This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carlson, M. D. Articles by Garan, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carlson, M. D. Articles by Garan, H.

Circulation, Vol 79, 1197-1203, Copyright © 1989 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Cardiac conduction abnormalities during percutaneous balloon mitral or aortic valvotomy

MD Carlson, I Palacios, JD Thomas, JN Rottman, CS Freeman, PC Block, JN Ruskin and H Garan
Cardiac Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

To evaluate the electrophysiologic changes in the cardiac conduction system that occur during percutaneous mitral or aortic balloon valvotomy, we prospectively studied the conduction system in 19 patients (10 mitral, 8 aortic, and 1 both) undergoing this procedure. A His bundle electrogram was recorded in all patients, and when sinus rhythm was present, the atrioventricular (AV) node effective refractory period was measured. Holter monitoring was performed during and for 24 hours after the procedure. Follow-up electrocardiograms (ECG) were available in 11 patients 2.3 +/- 1.5 months after the procedure. The AV node effective refractory period before (276 +/- 86 msec) and after valvotomy (298 +/- 85 msec) were not significantly different. The maximum His-Purkinje conduction time (HV interval) observed during valvotomy (66 +/- 20 msec) was significantly longer (p less than 0.01) than that measured before (57 +/- 10 msec) or after (60 +/- 18 msec) valvotomy. The mean HV intervals before and after valvotomy were not significantly different. The mean QRS complex duration increased from 95 +/- 28 to 112 +/- 28 msec during valvotomy and remained significantly prolonged (109 +/- 26 msec) 24 hours after the procedure (p less than 0.01). A new intraventricular conduction defect (QRS complex duration greater than 100 msec) or bundle branch block occurred in five of 13 patients who had normal QRS duration before the procedure. The change in HV interval did not correlate with the change in QRS complex duration. In four patients, the newly acquired intraventricular conduction defect was still present on follow-up ECG tracing. Complete heart block was not observed in any patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Piazza, Y. Onuma, E. Jesserun, P. P. Kint, A.-M. Maugenest, R. H. Anderson, P. P. T. de Jaegere, and P. W. Serruys Early and Persistent Intraventricular Conduction Abnormalities and Requirements for Pacemaking After Percutaneous Replacement of the Aortic Valve J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 310 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Plack, G. M. Hutchins, and J. A. Brinker Conduction System Injury After Aortic Valve Dilation in the Dog Single- Versus Double-Balloon Catheters Angiology, November 1, 1990; 41(11): 929 - 935. [Abstract] [PDF]