Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1990;82:798-807

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taniguchi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuda, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taniguchi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuda, H.

Circulation, Vol 82, 798-807, Copyright © 1990 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Left ventricular ejection performance, wall stress, and contractile state in aortic regurgitation before and after aortic valve replacement

K Taniguchi, S Nakano, Y Kawashima, K Sakai, T Kawamoto, S Sakaki, J Kobayashi, S Morimoto and H Matsuda
First Department of Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, Japan.

Left ventricular ejection performance, wall stress, and contractile state were evaluated in 35 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Cineangiography and pressure measurements were obtained before and a mean of 26 months after aortic valve replacement, and data were compared with those from 30 normal control subjects. The relation between quantitative changes in wall stress and changes in ejection fraction after surgery was determined. Preoperatively, end-systolic stress was elevated in patients with aortic regurgitation (218 +/- 45 vs. 160 +/- 23 kdynes/cm2 [mean +/- SD] for control subjects, p less than 0.01), and ejection fraction was depressed (0.46 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.65 +/- 0.05, p less than 0.01). End-systolic stress decreased postoperatively (151 +/- 41 kdynes/cm2, p less than 0.01) and ejection fraction increased (0.58 +/- 0.11, p less than 0.01). The magnitude of increase in ejection fraction correlated significantly and negatively (r = -0.65) with the quantitative change in end-systolic stress after surgery. Contractile function, as assessed by the ejection phase index- end-systolic stress relation, did not significantly change: 23 of 35 patients preoperatively and 18 of 35 patients postoperatively had values that clearly fell below the 95% confidence limit of the ejection fraction-end-systolic stress relation for controls. After surgery, individual ejection fraction-end-systolic stress relationships demonstrated a shift parallel to the regression curve for the control subjects. Moreover, persistent postoperative left ventricular hypertrophy was significantly associated with persistent contractile dysfunction. Thus, late improvement in left ventricular ejection performance after aortic valve replacement can be attributed to the reduction in end-systolic stress. Contractile function itself was not improved by surgery. Persistent postoperative hypertrophy may be a marker for myocardial contractile dysfunction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular MedicineHome page
A. Vahanian, B. Iung, L. Piérard, R. Dion, and J. Pepper
CHAPTER 21 Valvular Heart Disease
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K. Taniguchi, T. Takahashi, K. Toda, H. Matsue, Y. Shudo, H. Shintani, M. Mitsuno, and Y. Sawa
Left ventricular mass: impact on left ventricular contractile function and its reversibility in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 32(4): 588 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. A. Grayburn
Improved Surgical Outcome for Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation With Severely Depressed Left Ventricular Systolic Function
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2007; 49(13): 1472 - 1473.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. A. Carabello
Vasodilators in aortic regurgitation--where is the evidence of their effectiveness?
N. Engl. J. Med., September 29, 2005; 353(13): 1400 - 1402.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Bekeredjian and P. A. Grayburn
Valvular Heart Disease: Aortic Regurgitation
Circulation, July 5, 2005; 112(1): 125 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. A. Carabello
Is it ever too late to operate on the patient with valvular heart disease?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 376 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. L. Yun, C. F. Sintek, D. C. Miller, G. T. Schuyler, A. D. Fletcher, T. A. Pfeffer, G. S. Kochamba, S. Khonsari, and M. R. Zile
Randomized Trial of Partial Versus Complete Chordal Preservation Methods of Mitral Valve Replacement : A Preliminary Report
Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100 (2009): II-90 - II-94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
X. Y. Jin, R. Pillai, and S. Westaby
Medium-term determinants of left ventricular mass index after stentless aortic valve replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1999; 67(2): 411 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
X. Y. Jin, J. R. Pepper, D. G. Gibson, and M. H. Yacoub
Early changes in the time course of myocardial contraction after correcting aortic regurgitation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1999; 67(1): 139 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. A. Carabello and F. A. Crawford
Valvular Heart Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., July 3, 1997; 337(1): 32 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Skudicky, M. R. Essop, and P. Sareli
Time-Related Changes in Left Ventricular Function After Double Valve Replacement for Combined Aortic and Mitral Regurgitation in a Young Rheumatic Population: Predictors of Postoperative Left Ventricular Performance and Role of Chordal Preservation
Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 899 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. A. Carabello
Aortic Regurgitation in Women: Does the Measuring Stick Need a Change?
Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2355 - 2357.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
X. Y. Jin, Z.-M. Zhang, D. G. Gibson, M. H. Yacoub, and J. R. Pepper
Effects of Valve Substitute on Changes in Left Ventricular Function and Hypertrophy After Aortic Valve Replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1996; 62(3): 683 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Sawa, K. Taniguchi, K. Kadoba, M. Nishimura, H. Ichikawa, A. Amemiya, T. Kuratani, and H. Matsuda
Leukocyte Depletion Attenuates Reperfusion Injury in Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Circulation, May 1, 1996; 93(9): 1640 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text]