Circulation, Vol 86, 812-819, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association
HC Herrmann, M Buchbinder, MW Clemen, D Fischman, S Goldberg, MB Leon, RA Schatz, P Tierstein, CM Walker and JW Hirshfeld Jr
BACKGROUND. The balloon-expandable intracoronary stent developed by Palmaz
and Schatz is undergoing clinical evaluation for use in unfavorable
anatomic situations and in the prevention of restenosis. Because the
stent's mechanism of action would suggest effectiveness in salvaging
certain percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) failures, we
retrospectively examined the results of emergency unplanned coronary artery
stenting for failed PTCA procedures, including acute occlusion. METHODS AND
RESULTS. The study population consisted of all US patients receiving
emergency unplanned stent implantation in a nonrandomized fashion at seven
centers over a 2 1/2- year period (n = 56). All available medical records
and angiograms were reviewed to determine retrospectively the reason for
stenting: Group 1 consisted of 23 patients with a suboptimal angioplasty
result; group 2 included patients with evidence of impending vessel closure
after PTCA (n = 15); and group 3 were patients with frank acute occlusion
after PTCA (n = 18). The immediate and final (30-day) results of stenting
were examined with respect to major complications, which included death,
need for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and occurrence of myocardial
infarction. Finally, restenosis rates (greater than or equal to 50%
stenosis) based on follow-up angiography were calculated. Baseline
characteristics of the study population included a mean +/- SD age of 58
+/- 11 years and a large prevalence of angiographic characteristics
generally considered unfavorable for PTCA, which include lesion
eccentricity (49%), intimal dissection (9%), or angiographically visible
thrombus (6%). After conventional balloon angioplasty, there was an
increased incidence of intimal dissection (74%) and thrombus formation
(38%), and overall stenosis severity was unchanged (75 +/- 12% versus 70
+/- 27%, p = NS). Successful stent deployment was achieved in 55 (98%) of
56 patients with initial success (freedom from death, surgery, and
infarction) in 52 (93%) of 56 patients. The success rate at 1 month fell to
71% primarily because of the occurrence of subacute stent thrombosis (16%)
and its associated complications. Overall, major complications occurred in
16 (29%) of 56 patients within 30 days. The only predictor of subacute
stent thrombosis in multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis was the
presence of angiographically visible thrombus after stenting (p = 0.03).
Angiographic restenosis was documented in eight (23%) of 35 eligible
patients. CONCLUSIONS. Emergency stenting may be a useful and effective
treatment for failed angioplasty. High initial success rates (greater than
90%) can be achieved, but subsequent complications, often related to
subacute thrombosis, occur in a substantial portion of patients. Patients
who receive stents on an emergency basis, particularly those with previous
acute occlusion, should be considered to be at greater than usual risk for
complications and receive more careful anticoagulation and follow-up.
ARTICLES
Emergent use of balloon-expandable coronary artery stenting for failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Inoue, T. Uchida, I. Yaguchi, Y. Sakai, K. Takayanagi, and S. Morooka Stent-Induced Expression and Activation of the Leukocyte Integrin Mac-1 Is Associated With Neointimal Thickening and Restenosis Circulation, April 8, 2003; 107(13): 1757 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colombo, G. Stankovic, and J. W. Moses Selection of coronary stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1021 - 1033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Johansson, H. Olsson, and B. Wennerblom Angiography-Guided Routine Coronary Stent Implantation Results in Suboptimal Dilatation Angiology, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 69 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Pump, S. Möhlenkamp, C. A. Sehnert, S. S. Schimpf, A. Schmidt, R. Erbel, D. H. W. Grönemeyer, and R. M. M. Seibel Coronary Arterial Stent Patency: Assessment with Electron-Beam CT Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 447 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Malenka, P. D. McGrath, D. E. Wennberg, T. J. Ryan Jr., M. A. Kellett Jr, S. J. Shubrooks Jr., W. A. Bradley, B. D. Hettlemen, J. F. Robb, M. J. Hearne, et al. The relationship between operator volume and outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in high volume hospitals in 1994-1996: The northern New England experience J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1471 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D Fonger Integrated myocardial revascularization Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 16(suppl_2): S12 - S17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Windecker, W. Maier-Rudolph, T. Bonzel, G. Heyndrickx, J.M. Lablanche, M.C. Morice, V. Muhlberger, K.L. Neuhaus, F. Piscione, M. van den Brand, et al. Interventional cardiology in Europe 1995 Eur. Heart J., April 1, 1999; 20(7): 484 - 495. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P B M Clarkson, M Halim, K K Ray, S Doshi, M Been, H Singh, and M F Shiu Coronary artery stenting in unstable angina pectoris: a comparison with stable angina pectoris Heart, April 1, 1999; 81(4): 393 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Urban, C. Macaya, H.