Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:632-636

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, N. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gardin, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, N. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gardin, J. M.

(Circulation. 1995;92:632-636.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Coronary Artery Screening by Electron Beam Computed Tomography

Facts, Controversy, and Future

Nathan D. Wong, PhD; Robert C. Detrano, MD, PhD; David Abrahamson, MD; Jonathan M. Tobis, MD; Julius M. Gardin, MD

From the Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, and the St Johns Cardiovascular Research Center, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.

Correspondence to Dr Nathan D. Wong, Preventive Cardiology Program, C240 Medical Sciences I, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • coronary disease • tomography • calcium


*    Introduction
 
There are two things: science and opinion; the first leads to knowledge, the second to ignorance. Hippocrates

There has been a dramatic increase in the use of electron beam computed tomography to screen for coronary calcium phosphate deposits. This radiographic procedure, available at increasingly numerous centers in the United States and abroad, can detect small amounts of these deposits. The test costs about $400 (technical fee, including professional interpretation), takes 15 minutes to perform, involves little radiation (similar to that of a barium enema or chest radiograph series), and is noninvasive, not requiring injections or drugs to perform the procedure and obtain results.

Advocates of universal coronary calcium screening state that since coronary calcium signifies atherosclerosis, a potentially deadly disease, its detection is important, and a positive screen is reason for aggressive management of risk factors or even further evaluation with exercise testing or angiography. They argue that asymptomatic persons whose coronary status is unknown would benefit from the test, since those with positive scans can be treated more aggressively than those with negative scans and thereby be prevented from suffering myocardial infarctions or cardiac death.

Others are not as convinced regarding the value of this new procedure. A recent science advisory published by the American Heart Association1 concluded that the "clinical use of ultrafast computed tomographic imaging to screen patients for coronary artery disease is not justified at this time." Major reasons given were (1) the lack of a precise correlation between the degree of atherosclerosis and coronary calcium . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. J. Pletcher, J. A. Tice, M. Pignone, and W. S. Browner
Using the Coronary Artery Calcium Score to Predict Coronary Heart Disease Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Arch Intern Med, June 28, 2004; 164(12): 1285 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. Schurgin, S. Rich, and T. Mazzone
Increased Prevalence of Significant Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients With Diabetes
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2001; 24(2): 335 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Raggi, T. Q. Callister, B. Cooil, Z.-X. He, N. J. Lippolis, D. J. Russo, A. Zelinger, and J. J. Mahmarian
Identification of Patients at Increased Risk of First Unheralded Acute Myocardial Infarction by Electron-Beam Computed Tomography
Circulation, February 29, 2000; 101(8): 850 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. G. Hundley, C. A. Hamilton, G. D. Clarke, L. D. Hillis, D. M. Herrington, R. A. Lange, R. J. Applegate, M. S. Thomas, J. Payne, K. M. Link, et al.
Visualization and Functional Assessment of Proximal and Middle Left Anterior Descending Coronary Stenoses in Humans With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Circulation, June 29, 1999; 99(25): 3248 - 3254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. F Muldoon and M. H Criqui
The emerging role of statins in the prevention of coronary heart disease
BMJ, December 13, 1997; 315(7122): 1554 - 1555.
[Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Schmermund, D. Baumgart, G. Gorge, R. Seibel, D. Gronemeyer, J. Ge, M. Haude, J. Rumberger, and R. Erbel
Coronary Artery Calcium in Acute Coronary Syndromes : A Comparative Study of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography, Coronary Angiography, and Intracoronary Ultrasound in Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Unstable Angina
Circulation, September 2, 1997; 96(5): 1461 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. Wexler, B. Brundage, J. Crouse, R. Detrano, V. Fuster, J. Maddahi, J. Rumberger, W. Stanford, R. White, and K. Taubert
Coronary Artery Calcification: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Imaging Methods, and Clinical Implications: A Statement for Health Professionals From the American Heart Association
Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 1175 - 1192.
[Full Text]