Circulation, Vol 78, 1144-1149, Copyright © 1988 by American Heart Association
DL Jones, GJ Klein, GM Guiraudon, AD Sharma, R Yee and MJ Kallok
The ultimate aim of defibrillation testing is to predict consistent
defibrillation. This study tested the hypothesis that defibrillation
success could be predicted from a single measurement of defibrillation
threshold. We measured defibrillation threshold by using three patch
electrodes and a standard protocol intraoperatively in 49 patients
undergoing arrhythmia surgery. Each patient was then assigned to one of
five energy subgroups (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, or 2.5 times defibrillation
threshold) for a single shock (followed by a rescue shock if necessary) for
a subsequent ventricular fibrillation episode. A curve relating percent
success to energy was then constructed for the group. Defibrillation
threshold averaged 4.7 +/- 2.98 J for the group (mean +/- SD). There was a
curvilinear relation between the energy of the defibrillation threshold
ratio test shock and percent success: 33.3%, 58.3%, 81.8%, 91.7%, and 100%
at mean defibrillation threshold ratios of 0.56 +/- 0.14, 1.02 +/- 0.07,
1.53 +/- 0.14, 1.88 +/- 0.09, and 2.60 +/- 0.14, respectively. We conclude
that consistent defibrillation is predictable from a single measurement of
defibrillation threshold. Furthermore, for an individual patient, a safety
margin of 2.6 times defibrillation threshold should approximate 100%
successful defibrillation for a single test shock.
ARTICLES
Prediction of defibrillation success from a single defibrillation threshold measurement with sequential pulses and two current pathways in humans
Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Strickberger, E. G. Daoud, T. Davidson, R. Weiss, F. Bogun, B. P. Knight, M. Bahu, R. Goyal, K. C. Man, and F. Morady Probability of Successful Defibrillation at Multiples of the Defibrillation Energy Requirement in Patients With an Implantable Defibrillator Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1217 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1988 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |