Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;94:247-248

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. W.

(Circulation. 1996;94:247-248.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Should Fontan FenestrationsBe Closed With Coils?

John W. Moore, MD

the Division of Cardiology, Children's Heart Institute, Children's Hospital, San Diego, Calif.

Correspondence to John W.M. Moore, MD, Director, Cardiology, Children's Heart Institute, Children's Hospital–San Diego, San Diego, 3020 Children's Way, MC5004, San Diego, CA 92123-4282.


Key Words: Fontan procedure • catheterization • Editorials


*    Introduction
 
In this issue of Circulation, Sommer et al1 describe yet another use for Gianturco coils: closure of fenestrations placed in Fontan circuits. In 5 patients, they implanted coils with 8-mm helical diameters straddling 4-mm fenestrations. In 3 patients, there was immediate angiographic and echocardiographic closure, and in a fourth, echocardiographic closure was noted after 4 weeks. A small residual shunt persisted in the fifth patient. Among the 4 who had complete closure, oxygen saturation increased an average of 9% and tissue oxygen delivery decreased 12%. Sommer et al suggest that coil occlusion of fenestrations may be preferable both to no intervention and to occlusion with experimental septal occluders. They note that most pediatric centers have expertise with coils and therefore conclude that transcatheter closure of fenestrations should now be widely available.

Certainly, Sommer et al have demonstrated that coil occlusion of small fenestrations may be technically feasible. What they have not elucidated, however, are the more important issues: should closure of such fenestrations be performed at all, and if so, is it safe to use Gianturco coils for this purpose?

As background, it is worthwhile to note that a considerable percentage of small fenestrations close spontaneously. In Sommer's series, 4 of 14 patients had spontaneous closure. It is also interesting to discover the occasional patient who after closure of a fenestration with a septal occluder has required repeated placement of a fenestration (J.E. Locke, unpublished data, 1996). Thus, it may be prudent to pause and consider whether patients who require . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
A Gamillscheg, A Beitzke, J I Stein, M Rupitz, G Zobel, and B Rigler
Transcatheter coil occlusion of residual interatrial communications after Fontan procedure
Heart, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 49 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text]