(Circulation. 1995;92:3490-3496.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Prediction of Atrioventricular Block During Radiofrequency Ablation of the Slow Pathway of the Atrioventricular Node
Presented in part at the 16th Annual Scientific Sessions of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Boston, Mass, May 3-6, 1995, and the 17th Congress of the European Society of Cardiology, Amsterdam, Netherlands, August 20-24, 1995.
From St George's Hospital and St Mary's Hospital (D.W.D.), London, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Florian Hintringer, Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen, Fadingerstr 1, A-4010 Linz, Austria.
Background Selective radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway is an effective treatment for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry tachycardia. A previous report showed that rapid junctional tachycardia (JT) caused by RF associated with loss of ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction is related to increased risk for AV block. However, this can be difficult to detect during energy delivery, and more importantly, it cannot be measured before the onset of RF energy delivery. The aim of our study was to determine whether measurements made from electrograms could be used to predict the risk of AV block before RF energy is delivered.
Methods and Results Fifty-eight patients underwent 63 selective slow pathway RF ablation procedures. In 46 (26.9%) of 172 JTs caused by RF, VA block was observed, and in 11 this was followed by AV block of various degrees. Electrograms before each application of RF were analyzed for the interval between the atrial signals in the His bundle catheter and in the distal mapping catheter [A(H)-A(Md)], the interval between the atrial signals in the His bundle catheter and in the proximal coronary sinus catheter [A(H)-A(CS)], the AV ratio, and the presence of a slow pathway potential or a fractionated atrial signal in the distal mapping catheter. Mean cycle length (CL) of JT was calculated if it consisted of at least 10 beats. These parameters were compared between patients with JT who developed VA block and subsequent AV block (group 1), patients with JT and VA block but without subsequent AV block (group 2), and patients with JT without VA block (group 3). The A(H)-A(Md) interval was significantly shorter in group 1 (17±8 ms) than in groups 2 (33±8 ms, P<.001) and 3 (32±10 ms, P<.001), whereas the A(H)-A(Md) intervals of groups 2 and 3 did not differ from each other. CL of JT, A(H)-A(CS) interval, AV ratio, presence of a slow pathway potential, or a fractionated atrial electrogram were not related to the occurrence of AV block.
Conclusions The A(H)-A(Md) interval provides an electrophysiological marker that can be used in addition to the radiological catheter position to assess the risk for AV block before onset of RF delivery. CL of JT and occurrence of VA block are not related to the risk of AV block.
Key Words: atrioventricular node • catheter ablation • electrophysiology • tachycardia
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. Fujiki, T. Sakamoto, M. Sakabe, T. Tsuneda, M. Sugao, Y. Nakatani, K. Mizumaki, and H. Inoue Junctional rhythm associated with ventriculoatrial block during slow pathway ablation in atypical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia Europace, June 9, 2008; (2008) eun151v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J-L Lin, S K S Huang, L-P Lai, L-J Lin, J-H Chen, Y-Z Tseng, and W-P Lien Distal end of the atrioventricular nodal artery predicts the risk of atrioventricular block during slow pathway catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia Heart, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 543 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Duru, U. Bauersfeld, and R. Candinas Autonomic effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 181 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G.P. Kimman, N.M. van Hemel, E.R. Jessurun, P.F.H.M. van Dessel, J.C. Kelder, J.J.A.M.T. Defauw, and G.M. Guiraudon Comparison of late results of surgical or radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia Eur. Heart J., April 1, 1999; 20(7): 527 - 534. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F GAITA, R RICCARDI, and L CALO Importance and implications of the occurrence of AV block following radiofrequency ablation Heart, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 534 - 535. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O Elhag and H C Miller Atrioventricular block occurring several months after radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia Heart, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 616 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. G. Fisher, M. A. Pelini, and M. E. Bacon Adjunctive Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Slow Pathway Ablation in Human Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia : Anatomic Insights Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 3021 - 3029. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|