use of a . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. T. Newsome, M. A. Kutcher, and R. L. Royster
Coronary Artery Stents: Part I. Evolution of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 552 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. W. O'Neill, P. Serruys, M. Knudtson, G.-A. van Es, G. C. Timmis, C. van der Zwaan, J. Kleiman, J. Gong, E. B. Roecker, R. Dreiling, et al.
Long-Term Treatment with a Platelet Glycoprotein-Receptor Antagonist after Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
N. Engl. J. Med., May 4, 2000; 342(18): 1316 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. N. Ruygrok, R. Melkert, M.-A. M. Morel, J. A. Ormiston, F. W. Bar, F. Fernandez-Aviles, H. Suryapranata, K. D. Dawkins, C. Hanet, P. W. Serruys, et al.
Does angiography six months after coronary intervention influence management and outcome?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1507 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]