This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swartz, J. F. Articles by Karasik, P. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swartz, J. F. Articles by Karasik, P. E.

Circulation, Vol 88, 2646-2654, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Optimization of biphasic waveforms for human nonthoracotomy defibrillation

JF Swartz, RD Fletcher and PE Karasik
Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Md.

BACKGROUND. Biphasic waveforms reduce defibrillation threshold (DFT) in a wide variety of models. Although there are several human studies of long-duration, high-tilt biphasic waveform defibrillation, the specific biphasic waveform shape required to achieve optimal DFT reduction is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS. This study tested the effect of single capacitor biphasic waveform tilt modification on DFT using a paired study design in 18 patients undergoing nonthoracotomy defibrillator implantation. Baseline DFT was obtained using a 65% tilt, simultaneous pulse, bidirectional monophasic shock from a right ventricular cathode to a coronary sinus or superior vena cava lead and a subscapular patch. The single-capacitor biphasic waveform shocks, delivered over the same pathways, consisted of either both phases at 65% tilt (65/65 biphasic waveform) to produce an overall tilt of 88% and a delivered energy 11% greater than monophasic shock or both phases at 42% tilt (42/42 biphasic waveform) to produce an overall tilt of 66% and delivered energy equal to monophasic shock. The 65/65 biphasic waveform reduced stored energy DFT 25%, from 16.2 +/- 4.4 J with monophasic shock to 12.1 +/- 5.3 J (P < .02); however, it did not significantly reduce the delivered energy DFT. In contrast, the 42/42 biphasic waveform required 49% less stored energy (16.2 +/- 4.4 J, monophasic shock, vs 8.3 +/- 3.3 J, biphasic waveform; P < .001) and 49% less delivered energy (14.2 +/- 3.8 J, monophasic shock, vs 7.3 +/- 2.9 J, biphasic waveform; P < .001) than monophasic shock for successful defibrillation. The 42/42 biphasic waveform delivered energy DFT was 4.6 +/- 5.2 J (39%) less than 65/65 biphasic waveform DFT (P < .002). CONCLUSIONS. DFT reduction is an inherent electrophysiological property of biphasic waveforms that is independent of delivered energy. Overall biphasic waveform tilt and the relative amplitudes of the waveform phases are important factors in defibrillation efficacy. Defibrillation with a 42/42 biphasic waveform is more efficacious than 65/65 biphasic waveform defibrillation; however, the optimal biphasic waveform remains unknown.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K Kajino, T Iwami, R A Berg, A Hiraide, Y Hayashi, H Yukioka, H Tanaka, T Shimazu, and H Sugimoto Comparison of neurological outcomes following witnessed out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation defibrillated with either biphasic or monophasic automated external defibrillators Emerg. Med. J., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 492 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Marenco, P. J. Wang, M. S. Link, M. K. Homoud, and N. A. M. Estes III Improving Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest: The Role of the Automated External Defibrillator JAMA, March 7, 2001; 285(9): 1193 - 1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Brugada, B. Herse, B. Sandsted, U. Michel, B. D. Schubert, and S. J. Hahn Clinical evaluation of defibrillation efficacy with a new single-capacitor biphasic waveform in patients undergoing implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(4): 278 - 284. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Shorofsky and M. R. Gold Effect of Second-Phase Duration on the Strength-Duration Relation for Human Transvenous Defibrillation Circulation, October 31, 2000; 102(18): 2239 - 2242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Zhou, W. M. Smith, R. K. Justice, J. L. Wayland, and R. E. Ideker Transmembrane potential changes caused by monophasic and biphasic shocks Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1998; 275(5): H1798 - H1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G W N Dalzell Determinants of successful defibrillation Heart, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 405 - 407. [Full Text]

				J. J. Sims, A. W. Miller, and M. R. Ujhelyi Disparate effects of biphasic and monophasic shocks on postshock refractory period dispersion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 1998; 274(6): H1943 - H1949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Schauerte, F. A. Schondube, M. Grossmann, H. Dorge, F. Stein, B. Dohmen, A. Moumen, K. Erena, B. J. Messmer, P. Hanrath, et al. Influence of Phase Duration of Biphasic Waveforms on Defibrillation Energy Requirements With a 70-µF Capacitance Circulation, May 26, 1998; 97(20): 2073 - 2078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Gold and S. R. Shorofsky Strength-Duration Relationship for Human Transvenous Defibrillation Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3517 - 3520. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. Tomassoni, K. Newby, S. Deshpande, K. Axtell, J. Sra, M. Akhtar, and A. Natale Defibrillation Efficacy of Commercially Available Biphasic Impulses in Humans : Importance of Negative-Phase Peak Voltage Circulation, April 1, 1997; 95(7): 1822 - 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Pacifico, K. R. Wheelan, N. Nasir, P. J. Wells, T. K. Doyle, S. A. Johnson, and P. D. Henry Long-term Follow-up of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implanted Under Conscious Sedation in Prepectoral Subfascial Position Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 946 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. H. Bardy, F. E. Marchlinski, A. D. Sharma, S. J. Worley, R. M. Luceri, R. Yee, B. D. Halperin, C. L. Fellows, T. S. Ahern, D. A. Chilson, et al. Multicenter Comparison of Truncated Biphasic Shocks and Standard Damped Sine Wave Monophasic Shocks for Transthoracic Ventricular Defibrillation Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2507 - 2514. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Behrens, C. Li, P. Kirchhof, F. L. Fabritz, and M. R. Franz Reduced Arrhythmogenicity of Biphasic Versus Monophasic T-Wave Shocks: Implications for Defibrillation Efficacy Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1974 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. E. Gliner, T. E. Lyster, S. M. Dillion, and G. H. Bardy Transthoracic Defibrillation of Swine With Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1634 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				O. H. Tovar and J. L. Jones Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms Reduce Shock-Induced Response Duration Dispersion Between Low and High Shock Intensities Circ. Res., August 1, 1995; 77(2): 430 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. H. Bardy, B. E. Gliner, P. J. Kudenchuk, J. E. Poole, G. L. Dolack, G. K. Jones, J. Anderson, C. Troutman, and G. Johnson Truncated Biphasic Pulses for Transthoracic Defibrillation Circulation, March 15, 1995; 91(6): 1768 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. H. Bardy, J. E. Poole, P. J. Kudenchuk, G. L. Dolack, R. Mehra, P. DeGroot, M. H. Raitt, G. K. Jones, and G. Johnson A Prospective Randomized Comparison in Humans of Biphasic Waveform 60-µF and 120-µF Capacitance Pulses Using A Unipolar Defibrillation System Circulation, January 1, 1995; 91(1): 91 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text]