-J. Rupprecht, F. Kiemeneij, H. Emanuelsson, A. Fontanelli, M. Pieper, T. Wesseling, L. Sagnard, and f. t. M. Investigators Randomized Evaluation of Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stent Implantation in High-Risk Patients : The Multicenter Aspirin and Ticlopidine Trial after Intracoronary Stenting (MATTIS) Circulation, November 17, 1998; 98(20): 2126 - 2132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Bertrand, V. Legrand, J. Boland, E. Fleck, J. Bonnier, H. Emmanuelson, M. Vrolix, L. Missault, S. Chierchia, M. Casaccia, et al. Randomized Multicenter Comparison of Conventional Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy in Unplanned and Elective Coronary Stenting : The Full Anticoagulation Versus Aspirin and Ticlopidine (FANTASTIC) Study Circulation, October 20, 1998; 98(16): 1597 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Komatsu, M. Ueda, T. Naruko, A. Kojima, and A. E. Becker Neointimal Tissue Response at Sites of Coronary Stenting in Humans : Macroscopic, Histological, and Immunohistochemical Analyses Circulation, July 21, 1998; 98(3): 224 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rubartelli, L. Niccoli, E. Verna, C. Giachero, M. Zimarino, A. Fontanelli, C. Vassanelli, L. Campolo, E. Martuscelli, G. Tommasini, et al. Stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty in chronic coronary occlusions: results from the GISSOC trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1998; 32(1): 90 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Narins, D. R. Holmes Jr, and E. J. Topol A Call for Provisional Stenting : The Balloon Is Back! Circulation, April 7, 1998; 97(13): 1298 - 1305. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Baker JR Thrombosis and Hemostasis in Cardiology: Review of Pathophysiology and Clinical Practice (Part I) Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, January 1, 1998; 4(1): 51 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chauhan, E. Vu, D. R Ricci, C. E Buller, M. D Moscovich, S. Monkman, and I. M Penn Early and intermediate term clinical outcome after multiple coronary stenting Heart, January 1, 1998; 79(1): 29 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Karrillon, M. C. Morice, E. Benveniste, P. Bunouf, P. Aubry, S. Cattan, B. Chevalier, P. Commeau, A. Cribier, C. Eiferman, et al. Intracoronary Stent Implantation Without Ultrasound Guidance and With Replacement of Conventional Anticoagulation by Antiplatelet Therapy: 30-Day Clinical Outcome of the French Multicenter Registry Circulation, October 1, 1996; 94(7): 1519 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sheth, F. Litvack, V. Dev, M. C. Fishbein, J. S. Forrester, and N. Eigler Subacute Thrombosis and Vascular Injury Resulting From Slotted-Tube Nitinol and Stainless Steel Stents in a Rabbit Carotid Artery Model Circulation, October 1, 1996; 94(7): 1733 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. N. Ruygrok and P. W. Serruys Intracoronary Stenting: From Concept to Custom Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 882 - 890. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gawaz, F.-J. Neumann, I. Ott, A. May, and A. Schomig Platelet Activation and Coronary Stent Implantation: Effect of Antithrombotic Therapy Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 279 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Haude, G. Caspari, D. Baumgart, R. Brennecke, J. Meyer, and R. Erbel Comparison of Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Before and After Coronary Balloon Predilatation and After Stent Implantation in Patients With Postangioplasty Restenosis Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 286 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ozaki, D. Keane, P. Ruygrok, W. J. van der Giessen, P. de Feyter, and P. W. Serruys Six-Month Clinical and Angiographic Outcome of the New, Less Shortening Wallstent in Native Coronary Arteries Circulation, June 15, 1996; 93(12): 2114 - 2120. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Goods, K. F. Al-Shaibi, S. S. Yadav, M. W. Liu, B. H. Negus, S. S. Iyer, L. S. Dean, S. P. Jain, W. A. Baxley, J. M. Parks, et al. Utilization of the Coronary Balloon-Expandable Coil Stent Without Anticoagulation or Intravascular Ultrasound Circulation, May 15, 1996; 93(10): 1803 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kimura, H. Yokoi, Y. Nakagawa, T. Tamura, S. Kaburagi, Y. Sawada, Y. Sato, H. Yokoi, N. Hamasaki, H. Nosaka, et al. Three-Year Follow-Up after Implantation of Metallic Coronary-Artery Stents N. Engl. J. Med., February 29, 1996; 334(9): 561 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hall, S. Nakamura, L. Maiello, A. Itoh, S. Blengino, G. Martini, M. Ferraro, and A. Colombo A Randomized Comparison of Combined Ticlopidine and Aspirin Therapy Versus Aspirin Therapy Alone After Successful Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Stent Implantation Circulation, January 15, 1996; 93(2): 215 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colombo, P. Hall, S. Nakamura, Y. Almagor, L. Maiello, G. Martini, A. Gaglione, S. L. Goldberg, and J. M. Tobis Intracoronary Stenting Without Anticoagulation Accomplished With Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance Circulation, March 15, 1995; 91(6): 1676 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1992 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |