Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1994;90:101-107

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sogaard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Thygesen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sogaard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Thygesen, K.

Circulation, Vol 90, 101-107, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Ventricular arrhythmias in the acute and chronic phases after acute myocardial infarction. Effect of intervention with captopril

P Sogaard, CO Gotzsche, J Ravkilde, A Norgaard and K Thygesen
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are independent predictors of mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), and they are more likely to be induced in dilated hearts with increased wall stress. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to prevent progressive dilation of the left ventricle after MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effects of captopril were evaluated in 58 patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after MI. Patients were randomized on day 7 to either placebo or captopril (50 mg daily) in a double-blind parallel study over a period of 6 months. Patients were followed up by means of ambulatory ECG monitoring and echocardiography. There was a significant increase in VA in the placebo group (P < .05) in contrast to a significant decrease in the captopril group (P < .05). As a consequence, there was a significant between-group difference after 6 months (P < .05). Furthermore, the number of patients without VA at baseline who presented with this at the completion of the study was 6% in the captopril group versus 38% in the placebo group (P < .05). At baseline as well as at the termination of the study, LV end- diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) were significantly increased among patients with VA (P < .01). On day 180, both myocardial ischemia and an increase in the LVEDVI were independent predictors of VA; however, progressive dilation of the left ventricle was confined to the placebo patients with significant increases in the LVEDVI compared with the captopril group: 17% versus 0%, respectively (P < .01). Furthermore, the duration of ambulatory ST- segment depression was significantly longer in this group compared with the captopril group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Dilation of the left ventricle and myocardial ischemia predict VA during both the acute and chronic phases after MI. In post-MI patients with LV dysfunction, captopril has a beneficial effect on both the number of complex VAs as well as the number of patients who develop VA during the chronic phase. This is in all probability mediated through effects on both LV remodeling, LV function, and myocardial ischemia in patients who are exposed to an increased risk of undergoing progressive dilation of the left ventricle.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
O. A. Centurion
The Open Artery Hypothesis: Beneficial Effects and Long-term Prognostic Importance of Patency of the Infarct-Related Coronary Artery
Angiology, February 1, 2007; 58(1): 34 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. R. Ehrlich, S. H. Hohnloser, and S. Nattel
Role of angiotensin system and effects of its inhibition in atrial fibrillation: clinical and experimental evidence
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2006; 27(5): 512 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
S. H. Hohnloser
Ventricular Arrhythmias: Antiadrenergic Therapy for the Patient with Coronary Artery Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, October 1, 2005; 10(4_suppl): S23 - S31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Bogun, S. Krishnan, M. Siddiqui, E. Good, J. E. Marine, C. Schuger, H. Oral, A. Chugh, F. Pelosi, and F. Morady
Electrogram Characteristics in Postinfarction Ventricular Tachycardia: Effect of Infarct Age
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2005; 46(4): 667 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. McMurray, L. Kober, M. Robertson, H. Dargie, W. Colucci, J. Lopez-Sendon, W. Remme, D. N. Sharpe, and I. Ford
Antiarrhythmic effect of carvedilol after acute myocardial infarction: Results of the Carvedilol Post-Infarct Survival Control in Left Ventricular Dysfunction (CAPRICORN) trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 15, 2005; 45(4): 525 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
O. D. Pedersen, H. Bagger, L. Kober, and C. Torp-Pedersen
Trandolapril Reduces the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Circulation, July 27, 1999; 100(4): 376 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. H. Newby, T. Thompson, A. Stebbins, E. J. Topol, R. M. Califf, and A. Natale
Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients Receiving Thrombolytic Therapy : Incidence and Outcomes
Circulation, December 8, 1998; 98(23): 2567 - 2573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. G. Stevenson and P. M. Ridker
Should Survivors of Myocardial Infarction With Low Ejection Fraction Be Routinely Referred to Arrhythmia Specialists?
JAMA, August 14, 1996; 276(6): 481 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]