This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jung, W. Articles by Luderitz, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jung, W. Articles by Luderitz, B.

Circulation, Vol 86, 1217-1222, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Failure of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to redetect ventricular fibrillation in patients with a nonthoracotomy lead system

W Jung, M Manz, R Moosdorf and B Luderitz
Department of Cardiology, University of Bonn, Germany.

BACKGROUND. Shock delivery of an implantable defibrillator may cause a change in the amplitude of endocardial electrograms and impair the detection of ventricular fibrillation. Thus, the effects of shock discharges on the amplitude of endocardial electrograms were evaluated in five patients undergoing implantation of a cardioverter- defibrillator in combination with a new nonthoracotomy lead system. METHODS AND RESULTS. At implant, bipolar endocardial electrograms were recorded before each shock application, during ventricular fibrillation, during redetection of ventricular fibrillation in case the applied shock was ineffective, and at intervals of 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, and 120 seconds after each shock delivery. The amplitude of the endocardial electrograms decreased from 10.5 +/- 3.8 mV during sinus rhythm to 6.3 +/- 1.9 mV during initial ventricular fibrillation and declined to 2.2 +/- 1.3 mV during redetection of ventricular fibrillation. After successful termination, the following bipolar electrograms could be obtained at the predetermined intervals: 1.9 +/- 1.2 mV, 3.1 +/- 1.8 mV, 4.5 +/- 1.9 mV, 6.5 +/- 2.9 mV, 9.5 +/- 3.3 mV, and 10.4 +/- 3.8 mV. At predischarge testing, failure of redetection of ventricular fibrillation could be documented in two patients, requiring rescue external defibrillation in both cases to restore sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS. These findings demonstrate that the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator did not ensure reliable redetection of ventricular fibrillation in patients using the implanted nonthoracotomy lead system. Thus, the potential risk of sudden cardiac death may persist in these patients despite defibrillator therapy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. D. Swerdlow Implantation of Cardioverter Defibrillators Without Induction of Ventricular Fibrillation Circulation, May 1, 2001; 103(17): 2159 - 2164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Pires, M. H. Lehmann, R. T. Steinman, J. J. Baga, C. D. Schuger, and Participating Investigators Sudden death in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: clinical context, arrhythmic events and device responses J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 24 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Epstein, G. N. Kay, V. J. Plumb, S. M. Dailey, and P. G. Anderson Gross and Microscopic Pathological Changes Associated With Nonthoracotomy Implantable Defibrillator Leads Circulation, October 13, 1998; 98(15): 1517 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Natale, J. Sra, K. Axtell, M. Akhtar, K. Newby, V. Kent, M. J. Geiger, M. J. Brandon, M. M. Kearney, and A. Pacifico Undetected Ventricular Fibrillation in Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators : Prospective Comparison of Different Lead System–Device Combinations Circulation, January 1, 1996; 93(1): 91 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. U. Alt, P. C. Fotuhi, R. L. Callihan, E. Mestre, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker Endocardial Carbon-Braid Electrodes : A New Concept for Lower Defibrillation Thresholds Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1627 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. S. Manolis Transvenous Endocardial Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems: Is the Future Here? Arch Intern Med, March 28, 1994; 154(6): 617 - 622. [Abstract] [PDF]