(Circulation. 1995;92:304-308.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the State University of New York-Health Science Center, Syracuse, NY.
Correspondence to Rae-Ellen W. Kavey, MD, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, SUNY-Health Science Center, 725 Irving Ave, Room 804, Syracuse, NY 13210.
Background Total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) to repair functional single ventricle involves the sinus node area, in contrast to the Fontan procedure. We compared ECG findings after TCPC and Fontan to evaluate the impact of the cavopulmonary connection on sinus rhythm postoperatively.
Methods and Results The Fontan group consisted of 17 patients
repaired at 7.8±3.1 years of age (mean±SD): 11 for tricuspid or
pulmonary atresia (TA/PA) and 6 for single ventricle. The TCPC
group consisted of 19 patients repaired at 5.1±3.2 years of age
(mean±SD) (P<.001): 9 for TA/PA, 4 for single ventricle,
and 6 for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Mean follow-up after
Fontan was 7.7±2.7 years versus 2.8±1.6 years for TCPC
(P<.001). Preoperative ECGs on all TCPC patients showed
sinus rhythm (SR), whereas 16 of 17 Fontan patients had SR and one had
nonsinus atrial rhythm (NSAR) since birth. On the first postdischarge
ECG, 12 of 19 TCPC patients (63%) were in SR, 4 were in junctional
rhythm (JR), and 3 were in NSAR. In comparison, 15 of 17 Fontan
patients (88%) were in SR with 1 of 17 in NSAR and 1 in
supraventricular tachycardia (P<.05
with
2 test). By 2 years postoperatively, only 6
of 15 TCPC patients available for follow-up (40%) were in SR, with
7 of 15 in JR and 2 of 15 in NSAR. By contrast, 13 of 17 Fontan
patients (76%) remained in SR, with 1 in NSAR and 3 in JR
(P<.05 with
2 test). TCPC patients
with loss of SR did not differ from other patients in the group in age
at repair, preoperative diagnosis, or surgeon performing the
procedure.
Conclusions This significant incidence of loss of SR temporally related to surgery suggests that operative compromise of the sinus node area is common with TCPC.
Key Words: Fontan procedure electrocardiography surgery sinoatrial node
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. H. Nurnberg, S. Ovroutski, V. Alexi-Meskishvili, P. Ewert, R. Hetzer, and Peter. E. Lange New Onset Arrhythmias After the Extracardiac Conduit Fontan Operation Compared With the Intraatrial Lateral Tunnel Procedure: Early and Midterm Results Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 78(6): 1979 - 1988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Woods, U. Dyamenahalli, B. W. Duncan, G. L. Rosenthal, and F. M. Lupinetti Comparison of extracardiac Fontan techniques: Pedicled pericardial tunnel versus conduit reconstruction J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2003; 125(3): 465 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.S. Haas, H. Hess, M. Black, J. Onnasch, F.W. Mohr, and J.A.M. van Son Extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure: early and intermediate results Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 17(6): 648 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Balling, M. Vogt, H. Kaemmerer, A. Eicken, H. Meisner, and J. Hess INTRACARDIAC THROMBUS FORMATION AFTER THE FONTAN OPERATION J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2000; 119(4): 745 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |